ND RECRUITING: A POOR EXCUSE FOR A RICH IMAGE
The underplayed story from yesterday’s signing day–and again, how a story about Notre Dame got underplayed is beyond us–was the real, legitimate, non wind-aided (Lemming, windmaker) performance of Irish in recruiting. In recent history , when a recruit like Deion Walker wobbled on signing day, the wobble went full-bore wiggle and turned into defection. (Or theft, depending on your perspective cough cough Urban Meyer cough.)
Yet Walker came through for the Irish, who did what teams sometimes actually do on signing day: address needs while flashing the necessary star power. 3-9 may have been the best “help wanted” advertisement imaginable, as Weis himself admitted after the fax machine was turned off and the LOIs in and secure:
“If you really want to take a negative season and turn it into a positive, you say to these guys, ‘Do you want to play? You’re watching the games, right? If you think you can play here, let’s go, and if you don’t, go somewhere else,’ ” Weis said.
Say what you will, he is honest….and in possession of a startling array of moves.

You can always eat your lunch tomorrow. It’ll probably keep if you put it back in the fridge immediately. (We have a theory as to why Notre Dame’s performance yesterday didn’t get the bandwidth it might have gotten, and it has to do with the perpetual comeback the program has been on, and the media fatigue with it, blah blah etc. We’ll be over here with our bag full of obvious insights putting together a theory that though yesterday was very exciting, in the end it’s all about needing the total package to succeed in college football. Blogger cliche heh RTWT LOL!)












33
Rivals has ND from 2002 to present as:
24, 12, 32, 40, 8, 8, 2.
I think its very easy to see how the direction of things happened. Weis’ first year after the SB, was the 40th ranked class, Tys Last class. Sorry but if you feel it is a lame excuse, I don’t think it is. That coupled with the fact that Weis hadnt coached at the college level == disaster.
This year it is expected that ND will compete, will get to a bowl game. I expect the year after that they will be, and beat Top10 competition.
Comment by OpEd — February 11, 2008 @ 8:11 pm
32
Tim- except Urban Meyer.
Comment by Bob Hewko — February 9, 2008 @ 10:32 am
31
I can’t believe we’re still having this argument. Ty’s first class was Davie’s class, not Ty’s. Ty had one great class and two awful ones. They were small and mediocre on signing day and they dropped from there as players disappeared for various reasons. That is why there were no juniors and seniors last year. No one could have won with that many freshmen and sophomores
Comment by tim — February 8, 2008 @ 10:11 pm
30
Weis’ best year came with Willingham’s recruits leading the charge. Last year, with a decided schematic advantage, Weis managed to field an offense that was #110 in passing, #116 in rushing and #117 in scoring.
I’m deeply skeptical of recruiting class rankings, but I haven’t seen anyone put Willingham’s classes in the 100s.
Comment by OhioDawg — February 8, 2008 @ 6:36 am
29
I hate you for that Weis gif. It’ll stick in my brain forever.
Comment by Lawrence Ross — February 8, 2008 @ 4:03 am
28
Are this year’s recruits total morons or what? Since when have either Notre Dame or Alabama been anything more than a history lesson?
Comment by NogginsJefers — February 7, 2008 @ 5:59 pm
27
The longer you look at that gif, the funnier it gets.
Comment by Digital Headbutt — February 7, 2008 @ 5:54 pm
26
PapaLou - the argument is the validity of the rankings that are created the day after LOI day. The vast majority of cfb devotees understand that ND is typically inflated, just as they are in preseason rankings. Loou Holtz has repeatedly remarked on this phenomenon.
You argue your facts well and I have no problem with you.
The question is the set of facts (worthiness of recruiting rankings). Also, ND faced (and still faces) for the past five years at least, a particular problem with numbers at DL. Recruiting rankings simply do not, in a given year, reflect positional shortfalls - they only reflect a bulk number of rating stars, and the flashy speed/skill position player or three.
Last year was on Ty and the ND administration at that time. Period. Knute couldn’t have finessed a winning record with the material CW had. Neither could Charlie Mac, Nick, or Les.
Comment by Ed — February 7, 2008 @ 4:30 pm