REALITY IS COMPLEX AND DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND: KIFFIN, VOLS, AND HOOD
Our own rational-as-possible estimation of the Daniel Hood case is up over at TSB. As easy as it would be to knee-jerk carpet bomb Kiffin over this, the transparency involved is noteworthy as being the right way to take on a recruit with a criminal past–one that Kiffin, Hood himself, and the unversity are tackling headlong. (We shouldn’t even really know about this in the first place, but lawyer operator error sometimes has horrifying and public consequences. See, um, this whole case.)
Lane Kiffin’s still an asshole, but at least he’s being forthright and transparent about it. It’s ballsy–if Hood behaves, strategy justified. If he doesn’t, Tennessee slides back a decade in terms of how their relative level of player discipline is perceived.









51
Kyrana says:
I wonder if the rape victim gets a full scholarship to college. And a second chance at leading a normal life.
May 7th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
52
Sutpen says:
Feel free to cheer for the guy Vol. I’ll be one of the folks hoping he blows out both knees. The juvie records were unsealed because of his decision to press the appeal.
NB’s descriptions are “inflammatory?” Really? I think you have a warped perspective of this whole thing. Obviously you don’t want your school and coach to look like dirtbags for taking this guy, and perhaps you don’t whisper to yourself that you wish one of those other schools had gotten him instead. But the facts are the facts. I encourage you to read the entire TN Ct. App. decision. To phrase his actions as a “mistake” is a gross misuse or misunderstanding of language.
May 7th, 2009 at 9:40 pm
53
Dave says:
Sutpen, just wanted to chime in with agreement. Again, the notion that no one should be talking about what’s in a published opinion — published because Hood unsealed his own juvenile record as an adult to make it part of an appeal — is ridiculous.
May 8th, 2009 at 10:04 am
54
Vol says:
Well I am a lawyer, but I don’t deal with juvenile matters. All I know is that all case styles I have ever seen dealing with minors, even at the appellate level, use initials and not names. Bottom line: It’s awful, but he’s done all he can do to make it right. I would certainly hate to be defined by anything I did when I was 13 years old. Hope he turns out to be a Gator killa.
May 8th, 2009 at 12:37 pm
55
Vol says:
By the way, I also doubt that procedurally, you’re required to reveal your identity in public records in order to pursue your right to appeal. I do believe that would be unconstitutional. I could be wrong.
May 8th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
56
NB says:
Vol,
As I understand it, juveniles are not accorded the same constitutional protection of due process as adults. There are legal procedures to unseal juvenile records, i.e. determining a behavior pattern, but that varies from state to state. I don’t know why the court’s opinion was released.
May 8th, 2009 at 4:52 pm