BLOGPOLL, WEEK SEVEN: FURTHER MADNESS
At some junction in the season, rank arbitrary judgment must peek its snout into the rankings and coexist with the scanty evidence of a half-season’s evidence. Nowhere is this more evident than in our poll this week, which we divide into:

The VIP. A velvet rope stretches across the poll around the seven or eight spot, depending on the week. Inside? A group of stone ballaz grippin’ and sippin’ only the finest promethazine and watching round mango rump maneuver in only the iciest of fashion. This is Prada, bitch. Don’t spill the Dom on it. Think Kanye West around right now: bloated, rolling in cash, and either poised to reign or fixing to plummet into a pit of self-indulgence.
9-19 :The madding crowd. People who either were in the VIP and lost their juice, or mad angry toughsters on the way in and gunning. The most unstable of the lot, they’re liable to get skunked in a bad street deal one week and then run savage game the next three matchups in a row. Darwinian competition and sheer ambiguity down here.
20-25: Just happy to be there, ceremonial invites. The odd paparazzi photo you see of Tony Robbins hanging out with 50 Cent, or perhaps old Studio 54 pics where Anwar Sadat is seen dancing with Bianca Jagger? That’s who these people are, the odd fits making an appearance either on the way to the madding crowd level or diving out to the nether-regions of middling college football. You’re name’s not on the list…but my, you’re flashing enough leg to get the bouncer’s attention. Come on in for a bit, mama.
Apologies, half-justifications, and capricious judgments admitted below.
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LSU | — |
| 2 | Ohio State | 2 |
| 3 | California | — |
| 4 | Oklahoma | 6 |
| 5 | Boston College | 1 |
| 6 | South Carolina | 7 |
| 7 | Missouri | 9 |
| 8 | South Florida | — |
| 9 | Oregon | 4 |
| 10 | West Virginia | 2 |
| 11 | Southern Cal | 9 |
| 12 | Arizona State | 8 |
| 13 | Florida | 2 |
| 14 | Texas | 3 |
| 15 | Cincinnati | — |
| 16 | Kentucky | 7 |
| 17 | Illinois | 9 |
| 18 | Kansas | 6 |
| 19 | Florida State | 7 |
| 20 | Auburn | 6 |
| 21 | Wisconsin | 14 |
| 22 | Hawaii | 3 |
| 23 | Virginia Tech | 3 |
| 24 | Tennessee | 2 |
| 25 | Stanford | 1 |
LSU is number one. Honestly, we feel honored to have been at that game Saturday night. Pat Forde called it the matchup of the year thus far, and we cannot disagree with the Sapient Forehead on this count. Both teams played heroic football.
Ohio State over Cal. Cal can’t compete defensively with Ohio State. Ohio State can’t compete offensively with Cal. Cal’s played a tougher schedule thus far, but their defense will cost them a game prior to bowl season in point-giddy PAC-10 play. Ohio State enjoys the privilege of being in the Bobby Bowden 1996 seat as the only balanced team in an uneven conference. They’re the slightly–oh, just ever that much more so–better team at the moment.
One loss Oklahoma over BC. Another value call. No apologies. Oklahoma’s a machine that threw a piston at high altitude in a freaky situation in Boulder. Boston College is riding Matt Ryan until his arm misfires–which, not being Vince Young and therefore being human, it will once.
Exeunt USC. Their spot’s a bit arbitrary and unnecessarily punitive. But shit, you just lost your starting qb in effect and coughed up a win to Stanford. Like an orchid, we have no idea where to put you in our taxonomy: in the flowering dicots? In with the asparagus family? A very lazy form of leafy mammal? WHAT ARE YOU USC? SCIENCE DEMANDS ANSWERS!
Florida and Texas: In knots over both teams. Both could be out of the poll in two weeks, or back in the fringes of the VIP. Science again throws up its hands, since both lost close rivalry games. Florida’s lost their two games by a combined 7 points, though, while Texas got blown out by K-State and seems more discombobulated than simply “inexperienced.”
Dropped: all of those, really? Yes, really. Georgia’s a mongrel mess. Virginia Tech remains one of the most treacherous poll picks in the nation, and Clemson’s preparing to stage their annual “Passion of the Tommy” play to resurrect his chances of keeping his job. Rutgers’ worst fears about Mike Teel have come true. Kansas State is as maddeningly inconsistent.
The 15 Minutes Of Fame Spot at 25 goes to: Stanford. The 25 spot is for funzies, and Stanford is certainly owed some ludic tribute for their defeat of USC.
WAAA WAAAA WAAA BUT HOW COULD YOU???? Yes, you’re right. The rest is a total disaster, as usual. So is your poll. We’re faithfully building our Sim City of a poll like the rest of you, but we left the “disasters” option in the menu on for 2007. We promise to turn that off next year so we can build some of those superb arcologies we’ve been hearing about.

Dammit, it just blew up the SEC! AGAIN! We’ve got to turn that off next time.
90 Replies »
Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

2
4 










90
#76 BAB–way too much foobaw to go to worry, though I know we all still hear the snivelin’ of Ass Clown Mack Brown whining his way into OUR 2004 R@$e B@wl
Sir Ginho, down boy…’cause when the Zooker gets a little bit of speed in his program & all of a sudden he’s rolling the conference like he’s cranked on taffy–it’s an indictment of your conference’s strength
Watching the B11 network is like watching any other conference with your Tivo on 1/2 speed. And I’ll see your Gonzales & Ginn (on milk carton) & raise you our Marshawn
Comment by Growwler — October 11, 2007 @ 11:53 pm
89
it’s = its
Comment by Out of Conference — October 11, 2007 @ 2:35 pm
88
#84 - Are you smoking crack? “Miami (FL) is a quality, but not great, team. That’s your average upper tier, just short of LSU/Fla., team in the SEC.”
A supposed second-tier SEC team is about to kick the shit out of a team this weekend that made Miami it’s prison bitch last weekend.
Comment by Out of Conference — October 11, 2007 @ 2:33 pm
87
simcity is cool
Comment by cockengr — October 11, 2007 @ 12:40 pm
86
Why do you idiots gush love all over Ohio State?
Comment by Hossnfeffer — October 11, 2007 @ 10:26 am
85
Putting up those silly numbers against the likes of North Texas, Tulsa, and Utah State doesn’t mean much. The Miami win is a quality win, but Miami is so schizophrenic that it’s unclear if they’re a good team that occasionally plays poorly or a bad team that occasionally plays well. I agree that the Texas game is a huge game, regardless of how good or bad Texas is this year, simply because it’s a rivalry game.
That being said, I was pretty high on Oklahoma after the first few weeks of the season. They looked like they could legitimately go unbeaten and challenge LSU. I’m not so sure now. I don’t necessarily buy the “thin air” argument, either. Yes, the defense was gassed by the fourth quarter (as they gave up 17 points), but the offense theoretically should have been pounding away all game. The offense didn’t live up to the billing it received after slaughtering some flimsy opponents. Either way, rankings this week won’t matter a whole lot if they don’t win out. They play a tough Missouri team this week, so we’ll know more in a couple days.
Comment by Beardguy — October 11, 2007 @ 9:45 am
84
83- I don’t think OU suffers that much with a move to the Pac Ten or SEC. Miami (FL) is a quality, but not great, team. That’s your average upper tier, just short of LSU/Fla., team in the SEC. Texas, when it comes to play (see the OU texas game and the second half of TCU. other than that, it’s just all good times), is up there. If you’ve ever been to an OU texas game, you know that a quarterback has to have a certain amount of experience and presence to come out well. Simms never did, it took Vince Young an ass kicking to learn it, and Oklahoma has lost the game due to that kind of inexperience. Watching Bradford last week, and through the season, this guy doesn’t play nor act (the later being of more importance) like a freshman. As for tailback, that was the least of my concerns heading into the season. They’re just as productive and they’re five deep. Not better than Peterson, but just as productive. The only real concern is depth at linebacker and the mike-linebacker’s play over the middle/deep-middle zone against the pass. The TE’s are killing them on post routes and slot recievers on the slants. I’m not trying to sell OU as a national champion, but I do think (if you’ve watched OU in comparison to LSU, Fla., and so on) that they’re a lock for top five. Had they not fallen asleep at the wheel, just as Fla. and LSU have done (though LSU managed to wake up before bursting into flames), would you still be questioning them? I legit loss to a better team is one thing, a fluke is another. I’m pretty certain that the Colorado game was a fluke.
Comment by them oklahoma — October 11, 2007 @ 8:47 am
83
I would agree with you that OU doesn’t lack big game experience, except that they are starting a freshman at the most critical position on the field and lost their best running back to the draft. It’s little things like “losing your best player and having no experience at vital positions” that can cost you games. Yes, Bradford has played well, but at some point he’s going to make the same mistakes all freshman make. It’s practically inevitable. Just consider yourself lucky that OU isn’t in a strong conference this year, like the SEC or PAC 10.
Comment by Beardguy — October 11, 2007 @ 8:21 am
82
Yes, we lost 41-14 in our second MNC game of the decade. We won the first one.
As for Cal, congratulations! You’re no longer irrelevant!
Comment by Sir Ginho of the 216 — October 11, 2007 @ 7:28 am
81
#80
What would Cal have been beaten by? Florida must feel great with all these other teams living vicariously through them.
Get a clue.
Comment by justanotherbuckeye — October 11, 2007 @ 7:07 am