Bizarro-EDSBS Destroys Bylaws Blog

Way to go, uncreative and pathetic hack who should be cease-and-desisted for tarnishing an already established brand and admitting to it on your own blog. Nothing like depriving the internet of actual useful information all in the name of a few page hits.

If ever there is a Fulmer Cup for shitty fans, this guy should win it. Every year for years to come. This is not how one does fake internet journalism correctly.

over 1 year ago Spyder Mayhem 6 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Since we’re getting asked, yes: We are, for the record, rolling our eyes nonstop at his choice of blog title.

________________________________
I will give my shirt for Tennessee today.

by Holly Anderson on Jul 24, 2010 1:57 PM EDT reply actions

The intent is homage ...

I’m sure without this controversy folks like Spyder wouldn’t be as pissy about the name, but it’s intended as an homage (or tribute, if you will) to the old work of Orson Swindle, with the twist over to LSU’s particular Saturday night culture. But if Spencer or his new overlords have an issue with it, it’s no big deal; this is new branding and I can switch it. Tell him to hit me up if he wants me to lose ENSBSN; he’s got my addy.

by Cap'n Ken on Jul 24, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions

If it matters

I agree with you on anonymity issues. If your info can be found in under an hour thru standard tools YOU ARENT FUCKING ANONYMOUS. I have no assumption of anonymity posting under the name gtne91. For one thing, I think that immediately cuts down to 13 possibilities.

Your blog name still sucks though.

Conference homers are the lowest form of fandom. That is why the SEC has so many of them.

by gtne91 on Jul 25, 2010 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions

I'd never heard of the Bylaws Blog until

Must have been pretty good. It’s a shame.

"I'm colonel cool! And I'm the captain on this rocket to the stars!"

by psuphiman80 on Jul 25, 2010 12:04 PM EDT reply actions

Dunno about Spencer...

… but you might want to change it anyway, since you’ve been outed as a tremendous douche and may want someday to go into hiding.

Seriously, teaching the world a Very Important Lesson about anonymity by taking down a perfectly decent guy and a really useful resource? Deciding that because he didn’t say in so many words that his blog (and possibly his job) would go down if his identity were revealed, it was okay to go ahead and do it? Because he said he wanted to remain anonymous, but he didn’t say he had to remain anonymous?

And when you uncovered him, you couldn’t have shot him a friendly e-mail saying, “Hey, bee tee doubleyou, you’re not as anonymous as you think,” rather than just ruining his life for him? One of your commenters said it was like showing him how his garage is a fire hazard by setting his garage on fire. I wish I’d said it.

And in the interest of bookending a salient comment with personal insults: Douche.

by Harmless on Jul 26, 2010 1:03 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs