Comments on: STEWPENDOUS

By: dawgaddict

dawgaddict — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:04:53 +0000

also, for some levity @7

mini-Utes, but with full-size Coach Whittingham?

By: dawgaddict

dawgaddict — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:58:19 +0000

(i know, late and irrelevant, yawn…just read it)

in defense of the ESS EEE SEE (and you, Mr. Hall), Utah doesn’t have to beat just ONE of the (bottom-dwelling) SEC teams to be as good as the SEC teams listed above.
Utah actually has to beat at least 3 of them.
this year, the teams with less than 3 wins in conference qualify as the worst 4-5 that Msgr. Swindle predicted they might be better than…here, read and be edified:

to be considered better than those bottom 4-5 teams, they have to win at least one and as many as 2 SEC games.
definitely plausible.
however, to be considered better than the bottom 5…the win slope increases dramatically from there, winning 3 or 4 games to be in consideration for a top 6 team in the SEC, much less to be considered better than 9 (lawdy!) teams…which requires at least 6 SEC wins.

needless to say (but said anyway, har), no team that gives up (23, what?!) numerous sacks to MWC etc. foes is a credible contender for the ESS EEE SEE crown.
in fact, i’m pretty sure there are no top-half SEC teams with much more than 15 sacks allowed on the season….lulz pwnd

thanks for playing MWC-homers, and good luck with OU/TTech/Texas/Missou/OkSt in AZ.

By: Gen. Stoopnagle

Gen. Stoopnagle — Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000

or, perhaps you missed the Utah @ Michigan game?

By: Ted

Ted — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:54:28 +0000

SpartanDan,

Come on man. Like Ole Miss barely lost to Wake Forest and like Vandy totally almost beat Duke (in Nashville). Did you or did you not see what Mississippi State did with Louisana Tech? Wyoming ain’t got nothing on Tennessee, execpt some good fortune. You can’t blame Auburn for struggling at West Virginia, its cold up there. Look at the big wins the teams like LSU, Kentucky and Arkansas narrowly pulled out against juggernauts like Troy, MTSU, and Tulsa. Those guys are tough when you get beat up on by the above other teams week in week out!

Seriously, what SEC are you watching, bro? Utah has no ESSS EEEE SEEEE speed, no chance they could hang.

(PS I agree with you)

By: TigerNacho

TigerNacho — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:27:20 +0000

#5 – Are they the Mini-Utes or full-size Utes?

By: PW

PW — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:09:01 +0000

2 & 5

I think Utah could invent a time machine and beat each Super Bowl champion of the past 20 years.

What’s that? This isn’t “Unbelievable Bullshit Hyperbole Hour”? Oh, in that case I agree with Orson’s 4-5 estimate.

By: SpartanDan

SpartanDan — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:58:20 +0000

#2: I’d say 9 (anyone who’s watched LSU and thinks they could beat Utah is praying for a sudden inexplicable burst of competence from their QB). And I think it’d be a hell of a game against Georgia.

By: Bellefay

Bellefay — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:49:56 +0000

I didn’t get to hear but did you inform them that David Pollack is horrible on the radio and to bring back Chuck Oliver?

By: Orson Swindle

Orson Swindle — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:39:38 +0000

Good lord, they asked me about the ACC standings. That’s just not fair for dog or man.

By: gosouthgohard

gosouthgohard — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:33:57 +0000

“utah is better than 4 or 5 teams in the SEC”

really, orson? I’d put the count closer to 6 or 7.

By: The Snake will Drive Again!

The Snake will Drive Again! — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:30:43 +0000

Say hello to the dogs and poodles for me.