VISITING LECTURER: ENJOY THE ENJOYMENT ON WASHINGTON
Teams: there are a lot of them. In our effort to bring you the finest “bullshit” coverage of college football, our Visiting Lecturer Series today welcomes Seth, the author of the fine Huskies-compatible blog Enjoy the Enjoyment and Executive Editor of the wonderful new publication Sports Northwest Magazine. A Napoleon Kaufman-esque performance follows. (Hey! He has mixed feelings on Rick Neuheisel! Imagine!)
One: what color is your season? In other words, please explain the metaphorical state of your program through the metaphor of color:
Fire Engine Red. Anyone who’s bothered to compile a pre-season “Coaches on the Hot Seat” list has Ty Willingham at the top of it. Mix that into a dish that includes Phil Steele ranking the Huskies’ schedule as the toughest in the nation (for the second consecutive year–thanks athletic department!) and pre-season injuries to key players, and you’ll understand why Willingham often has a sour look on his face–he tastes a set up. Many Husky fans would welcome Willingham’s firing, but some (i.e., me) see it as another step back for a program that’s rapidly devolving toward irrelevance.
Two: What historical nation and period do you resemble most right now?
Imperial Rome, Crisis of the Third Century.
After the relative peace and prosperity of the Owens/James/Lambright era (1957-1998), Willingham leads a shaky regime, populated by citizens who remember better times and haven’t come to terms with the outside forces (parity, the rise of the Oregon schools) that have beset their beloved empire. As a result, the Huskies have had four head men in just ten years, and another coup is imminent.
Three: You have important players. Discuss a few of them hastily.
HUGS FOR JAKEY! HIM LOVE THE HUGS!QB Jake Locker: The Tim Tebow of the West. Locker shares Tebow’s speed, strength, and earnest whiteness. One major difference–Locker’s spending his summer playing amateur baseball, not circumcising Filipino boys. Locker set the official Pac-10 record for rushing yards by a QB last year, but also the unofficial record for most receivers left standing confused as a pass sailed 20 feet over their heads. The man’s acceleration and slipperyness in the open field are a joy to watch, but his accuracy must improve.
C Juan Garcia: He’s the guy fans look at and ask “is he STILL on the team?” Garcia was recruited to UW by Rick Neuheisel. The only returning Husky to appear on an All-Pac-10 team last year, Garcia came back for a sixth year (he got two medical hardship waivers) to improve his pro prospects. Then, in ‘08 spring practice, he tore a ligament in his foot. Instead of having season-ending surgery, Garcia’s opted to hope that the ligament will heal itself by football season. Early reports are promising, so we’re keeping our fingers crossed, but it looks likely that the Huskies won’t have their second most-valuable player.
LB E.J. Savannah: The Huskies’ leading tackler last year (and sixth in the Pac-10) was suspended for part of spring practice for reasons that Ty Willingham wouldn’t identify. Then, early this month, Savannah broke his arm. How? While arm wrestling, according to the Seattle Times. To steal a joke from one of my blog commenters, looks like all the post-practice chocolate milk the Huskies were drinking didn’t strengthen their bones. Savannah’s out three months which (boop beep boop) could force him out of the season opener. Look for the Dawgs defense to improve once he gets back.
Four: Name two games we might actually want to watch featuring your team.
vs. Notre Dame (Oct. 25): Willingham finally gets his chance to prove that black coaches are smarter than fat ones. Willingham typically displays about the same amount of emotion in public as Dick Cheney, but gets an unmistakable glint of anger in his eyes when Notre Dame comes up. If Willingham could suit up for this game, he probably would.
Neuheisel’s return will be a dramatic, gripping, and finely wrought performance.vs. UCLA (Nov. 15): Slick Rick Neuheisel’s return to Husky Stadium will be the occasion for the most thorough booing since J.D. Drew’s first game in Philly. Husky fans may be divided about Ty Willingham, but we all despise Rick Neuheisel for running the program into the ground (more on that later).
Four-A: Save us all some time and mention the game we’re better off NOT watching.
vs. Stanford (Sept. 27): This game is usually close, but in the worst possible way–both teams seem to play down to each other. Two years ago the Dawgs lost by 17 points despite allowing just 7 first downs. Go figure that one out. Someone asked Willingham after that game what the problems were with the Husky offense. He said in his laconic way: “Throwing and catching. Blocking and running.”
Five: Every hero forgets something in their toolbelt. What does your team lack?
Any semblance of a defensive line. Three of four starters graduated, and the two top DEs on the depth chart have a combined three career tackles. This disastrous situation (hello? JC?) has led to speculation that new DC Ed Donatell, formerly of the Packers and Falcons, will install a 3-4. Mum’s the word, though, the better to surprise season-opening opponent Oregon.
Six: Describe your team with a Jimmy Buffett song. No, we’re serious–do it.
Come Monday
I guess I never was meant for glitter rock and roll
And honey I didn’t know
That I’d be missin’ you so
…
California has worn me quite thin
I just can’t wait to see you again
In the late ’90s, the Huskies were rolling along smoothly under Husky lifer Jim Lambright, racking up annual bowl game appearances despite killer non-conference and Pac-10 schedules. But one 6-6 season got AD Barbara Hedges looking into UCLA-grad Rick Neuheisel’s dreamy blue eyes, and she was hooked on Rick. Lambright’s one-foot-in-front-of-the-other ways (he spent 23 years as an assistant before getting his shot at the head job) were cast aside for Neuheisel’s WIN! WITH! GLAMOUR! mentality. The program was already in decline before Neuheisel’s gambling got him canned (unfairly, a court later ruled, costing UW a $4.5 million settlement). With the talent cupboard bare due to Neuheisel’s disdain for unglamorous positions like lineman, the program went into freefall, and–just to show you how far we’ve come: that same 6-win season that cost Lambright his job in 1998 would, in 2008 Husky World, probably save Willingham’s.
Seven: We’re master wagerers. Give us a bet to place for up to ten dollars about your team.
Once per game, Jake Locker’s deceptive speed will cause a safety or linebacker to take a terrible angle, leaving him grasping desperately at Locker’s winged feet.
If you’d like to read more about Washington football, the Library of Congress recommends Dead Souls by Nikolai Gogol. Oh, drat: we meant Enjoy the Enjoyment. If you’d like to contribute your own Visiting Lecturer post, please contact us at harumphharumph of the gmail email variety address.












19
No one is saying that RN’s classes weren’t highly rated. They were because they were loaded with big time skill position players ala Reggie Williams and Paul Arnold. The problem was the team became depleted in the trenches under his reign and the program collapsed as a result.
Of course Im not happy with the current state of affairs. No one is. But if you’re looking for someone to blame, look at RN and not TW, who inherited a steaming pile of crap.
Willingham’s most recent class is definitely a step in the right direction…
Comment by sineptafgib — July 1, 2008 @ 10:01 am
18
Sineptafgib: I share your pain, but you need to check your facts. Take rivals, scout, or any other objective recruiting ratings and compare Neuheisel to any coach since or Lambright. Not considering rankings important is exactly one of the anti-Neuheisel mentalities that has led to disaster since he left. And you must be kidding about our line recruiting since he left. Tell me about any highly rated linemen that have been recruited since he left, compared to when he was here. Please present some facts to support your contentions. I don’t mean to knock Lambright, but I think it was felt that RN was a better national recruiter for the top players and had more potential to deliver titles. I noticed you didn’t say you are happier about the program overall now than when RN was here? How many years after he is gone are you going to blame him for the dismal state of the program? Do you think the anti-RN mentality has produced positive results,either now or over the next few years? Even with Locker there just aren’t enough quality recruits to compete with most of the rest of the PAC-10, all recruited by coaches since RN (except perhaps the best, Garcia, ironically enough recruited by RN!) I hope I am wrong, because I am a HUGE Husky fan. GET OVER RN and let’s move on. RN has moved on and now has one of the best jobs in the nation at UCLA. Just think with facts and not emotions like a jilted lover. lol
MC
Comment by Michael Cummings — June 30, 2008 @ 3:26 am
17
Michael Cummings– What’s the matter the with you? The fact Slick Rick’s recruiting directly led to the demise of UW football is so objectively obvious as to be beyond contention. That his classes “could have been better balanced” is the understatement of the decade. That’s like slapping the torso of a gorilla on the legs of a meerkat and remarking “hmm, could be better balanced.”
And to say the Huskies became mediocre under Lambright isn’t really fair given that Lambright inherited the team during a period when they were ineligible for bowl play due to probation and did nothing but guide them to the winningest record in the Pac10 in the 90s. Neuheisell won a Rose Bowl with a team full of Lambright’s players (that he recruited while on probation), including Tui and a massive, dominant Offensive Line.
I’m saddened any UW fan could think R.N. did anything but run the ship into the rocks…
Comment by sineptafgib — June 26, 2008 @ 6:06 am
16
Yes, but Wooderson, now Ty can play with HIS players against DSA’s players. Before, DSA won with Ty’s players, the ones he supposedly couldn’t recruit.
[collapses on his own circuitous argument, hates self]
Comment by Eirishis — June 25, 2008 @ 11:19 am
15
Um, Ty finally gets a chance to play ND?
He already had a chance. In Seattle.
They lost 36-17. I believe it was 31-3 at one point. Not even close.
I always respected UW, I hope they see the light and can his ass after the season is over.
Comment by wooderson — June 25, 2008 @ 8:49 am
14
Do you have a man crush on Slick Rick????
Comment by Last Dragon — June 25, 2008 @ 8:41 am
13
As a huge Husky fan, I completely disagree with the assertion Rick Neuheisel’s recruiting was somehow responsible for the demise of Washington as a college football power. I realize there are angry fans out there but the FACTS to do support the notion. I have LOTS of examples, but let’s just start with these. Under Lambright the Huskies became average, and have been horrible ever since Neuheisel left, and the mentality (proven dead wrong) became to recruit the run the program as the anti-Neuheisel approach. Every objective analysis of recruiting classes have put Neuheisel’s classes and BY FAR the best overall since some by James. What system are you using that says otherwise, particularly just before Neuheisel came and since he left? Losing the # ranked OL in the) to a back injury before getting to play for the Huskies hurt, but when was the last time and when will be the next time we recruit the #1 OL in the nation. Some other quality OL left or were run out after he left. The only truly quailty and hightly ranked one we have now (Garcia) was,ironically, recruited by GUESS WHO. Oh, and when have the Huskies ended the season ranked #3, and when do you think that will happen again, with this ridiculous anti-Neiheisel mentality, which has led to ruin. We should recruit the BEST PLAYERS, period, and just because they are tough, or from WA, etc., alone is not enough. Perhaps some of his classes could have been better balanced, but he rightfully took the best players, by every objective measure. I’ll be happy to elaborate further but the general points are clear. But perhaps the biggest problem is that with Neuheisel the program was FUN. He was a great interview, FAR more intelligent (the only place TW might match him), insightful, funny, and informative than any other recent WA coach. Practices were open, the Huskies were winning, the player’s names were on the uniforms (even TW can learn from his mistakes, as knowing the players is important to fans), fans were enthusiastic, the stadium was full, life was good for Husky fans. He is gone, and you now have what you have wished for, the anti-Neuheisel. Revel in it if you must, but I liked it much better then. Hopefully, the Husky Nation will rise again. Just don’t scapegoat the man inaccurately who led the Huskies and their fans to their most successful seasons since James,
Comment by Michael Cummings — June 25, 2008 @ 3:56 am
12
Thee holiest specimens of athleticism from Notre Dame square off against thee very man who once blindly led them into battle some four years ago. Tyrone was an angel who hath fallen from grace; he is now a shell of a man, a cowardly, petty soul more concerned about chipping in for birdie than leading his “proud young men” to victory. His Huskies of Washington shall fall once again to the mighty, all-knowing Charlie Weis. Mortals mistake Charlie’s body as being made of fat; these fools are gravely mistaken. For on the third day when I created Charlie Weis for all the ends of Earth to either enjoy or loathe, I evenly dispersed his brains throughout his body and made it appear as fat. I knew if I shaped his skull large enough to contain all the brains it takes to lead thee holy men of Notre Dame to victory it would be so large that he would be persecuted by thee public far worse than if I made him appear fat. “Go ahead and mock thy belly, LSUFreek,” says the omniscient Charlie Weis, “for when Saint Peter judges you at the gates of Heaven and sees that you mocked the leader of Notre Dame Football during your time on Earth, he will stone you until you fall into Lucifer’s lap.”
Notre Dame 349
Washington 2
-Jesus
Comment by Jesus — June 24, 2008 @ 4:47 pm
11
Seth,
I enjoyed your article a while back that called out how ex-NFL coaches were no good in college.
Keep up the good work buddy!
Comment by fife in the bay — June 24, 2008 @ 4:43 pm