BLOGPOLL, WEEK EIGHT: COVERING THE HINDQUARTERS
You lose points for lutefisk.Polling is becoming like composing the UN’s HDI rankings: at the top, you’ve got indisputably happy football people quibbling over the tiniest and most subjective of details.
Norway: We have universal health care and the highest standards of living in the world.
Denmark: We have the same, and we have butter cookies.
Norway: Your butter cookies suck the nasty diseased taint of our fine pickled fish products.
Denmark: We have liberal sexual mores.
Norway: We, too, have liberal sexual mores, and no rampant kiddie porn problem.
Denmark: Oh yeah? Well, that is a valid point.
Then there’s the middlins, who have one glaring weakness they can’t possibly help, like South Korea’s situation with having a crazy, psychotic, and very well-armed brother just over the fence, or Florida’s dazzlingly talented yet immature youth movement. These are followed by the bottom dwellers of the rest of the top. Think of Hawaii as South Africa: Exotic! Exciting! Awesome relative to its neighbors, but still not punching G8 weight! But have you seen our lions and dazzling gold jewelry!
This week’s abomination is below. One clarification: our ballot below is the corrected ballot, which was not the hasty-as-usual ballot crapped into Brian’s inbox this a.m. that had–among other errors, a rise in Cincy after a loss, a few curious bunches of teams in the same conference, and a vote for ice cream at eight. Because we really, really wanted some ice cream this morning. Again, we remind you:
1. The arrows mean nothing.
2. We fucked up.
3. We’re clearly an ass. Asses. Damn plural first person…
Off with our heads, and on with the ballot…
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio State | — |
| 2 | Oklahoma | — |
| 3 | South Florida | — |
| 4 | LSU | — |
| 5 | South Carolina | — |
| 6 | Boston College | — |
| 7 | Kentucky | — |
| 8 | Arizona State | 1 |
| 9 | Kansas | 1 |
| 10 | Missouri | 2 |
| 11 | California | 2 |
| 12 | Oregon | 2 |
| 13 | Texas | 2 |
| 14 | Southern Cal | 1 |
| 15 | Florida | 1 |
| 16 | Penn State | 1 |
| 17 | Auburn | 1 |
| 18 | Cincinnati | 10 |
| 19 | Texas Tech | — |
| 20 | West Virginia | — |
| 21 | Tennessee | — |
| 22 | Illinois | — |
| 23 | Virginia Tech | — |
| 24 | Hawaii | — |
| 25 | Wisconsin | — |
Clarifications, errata, and outright shames.
WHA OK? Yes, Oklahoma. If you wonder what the methodology is, it’s a hybrid of resume balloting and truthiness subject to coffee, mood, and whatever we saw in the intestines of our daily pigeon kill this morning. (Augury–it’s what’s for breakfast.)
Which means that at this point, it’s absolute value voting, and that’s the absolute value we see. Boston College helped this by not trouncing Notre Dame, or even scoring as many points as Purdue did against the Irish. And South Florida could prove us very wrong by running Rutgers over with their Charismatic Fiero of Tampa Bay Area triumph. But for the top ten, that’s our value, with two notable creepers…
The last midgets up the hill. Arizona State may have peaked on the year with this ballot, since they’re both going into the grinding end of their conference schedule. Kansas, though, could pop up a few more spots over the rest of their angel-soft schedule. Their real bid for top 5 comes with a defeat of resilient Missouri and an appearance in the Big 12 Championship game. For an instant, the picture of Kansas in the national title game just flashed across our consciousness. We saw the Eternal Footman hold our coat, and snicker, and in short, we were afraid.
Climbers: Pretty much anyone between the 11-20 spots, really. We think brand name bargains are a-plenty down here, since many are retooling in angry fashion. Texas has begun this process, and we think Florida will do the same. This is the point in the movie where the soft version of the heroic theme song is playing, and they’re working out in montage at the gym like a madman. Or puking their puppet guts up in an alley in a drunken wallow of self-pity (see: USC.)
Texas Tech is always the dark horse in the Big 12, but keep an eye on them for real now that their defense isn’t playing under some exotic curse.
The rest? A glorious mess, of course.

1
2 










25
Anything that can accidentally turn into SOAP if you don’t cook it right will never be on the menu here. I’ll leave that shit to Tyler Durden.
Comment by Brian O'Blivion — October 17, 2007 @ 1:04 pm
24
Actually - USC just isn’t very good this year, regardless of injuries, that’s why they’re getting dinged.
Comment by Gentleman Masher — October 17, 2007 @ 1:01 pm
23
Frustrations, Frustrations Dept:
1) Polish Sausage: Is it just me, or is USC-w getting dinged too much in the polls lately? USC has been playing with one arm tied behind its back, given its ridiculous number of injuries. I think there is enough time in the season for many of the wounded to come back and put the scare back in the higher ranked Bs-BCS teams in and out of the Pac 10.
2) Viva Las Vegas: I checked the Vegas lines, and they still have USC-w as one of the favorites to do well in this Bs-BCS mess. But the football commentators, both pro and amatuer, are missing the boat big-time on this thing.
Comment by Stacy Keibler Luvs Me — October 17, 2007 @ 12:58 pm
22
I guess the “Legacy” line of thought is too powerful. Many people (coaches & voters) would rather stick with a program with history (OSU) than one without, despite what would appear to be better wins. But hey, objectivity is hard to come by sometimes.
On the same token, when you have a coaching staff like OSU’s, it’s hard not to think they are a good team based on coaching and past recuiting efforts. USF hasn’t had the same level of recuiting prowess as OSU in it’s history, and has risen like a lightning bolt up the rankings and has been helped lately by the fall of so many other teams.
Plus, USF has a nasty habit of turnovers. Grothe can make some silly/dumb passes at times and fumbles are a way of life. The thinking probably is that eventually some team is going to make USF pay for those mistakes.
Comment by The Bull-Gator — October 17, 2007 @ 12:56 pm
21
#19 - The Wannstache not on the sidelines? Sounds like Pitt’s chances of pulling the upset just got alot better!
Comment by Gentleman Masher — October 17, 2007 @ 12:49 pm
20
Guessing you have covered this in the past Orson, but your poll seems more of an attempt at predicting the outcome of the season and less of a reflection of each team’s resume to date. I would think that it should be the other way around.
Using USF as an example…
I know that you and others expect USF to fall off at some point — some as soon as this weekend against Rutgers. But still, doesn’t their undefeated status including wins at Auburn and over WFV mean that they have accomplished the most so far?
Has OSU really shown more than USF this year? What about Oklahoma and their loss to Colorado?
At any rate, I would suggest that USF has won the most impressive games so far and if they are a pretender, then they will fall on their own and should be moved down then. But suppose you and the pundits are wrong and USF runs the slate? Then are you willing to put them ahead of and undefeated OSU? Keep in mind that OSU has 1 AP ranked team on their ENTIRE schedule, and that is Michigan at #25, which will likely not be ranked at all after losing to OSU. I mean the big ten may as well be a mid major conference this year and OSU is going to walk right into the Superdome with no credentials.
This predictive mentality is what I would expect a renegade site like EDSBS to be trying to fight and not perpetuate.
Comment by TIGERinATL — October 17, 2007 @ 12:37 pm
19
You can’t make this stuff up.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3067426
Comment by Bobby Lowder's Checkbook — October 17, 2007 @ 12:30 pm
18
Orson,
Isn’t Nick Saban actually the GOD of Mammon.
Comment by Bobby Lowder's Checkbook — October 17, 2007 @ 12:27 pm
17
With all due respect to Boardmaster Brian (because I would agree with him, depending on the flavor of the ice cream), Penn State at 16, but Michigan unranked? Wisconsin still ranked?
Comment by Anon — October 17, 2007 @ 12:20 pm
16
At this point, you could almost put anyone from the top ten into the top spot, because it’s pretty unlikey that ANYONE will escape this season undefeated with the possible exception of Kansas, and even then . . . who aside from Kansas homers would put them up top?
BTW, any takers for this domesday MNC scenario:
USF v. Kansas
We could call it the “Fuck It, Who Knows” Bowl, brought to you by Chik-fil-a
Comment by The Bull-Gator — October 17, 2007 @ 12:19 pm
15
I’ll take Ice Cream with the points to beat Michigan.
Comment by Boardmaster Brian — October 17, 2007 @ 12:08 pm
14
Jesusgod, if I lutefisk was appropriate adjectivity for my wife, life wouldn’t be nearly this sunny.
Comment by Rather be in Amsterdam — October 17, 2007 @ 12:07 pm
13
I think this screwed up midseason should be the perfect excuse to reinsert Duke at #25.
Comment by Allahver Fist — October 17, 2007 @ 11:52 am
12
But beware - Once your girlfriend/wife discovers that you are willing to eat lutefisk, your excuses for not supplying oral sex evaporate.
Comment by Sean — October 17, 2007 @ 11:51 am
11
Uff Da!
Lutefisk - It builds character. Bump Norway over Denmark just for that reason, butter cookies be damned.
Comment by Sean — October 17, 2007 @ 11:48 am
10
S. Carolina could have beaten UNC by 3 TDs if they had wanted, they just chose not to (thus, ruining my 2-team parlay…@#$%!).
Anyway - I hope Wisconsin enjoys the plush confines of the Top 25. The ORV Hotel, with it’s 10 year old mattresses, is beckoning.
Comment by Gentleman Masher — October 17, 2007 @ 11:43 am
9
That’s what I’ve been saying…..haruspicy is by far the best method of coming up with a blogpoll ballot.
Comment by wilbur — October 17, 2007 @ 11:42 am
8
I come for the football, but the bachelor of English in me stays for the Eliot references.
Comment by Dave — October 17, 2007 @ 11:35 am
7
Defense gets them that fifth vote. But that’s right now. If they lose again, we’ll happily kick them down the hill.
Comment by Orson Swindle — October 17, 2007 @ 11:34 am
6
“We realize we’re not the sixth-best team in the country,” Steve Spurrier said Tuesday.
So Orson took his savior’s words to heart and voted us…fifth? Really? Did anyone out there even watch the UNC game?
Comment by Dr. StrangeCock — October 17, 2007 @ 11:33 am
5
You left UGA out of this just so you could do that ‘dazzling gold jewelry bit’, eh?
Comment by Rather be in Amsterdam — October 17, 2007 @ 11:31 am
4
Oklahoma at 2? Ewww. I’ve seen this from a few bloggers and I don’t get it. I understand the love for LSU, the other SEC teams and Oregon/Cal. But why OU? Their loss is worse than the ones suffered by LSU, USCe, KY, Oregon and West Virginia. Heck, it’s worse than Tennessee’s two losses combined!
They should’ve lost to Missouri but the Tigers self-destructed. Texas is no good. I’m just lost on the OU love.
Comment by Edsall is God — October 17, 2007 @ 11:29 am
3
Kansas will stumble this weekend and i will be there to witness it in all its glory
Comment by babaoje — October 17, 2007 @ 11:28 am
2
Damn. If we could lose to Oklahoma 2 more times we could get into the top 5.
sigh
Comment by bitterhorn — October 17, 2007 @ 11:26 am
1
I’m pretty sure Mrs. DG’s uncle owns one of those tee-shirts.
Comment by DevilGrad — October 17, 2007 @ 11:25 am