BLOGPOLL, WEEK NEGATIVE ONE
Our blogpoll is after the jump, and it’s the usual fine mess minus the fine. It was late, as well, and therefore not included in the current tally. We blame repeated viewings of the Big Ten Nutwork video for the delay.
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgia | 25 |
| 2 | Oklahoma | 24 |
| 3 | Southern Cal | 23 |
| 4 | Missouri | 22 |
| 5 | Florida | 21 |
| 6 | Ohio State | 20 |
| 7 | Auburn | 19 |
| 8 | West Virginia | 18 |
| 9 | Clemson | 17 |
| 10 | Texas Tech | 16 |
| 11 | LSU | 15 |
| 12 | Texas | 14 |
| 13 | South Florida | 13 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 12 |
| 15 | Arizona State | 11 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 10 |
| 17 | Oregon | 9 |
| 18 | Illinois | 8 |
| 19 | Tennessee | 7 |
| 20 | Kansas | 6 |
| 21 | Oregon State | 5 |
| 22 | Brigham Young | 4 |
| 23 | Alabama | 3 |
| 24 | Virginia Tech | 2 |
| 25 | Connecticut | 1 |

No Penn State? A personal decision we all must make and respect. Or mock. Whatever–a two headed unicorn television-faced offense doesn’t inspire, and neither does the cumulative frustration of two years of wondering where in the hell to put a team that can beat Akron but won’t even sniff at its serious in-conference rivals. They’ll creep in, but they’ll have to earn it by beating someone besides a derelict Texas A&M in the Alamo Bowl, and that’s unfair, wack ballotish, and done.
Top ten rejiggering elucidated: Refuse to overreact on the Sturdivant injury for Georgia, since they are on balance as complete a team as Oklahoma in identity and personnel. Oklahoma could conceivably be right there at number one without much shame or equivocation.
Ohio State gets this low because, if the game comes down to Boeckman passing versus a quality defense, they lose, and also because their defense has gotten outschemed in their rare but prominent nationally televised debacles. USC’s injuries and downgrade to mere offensive “goodness” take them low for the moment, but we’re sure we’ll get overhyped on either them or Ohio State following the great USC/tOSU shakeout of 2008.
(It’s all part of an attempt to actually not just paste the same teams up there for the third year running due to bowl carryover/program mojo/vaguely conceived “buzz” and actually look at the personnel likely to take the field. We’ll get over this unfortunate virus soon enough, though.)
Florida’s up there because even a marginal improvement in their pass defense takes them to potential top five talent. Bullish on Missouri and most especially Auburn, another team where marginal improvement on one side of the ball would yield a significant swing in the win total. Unbullish on WVU (scheme monkeying, defensive losses,) Clemson (irrational conviction Bowden will blow this, actual rational concerns on their offensive front,) and LSU (quarterback muddles.)
(Missouri will break our hearts, though. It’s only a matter of time before they drop a late-night Big 12 shootout that comes down to who scores last.)
The rest is more haphazard. Virginia Tech scares the daylights out of us: defensive losses, no receivers, and a run game threatening to take a second year off in a row to you know, get its head together, think about applying for law school, get its life together. Arizona State looks way high for a team with zero track record of protecting their quarterback. Kansas, Wisconsin, and Tennessee are all essentially the same quantity: good, but we have no idea of their absolute value until seen on the field due to offensive wrinkles for UW and Tenn. and Kansas actually playing a schedule.
Bullish on: Oregon State, who behind Maryland (DAMN SPASMODIC DYSLEXIA) was America’s second quietest nine victory team, and Connecticut, who never gets any respect whatsoever and is taking angry notes recording this lack of respect. They’re like the mini-Auburn of the Big East, winning games at the margins and doing so without any concern for stats. Oh, and like Auburn, just when you pay them the respect, they then take said credit and board the failboat in embarrassing fashion to a lesser team. As long as you’re prepared for this, feel free to endorse them heartily.

25 










45
Orson,
You got some info on Wake the rest of us don’t? And I’m a fan. Don’t leave us hangin.
Oh, and VT is gonna burn you. But not like you think.
Comment by acchalfbreed — August 20, 2008 @ 7:07 pm
44
#38- Well, color me unimpressed re: TAH-NOO-TAH, as usual his defenses are overrated, GT finished 58th in pass efficiency D last season, despite facing the worst collection of QB talent ever in a major conference in the ACC, and also getting Notre Dame on the OOC slate, the worst offense in CFB.
And the VT game? Maybe he was good in the 2nd half, he finished 9/21 for 129 yards with a TD and an INT, so unless he was 0/21 and an INT in the 1st, his 2nd half couldn’t have been awesome.
Now, the intangibles such as “being a winner”, maybe that’s true, just hard to assume for a guy who was 56th in pass efficiency last season, and whose schedule gets harder this season.
Comment by Pants McPants — August 20, 2008 @ 4:15 pm
43
#36
If we can trust Wiki, then the SEC plays an equal or better counterpart in ALL of its bowl games. Two out of seven matchups are guaranteed higher finishers in the other conference. One is a guaranteed #2 vs. #2. The other four reqire the lowest possible SEC pick and the highest possible opponent pick to have an “even” matchup.
I think this requires a more than casual glance when using bowl season to guage conference strength.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_bids_to_non-BCS_bowls
PS: Sorry if this is a multiple post. I blame having to retype my email every damn time. POST THIS TIME DAMMIT!!!!!!
Comment by TIGERinATL — August 20, 2008 @ 3:35 pm
42
#37 Your excuse last year was that he bobbled the ball in some reverse angle shot (I looked at that too, and he didn’t). I’ve seen that video a dozen times, and the Temple guy’s foot was in. Absolutely a blown call. And Louisville wins that game without that blown call as well.
I’m not a fan of any of those teams by the way. But the ass raping by WFVU and the bowl game loss to Wake was certainly some instant karma.
Comment by Brian O'Blivion — August 20, 2008 @ 3:02 pm
41
Albino,
Because we all know that Wikipeida is always accurate: the below link has the most comprehensive bowl matchup grid I could google in 5 minutes. According to this the SEC bowl teams can never finish higher in the SEC than their opponent finishes in their own confernce. Though only the Cotton/Chikfila guarantee a B12/ACC #2 vs SEC #3/4/5, all others require the highest possible SEC pick and the lowest possible other conference pick to get even a tie. Again, NONE give the SEC an advantage.
I think this is worth more than a casual glance when using bowl season to measure conference strength.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_bids_to_non-BCS_bowls
Comment by TIGERinATL — August 20, 2008 @ 2:55 pm