YOUR FOOTBALL SIGN DISCOVERED
No wonder defensive coaches tend to be the hollerin’ charismatic bastard types and not the monastic, pen-chewing booth types. Overthinking the calls is pointless when the mathematics of football failure are, for the most part, on your side no matter what you call on 3rd and long, or worse, 4th and short with the national title on the line.
Brilliant call to blitz there? Yes. A play likely to fail anyway? Also, yes, thanks to the joy that only sports mathematics can bring.
RockMNation’s been working on the numbers, and while this may strike you as “Man on Moon” quality stuff, we’re all behind empiricism in even its tiniest forms. (We have timed the best ways to get our gym, up to and including complex variations on how to avoid a particularly thorny set of railroad tracks. There’s flow charts and everything. No, the medication is NOT working.)
The Sabermetric-type methodology does add numerical backbone to what you had previously assumed to be true just because some man who’d spend a lot of time in Bike shorts had told you: that getting into third and long is real bad in numerically demonstrable ways, and that yards gained closer to the goal line remain far valuable than yards gained far away from your own goal line. SMQ concludes:
I welcome this, personally, as an empirical base that bolsters my usual emphasis on keeping the entire playbook open: outside of talent, predictability is the number one killer of offenses, and defenses that stop the run and make offenses one-dimensional are, well, see above.
To invert this, though: what does this say about defensive strategy? Given the propensity of most offenses to view first down as a running down, why not run blitz four first downs out of five? And just hang back on third down and rush three? The number of drinks we’ve crushed in our hand* watching a defense lay back on third down only to give up a square in remains countless, but given the numbers, isn’t that the safest bet against most passing sets, since most offenses will, when dared to save themselves with a pass, drop the elephant gun of probability and blow their own head off?
It’s testament more to the gnat’s attention span of our own brain and, we suppose, most fans in that you don’t remember when the mathematically probable strategy works. We saw an interview with Norm Chow once where, in discussing play design, he said the most important thing he could emphasize was humility. “You don’t know what’s coming. You can’t.” Humility, for him, meant understanding that the most important down was first down, and that your play design had to have the kind of flexibility built into it to mitigate chaos hurtling in from the defensive side.
On the defensive side, the howling void of probability and numbers may be even more daunting. On third down, the offense might have some ideas on how to craft a play to beat several defenses, drawing up routes to accommodate two or three possibilities. However, the “success” or “failure” of a particular defense may be even more arbitrary, as the offense could grant you a freebie due to incompetence no matter the call. The defense can grant the same to the offense on third down, sure, but the chances are lower since, by assignment, the defense is less flexible on a passing down than the offense.
So, if you’re curious as to the practical applications of this, go to a casino. Do you have “a system” for beating the roulette table? Have you really convinced yourself that you have a statistical advantage over the dealer at a blackjack table? Do you sit at the table nervously, speaking to no one and trying to remember what that important bit of verbiage on re-raise bets was from page 37 of Doyle Brunson’s Super System? Congratulations, your football sign is offensive coordinator. You are doomed to misery and a lifetime of hand infections from writing too many plays down with an ungloved hand. Enjoy.
If you are doubling down on a pair of twos, garrulously chatting to everyone within earshot, and double-fisting drinks even though the cards are getting blurry and you don’t recall where you put your last three thousand dollars…well, congratulations to you, too. You are a defensive coordinator by temperament. Look forward to being fired for giving up 3rd and 16 despite winning a conference title with the exact same blitz package three years earlier. Either way, feel free to get your yaw-yaw on, you blitzmeister you.
*Plastic cups only, of course. If our hands could crush fine crystal and glass, we’d be out making ducats on the Professional Arm Wrestling circuit–in between stints as a long-distance trucker trying to win back the love of his son.









1
rjsplow says:
I think this post and SMQ’s quote makes a pretty good argument… but Orson, how do you account for the fact that the team with the best third down conversion percentage in major college football (Florida) was also the most predictable (Tebow smash)?
Everyone knows whats coming on 3rd down against Florida. Who is “everyone”? Everyone on Florida’s sideline, the opposing sideline, watching the game in the stadium, outside tailgating, watching on television and even those bathing in the Ganges river in India knows whats coming.
June 17th, 2008 at 10:47 am
2
hobeg8r says:
Even Verne Lundquist knew.
June 17th, 2008 at 10:53 am
3
dex says:
Stop me before I blitz again! Now allow me to pick one or two obscure plays from an entire day of football where the blitz failed, ignore the times it did work, and proclaim myself God of Football Strategy! Who wants to talk about the myriad of errors I have uncovered in science fiction television shows??
Sorry, slipped into Easterbrook mood.
June 17th, 2008 at 10:57 am
4
Orson Swindle says:
You know, the game where the Florida offense worked best–Tennessee–featured more first down passing than we could remember. Watching it again on vacation (Viva SunSports!), Florida was anything but predictable in that game.
Then, versus Auburn, we went to Tebow smash and voila! Instant stifle.
June 17th, 2008 at 11:37 am
5
CincySooner says:
Sigh….
I’m an offensive coordinator destined to suffocate under the weight of my own angst.
June 17th, 2008 at 11:56 am
6
sullivan013 says:
Given enough data, one could also use these measurements to rate coordinators, nicht wahr?
It would be interesting to see if the ratings of the various hires in and around the NCAA. What is Norm Chow’s or Will Muschamp’s rating? How does Major Applewhite or Jimbo Fisher really contribute to their team? What about new hires like Auburn’s Tony Franklin – what was his rating at Troy?
Inquiring minds want to know.
June 17th, 2008 at 12:08 pm
7
COB says:
Thank you. It has been too long since I had the pleasure of watching Miami lose that game yet again. If for only some arbitrary reason you can find a way to incorporate the Dan Fouts classic, “Dear Lord, that is a serious knee injury for Willis McGahee” that would top it off. While the video is nausiating, it is a lesson on the human body’s ability (or lack thereof) to withstand flying Will Allens to the kneecap.
RE: the sweet science of football…it all makes sense untill you are making the calls…the ole boys at OU (06 Fiesta) thought that 3 down and 9 back was all brains untill they let a hook and lateral tie the game. Then of course, the infamous two “no pressure” defensive efforts the last two plays of the game. While OU D was garbage in that game, those aren’t bad calls unless BSU makes rediculous plays, which they in fact, did. There is something to be said for unpredictability (mad hatter-esque unpredicability) in defensive play calls. Ultimately, it is on the DC to either play “power poker” percentages or simply pull the calls right out of his ass, can’t say either will give you a consistant job.
73 DAYS!
June 17th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
8
Jester says:
If jumping up and dahn makes a good d-coordinator, well, Auburn got a great one.
Just watch Paul “I was born with a pogo stick” Rhoades this year.
June 17th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
9
beckett says:
How badly does WfVU screw with the numbers also, where even 3rd and 24 is a run down??
June 17th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
10
OhioDawg says:
I was getting all thinky there for a minute, with all the numbers and what not.
Thanks for the Joe Kines video. Whaddya gotta do Joe? “Get back in there and play.” I’ll take that every day of the week.
June 17th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
11
carlinthemarlin says:
I wonder how this would have looked in the hey day of option football. in 1983, every down was a running down!
June 17th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
12
carlinthemarlin says:
did i just write “hey day?” yes i did.
Me = FAIL!
June 17th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
13
Tatum says:
You gotta stop the inside trout.
June 17th, 2008 at 1:45 pm
14
Vol says:
Ahh the inside trout’s a bitch.
June 17th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
15
Downtown Plainsman says:
@ Jester
I don’t have a retort to your comment. I’ve heard mixed reviews from Panther fans on PR and the majority seems to fall on the negative side of the fence.
I know he’s got large shoes to fill but I feel confident with our players he will do more than fine; anxious-yes, nervous-not really. I would not feel as confident if not for three reasons:
1) This was the second time Tubs tried to lure PR away from Pitt, the first time was in ’02. What’s the story you ask? Well PR was Tubs first choice for a new DC but he did not want to become “nomadic”, which I respect, and he stayed. Our SECOND choice was a man named Gene Chizik out of Central Florida who you could say Tubs made his career what it is, TIFWIW.
2) His last game coached as a Panther showed what he could do when his team executed plays (you knew this was coming and I don’t want to stress this b/c it’s not a BIG reason for my confidence).
3) Bottom line, it’s always Tub’s top-ranked defense, just different DC on the sidelines, he’ll make sure of that.
Good luck next year, McCoy’s a beast.
June 17th, 2008 at 2:18 pm
16
Der Schatten says:
Fuck yea, O! Long live the “inside trout”!!
Swear to god, when my daughter (born in Tuscaloosa, by the grace of God), gets old enough to appreciate both the inside trout and the OSU run game, I will make her recite these sweet lines in her valedictorian address at Oxford (and, hey, Sister State, that doesn’t mean you!!!).
June 17th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
17
Last Dragon says:
any excuse to post Joe Kines is appreciated. all that other shit made my head hurt thinking. guess that makes me a DC.
June 17th, 2008 at 2:49 pm
18
Big Jon says:
Inside trout and an Over the Top reference? It must be my birthday.
Regarding the 3rd and 16 square in arguement, the DC can go one of two ways. He can play back and hope that futility reigns and they don’t pick up the 1st down with the square in- let’s say the offense doesn’t screw that up 6 out of ten times. He can also opt to play up and arduously defend the square in hoping the offense screws up the deep ball which they will, let’s say, seven of ten times. Here’s a breakdown:
square in: 60% success rate, allows 1st down
deep ball: 30% success rate, allows 1st down and OMG big yards, possibly a TD
BIg plays for points cost people jobs. Of course you don’t have to be a pussy about it and just blitz all the time.
June 17th, 2008 at 5:07 pm
19
Year2-Dave says:
Orson @4:
I compiled some play-by-play listings for Florida in 2007 a while ago, so I went back and looked and the Gators only threw on first down about 20% of the time against Tennessee. It was the lowest percentage of all the games I got around to. In the Auburn game, it was close to 50% passing on first down.
June 17th, 2008 at 5:34 pm