EDSBS LABS: WHAT'S GETTING RECRUITS?
by Orson on Feb 4, 2008 3:38 PM EST
28 comments
Remember, this is science. Don't try this at home without years of empirical methods study and statistical analysis seminars. You may, however, click on the image to see a larger version for the home audience.
0 recs |
28 comments
Email
Print
Comments
surprising, I would have thought Titties! Titties! would have played a larger role. Shows what I know.
by ramblin' on Feb 4, 2008 3:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
These are the results you get when you don’t include “bunda” in the list of offered survey responses.
by DevilGrad on Feb 4, 2008 3:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
“The pay” and “Proximity to Dog Track” explains Alabama’s recruiting success over the years.
by hailstate on Feb 4, 2008 3:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Survey design may be at fault here.
by Orson Swindle on Feb 4, 2008 3:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Cocaine fueled orgies isn’t even one of the choices. This design is extremely flawed.
by Biggus Rickus on Feb 4, 2008 3:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
So I guess that graphic won’t make it to broadcast TeeVee, a la 2007 UF play choice spinner.
Also, might want to add “School was only division 1 school to make an offer*”
- ACC only
by Raleigh Urbain on Feb 4, 2008 3:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Free Women’s sports tickets can account for USC’s success – Must be how Leinart met his baby’s momma.
Titties Titties = Tebow’s “gf”
Dog track (and I assume Jai Alai) – bodes well for FL schools altogether. (+2 for UF so far)
The Pay — Don’t look now but with June Jones and good pay, SMU is gonna be back on top! Pony Up!
Free Puppy — Uconn had a great season, is this why? Free Huskies for everyone. In related news, VT decided to discontinue this recrooting incentive.
Flipped Coin - that explains why Duke and Baylor still have teams.
by Brian on Feb 4, 2008 3:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
re: Brian @ #7
Free Puppy Uconn had a great season, is this why? Free Huskies for everyone. In related news, VT decided to discontinue this recrooting incentive.
+1 for subtle Vick reference.
by Geaux Irish on Feb 4, 2008 4:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i refuse to believe boobs (and all that is implicated in that) only equates for 11%.
Poppycock.
by ThreenOut on Feb 4, 2008 4:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
35% for the dog track? I’m guessing there’s a lot of JUCO respondees in the data.
by Flatlander on Feb 4, 2008 4:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
1
“Titties. Titties” is the deal-sealer at institutes of higher learning with Gary Barnett on the payroll. Just ask Katie Hnida (and, yes, my fiance just hit me for typing that).
Speaking of Mr. Barnett, this was some class stuff, ""Katie was not only a girl, she was terrible. OK?"
All your Title VII’s are belong to us.
by Der Schatten on Feb 4, 2008 4:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Free women’s sport tickets in the form of pubic triangulation?
Coincidence, I think not.
by hunglikehussain on Feb 4, 2008 4:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Survey validity in doubt because the chart appears to be the keynote default pie-chart data.
Plus, no bunda.
by Kevin on Feb 4, 2008 5:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I believe the recruiting guru Eazy-E – mentor to UCLA’s coach Eric Scott – cut to the chase when he pointed out that life ain’t nothin but bitches and money.
Accordingly, every recruit who didn’t answer “titties titties” or “the pay” is either lying or lying.
by DC Trojan on Feb 4, 2008 5:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Charlie Weis and the Number One Recruiting Class Dept:
No wonder ND is number one or two right now in footbaw college recruiting…..Charlie has the biggest boobies of everyone out there (Mangino excluded).
by Stacy Keibler Luvs Me on Feb 4, 2008 7:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Poppycock got less than 1%, making it inconsequential to the final result.
Kind of like Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul.
by Rival on Feb 4, 2008 8:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
mp,
Hope that eases the sting of 7-6 next year.
by Biggus Rickus on Feb 4, 2008 8:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Only 11% for titties?
This is obviously the pie chart for Georgia Tech.
by Kanu on Feb 4, 2008 8:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
“The pay and Proximity to Dog Track explains Alabamas recruiting success over the years.”
Says Hail State…..this coming from a fan of a university that employed Jackie Sherrill not long ago.
Alas, all the money and bull balls in the world can’t get enough good kids to come to the shit hole that is Starkville, MS for a run at anything that resembles sustained success.
by SpookyJuice on Feb 4, 2008 9:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
-For the young African American male, who makes up the majority of our team at Tech, I would remind you that Atlanta is essentially “ne plus ultra” in being able to provide the sweet sweet chocolate love.
by Brian on Feb 4, 2008 11:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
@spooky
The irony of your statement is only lost on you…
by lance harbor on Feb 5, 2008 12:05 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Running the sampling on just the Alabama recruits we find:
- BIG titties 22%
- ANY KIND of titties 13%
- All the cornbread you can eat 11%
- Hundred dollar handshakes 10%
- Proximity to dogtrack 10%
- Free 22’s just like D-Mac’s 10%
and the number one reason:
- Get your own Fuck Lion 24%
by Futbawl Fan on Feb 5, 2008 9:06 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I thought an eff lion was part of signing day in the fine print.
by ThreenOut on Feb 5, 2008 9:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wow … a Bama/State threadjack.
And we’d all thought the Tide lowered a bit when declaring Tennessee their true, bitter rival (owing to their ability to still compete with UT).
by Kenny on Feb 5, 2008 11:04 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
