EDSBS “WOMEN IN PANTS WITH LIQUOR” CALENDAR: COMING SOON
So, yes, a Florida undergraduate posed on the cover of Playboy because, in her own words:
“There weren’t any girls from the Big Ten who were hot enough to be on the cover, so they had to pull someone from the SEC,” she quipped.
ZOWIE! It takes a special kind of person to be on the cover of Playboy: you have to be willing to be naked, airbrushed to within an inch of your life, stripped of all your personal hair through various heinous methods, and must have undergone a procedure to insert plastic bags of saline into your chest. (Gullible. Apes.)

You said titties? Please, go on.
Obviously, we have two points totally unrelated to the obvious “school poontangery supremacy” argument, one we find noxious for many, many tiresome reasons. One: when the EDSBS calendar of “Wealthy Ladies Who Like Wearing Pants and Drinking” comes out in November, you’ll see just what we really appreciate in women: a superb credit rating, a proficiency with firearms, the ability to make a quality cocktail and then enjoy it, loyalty, and the understanding that, for at least an hour a day, we don’t want to talk to anyone and would prefer to be left the hell alone.
(Also, she should tell us how good we are at sex. That’s cool, too. She doesn’t have to mean it; she just has to say it. We have no illusions here.)
Our second point? Playboy was way, way hotter forty years ago. Insanely, ridiculously hott with two t’s and five damns careening down a freeway of lust and headed for the border post of Bonerlandia. The women actually looked like someone who, when planets aligned and standards lowered appreciably in the precise and unrepeatable circumstances of the moment, you could get a hand job and a pat on the head from at a party. And you’d take it and consider yourself awarded handsomely by fate.
Therefore: if contemporary Playboy is the home of the assless Stepford Wife, let EDSBS be the home to all the ladies of all conferences who like wearing pants, drinking, and most importantly, consuming eight to ten hours of football every Saturday in the fall. You’re diamonds of femininity, every last one of you. Also, if you happen to look like someone who posed in Playboy in the 70s, um, well…you just stay over there. We’re married, and you make us do that nervous sweating thing we can’t explain away with “No, honey, I was just looking to see what brand her jeans were. Really.”









51
gerry dorsey says:
raider red @ 33
have you succeeded in finding said woman who has an interest in and is able to disuss sports?? b/c if you have i’m betting it either has, or will get old. who the hell wants to spend that much time together?? not to mention add another subject you can argue about??
September 11th, 2008 at 9:59 am
52
Raider Red says:
Gerry Dorsey, you get a C in reading comprehension. (See post #36.) We’ve been together for over eight years, and no, I will not get tired of someone who’s smart, funny, has a tremendous natural rack, shares my interests, and makes nice bank.
Although she does pull for Team Donkey. Nobody’s perfect.
September 11th, 2008 at 10:14 am
53
diamondm says:
Gerry @ 51,
Uh, yeah. That’s pretty much why he married me. That and the curves. See post at #36.
If you don’t get bored talking about sports and attending sporting events with guys, why would Raider Red get bored talking about sports and attending sporting events with a a woman who sleeps with him? Do you find that penises hold your attention better than boobs?
September 11th, 2008 at 10:14 am
54
gerry dorsey says:
hey smart guy…considering i referenced #33, do you think maybe that means i didn’t read #36?? omission not lack of comprehension.
and kudos to you, but i ain’t interested. i don’t want my girlfriend to be able to discuss sports for the same reason i’m not interested in 90% of what (insert female sideline reporter) has to say. flame on that.
September 11th, 2008 at 10:26 am
55
gerry dorsey says:
or maybe if i spend too much time with women i find them to be a tremendous pain in the ass b/c they tend to make ignorant ass statements like the one you just made.
September 11th, 2008 at 10:33 am
56
Last Dragon says:
I prefer for my women to have a limited knowledge/interest in sports. And I’ve learned that they likewise prefer for me to have limited knowledge/interest in their girlie activities.
September 11th, 2008 at 10:47 am
57
The Conscience of a Nation says:
Gerry Dorsey–
Maybe women enjoy pissing you off because you’re rude and dismissive.
On the other hand, I’ve noticed that there is a subsection of heterosexual men who hate women for anything but sex and housework, and a subsection of heterosexual women who hate men for anything but sex and income. They often pair up together. As sick as it seems, some of those marriages work really well– as long as they don’t have to spend time together. It’s like an odd form of homosexuality– homofrienduality. Separate spheres and all that.
You must understand, though, that for those of us who like and respect the opposite sex, and our partners, that you sound a bit off.
September 11th, 2008 at 10:56 am
58
gerry dorsey says:
oh jeezus…here we go. now i’m a woman hater. let the overreacting begin.
do you know me tcoan?? no you don’t. not only do i love women, but i respect women, not that i give a shit what anyone on a college football blog thinks on the subject.
‘m not even going to participate in some gender war. all i did was state what my preferences in a girl, someone else stated theirs, and than said person’s wife had to go imply that i like cock. my statement was meant to call a single person’s statement ignorant…not an entire gender. take a deep breath b/c you’re unnecessarily barking up the wrong tree.
September 11th, 2008 at 11:14 am
59
blon says:
DiamondM and Red Raider,
A Tech and SMU marriage? Talk about odd couples… But it is nice to hear from the happily married.
Gerry, don’t plan on spending much time in Texas. Women are expected to know about sports, especially football. Besides religion, guns and executions, it is a continual topic of conversation.
September 11th, 2008 at 11:15 am
60
Chloe Denmark says:
+100 cocktails to TCOAN, diamondm, and blon….intelligent, successful, and insightful women make the world go round. Trust me, I too am a woman who talks sports with men on my construction site all day. Some how my lack of “ignorant ass statements” and ACTUAL knowledge has gained me more respect than showing off my tits. Imagine that?!
September 11th, 2008 at 11:16 am
61
gerry dorsey says:
lived in texas for 7 years now blon. the last 2 of which with my non sports talking girlfriend. and she is very happy with her sports loving, respectful boyfriend.
chloe i never said that talking sports makes you ignorant, only implying that i like cock b/c i like to watch sports with my buddies.
September 11th, 2008 at 11:23 am
62
TCOAN says:
Aww, Gerry, I’m just busting your chops. I think it’s healthy and fine to have totally separate interests from your girlfriend (really, no sarcasm). But come on, with that “ignorant ass” comment, you had to know we were going to start screeching at you.
September 11th, 2008 at 11:28 am
63
Doug says:
“I respect women, but if I spend too much time with them I find them to be a tremendous pain in the ass.”
Cognitive dissonance: It’s what’s for dinner!
September 11th, 2008 at 11:28 am
64
blon says:
Chloe,
I’ve actually had one boyfriend (in high school) that was uncomfortable with the fact that I knew about as much, or maybe as much, as he did. He probably didn’t like the fact that I could tell him what went wrong in every game, especially when he screwed up.
And he went on to play CF. The schools in Texas weren’t interested so he went on to play in the SEC. (Sorry, just had to add that in for another prop for the Big 12.)
Men. Fascinating, yet…
September 11th, 2008 at 11:35 am
65
Chloe Denmark says:
Gerry – It’s ok. I like to watch sports with my guy friends too.
September 11th, 2008 at 11:35 am
66
Orson Swindle says:
Gerry–What? Now you’re saying you don’t like cock? Goddammit. Delete that picture I just sent you. IT LOOKS BIGGER IN PERSON, DAMMIT STOP LAUGHING!!!
September 11th, 2008 at 11:37 am
67
gerry dorsey says:
tcoan,
an ignorant post resulted in an ignorant post. what can i say??
and now i have to bail on this ass whipping of gerry as its causing me to fall behind on my misogynist business endeavors…strip clubs and brothels if you’re curious.
September 11th, 2008 at 11:39 am
68
Jebus says:
Apparently Florida’s experiencing some unseasonably cold weather, eh, Orson?
On a serious note- can someone explain dating girls that aren’t sports fans to me? I’m not judging, really I’m not, but I would have a hard time being with someone long-term who didn’t understand why it is right and proper that the entire state of Ohio be removed from North America and cast into the sea.
September 11th, 2008 at 11:41 am
69
blon says:
#68
Ohio, not a problem for me. But the other “O” state- Oklahoma. Just cut it right on out of the US.
September 11th, 2008 at 11:44 am
70
Chloe Denmark says:
Or better yet, why can’t Canada just adopt Ohio?
September 11th, 2008 at 11:46 am
71
Chloe Denmark says:
blon – I understand your irrationalized hatred towards Oklahoma…but really it has so little to offer the rest of the world (trust my 24 years of living there) just let it have ONE CFB team…
September 11th, 2008 at 11:50 am
72
blon says:
Chloe,
Please tell me aren’t living there now…If so, GET OUT NOW. SAVE YOURSELF.
September 11th, 2008 at 12:05 pm
73
blon says:
Do any of you watch HGTV? I know, I know, a girlie thing to do. Have you seen David Bromstad’s show? This guy looks like Sam Bradford. I knew I couldn’t hate that kid for some reason. He has great style and a profound sense of color.
http://www.bromstad.com/
September 11th, 2008 at 12:07 pm
74
Chloe Denmark says:
blon – No no. I got out. Officially about 5 years ago when I graduated with my B.S., unofficially in ‘99. I’m now in Orson’s neck of the woods. I try not to go back to OK but for some reason my parents have yet to leave…
And no I haven’t seen that show, but now I might start watching…
September 11th, 2008 at 12:13 pm
75
DevilGrad says:
70 –Or better yet, why can’t Canada just adopt Ohio?
Comment by Chloe Denmark — September 11, 2008 @ 11:46 am
Because then all our rednecks (a.k.a., DG’s family reunion) would have to learn French.
September 11th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
76
zzgator says:
Well…this discussion took an interesting turn while I was attending to actual business.
I think it can best be summed up by “it takes all kinds.”
September 11th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
77
Texas Gal says:
God, how I love you, EDSBS.
September 11th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
78
Daywalker trailer park says:
blon, you don’t hate Ohio?
You must be new here. Give it time.
September 11th, 2008 at 5:09 pm
79
diamondm says:
Sorry to flame and run, but I actually worked very hard today earning that bank Raider Red mentioned. It was fun reading what ensued though.
Just to clarify — Gerry, I didn’t actually think you liked cock better than boobs, it was sarcasm.
And now I’ve got to go participate in yet another boring sporting event with Raider Red.
September 11th, 2008 at 5:56 pm
80
DC Trojan says:
Jebus @ 68 – Mrs DC Trojan isn’t much interested in sports, but since she grew up in Ann Arbor, she has a keen appreciation of the need to dispose of Ohio. I think that most Michiganders would be willing to do their part.
September 11th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
81
blon says:
#78
No, I don’t hate Ohio. I haven’t spent much time there, but it was a lovely state. The people were very friendly. If I had a Michigan plate it might have been a different story?
I’m from Texas. We detst Oklahoma. We come out of the womb hating Okies and that continues on well into the grave.
I cannot believe the land thieves aren’t coming out in spades on this site. They are wining big, will most likely end up in the NC game, QB in the Heisman talk, etc… something is up.
September 12th, 2008 at 7:27 am