BLOGPOLL, WEEK NEGATIVE ONE
Our blogpoll is after the jump, and it’s the usual fine mess minus the fine. It was late, as well, and therefore not included in the current tally. We blame repeated viewings of the Big Ten Nutwork video for the delay.
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgia | 25 |
| 2 | Oklahoma | 24 |
| 3 | Southern Cal | 23 |
| 4 | Missouri | 22 |
| 5 | Florida | 21 |
| 6 | Ohio State | 20 |
| 7 | Auburn | 19 |
| 8 | West Virginia | 18 |
| 9 | Clemson | 17 |
| 10 | Texas Tech | 16 |
| 11 | LSU | 15 |
| 12 | Texas | 14 |
| 13 | South Florida | 13 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 12 |
| 15 | Arizona State | 11 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 10 |
| 17 | Oregon | 9 |
| 18 | Illinois | 8 |
| 19 | Tennessee | 7 |
| 20 | Kansas | 6 |
| 21 | Oregon State | 5 |
| 22 | Brigham Young | 4 |
| 23 | Alabama | 3 |
| 24 | Virginia Tech | 2 |
| 25 | Connecticut | 1 |

No Penn State? A personal decision we all must make and respect. Or mock. Whatever–a two headed unicorn television-faced offense doesn’t inspire, and neither does the cumulative frustration of two years of wondering where in the hell to put a team that can beat Akron but won’t even sniff at its serious in-conference rivals. They’ll creep in, but they’ll have to earn it by beating someone besides a derelict Texas A&M in the Alamo Bowl, and that’s unfair, wack ballotish, and done.
Top ten rejiggering elucidated: Refuse to overreact on the Sturdivant injury for Georgia, since they are on balance as complete a team as Oklahoma in identity and personnel. Oklahoma could conceivably be right there at number one without much shame or equivocation.
Ohio State gets this low because, if the game comes down to Boeckman passing versus a quality defense, they lose, and also because their defense has gotten outschemed in their rare but prominent nationally televised debacles. USC’s injuries and downgrade to mere offensive “goodness” take them low for the moment, but we’re sure we’ll get overhyped on either them or Ohio State following the great USC/tOSU shakeout of 2008.
(It’s all part of an attempt to actually not just paste the same teams up there for the third year running due to bowl carryover/program mojo/vaguely conceived “buzz” and actually look at the personnel likely to take the field. We’ll get over this unfortunate virus soon enough, though.)
Florida’s up there because even a marginal improvement in their pass defense takes them to potential top five talent. Bullish on Missouri and most especially Auburn, another team where marginal improvement on one side of the ball would yield a significant swing in the win total. Unbullish on WVU (scheme monkeying, defensive losses,) Clemson (irrational conviction Bowden will blow this, actual rational concerns on their offensive front,) and LSU (quarterback muddles.)
(Missouri will break our hearts, though. It’s only a matter of time before they drop a late-night Big 12 shootout that comes down to who scores last.)
The rest is more haphazard. Virginia Tech scares the daylights out of us: defensive losses, no receivers, and a run game threatening to take a second year off in a row to you know, get its head together, think about applying for law school, get its life together. Arizona State looks way high for a team with zero track record of protecting their quarterback. Kansas, Wisconsin, and Tennessee are all essentially the same quantity: good, but we have no idea of their absolute value until seen on the field due to offensive wrinkles for UW and Tenn. and Kansas actually playing a schedule.
Bullish on: Oregon State, who behind Maryland (DAMN SPASMODIC DYSLEXIA) was America’s second quietest nine victory team, and Connecticut, who never gets any respect whatsoever and is taking angry notes recording this lack of respect. They’re like the mini-Auburn of the Big East, winning games at the margins and doing so without any concern for stats. Oh, and like Auburn, just when you pay them the respect, they then take said credit and board the failboat in embarrassing fashion to a lesser team. As long as you’re prepared for this, feel free to endorse them heartily.

25 







1
J-Mac=WMD says:
Just a heads up, Nebraska (Now with A defense, they don’t even have to be good, just breathing and remember to tackle occasionally) will beat VTech. VTech has no offense, hooray for Sean Glennon, and Nebraska did not lose it’s offensive coordinator, so if they score 1/2 as many pts per game as they did once Ganz took over and they’ll be fine.
Also, watch for Redacted’s team to lose by 3+ TDs the first week of the season, with a score somewhere around 31-10. Mizzou only has 3 WRs healthy and practicing who have caught a pass in the NCAA. So, they’ll “only” score 31, and our defense is CRAZY good this year. Pinkel has mentioned that the defense could very well be the strength of the team….. just think about that for a few seconds, an offense that returns 2 All-Americans could be the weak point.
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
August 20th, 2008 at 11:41 am
2
Dr. Saturday says:
‘…behind Maryland was America’s second quietest nine victory team…”
Uh, Maryland only won six. They won nine in 2006, somehow, despite not being good at any aspect of the game. But only six last year, and two of them were against Villanova and Florida International.
August 20th, 2008 at 11:42 am
3
Edsall is God says:
UCONN!!!!!!!
Sadly, this is the first ounce of respect the defending co-champs of the big East have gotten all preseason. Seeing Pitt ranked in the AP Poll made me physically ill last week.
August 20th, 2008 at 11:44 am
4
Orson Swindle says:
Corrected. We have no excuse but incompetence.
August 20th, 2008 at 11:48 am
5
TIGERinATL says:
“Bullish on … most especially Auburn, another team where marginal improvement on one side of the ball would yield a significant swing in the win total.”
I’ve had the same theory on AU since Tubs hired Franklin and especially since the bowl performance. If the D stands pat and the O shows even moderate improvement, this team is scary good.
New DC doesn’t bother me too much since the worst D we’ve had in the last 5 years (3 different OCs) lost only 3 games and sacked Brodie Croyle nine times. Biggest concern is that the D gets tired out due to short (successful or otherwise) offensive posessions.
Full disclosure: Total and unashamed AU homer.
Also, doesn’t TTech fall into the same category but on the flip side?
August 20th, 2008 at 11:50 am
6
InsaneCoachPosse says:
why is everybody dissing Miss St? don’t they know that Croom is giving intravenous injections of his own blood to each player, and that they each take a shot of Crum before the second half? This alone will help them to defeat teams with twice their talent!!
just wait till the interview with the players on TV – they are all speaking basso profundo these days
August 20th, 2008 at 11:50 am
7
MJRuffalo1 says:
I am pretty much a PAC-10 homer but I cannot see Oregon St being ranked right now. Entire front 7 from last year is gone, from the #1 ranked rush defense in AMerica. It is not like Oregon St. has the recruting acumen to be able to withstand that type of loss. I have Stanford beating them (though I did take the 3 poitns) a week from tomorrow. (Damn it feels good to say that football will be happening a week from tomorrow)
August 20th, 2008 at 11:56 am
8
gobrutus says:
The only problem I have with your explanation is that you put OSU down because of ‘personnel likely to take the field’ but you prop Florida up based on ‘potential.’ Are you being a homer? Yep. Am I being a homer? Yep. Isn’t everyone who pays any attention to sports always going to be at least a homer? Of course!
Keep up the good work guys
August 20th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
9
Brian O'Blivion says:
Uconn will get respect this year as long as they don’t win two games because of bullshit ref calls. That is all.
And Cal will work its way into the poll very soon. Despite the second half fade last year, I think they have potential to win 9 games this year.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
10
Gen. Stoopnagle says:
@ #1: Wasn’t one of those returning AA’s at Mizzou an OLman who is now injured. And why is it one OL at UGA goes down and the sky is falling, but two go down at MU and nobody knows? Wait… I think I answered my own question.
@ #3: UConn won’t beat anyone of consequence. Just like last year. TEMPLE!
@ Orson: I think – you’re shocked – Ohio State is too low. They’ve been aiming for this year and it’s not their fault that their league is full of push-overs. I was once dedicated to the idea that The Humanitarian would – with a week off beforehand – easily dismantle the Buckeyes in LA. Now, I’m not so sure. Not that I’m losing faith in TH’s prowess, but it “sounds” like maybe Southern Cal is not as dominate as once thought.
I don’t mind Georgia being No. 1, but it’s clear that in the other polls, the SC/OSU winnah will jump UGA. (One egg, two eggs, three eggs…) Unless UGA absolutely hammers SC – err, sorry: South Carolina. If that happens (doubtful), then UGA might score some of the loser’s first place votes. But if it ends up what it will end up being (a 14-12 type deal), then the Greatest College Football Game of All Time (TM) winner will get the spoils.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:06 pm
11
TIGERinATL says:
And I agree on Clem too. Total bummer, but they will lose to Alabama in week one.
Start with the fact that this will be a HIGHLY motivated Alabama team. Next, what exactly do you scheam against if you are facing a team that just went 7-6 on National TV in week 1? Their best players are true freshmen.
Conversely, if you’re Saban, you’ve known what you had to do for months. You’ve had your assistants watching film in 24 hour shifts with only bread and water and wearing adult diapers for months trying to figure out how to stop them.
Now take into account Cousin Clem’s (even better than AU?) record of “board[ing] the failboat” when expectations are raised.
Conclusion: Saban is on the cover of SI in Week 2 with the headline”BAMA IS BACK”. Obviously, they won’t REALLY be back because we’ve all seen that movie before. Tommy B is on the hot seat the rest of the year but saves his job by beating the OBC in the end.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
12
AlanInDC says:
Orson,
Don’t sleep on Ball State. They’ll be Top 20 by the end of the year, and you can buy them now while cheap.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
13
Josh says:
You can put PSU wherever you like, but can it please not be 15 spots behind Wisconsin? If they’re #14, they should count as a ’serious in-conference rival’ and a 31-point trip out behind the woodshed should count as a ’sniff.’
August 20th, 2008 at 12:13 pm
14
Tricky Dick says:
Florida will lose because Percy Harvin thinks leadership is for sexy Tim TeaBag. No homo!
Seriously I think Florida comes out of the SEC with one L and the Dawgs with 2 (one of which will be to Florida)
OSU vs. UF rematch bitches! As a buckeye I really can’t speculate as to how that one will turn out with out hitting myself in the twig n berries.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
15
OhioDawg says:
Oregon over Oregon State? The “Spotlight on Oregon State” piece from last week had me convinced the Beavers had it all over the Ducks.
Otherwise, it’s as good as any at this point. Except I think the Cincinnati Bearcats should be in rather than UConn, but that’s the most ridiculous piece of minutia I can come up with.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:20 pm
16
Mr.Pelican Pants says:
Since we all know NCAA 2009 is the TRUTH:
I wish I could believe that Bama will beat Clemson in week 1. I have simmed the game on NCAA 2009 on all levels, 10 min qtrs, and Clemson soundly beats Bama on all fronts. I even played it myself, both as Clemson and Alabama, and Clemson has won with or without me at the helm. Simply put, Bama has no answer for Spiller or Davis. Period. Bama will score, they just cant keep Clemson from scoring with their very young and very thin defense, and in all games, the one who can score last wins….not to say they wont have trouble covering Julio, but we have but one Julio, they have Spiller and Davis, who should both be in the NFL as of right now. It pains me to say it:
I say Clemson 28-21 over Bama, with or without overtime.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:26 pm
17
Biggus Rickus says:
I am upset by the ranking of my area’s sports team.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:29 pm
18
TF says:
Oh joy. Another preview that refuses to aknowledge anything about the Jayhawks other than their schedule. How original.
Mizzou falls apart with the injury bug. Kansas wins the Big 12 North. Bloggers everywhere discount the accomplishment. Que sera sera.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:31 pm
19
immikefazz says:
Good news for you all. Oregon State comes to Happy Valley for an ass-kicking on September 6…end of bullishness.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
20
TIGERinATL says:
Pelican,
I just see Bama coming out fired up and looking to prove something. Not saying they are the better team – not by a mile. But my gut says they are going to put up an over-their-head performance like they did against the Vols last season.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
21
PSUrob says:
Blue Horsehoe loves Penn State.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
22
blon57 says:
Tx Tech has such a soft non-conference schedule, their first real game doesn’t come until October. Their defense is question mark, even though there are a lot of return starters. Leach is sold on the idea that they have vastly improved, but look at the points they gave up last year. They should have scheduled some stiffer competition before conference play so that the D doesn’t coast until the big boys arrive.
Tech has three tough away games- Texas A&M, Kansas and Oklahoma. They should beat A&M, but Kyle Field is a horrific place to play. There is a distinct home field advantage there. Kansas is a good team (I consider them higher than #20) and they will be ready. I’m sure that OU is a beast at home (all those potential guests of the Jerry Springer show can’t possibly be well-behaved), let alone anywhere else because of talent.
They should be in the top 20, but I don’t see them that high.
August 20th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
23
COB says:
OS, I agree with the irrational conviction on Bowden/Clemson…destined for a crushing collapse under *any* national expectations. Also, although the Illinois v. Mizzou game will not be much of a contest (Mizzou), I still don’t think that with no wins v. OU last year and a stronger OU side this year, how anyone can expect anything but a 2 loss campaign in a weak conference. Call me crazy but watching big12 teams in bowl games last year, I think the they were just as down as the big10. Wins against the disaster at the helm of ARkansas and a horribly overrated VAtech team…of course we must note the sodomy in Glendale. Why does the big12 not get nationally nut checked like the big10?
August 20th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
24
Big Jon says:
Arizona State looks way high for a team with zero track record of protecting their quarterback.
Arizona State has two returning starters on the offensive front…oh wait, they don’t have a record of protecting Carpenter either. I’m not sure why they’re that high in the polls either, but the word out of camp is second year in the system blah blah blah.
And MJRuffalo is exactly right on Oregon State, nobody outside of the seriously elite can replace their entire front seven and expect to thrive. In addition, the last of the Erickson running bot clones, Yvenson Bernard, is out of eligibility.
Without my Phil Steele Bible in front of me, hasn’t Auburn lost a lot of talent on the defensive front this year? If there’s one thing I’ve learned from Gridiron Greats, it’s that the good teams always have a ton of talent on the D-line. Consider me suspect.
August 20th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
25
blon57 says:
#22
Bowl game listed with teams and score, final ranking in parenthesis.
Big 12
Fiesta- West Virginia (#6) 48, Oklahoma (#8) 28
Orange- Kansas (#7) 24, Virginia Tech 21
Gator- Texas Tech (#22) 31, Virginia 28
Cotton- Missouri (#4) 38, Arkansas 7
Independence- Alabama 30, Colorado 24
Alamo- Penn State 24, Texas A&M 17
Holiday- Texas (#10) 52, Arizona State 34
SEC
BCS- LSU (#1) 38, Ohio State (#5) 24
Sugar- Georgia (#3) 41, Hawaii 10
Capital One- Michigan (#18) 41, Florida (#13) 35
Outback- Tennessee (#12) 21, Wisconsin 17
Chick-fil-A- Auburn (#15) 23, Clemson (#21) 20
Music City- Kentucky 35, Florida State 28
Humanitarian- Fresno State 40, Georgia Tech 28
Liberty- Mississippi State10, UCF 3
More SEC teams participated in bowl games overall and LSU won the BCS, but the BIg 12 isn’t the piece of crap that you believe us to be. The conference had five teams in the top 20 at the end of the season vs. SEC’s six.
August 20th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
26
Floridan says:
I don’t see Georgia ending up on top — they’ve got much too tough a schedule. If they can get by the beasts they have to face, they deserve to be ranked number one and number two and have an intersquad game in the Orange Bowl.
Although Ohio State will probably end up ranked higher than number 6, their creampuff schedule (excepting USC and maybe Wisconsin,both on the road) should relegate them to double-digits.
I do hope you are correct in ranking Alabama at 23. I think they will lose four games, at least.
August 20th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
27
blon57 says:
I should have said top 25 teams, nit top 20.
August 20th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
28
Brewdog says:
Speaking of Phil Steele … Illinois? Connecticut? Srsly? Phil doesn’t agree with your poll, and he’s a man who can watch 24 football games at the same time!
August 20th, 2008 at 1:38 pm
29
TIGERinATL says:
#23
DL is one are where Auburn just reloads. Lost Groves, but still have Antonio Coleman (who outperformed Groves in ‘07) at DE Antoine Carter ain’t bad either. DT Pat Sims went pro, but SenDerrick Marks is still there and is on award watch lists.
So, no. D line talent is not a concern for Auburn in 2008.
Secondary will be young, which is the scariest defensive sub-unit for AU homers like myself.
August 20th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
30
NewAZTiger says:
Of course, 10 minutes after EDSBS live went off the air, I had the perfect answer to the question that Orson asked re: AU’s 2 headed monster at QB.
I’m not worried about Burns/Todd. The reason is this: Tony Franklin put in the System in 9 days at beat Clemson with it – and Clemson is used to seeing the spread, and they were the #1 D in the ACC last year.
He did this with Brandon Cox at QB – a QB who will go down in history as perhaps the worst spread QB to ever win a game. Now, I love Brandon Cox, and I personally think he was one of the toughest guys to ever play QB in the SEC (takes a lickin’, keeps on tickin’ – oh yeah, he also has myasthenia gravis), but he was not and is not a spread QB.
And the Coordinator changes at AU are just 1 spot changes. The guys below all stay the same, which is why AU has had such consistancy on D, as well as on O (O-line and RB positions have shone).
August 20th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
31
NewAZTiger says:
Oh, and one other thing about UCONN.
I would love for AU to do a Home and Home with UCONN with a basketball tie in for home and home.
BCS teams where AU helps the profile of UCONN in football, and UCONN helps the profile of AU in basketball.
August 20th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
32
Reggie Slack says:
It will be interesting to see Auburn WRs do something besides block on the outside.
August 20th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
33
Biggus Rickus says:
blon57,
Not really disagreeing with your point, but Ga. Tech hasn’t been in the SEC since 1964.
August 20th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
34
Pants McPants says:
Blah blah blah Ohio State too low, last year wasn’t even expected, everyone back, this is the season, blah blah.
The only thing that bothers me (about all the polls) is the baffling confidence everyon seems to have in Matt Stafford, I mean Georgia didn’t exactly run a murderer’s row for their 7 win streak ending last season. This season, they have a 4 game stretch that is brutal, while Florida has a (relatively) easy SEC schedule with a Heisman winner at QB…
Sell UGa, buy FL.
August 20th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
35
TIGERinATL says:
blon,
I haven’t taken the time to brak down your bowl lists from 2007. But I think another thing to consider is that in many bowl games, the SEC team is matched against an opponent who finished higher in their respective conference. I think this is an interesting bit of information that gets left out of bowl season analysis.
August 20th, 2008 at 2:08 pm
36
blon57 says:
#32
Sorry about that. Scratch that one from the list.
August 20th, 2008 at 2:18 pm
37
Albino Tornado says:
TigerInATL — it tends to happen that way to some degree for every conference. For example:
Holiday Bowl: Pac-10 #2 vs. Big 12 #3.
Cotton Bowl: Big 12 #2 vs. SEC #(~3).
Add in the BCS pulling teams out and conference selections not being required to be in the same order as conference record and it starts getting really wacky.
August 20th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
38
Edsall is God says:
Per UConn bullshit: The Temple guy was out of bounds and Louisville was up 10 in the 4th quarter. Two legit wins.
UConn won 9 games last year and is better this year with just about everybody back. As long as they beat UVA in week 3, they will be undefeated into October and hopefully the nation will take notice.
To the Auburn fan: I have NO idea why UConn doesn’t schedule teams like Auburn for football/basketball rivalries. They do them with schools like Indiana, UNC and UVA but that doesn’t really help the football team. And the bball team needs no help.
August 20th, 2008 at 2:45 pm
39
Tommy says:
@33: Stafford torched Tenuta’s and Muschamp’s defenses during that seven-game stretch, which was no mean feat, and he put on a 2nd half clinic against Virginia Tech last year.
Tebow racks up stats in an offense designed for exactly that. http://blutarsky.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/how-long-he-can-endure-remains-to-be-seen/
Stafford? All he does is win games.
August 20th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
40
NewAZTiger says:
#37: UCONN is high on my list of teams that AU should play home and home with in football. I’m a bit of a closet UCONN fan after watching their program grow and they way they play football. I think that UCONN coming to Auburn for help with increasing the AU basketball program’s profile in return for AU increasing the UCONN football program’s profile is win-win for both schools.
It helps with OOC scheduling for both schools in football, increases national awareness of both schools (would likely be an ESPN game), would help UCONN with it’s stadium expansion (or even get creative and schedule the game at a nearby NFL stadium like Giant’s Stadium or Gillette Stadium) and would give AU exposure in a market it usually doesn’t get for football.
As for basketball, it gives UCONN an easy two wins, helps with OOC scheduling (not that you need much of that in basketball), and will help AU’s basketball profile and recruiting.
I would LOVE to see an AU-UCONN Football/Basketball series. In fact, they are my #1 school that I would like to play OOC if the deal can be arranged like that.
August 20th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
41
TIGERinATL says:
Albino,
Because we all know that Wikipeida is always accurate: the below link has the most comprehensive bowl matchup grid I could google in 5 minutes. According to this the SEC bowl teams can never finish higher in the SEC than their opponent finishes in their own confernce. Though only the Cotton/Chikfila guarantee a B12/ACC #2 vs SEC #3/4/5, all others require the highest possible SEC pick and the lowest possible other conference pick to get even a tie. Again, NONE give the SEC an advantage.
I think this is worth more than a casual glance when using bowl season to measure conference strength.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_bids_to_non-BCS_bowls
August 20th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
42
Brian O'Blivion says:
#37 Your excuse last year was that he bobbled the ball in some reverse angle shot (I looked at that too, and he didn’t). I’ve seen that video a dozen times, and the Temple guy’s foot was in. Absolutely a blown call. And Louisville wins that game without that blown call as well.
I’m not a fan of any of those teams by the way. But the ass raping by WFVU and the bowl game loss to Wake was certainly some instant karma.
August 20th, 2008 at 3:02 pm
43
TIGERinATL says:
#36
If we can trust Wiki, then the SEC plays an equal or better counterpart in ALL of its bowl games. Two out of seven matchups are guaranteed higher finishers in the other conference. One is a guaranteed #2 vs. #2. The other four reqire the lowest possible SEC pick and the highest possible opponent pick to have an “even” matchup.
I think this requires a more than casual glance when using bowl season to guage conference strength.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_bids_to_non-BCS_bowls
PS: Sorry if this is a multiple post. I blame having to retype my email every damn time. POST THIS TIME DAMMIT!!!!!!
August 20th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
44
Pants McPants says:
#38- Well, color me unimpressed re: TAH-NOO-TAH, as usual his defenses are overrated, GT finished 58th in pass efficiency D last season, despite facing the worst collection of QB talent ever in a major conference in the ACC, and also getting Notre Dame on the OOC slate, the worst offense in CFB.
And the VT game? Maybe he was good in the 2nd half, he finished 9/21 for 129 yards with a TD and an INT, so unless he was 0/21 and an INT in the 1st, his 2nd half couldn’t have been awesome.
Now, the intangibles such as “being a winner”, maybe that’s true, just hard to assume for a guy who was 56th in pass efficiency last season, and whose schedule gets harder this season.
August 20th, 2008 at 4:15 pm
45
acchalfbreed says:
Orson,
You got some info on Wake the rest of us don’t? And I’m a fan. Don’t leave us hangin.
Oh, and VT is gonna burn you. But not like you think.
August 20th, 2008 at 7:07 pm