A THING OF BEAUTY IS FOREVER
Spatial mathematics. Topology. At its most abstract, football is math, and particularly wirebrained coordinators understand this. Gutty Little Bruins points us toward this old but still indisuptably essential slice of Norm Chow’s playbook squeezed into a basic article on his system, and again: the inside of Chow’s brain must be a tidy, well decorated room of baroque simplicity and variation in the decorating. This play alone gets the Chessmaster treatment:

It’s called 69 Weak, and Norm Chow has already scored three touchdowns on you with it. The space-brain calculations Chow’s capable of making deplete our word bank when we reach for awestruck adjectives, so just read the damn thing and be duly impressed. If the schemes leave you cold, then at least marvel at the simple genius of Chow’s philosophy.
For our basic passing game we have a strongside vertical, and we have a middle vertical, and a weakside vertical. We have a couple of horizontal stretches and we have a couple of man routes. We have a few one-man routes. We have a route to attack Cover 2, and we have the four verticals game. That is our basic passing game. There I have told you everything we do and I did it in two minutes. Again…we have one strongside vertical route, one middle vertical route, one middle vertical and one weakside vertical. We have two horizontal stretch routes, a man route, four verticals and a Cover 2 beater. That is all we basically do. We attack everyone we play with these basic plays. Our kids know these plays the second day of practice.
It’s just that simple. Now go score forty a game just like Uncle Norm does, and you too can be the premiere signal-caller of your generation. Dear Jebus, thank you for bringing him back.









1
This Is Your Captain Speaking says:
This probably rates up there with nitpicking, but “Baroque” and “simplicity” are mutually exclusive. The Baroque period was known for its drama, grandeur and opulence in areas such as sculpture/architecture/music/literature.
/musicgeek
February 25th, 2008 at 3:06 pm
2
Paragon SC says:
Hmmmmmm…
very nice, but what are all those lines and arrows???
good luck making that work without an offensive line. That QB is going to be running for his life all season.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:07 pm
3
ThreenOut says:
Am I reading that correctly, that the slot back/RB whatever is running the width of the field and back?
If so…. Chow’s a tricky Chinaman. Not that he wasn’t already.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
4
Orson Swindle says:
Captain–
Not necessarily. Theme and variation: That’s Bach. Simple repetition elegantly arranged.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
5
3rd says:
well shit that is damn near perfect writing. if he goes blind or for whatever reason quits coaching, he should be an english professor
February 25th, 2008 at 3:14 pm
6
DevilGrad says:
Just like Lombardi, but with that new-fangled forward passing stuff. It will be interesting to see how well it works when his guys aren’t better than their counterparts at eight (or more) out of eleven positions, as was typically the case at USC.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:16 pm
7
Erdinger says:
The Chinaman is not the issue here dude.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:22 pm
8
NRBQ says:
Have to go with the Captain here, O.
Baroque = heavy, over-decorated.
Just sayin’
/Antiquegeek
February 25th, 2008 at 3:23 pm
9
Biggus Rickus says:
What does Bill Callahan have to say in rebuttal? That Chow is a philistine incapable of understanding the sublime complexities of his encyclopedic playbook?
@DevilGrad,
He did pretty well with a bunch of mormons back in the day.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
10
yoyofutbawl says:
That looks like some diagram from my Calculus 101 days, which explains why I’m no Norm Chow.
Does Saban’s mind work this way? Simple & Straightforward?
Nah. Just kiddin.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
11
Cincy says:
wow… I got about halfway through that and needed an aspirin.
I’ll read it again sometime when I’ve had a full night’s rest and can devote my complete mental faculties to reading comprehension.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
12
DC Trojan says:
To elaborate on Paragon’s comments @ 2, take a look at Dictum 5 on the Gutty Little Bruin’s post:
We are going to protect the QB, otherwise nothing works
That’s the crux of it – Chow’s design principle of keeping it simple and allowing the QB to manage simple variations, while advising of mismatches, is perfectly suited to the college game.
However, Matt Leinart wasn’t making those plays on the run for the most part.
It’s not insignificant that when SC finally got going this past season, it was on the strength of a few plays called by Sarkisian (taught as a QB and caller by Chow) and executed behind a healthy-ish OL by Booty.
UCLA’s going to be a hell of a lot better in 08 than in 07, but Olsen still has a glass knee, and Cowan – while tough as old boots – can only take so much of a beating. Neuheisel’s going to have to do much better on squad management to keep things moving along.
Biggus Rickus @ 9 – sure, but that was in the WAC, where they look at defense like Steve Szabo looks at the spread offense.
February 25th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
13
sb says:
…inscrutable asians…
February 25th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
14
Biggus Rickus says:
DC Trojan,
True, but they also played some quality teams tough or beat them outright. Though, to be honest, the ‘90 upset of Miami is the only one I remember. I don’t count the ‘84 team beating a 6-5 Michigan team as an impressive showing.
February 25th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
15
NewAZTiger says:
Uh, so where do chop-blocks fit in?
February 25th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
16
BuckeyeDomer says:
Yeah, it’s easy to win with the basics when you’re working with USC’s talent (three straight #1 classes during Chow’s time). Let’s see how he does with less of a personnel advantage.
February 25th, 2008 at 4:22 pm
17
Biggus Rickus says:
NewAZTiger,
How do you think he plans on protecting the QB this year with a shitty offensive line? Confucius say, Man who not walk, not run through line.
February 25th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
18
ev says:
You only have to look at the 2001 USC season to know what Chow does with lesser talent…6-6 and could only score two FG against Utah.
February 25th, 2008 at 4:56 pm
19
fattus says:
why all the hate? does anyone succeed without protecting the QB, no matter what scheme they run? does anyone succeed consistently when outmatched in talent? i see nothing wrong with this offense.
1. protect the QB
2. read the defense
3. check down largest to smallest gain
4. don’t turn the ball over
that’s the 4 main rules for every single scheme out there. no need to overcomplicate what works. make the right reads and you win that play.
February 25th, 2008 at 5:17 pm
20
robert says:
God I love this shit. Playcalling & drawing up plays is the best. Semi-threadjack–does anyone know any other things I should read to get my geek on about “theory of play design?”
February 25th, 2008 at 5:26 pm
21
Paragon SC says:
@ Fattus
Well, sure…I would agree with that but it all comes down to talent. and ucla may have some nice new talent but they are untested at this level.
I would expect them to be competitive in 2009 but not in 2008. They will be a little better in 2008 but not much, not without an O line to protect the QB so he can “read the defense”, “check down largest to smallest gain” and protect the ball. I’m still not sold that Olson or Cowan is that guy. Chow will make them better no doubt but without protection they will have a hard time succeeding in any scheme.
February 25th, 2008 at 5:30 pm
22
Irwin Fletcher says:
Dude, “Chinaman” is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American, please.
February 25th, 2008 at 5:31 pm
23
twogreattastes says:
The Chinaman who peed on my rug, I can’t send him a bill, so what the fuck are you talking about?
February 25th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
24
GTDave says:
Shut the fuck up, Donny!
February 25th, 2008 at 7:26 pm
25
oc phil says:
Dude, say what you will about Chow’s offense, at least he’s housebroken.
I don’t think the USC fan’s here are dissing NC’s skillz as an OC. But neither are they shaking in fear at his taking over the offense at UCLA. Slick Rick and Co need to show that they can rise to the level of the programs at ASU, Cal and Oregon before USC fans are going to see them as a long term threat.
That Gutty Little Bruins site has some good information on it. I’m glad to see a blog by UCLA fans who are not clueless assholes out of touch with reality.
February 25th, 2008 at 9:18 pm
26
Elliott says:
Awesome post. The site that has the article originally has some excellent articles on it as well.
Chow clearly has the offensive basics worked out well. He puts all the pressure on the receivers to make good reads and lets the gravity of the situation put pressure on the QB. Not a bad plan….
February 26th, 2008 at 1:30 am
27
Irwin Fletcher says:
This isn’t a guy who built the fucking railroads here. He’s just a playcaller.
February 26th, 2008 at 7:36 am