UTAH WINS QUARTER OF NATIONAL TITLE
See, John Parker Wilson stands at a bar at Bourbon Street, and he’s wondering what to drink. There’s a lot of beers, see. Tons of them. There’s Abita Amber, Abita Turbo Dog, Bud, Bud Lite, Corona, Coors Light, Harp, Guinness, PBR. So many options! He’s just about to decide, he’s looking, he promises he is and he’s looking….he reaches his bruised arm into his pocket to get money.
The bartender asks: “What do you want?”
And in the moment, just when John Parker Wilson is about to decide, he is tackled by three defenders wearing Utah jerseys. They take his money and mock his bangs before heading to Pat O’Brien’s to drink Hurricanes until their eyes cross.
Oh, go ahead and laugh and lean back in your chair and lean back on that most Alabamian of nostrums, “There ain’t no answer for power football.” There is: tt collapses in the face of more powerful football played to nasty precision fueled by a level of infectious anger that, to the disloyal objective viewer, had to convert you to rooting for the Utes by the second quarter.
Award Utah a fourth of the national title. This is not 2004 Utah, a team that turned a fluffy schedule and a victory over a palsied Pitt team into an undefeated season. Utah beat 5 ranked teams and embarrassed the SEC West champion. They did not lose a game this season. They had a defense that dealt out harm to all they faced and boasted one of the more accurate quarterbacks in the nation. They beat people with spread-option tactics executed with wishbone brutality.
If you want more from a team, you’re either unreasonable, a total flaming asshole, or both. In lieu of a playoff, we have to resort to fractions, and to be fair: one fraction is just as good as another.
Therefore, the gold coin of the national title this year will be delved out in pieces of eight. Utes, you get at least a quarter for perfection achieved against quality. This may seem unfair, and it is, but in this most imperfect of college football worlds, unfair desserts are the only dish on the menu.










1
Seer says:
If Florida wins close, give the Utes another quarter, because Bama is Florida’s best win to date.
January 3rd, 2009 at 1:37 am
2
OPS says:
Word. And this sure didn’t look like an upset. Big ups to Utah.
January 3rd, 2009 at 1:38 am
3
tcugolf says:
This should be your Sporting News article this week. Great win for the Utes. Big middle finger to the BCS!
January 3rd, 2009 at 1:40 am
4
BamaCPA says:
I’d argue with you, except you’re right. They whipped us ! Hats off to the Utes.
January 3rd, 2009 at 1:50 am
5
Kanu says:
Come on Swindle, any respectable establishment in NOLA that serves Abita products would certainly also have Dixie beer, no?
I thought those IceHouse drafts we shared meant something(other than that we are morons) man…
January 3rd, 2009 at 1:56 am
6
Orson Swindle says:
Kanu–we should both be shot for ordering Icehouse draft. Ever. You are correct, though.
January 3rd, 2009 at 1:58 am
7
Timugen says:
If this year doesn’t blow up the BS system, then nothing ever will.
January 3rd, 2009 at 1:58 am
8
Bo-rice says:
Mighty gentlemanly of you, Swindle, considering most of your fellow Florida fans are presently racking their brains–in anticipation of their ESSS-EEE-SEEE-SPEEEEED inevitable win over Oklahoma–to come up with reasons why Utah’s claim isn’t legit.
But if Utah gets a quarter, what’s USC’s share?
January 3rd, 2009 at 2:02 am
9
TAFKastOSUB says:
That was an unbelievable performance by Utah.
January 3rd, 2009 at 2:03 am
10
donkeydawg says:
I’m relieved that Orson thinks rooting for the Utes was natural by the second quarter. Not that he’s any reliable moral arbiter, but I still feel bad about my desire to see an SEC team lose.
National dynamics aside, a’course, my main reason for enjoying Utah’s win was the visible displeasure of Nick Saban. He is one of those folk who are equally competent and arrogant. Sorta like the people who ran Wall Street until recently, doncha know.
Urban Meyer fits the same profile, but I can’t bring myself to support a non-SEC team for the MNC. I may feel differently, though, if the Okies run up a big lead and Meyer’s repeatedly shown on the sidelines looking like he’s telling every underclassman that he’s going to be replaced by yet another five-star recruit.
As a Georgia fan, my main consolation is not having a coach in living memory who is an extremely successful asshole. Saban and Meyer are great, great coaches, but i’m glad I don’t have to pretend they are good people.
January 3rd, 2009 at 2:09 am
11
Vandy J says:
Rant on:
Honestly, at this point, if the 1990 rules are still in effect? (Making a couple of allowances for realignment and etc) Your matchups:
ROSE: USC-PSU
SUGAR: Florida-Texas
FIESTA: Oklahoma-Utah
ORANGE: Alabama-VaTech
COTTON: Cincy-Texas Tech
If everything works out like you’d expect, USC, Florida and Utah are all clamoring that they deserve a piece of the title…and fat F-ing shocker, that’s EXACTLY what we have now.
Blow it up. Blow it all up. No playoff, no BCS, nothing. Go back to the way things were in 1990 and not one single thing will be any worse off.
January 3rd, 2009 at 2:21 am
12
hobeg8r says:
Okay, Donkeydawg, I’ll take the bait.
I guess being called an asshole is subjective. (To me, an asshole is someone who encourages unsportsmanlike conduct – apologizes for it the next week to SEC honchos – and then denies that he, in fact, encouraged it).
While I have certainly seen Meyer angry (mostly at officials) – I don’t think I have ever witnessed the display Saban put on tonight towards his players.
On that point, I will agree. Saban’s behavior was deplorable. I’ll accept it at the NFL level – because these guys are making millions of dollars. Their only loyalty is to the next contract they can negotiate. I don’t really take issue with that. For every college athlete I have ever seen or heard, they were playing for the love they felt for their school. To degrade someone who is truly trying – and not making mental mistakes – is bush league.
January 3rd, 2009 at 2:23 am
13
Big Jon says:
Just to play devil’s advocate and defend Saban, one can understand his frustration. This was a team that executed all season long. I didn’t think they even played bad in their loss to Florida; they executed well but lost to a better team and there’s no shame in that. But to not show up to a winnable game- that’s just plain inexcusable. Perhaps they set their own bar too high- they are supposedly one year ahead of schedule after all. His actions were probably uncalled for in terms of time and place, but I understand.
But Nick Saban is an asshole and there’s no defending that. It’s what makes him so successful. Big Daddy Drew was nice enough to define exactly what classifies one as an asshole a couple of years ago:
http://fatherknowsshit.blogspot.com/2006/07/fks-field-guide-assholes-and-badasses.html
This isn’t to take anything away from Utah, it’s their night and they earned it. They executed an outstanding gameplan and deserve at least 1/4 MNC.
January 3rd, 2009 at 3:16 am
14
donkeydawg says:
hobeg8r (#12):
You’re right that “asshole” is a subjective term, though there are coaches (many of them very successful) who proudly meet any definition. Bear Bryant was in my opinion the greatest college football coach of all time, but there’s no question he was a prize asshole, and very proud of it. I’d say one reason Saban has been so exalted in Tuscaloosa is that he’s a potential Bryant in personality as well as football success.
Some coaches win big by being innovators, some by being in the right place at the right time, some by persistence, some by cheating, and some by simply being “winners.”
I don’t know how Urban Meyer fits into this schema, and perhaps he is less of an asshole than Saban, but I doubt it. Meyer strikes me as a guy who was one or two years ahead of everybody else in devising the latest offensive fad, at the very best moment, and then landed in the very best recruiting landscape in the history of the game.
But I’ll say it again: I hope Meyer wins the MNC. Like Bryant, he can justify his personality issues by winning.
January 3rd, 2009 at 3:17 am
15
NogginsJeffers says:
Bear was only good because nobody gave a shit about college football in his era and you could sign a class of thousands of players with no limit and no rules.
January 3rd, 2009 at 3:49 am
16
jack says:
first off alabama did get beat be a better florida team. thats because florida is better than them straight up. and then to come in and say they didnt show up to play utah. your crazy did you not watch it? utah out played them in everything they stop the run the stop the pass the tore down bamas D. and your saying they didnt show up that takes guts. if you watched the game you would have noticed the john parker wilson looked nervous out of his mind and they got beat by a better utah team. top three teams in the contry. Florida, USC, Utah the difference maker in this is utah has an offense and a defense therfore best team in the nation University of Utah
January 3rd, 2009 at 3:59 am
17
Bo-rice says:
Also, official 2008-2009 season results:
Utah 25 – Tenth-place-in-the-Big-Ten Michigan 23
Utah 31 – SEC runner-up Alabama 17
January 3rd, 2009 at 4:28 am
18
Signal to Noise says:
What we saw was a pure, disgusting defenestration of a team that had spent several weeks at #1 and either didn’t come ready and/or just got outplayed. Likely both.
I’ve never seen Saban that furious on TV; it burned through the screen in HD, and it’s likely the only time I can remember him looking like he got outcoached in college football. I KNOW I saw him make those faces in his stint with the Dolphins, but this was another level.
Hats off to Utah. A devastatingly efficient, undefeated season is theirs, and it was nothing short of joyous to watch.
January 3rd, 2009 at 5:04 am
19
TheMightyErik says:
I feel you pain, Bama. A great offensive team came out and dismatled both of our teams (PSU here, btw). I hoped PSU would have played a flawless game and given a great SC D trouble, and we did, to an extent. Unfortunately their O crushed us and I saw the Tide fall victim to that same kind of thing tonight. The Utes deserve any and all love they get.
God please grant us some kind of playoff.
January 3rd, 2009 at 5:40 am
20
Chas says:
Sadly, I doubt ESPN will take Pete Carroll’s cock out of their collective mouths long enough to acknowledge Utah’s win tonight as anything other than an upset along the same lines as Boise State two years ago.
January 3rd, 2009 at 7:15 am
21
TJ says:
Why is it that ESPN, when bullet pointing Utah’s accomplishments this season, always put “beat Michigan” in the top 3? Look, great season, and Orson’s right, but “barely beat a 3-9 Big Ten team” is NOT exactly the strongest part of the year.
January 3rd, 2009 at 8:11 am
22
Der Schatten says:
If there has been a more perfect gameplan coupled with execution, then I have yet to see it. The Utes are legit in extremis, and Mr. Whittingham’s agent should prepare for the deluge of calls from Big 6 conferences in the very near future
January 3rd, 2009 at 8:43 am
23
bj says:
speaking of agents, I’ve got breaking news regarding the agent with whom Andre Smith was in contact with…
he goes by the name CyberTyde. This is part of the plan. Don’t you see?
January 3rd, 2009 at 8:51 am
24
CuseFanInSoCal says:
TJ – because ‘beat Oregon State’ just doesn’t sound as good; I mean, Utah’s best five wins, in order, were TCU, Alabama, Oregon State, BYU, and Air Force. Michigan’s down there with the third-tier MWC teams. But they are a traditional power.
January 3rd, 2009 at 8:57 am
25
Sean Glennon's Jersey says:
And correct me if I’m wrong, but a “plus 1″ format wouldn’t give satisfaction on this either.
According to Brent Musberger and Kirk Herbstreit (I’m sure I mangled the spelling…no apologies), USC is not only the best team in the history of college football, but likely could have stormed the beaches at Normandy and probably should be deployed to the LHC to prevent an earth-swallowing black hole.
Personally, I liked the idea of going back to the old bowl system; right up until last night. The beatdown administered to the tide was very, very convincing. If that team comes out and executes like that, I’m not sure that any team in the country could beat them, including Florida, USC and Oklahoma.
January 3rd, 2009 at 9:09 am
26
Me says:
I think Utah just took at least half of the title. And Pete Carroll (and his ESPN lovers) can shut the hell up. 13-0 trumps 12-1 any day.
January 3rd, 2009 at 9:11 am
27
Jmuthaf'nT says:
I dont get why everyone is on utahs nuts all of a sudden because they beat bama. everyone during the season kept waiting for them to lose and they kept edging out opponents. now they get beat down by a team ready to execute and understanding whats on the line and everyone thinks utah should be playing for the natl championship?
tell me honestly those bama boys were taking this game seriously..in NOLA. Those mormons have nothing to do but sit in their hotel rooms and prepare for this game
dont sit there and tell me urban wont have the boys of florida ready for their game. I will be in gville next week pounding drinks and chicks from the swamp to the previously named cluck u and everywhere in between
Dahhh Da Da Dahhh..GOoo GA-TORS!
January 3rd, 2009 at 9:24 am
28
meatybob says:
@25
You get a time out. Go to your room and think about what you typed.
Yeah, Utah should get the AP title. What was so impressive is that USC’s peformance in the Rose was matched and surpassed by Utah’s. More difficult opponent on what was a road game. That Ute O would have torn up either’s OU’s or Fla’s defense and their schedule was easly hefty enough for an unbeaten team, esp now it makes one wonder if either OU or Fla even beat a top ten team.
This year, in the eyes of the Mountain West Conference, we are all in the Big Ten.
January 3rd, 2009 at 9:38 am
29
Boclive says:
On the find something positive side: that is the last time I ever have to watch Princess “play” quarterback.
January 3rd, 2009 at 9:49 am
30
Run Up The Score says:
Blow it up. Blow it all up. No playoff, no BCS, nothing. Go back to the way things were in 1990 and not one single thing will be any worse off.
Yeah, the same thought occurred to me last night, but had the added benefit of me actually time-traveling back to 1980 when Penn State was an independent and could go anywhere. Those were good times. Also, I was five years old, which was even better.
Still, your point remains valid. We’ve gone from a system of voting on the #1 team to a system where we essentially vote on the #1 and #2 team with the non-help of computers. I fail to see how that’s an improvement in any regard.
January 3rd, 2009 at 10:09 am
31
Mr.Pelican Pants says:
I knew the game wasnt gonna go our way when we punted to them and the ball BOUNCED OFF UTAHS FACEMASK AND INTO THE ARMS OF A TEAMMATE….then of course missing our best NFL prototypical left tackle didnt help since timing is everything, and it was apparent last year and this year with the Tulane game that everything is out of sync with Andre missing. Then Mike Johnson goes out. So thats two great starters off of a unit on a run first team you CANNOT replace with non players, much less a FRESHMAN. Take this same formula, without Andre and Mike Johnson we are an easy 8-4 team this year with losses to Ole Miss,LSU,Kentucky,Georgia…With a game like this, it was a perfect storm of FAIL since it was obvious from last year that we had a game manager who could hand off and occasionally make one or two throws a game. Now he is forced to make at a minimum 30 passes that he cant make. IF I was gonna game plan for Bama I would blitz Jpw every down too and make him beat you>>>>see last years CAP ONE BOWL with florida getting thumped by michigan the same way we got thumped by utah both underdogs were motivated by emotion and happy to be there and the other team looked bored didnt want to be there and got there hats handed to em and also got outcoached>>>>SABAN historically has always had that one WTF loss on his schedule during the regular season< like he takes a week off from coaching like USC does every year>>
Great game UTAH< you found our achilles heel and cut if off and fed it to us< bit by bit>>
TO QUOTE THE SILVER SURFER: all that you know is at an end BCS>>>>
January 3rd, 2009 at 10:14 am
32
BCS IS FOR SUCKAS says:
SO who would win in a four team playoff with utah vs usc and oklahoma vs florida? who would be last man standing in that scenario? does utah beat usc?
January 3rd, 2009 at 10:21 am
33
Elno Lewis says:
Gee the Wolverines played Utah better than Bomo. Does that mean we are better than Bomo?
Probably not, but its nice to fantasize.
January 3rd, 2009 at 10:22 am
34
Gen. Stoopnagle says:
Well, on the bright side, now winning the Sugar Bowl by beating Hawaii doesn’t like such a bad deal afterall!
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:01 am
35
Crabapple Buck says:
If I had not bet $200 on the Tide to cover 10 points, I would have been pulling for Utah from the outset. Once I saw the bet lost, I was hoping they would hold on and not blow it.
It seems to me, that the Tide was victim of drinking the SEC koolaid. The stuff that makes teams think that the SEC teams are able to roll out the helmets and others crap their pants in fear. Bama wasn’t ready to play and it showed. Texas Tech at least scored 14 points before they packed it in. Bama never even gave a false hope.
It gives me hope for tOSU though that Texas may not be all that enthused about a Fiesta Bowl game on Monday night.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:08 am
36
CuseFanInSoCal says:
@23/Sean Glennon’s Jersey – a ‘pure plus one’ format would almost never be useful. This year it’s just more obvious why. A seeded plus one sort-of works if you’ve got three or four legit contenders, but you’ve usually got more than that.
http://cusefaninsocal.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-pure-1-playoff-model-is-bad-idea.html
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:17 am
37
PW says:
I wonder if the OU/UF winner won’t still finish #1 in the AP Poll because of USC and Utah splitting the “maverick” voters and OU/UF getting the remaining #1 votes.
Also, what is the AP Poll formula? Could we see something akin to the Heisman voting where the winner doesn’t get the most first place votes?
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 am
38
SpartanDan says:
#28: Actually, I think the computers (except for Billingsley) do a better job of ranking teams than the human polls more often than not. Computers aren’t fooled by the jersey. The only problem is that they aren’t allowed to consider margin of victory.
But you’ve nailed the essential problem: voting on #1 was often an impossible problem. Voting on the top 2 isn’t any easier. The top 6 or 8 would be far better – yes, you might get the last spot wrong, but if you have to argue that you should be #7 or 8 instead of #9, you’re probably not #1.
At least the old system made no claim to determining a legitimate national champion on the field. The BCS promises that and fails to deliver. Any system that hands out titles but gives an unbeaten team no chance to earn it is fundamentally broken.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:23 am
39
SpartanDan says:
PW: 25 points for a first-place vote, 24 for second, and so on down. It’s certainly possible (in fact, I think it happened at least once during the season this year), but not likely – the winner of the BCS title game probably won’t get any votes lower than #2, which means if they get at least half the #1 votes they can’t be beaten.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:26 am
40
not If I see you first says:
I think Alabama over-achieved all year and what we saw last night was not them being too cocky or having drunk the SEC kool-aid, just them getting beat.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:34 am
41
Smyth says:
It’ll be like ‘04, with undefeated Auburn. If one team is clearly dominant in the championship game, they’ll win the AP poll. The best thing to hope for for Utah to get a share of the title is a Sun Bowl-esque level of ugly in the title game, where neither team appears to be title-worthy. Unfortunately, I just don’t see it happening.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:54 am
42
meg says:
To the whole world berating UGA as such a disappointing team this year, you may line up starting here to kiss Coach Stacey Searels ass….
Playing umpteen starting rotations on the OL throughout the year due to injuries, the OL gave up a total of 15 sacks.
But throw my hate into the ring of either blowing up the BCS entirely or going to a 8 team seeded playoff with only winners of 6 top conferences and the winners of the two best mid major conferences based on record against BCS schools every year. No one could really complain in that system as everyone would have had a chance to win a national title due to performance on the field.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:54 am
43
chuy says:
Was Alabama or the Big 12 south more overrated this year? I’d say it’s a coin-flip…
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:58 am
44
not if I see you first says:
But an 8 game playoff cannot work. It would have to expand to include more teams — probably till it got to 24 or more, due to lawsuits that would occur immediately. The only way they get away with a BCS series right now is by calling them bowl games instead of playoffs. The minute they call them playoffs, more teams will demand opps, and they will get them from the courts.
Right now we have a playoff atmosphere all season. Every Saturday is a treasure. The BCS has it’s big injustices, but if we go to a 24 game plus system (which we will eventually have if we institute any playoff at all), the college football regular season will lose its thrill.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:04 pm
45
Smyth says:
#40
After seeing the hurt that Ole Miss put on Texas Pirate Academy, and Oregon’s win over OK State, I’m gonna take the Big 12 South in the overrated department.
Of course the championship game will tell all.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:06 pm
46
tcugolf says:
29 – I thought depth was why all the non-BCS schools couldn’t play with teams like Alabama. After all, Alabama wouldn’t even recruit any of Utah’s starters. They would be third team at Bama and would be exhausted from the SEC speed and brutality.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:20 pm
47
Smyth says:
How about a 16 team playoff, with every conference champ getting a spot and the current ranking system determining 5 at-large spots and seeding? It would be like March Madness, everyone has a chance going in, and if nothing else, the lower conference champs (in most cases) would provide easy wins for the top seeds. You could even play the first round games at the higher seeds home site to increase ticket sales. Play the remaining 7 games at the BCS bowl sites, plus add in a couple others.
If it were done this year it would look like this:
Oklahoma (B12) vs. Troy (SB)
Florida (SEC) vs. Buffalo (MAC)
Texas (At-Large) vs. East Carolina (C-USA)
Alabama (At-Large) vs. Va. Tech (ACC)
USC (Pac-10) vs. Cincinatti (Big East)
Utah (MWC) vs. Ohio State (At Large)
Texas Tech (At-Large) vs. TCU (At-Large)
Penn State (Big 10) vs. Boise State (WAC)
Doing this, every team that anyone believes has a legitimate argument for the championship is in. Everyone ranked top 12 in the BCS is in.
This would work, if the NCAA had the guts to implement it.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:31 pm
48
tim says:
#44
I actually propose a 12-team playoff, with the top four seeds getting byes and one at-large slot selected by NCAA committee (the same way they choose at-larges for I-AA) to allow for Navy, Notre Dame, etc.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:35 pm
49
Raider Red says:
USC and ESPN can STFU. Utah beat Oregon St., USC did not.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:37 pm
50
Seer says:
I like a 6 team play off with no auto bids. Basically, Brian’s proposal where the one and two seed get a bye and higher seed gets home field advantage. Championship played in Rose Bowl.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:42 pm