Comments on: CHAMPIONSHIP NITPICKERY/SOMETHING’S ALWAYS WRONG

By: cob

cob — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:18:19 +0000

@28…and 29. One thing we can be sure of is that the “someone” you refer to will certainly not be your side. Over under on that spread? 35? I think I saw the rest of the pac 10 shit their pants all weekend to mediocre sides so who is going to beat SC again? “Someone”? Good luck.

[/tOSUfanfollowingokiedomer'sremodyforshame]

By: Will (the other one)

Will (the other one) — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:54:47 +0000

Reminder: An Ohio St University’s supposedly great D gave up 14 to Ohio’s backup QB.

They’re potentially a 3-loss team this year, maybe even the Big 10’s answer to 2003 Auburn or 2005 UT.

By: D'Jango

D'Jango — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:31:12 +0000

As a UCLA fan, it saddens me, but I must move on. If Florida would be considered at minimum a 4-pt favorite over BYU, does that mean they should beat Tennessee by at least 66 points?

By: Big Jon

Big Jon — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:11:17 +0000

#28-

They don’t have to be Pete’s best yet. They just have to be Pete’s most focused team. Every loss USC has sustained since 2002 has been due largely in part to looking ahead, reading their own press clipings, or whatever overused cliche you want to use. Last year vs. Oregon is the worst I’ve seen SC look in a “big” game since Paul Hackett.

If they stay humble and hungry, they’re untouchable.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:55:36 +0000

Wow, just wow LSUfreak. I finally looked at this page on my computer, not phone and that little bit of animation is incredible.

By: Andy

Andy — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:27:50 +0000

Maybe you forget Sanchez had 4 TDs last year in South Bend as USC shut out Notre Dame at home for the first time ever. It was him, not Booty, piloting the Trojans. He’s better than the last two, possibly 3 Trojan QBs.

By: southbendblarney.com

southbendblarney.com — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:00:38 +0000

I am retarded and can’t spell. It’s Joe McKnight (forgot the “k”)

By: southbendblarney.com

southbendblarney.com — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:56:40 +0000

Wow! Not sure what to make of the football season so far except:

Someone is going to beat USC.

USC is loaded-but I don’ t think they’re Pete’s best yet. I think the jury is still out on whether they have offensive game breakers or not with the exception of Joe McNight. Sanchez look to be for real, but USC offensive lines have kept USC quarterbacks over rated since 2002.

Defensively they have big names, but guys like Rey Maualuga gets praise for silly things like getting a pick six on Todd Boeckman-not the hardest thing to do. Chris Carter “All he does is catch touchdowns”, meet Todd Boeckman “All he does is throw picks in big games.” (Well that, and run around like a chicken with his head cut off as he is prepared to get fried and smothered in delicious BW3’s Spicy Garlic Sauce.)

They destroy out of conference foes, but the Pac 10 teams play them well, and someone will get’em.

By: SpartanDan

SpartanDan — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:29:10 +0000

#21: Tied for last in the Atlantic Division. With NC State. More or less completely out of the national championship hunt (even Ohio State ought to get in ahead of a one-loss ACC team), and only in the BCS hunt because someone in the ACC has to go.

Does that answer your eponymous question?

By: Josh M

Josh M — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:41:17 +0000

Wait, is that from Bridget Jones: The Edge of Rea…

I mean, wait, I have no idea what that’s from.

By: db

db — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:34:58 +0000

shanensga- I’m hoping your not referring to osu being ranked 13th as “love” from the polls. A top 5 team looked bad losing to the best team in the nation, they don’t drop out of the top 25. OSU would be rightly favored over every team behind them, and would (will) beat a some of those ahead of them (see Penn State and Wisconsin, for instance),

By: ed

ed — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:06:38 +0000

the pac 10 might look bad, but that doesn’t mean that USC is as bad as the other teams in that conference. Prediction USC undefeated campions.

hey i also started a site and hope that you can give me some feedback if you have some time.

http://cheehee.com/users/new

thanks!

By: shanensga

shanensga — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:18 +0000

USC is on top, for now, Their problem is that the Pac 10 looks so bad that an upset should drop them to third or fourth. What is the reason for all the OSU love from the polls? Spurrier did a good job of preparing His team for the Dawgs. He made the game ugly, which was the Cocks only chance of winning. Just like last year. Of course the Dawgs shot themselves in the foot by dropping a TD pass and a stupid penalty on third and goal from the one. The bright spots for the Dawgs and the reason for Their win? Renee Curan, A J Green, and the leadership of Stafford. Now I know Stafford can win the game with Moreno held under a hundred yds. Stafford will get little credit, and His stats won’t show it, but He carried that team.

By: meatybob

meatybob — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:01:47 +0000

I second everything.

Basically, for me this season has boiled down to wondering if I will see a team not get blow out by USC.

By: Where Is BC?

Where Is BC? — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:42:35 +0000

Where is Boston College?