Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jon Jones, Rashad Evans Reignite Rivalry

TEXAS RECRUITING PARTY STORY EARNS EVANS NAUGHTY SPANKING

Oh, you picky, picky bitches at the public editor's desk. You first take away our beloved Jayson Blair; then you tell us tales of "girls romancing each other" may just be the unverified, undocumented, and possibly fictitious ramblings of an over-recruited college athlete.

Orangebloods already had a fine rebuttal to the New York Times' article by Thayer Evans on the recruitment of Jamarkus McFarland whichm while not exactly clinical in its approach, was certainly enough to poke a few holes in the story.

mackbrown
We at Pajamas Media think you have unfairly cast Mack Brown as a Satanist with this photo!

Now the NYT public editor decides to just pee all over the best passage of the story by confirming the lack of confirmation on the story. BOO REPORTERY THINGS:

Evans did alert the university just before his article was published on the newspaper’s Web site. Why didn’t he seek reaction beforehand? He said that if anyone at Texas had spoken to him, it would have violated N.C.A.A. recruiting rules. And, he said, he did not want to give either Texas or Oklahoma information they could use to try to influence McFarland’s decision.

“I felt like we made the best efforts we could under the circumstances,” Evans said.

Regardless of whether Texas officials would have commented, Evans should have given them the chance. As in each of the other cases, a phone call could have headed off much embarrassment.

Hrmgnnmppmhhh...you could say that a reporter has to bend over into pretzeloid shapes to present both sides of the story, yes; or you could say that Evans depicted this kid's recruitment from his perspective, put it on paper, and then let the reader make up their mind.

Star-divide

We agree wholeheartedly with the idea that he should have gotten Texas' comment on the "girls romancing each other" story, but going too far to get equal coverage in what is essentially a narrative piece presenting one recruit's subjective experience is asking a bit much.

We came away from the original piece thinking that the idea of someone seeing girls making out with each other at any college recruiting party is more than likely, and that McFarland's mother sounded like any other of a thousand recruiting mamas whose sense of self-importance had been inflated ten thousandfold by the recruiting process, and who had decided her son was going to Oklahoma long before the recruiting process ended. These are people: ego, lack of perspective, lies, and exaggerated regard for your own opinions are the givens, not the exceptions.

Aside from the single error of not including a parenthetical verification of the story, finding outrage in the story on the part of a Texas fan--or any other fan, for that matter--seems like a case of willing or unwilling shitty reading comprehension. Read between the lines of the piece, and you'll see what you see in most recruiting cases: people overwhelmed by the situation who respond as people usually do, which is in mediocre, average, and spotty fashion.

What more did you want? Evans putting a complimentary picture of Mack Brown saving a puppy from being crushed in a hydraulic press in the sidebar? You can't worry about people as stupid to believe the cartoonish picture of Mack Brown as portrayed by McFarland and Adams in the article, an egomaniacal coach a few degrees shy of Jerry Jones, a portrayal at odds with almost every other single portrayal of the man we've ever read. (And make this distinction: that is not Evans' portrayal, but is instead Adams and McFarland's depiction as relayed through Evans. Again: shitty reading comprehension in the service of an outrage gland looking to flex is still shitty reading comprehension.)

The rest is overblown butthurt outrage over nothing, which on the internet is the second cheapest commodity and on our list of things to avoid for 2009. The first, you ask? Hentai porn. We're looking at you, Punter.

Comment 37 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Every Day Should Be Saturday

IOWA HAWKEYES: BIG IN KOREA

Jan 2010 by Orson - 39 comments

CURIOUS INDEX, 1/28/10

Jan 2010 by Orson - 19 comments

CURIOUS INDEX, 1/27/2010

Jan 2010 by Orson - 41 comments

Around SB Nation

Is John Clayton A Manatee?

Feb 2010 from Battle Red Blog - 124 comments

Comments

Display:

The BEST they could do at UT was girls MAKING OUT? For. Fucking. Shame. You want a top prospect, double ended dildos long enough to span the Yangtze are the order of the day. Time to get big league, bitches.

by HymanMotherfuckingRoth on Jan 19, 2009 12:40 PM EST reply actions  

The relevant public editor’s entry:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/18/opinion/18pubed-web.html?pagewanted=2

And the original story:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/26/sports/ncaafootball/26recruit.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&pagewanted=all

Best line and potential catchphrase:
“I have never attended a party of this magnitude.”

by gosouthgohard on Jan 19, 2009 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

Prolly bears mentioning that the NYT writer mainly covers OU which is part of what brought his treatment of UT into question.

by drexyl on Jan 19, 2009 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

better quote:

“submitting this document for a grade added credibility,” Abrams said — “maybe too much credibility.”

Evans also regrets reporting that McFarland plans to major in “puting out fireses” as indicated in an essay from the 1st grade. The NYT regrets any harm these errors might have caused.

by drexyl on Jan 19, 2009 1:30 PM EST reply actions  

Texas fans proving to be masters of the ad hominem attack.

by Ted on Jan 19, 2009 1:33 PM EST reply actions  

Wow, that was one terrible article by the New York Times – pretty much the journalistic crap we’ve come to expect from them. I see your point, Orson, but at the same time the piece was incredibly one-sided and unsubstantiated – I can see why Texas fans would be pissed off. Journalists are always griping about blogs and how they have no true journalistic integrity and are not to be trusted. To be perfectly honest, this article seems like a post on a hard-core OU blog rather than a NYT article.

by PSUfanNYC on Jan 19, 2009 1:34 PM EST reply actions  

Free Drugs and Alcohol in the Big 12 for defensive prospects?

Well, I guess that explains the conference’s defensive prowess.

by NewAZTiger on Jan 19, 2009 1:38 PM EST reply actions  

Shocked Dept:

Shocked! Shocked!

Cannot beleive the NY Times would publish biased, one-sided garbage without an ounce of journalistic integrity (in or outside the Op-Ed page).

The last time I was this shocked was when I was in Vegas and saw people gamblin’ ‘n drinkin’.

by Stacy Keibler Luvs Me on Jan 19, 2009 1:42 PM EST reply actions  

SKLM, your winnings, sir.

by Raider Red on Jan 19, 2009 1:51 PM EST reply actions  

Texas fans are pissed because of Evans’ track record. He’s written tons of fluff pieces on OU, used to write for an OU blog, and did another article last year in the NYT painting Texas in a negative light (on Darrell Scott’s recruitment.) It’s not that someone talked shit about Texas, it’s that a piece that should have been on OU’s Rivals page was published in the New York Fucking Times.

by Charlie on Jan 19, 2009 2:03 PM EST reply actions  

then you tell us tales of “girls romancing each other” may just be the unverified, undocumented, and possibly fictitious ramblings of an over-recruited college athlete

Sticks fingers in ears… “LA! LA! LA! LA! I can’t hear you! I can’t hear you! LA! LA! LA!”

by skinnyphatman on Jan 19, 2009 2:04 PM EST reply actions  

When EDSBS first covered the ‘girls was romancing each other" story y’all created a new taggy thing at the bottom of the story. Now you bring it up again but don’t use the taggy thingie. That doesn’t bother me — the lack of follow-up ’girls was romancing each other" stories, on the other hand … Definitely a daily or weekly feature even if you, like major newspapers, apparently just make it up.

by Wozzo the Wonder Dog on Jan 19, 2009 2:26 PM EST reply actions  

Mac Brown: I love you. You… you complete me. And I just …….”
Jamarkus McFarland: Shut up, just shut up. You had me at “girls romancing each other” .

by Mr. Pelican Pants on Jan 19, 2009 2:27 PM EST reply actions  

dear texas,

big boy programs have writers on staff at the nyt to fluff their teams and attack their rivals

too bad you’re not a big boy program

love,
Sooners

by okiedomer on Jan 19, 2009 2:35 PM EST reply actions  

Maybe Carlos Slim is a Sooner or a TexasTech Yosemite Sams fan.

They needs them some “robber baron” lovin.

by Techie on Jan 19, 2009 2:39 PM EST reply actions  

May Cthulhu strike down and eviscerate any who speak ill of Texas or Florida Universities. For on this site of satire they pronounce only truisms and never fall victim to the hypocrisy of not seeing the forest because of trees. A little known fact is that Mack Brown once appeared as a little girl/demon via Last Temptation of Christ and recruited Jesus to come down off the cross and play corner for UT in ’69.

by EastHoustonpondwater on Jan 19, 2009 2:45 PM EST reply actions  

Dear Oklahoma,

Big boy programs win bowl games. At least occasionally.

Love,

Everyone.

by All of Us on Jan 19, 2009 2:51 PM EST reply actions  

The addition of the “girls were also romancing each other” tag to our arsenal makes all of this worth it.

by Holly on Jan 19, 2009 3:00 PM EST reply actions  

Orson, I hate both programs equally and I think you are way off. This is a pretty obvious hack job by an OU supporter.

by What? on Jan 19, 2009 3:21 PM EST reply actions  

  1. gsgh

That sounds like a quote from Douglas Niedermyer, known asshole. This “girls were also romancing each other” sounds like it comes from The National Lampoon.

by Crabapple Buck on Jan 19, 2009 3:22 PM EST reply actions  

First, if McFarland really is a top student, his writing might just be the most damning indictment of the Texas public school system anyone could ever hope to produce.

Second, Evans probably should have gotten a quote from Texas, but so what? My entire experience with the University of Texas consists of PB’s impressions, a brief tour of the Texas Observatory and a stuffed horse wearing a Texas t-shirt (long story but has to do an Ella Fitzgerald song) but I bet I can come pretty close to the self-serving gobbledegook the university would trot out. No, the story isn’t objective, IT’S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE. This isn’t a hard-hitting expose on college recruiting. It’s a story describing the experiences of one particular kid. A kid who is obviously going to have a less-than-sparking opinion of Texas as he chose not to go there. If anybody should be embarrassed, it’s LSU — and McFarland’s English teachers.

by Harris on Jan 19, 2009 3:22 PM EST reply actions  

Dear Sooners,

If you call having one writer at the NYT as a fluffer proof of being a big boy program, it might be time to stop listening when Mommy tells you that you are small but perfectly formed, and it’s the size of the fight in the dog.

When you have an network of channels performing ass-to-mouth rotations for multiple seasons regardless of whether your team actually wins out, give us a call to compare notes.

regards,

the (insufferable) Trojan Family.

by DC Trojan on Jan 19, 2009 3:22 PM EST reply actions  

Doesn’t matter. Oklahoma will continue to lose to Texas. These hack job attack pieces are just an extension of the desperation in Norman to beat their rival, which, they can’t do.

The Sooners fooled the nation into putting them in the “title game”, but showed everyone what Texas already knew: They were the 2nd best team in the Big 12.

by BradfordReturns! on Jan 19, 2009 3:28 PM EST reply actions  

On the serious note, I find it unnerving that a mother is treating her son as a meal ticket, and she bases HER decision on where HER son should go, not where he wants to go…the question should be, if you were paying for this school and not playing football, where would you want to finish school, not based on who emailed your momma the most during the summer…no wonder this chick aint married…..I dont think LSU chicks were giving out lap dances, and I find it hard to believe Mack Brown endorses “drugs and drank to minors” and $20.00 meth-lesbo-hookers at the Motel 6, just for top recruits…..
If you are a recruit caught in these situations, my advice would be ,to ask yourself, “What would Lil’ Wayne do?” then roll with that….remember, weed aint drugs, meth is…….

by Mr. Pelican Pants on Jan 19, 2009 3:31 PM EST reply actions  

Is this where we get to take free shots at the media? Sweet!

Here’s my favorite recent quote:

The reality is that the mainstream media are thoroughly corrupt – manifesting itself in a lack of both conscientiousness and honor – which leads to incompetence and duplicity. It deals in half-truths, the suppression of facts, the exaltation of evil and savaging of the sublime, and outright lies all the time.

-Selwyn Duke

by Brian O'Blivion on Jan 19, 2009 3:38 PM EST reply actions  

Ted @5: Is it an ad hominem attack by Tx fans if the article is in fact ad hominem? Not to mention they went more after the content than the person, I think that was just for fun.

by Carolina Girl on Jan 19, 2009 3:41 PM EST reply actions  

Shooo, all I got on my recruiting visit to Morgantown was a 40 of Colt 45, some weak West Virginia homegrown herb, and head from a fugly bitch wit bad teef.

by Noel Devine's Gold Teef on Jan 19, 2009 4:01 PM EST reply actions  

coach GiggetypantsNutt says “if you ain’t renting the Batmobile to impress the potential signee you ain’t squat”

by WarChiziken on Jan 19, 2009 4:32 PM EST reply actions  

Your argument is inconsistent.
1. When reading this, remember that everyone is ignorant, selfish and dishonest
2. Do not get upset, readers will be smart enough to see it for what it is.

The problem is most of the public is either too lazy or too ignorant to realize this piece is biased. The average person knows very little of college football in general and UT in particular and will come away from this article in a “respected” newspaper thinking UT is morally corupt and OU is the paragon of virtue.
If you want to have want to be a biased opinion based form of the media, fine. But the NY Times claims to be something else, and then prints this crap.

by bob on Jan 19, 2009 4:40 PM EST reply actions  

Looking forward to that State of the Union address. The steak and hash browns deal sounds even better, though.

by Coop on Jan 19, 2009 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

All I got from the article is that McFarland’s mom calls him “J-Mac,” which is at least 6 kinds of stupid. Oh, and Bob Stoops set the McFarland dinner table and watched “Beauty Shop,” moves in the same league as Nick Saban’s complimenting LeAnn Tuohey’s window treatments during an in-home visit with Michael Oher.

by The Song of Hiawatha Francisco on Jan 19, 2009 5:25 PM EST reply actions  

“It’s a story describing the experiences of one particular kid.”

Including experiences that may not have ever happened, and certainly that the reporter himself never witnessed.

These are the kinds of problems you run into when you care more about “narrative” and “storytelling” than you are at what used to be considered journalism.

by SteveInHouston on Jan 19, 2009 6:52 PM EST reply actions  

Crabapple Buck @20:

I like to imagine Tracy Jordan on 30 Rock saying that whole paragraph quote.

by gosouthgohard on Jan 19, 2009 6:58 PM EST reply actions  

I think the conspiratorial posts on here regarding OU and the NY Times being in league to sink the reputation of Mack Brown and Texas are in the very least amusing. ‘J-Mac’ and his mother have nothing nice to say about UT because he decided not to go there. If he did, the piece would have received all the criticism from the OU camp. It is a pretty interesting window into the recruiting process surrounding one high school kid. Nothing more.

by Recruitnik on Jan 20, 2009 1:10 AM EST reply actions  

@ 34…Read Thayer Evan’s bio and previous work and try to tell me that he would have written the same article had the situation been reversed. Not a chance in hell.

by Charlie on Jan 20, 2009 9:11 AM EST reply actions  

Just got through part VII of a ten part rebuttal, and as far as I can see, it thrust is pretty much, “Waaaahhhhhh! I like Texas. Don’t say bad stuff about them.”

The guy from Orangebloods wants witnesses to everything. Newsflash, d-nozzle, the recruit was the witness. It wasn’t the author just making a bunch of assertions. Rather, he got his information from his source, the recruit.

Secondly, he asks for specifics a few times. Be careful what you wish for. I remember reading a post on an aTm board about a Sooner QB who was getting paid extra cash for work he didn’t do. An outrageous slander, said I. Put up or shut up! Oops.

by Steve-O on Jan 20, 2009 11:31 PM EST reply actions  

Except that there were other people on Orangebloods at that party, and all agree that nothing of the kind happened. He made up almost all of it.

by sessamoid on Jan 21, 2009 3:58 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Because College Football is too important to be left to the professionals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_0172_small
DICK TALK WITH JASON WHITLOCK
Sg_head_small
The Time A Kentucky Fan Saved Me From Being Raped and Murdered

Recent FanPosts

Small
Yes Emma, there is a Jayhawk
227210_10150231884830560_734255559_9012780_1389568_n_small
Deep Thoughts with BamaTaxMan
Rotate-3_small
Climate Change and its First Effect on College Football
Turd_small
Dear Commentariat: HELP ME OUT
Small
A Year in the Life of a College Football Fan
Hangover_small
Six Nations Rugby - mud blood guts & beer
Fbimgp0931_small
Thanks commertariat (and Spencer)
Small
To my Dawg friends

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Img_0172_small Spencer Hall

Small Orson

Screen_shot_2011-08-18_at_2 Holly Anderson

Editors

Lzprofilepictwopointoh_small Luke Zimmermann

Me_tuscaloosa_small Doug Gillett

Trex_small Run Home Jack