BLOGPOLL: ENDGAME EDITION
The Blogpoll gets closer and closer to something resembling actual knowledge. We submit our draft for customer review. Give us constructive criticism and receive another blogpoll ballot tomorrow, plus an invitation to get a taste of Swindle Ass Ham, the connoisseur’s meat of choice.
Clarifications, addenda, and further invitations to ass-kissing follow.
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LSU | 1 |
| 2 | Oregon | 1 |
| 3 | Oklahoma | 2 |
| 4 | Kansas | — |
| 5 | West Virginia | 2 |
| 6 | Missouri | — |
| 7 | Ohio State | 6 |
| 8 | Georgia | 3 |
| 9 | Arizona State | — |
| 10 | Virginia Tech | 3 |
| 11 | Texas | 4 |
| 12 | Southern Cal | — |
| 13 | Virginia | 3 |
| 14 | Clemson | 4 |
| 15 | Florida | 4 |
| 16 | Boise State | 5 |
| 17 | Tennessee | 9 |
| 18 | Illinois | 8 |
| 19 | Boston College | 9 |
| 20 | Cincinnati | 6 |
| 21 | Kentucky | 5 |
| 22 | Wisconsin | 4 |
| 23 | Connecticut | 15 |
| 24 | South Florida | — |
| 25 | Brigham Young | 1 |
LSU gets the nod over Oregon because they are more talented and do not have the injuries at wideout and running back that the Ducks have. Oh, and Glenn Dorsey’s a gravitational hole in the middle of the defense. We’re trying to avoid pitting the two teams head to head and playing out the matchup in our heads simply because that’s not what this is about at this point–it’s about absolute value. LSU’s just deeper across the board, and has played marginally tougher competition. It’s a call on the margins, but we’re making it. Disagreements may be lodged below; in return, see prior offer of ass ham.
Ohio State falls because tOSU still can’t defend a spread offense with good to great talent working against its defense. (wa-HAIII!!! See that good to great modifier, motherfucker! Taking the Northwestern card right out of your hands. The lotus does not fight the wind, nor does the dragon fear fire! wa-HAIIII!!!) They’re still very, very good, but they ain’t peaking, and that will get you Black Diamond sailing downhill quickly at the end of the year.
Plus look at any of the teams above them and consider their level of play, the general trend, and their over all record: is Ohio State playing above any of them right now? We don’t think so, and thus the nine spot for the Buckeyes.
You don’t get anywhere in this conference without Chan Gailey’s approval. The ACC teams are knotted up in the low teens, but the real deciding factor putting Virginia Tech at the Frank Beamer Event Horizon of the tenth rank (where Va Tech always seems to end up) is their flexilicious victory over FSU at home and the fact that they beat Georgia Tech, indicating that they are not potentially horrible. Virginia and Clemson both lost to the Tryptophan Man himself, Chan Gailey, meaning they can, from time to time, play horrible, horrible football.
Virginia Tech has only played one horrible game, and that was against this week’s current number one.
Florida’s below both of them because the secondary is still capable of bursting into flame at any instant. Do not stare directly at them, as intense attention may cause uncontrollable blazes that last for up to four hours. It’s a liability that has been proven to be too much for even the touchdown-chomping Tebow Smash! attack to overcome.
The rest is a complete mess, but give Illinois some cuddles and another tip to BYU for winning their last six games by a combined score of 190-89. They’ll beat the shit out of another hapless, unsuspecting bowl opponent this year again…like UCLA, for example? That’s got Karl Dorrell written all over it with Sharpie.
No Hawaii. If they beat Boise, we’ll rank them. Until then, they’re out.

1
6 










40
#22-24: games at Hawaii don’t count against the 12+CC max, so it could simply have been a one-game deal.
Comment by zlionsfan — November 14, 2007 @ 5:10 pm
39
Coach Croom say if Mississippi State ain’t ranked after beating Arkansas this weekend, he gonna come here and crash your new server with the sweet sting of his voice.
Comment by fresh — November 14, 2007 @ 9:56 am
38
Ranking UVA ahead of Illinois makes no sense. Virginia’s two losses are terrible (to NC State and Wyoming, ranked #57 and #82, respectively, in Sagarin) and they have only one credible Top 20 win (a one-point home victory over UConn) all season.
Illinois, on the other hand, has one poor loss (to Iowa, ranked #63 in Sagarin) and two highly credible ones (to Missouri and Michigan.) In addition, Illinois is 1-1 v. top-ten teams (OSU; Missouri) and 2-1 v. #10-30 teams. It beat Wisconsin when the Badgers were #5 and Penn State when the Lions were #21. Their play against #1 tOSU on the road was nearly flawless.
Virginia has nothing remotely so impressive on its CV this season.
Comment by Bob Zuppke Lives — November 14, 2007 @ 9:28 am
37
Yeah, UCLA would lose to BYU. Too bad we won’t see that game.
Oh wait, we already did. UCLA beat BYU 27-17. It’s one the Cougers two losses.
Comment by dethwing — November 14, 2007 @ 9:25 am
36
#29: You’ll get your answer on Sept. 20, 2008. Just like Clemson. Just like Boise State. Just like Oklahoma State.
Just remember, it’s always better to lose early.
Comment by UgasTexan — November 14, 2007 @ 9:14 am
35
I really like it. I think you have it this week and reguardless of who is one or two the most important thing is that the two best teams will be playing for a NC.
Comment by Harleyman — November 14, 2007 @ 8:35 am
34
Obviously several people have already called you out for somehow confusing NC State’s victory over UVA as somehow belonging to Chan’s Ramblin Wreck. Just curious if you intended any kind of response to your error or if you are just gonna roll with it?
Comment by Chuck D — November 14, 2007 @ 12:56 am
33
Penn State 38
Wisconsin 7
Brigham Young? A 3 loss South Florida? Come on…
Comment by mattp8498 — November 13, 2007 @ 11:20 pm
32
Oregon over LSU? Kneejerk, dudes, kneejerk.
I don’t expect the folks on this side of the country (the density of Orson’s Florida fanhood would cause the time space continuum to curve around Gainesville, I imagine, which is where I picture this point in cyberspace) to get this right.
Here’s an Oregonian sports reporter on the LSU versus Oregon strengh of schedules:
http://blog.oregonlive.com/ducks/2007/11/juggernaut_schedule_lsu_um_no.html
For a good team, they’ve been lucky more than good, and gotten by on a wing and a prayer far too much for a National Championship contender. National champions should separate a little more - and I’d be on my fiftieth Maalox bottle had I been an LSU fan.
Oregon has a far better quarterback, better head coach, better offensive coordinator, better running back, better time management, better game strategy, better defensive backs and better leadership.
Oregon has the fifth best Red Zone defense in the nation. The defense is not without flaws, they take risks and sacrifice yards for strategic gain. But statistically they look worse than they are - mostly because we pull out our first string so often in 4th quarter garbage time - so some padded numbers there. They’ve faced a stern test in USC, who were hands down better athletes - bigger, faster, stronger. Oregon relies on finesse, speed and skill to beat the greater physical talent frequently on the other side of the ball.
LSU has no significant weak spot, is a balanced team, plays with heart and does not give up. Flynn just doesn’t have quite the judgement and maturity that Dixon does, and that’s where the key difference comes in - better decision-making by the Oregon quarterback and coaches. The LSU kids deserve a better coach, I think. All that gambling and counting on luck will catch up with ya eventually.
Great game, either way.
So don’t, football voters, don’t, please, please for the love of God don’t f*ck it up and screw over Oregon once again, and leave them out of the NC. Please. If there’s any justice in the world. Either way, I’m going to need that Maalox.
Comment by gamedaytribe — November 13, 2007 @ 10:50 pm
31
Spread offense does not equal zone read triple option. Should probably look up the difference.
Comment by Maje — November 13, 2007 @ 10:44 pm