CURIOUS INDEX: 9/19/07
![]() |
||
|
Crank dat soulja boy! Texas may have problems: a starting linebacker who can’t tackle, bizarro backroom scheduling deals that have them going to Orlando to nearly lose a game to an upstart UCF team, team members on that purple drank, and a blogger snagged in a steroid scandal. But watch them DOOOOOO!!! Crank dat soulja boy!
Well, he is Phil Fulmer, after all. Fred Thompson, who has never really been seen in the same place as Tennessee head coach Phil Fulmer, slammed his door on a potential swing vote in the South Carolina primaries by announcing himself as a lifelong Vol fan too old to change at this point. One South Carolina pol responded: S.C. Rep. Michael Thompson, R-Anderson, is a major Fred Thompson supporter (although the two are not related) and a major Gamecock fan. Michael Thompson was displeased to hear his candidate’s comments. “We’re going to have a little talk about that,” Thompson said. “That’s all right. He’ll be saying that after the Ol’ Ball Coach rings up about half-a-hundred on him.” Thompson attempted to make up ground by reiterating his stance that he was the most anti-gay and anti-Muslim-witch candidate, a remark that drew thunderous applause from the torch-carrying crowd. He then asked someone to get him a beer, ’scro. Condolences: To the family of Nate Hill and those at Auburn mourning the former defensive tackle this morning. The 41 year old Hill died yesterday of unknown causes. Hill was a letterman at Auburn from 1984-1987. No need to watch: Skynet’s already simulated the whole thing. The incomparable Phil Steele has handily eliminated your need to watch the rest of the 2007 football season by simulating out the conference records in his massive, data-crammed macroprocessor of a brain. One surprise: he’s got Cal going 5-4 the rest of the way in the Pac-10. We’d love to comfort you, Cal fans, and jibe away at how ludicrous this is. But Phil’s phoning this in from his luxury condo in the future. Get busy painting NO FUTURE on the walls. Nebraska’s loss to Husker fans has beefy cornnecks screaming…um…Mammy?
You can’t leave, Rhett!Again: you’re glad he exists. Steve Spurrier on his voting methodology this week in his poll ballot: “Between LSU, Oklahoma and Southern Cal, it’s pretty much a coin flip,” he said. “But since LSU is in the SEC and we’re playing them this week, I voted them No. 1.” Brazen honesty. Blatant self-interest. Click-clack, motherfuckers. He’s the Scarlett O’Hara of football coaches, and shall never go hungry again–though we’re guessing that on Saturday his own private Tara is about to be razed, sacked, looted, and fricasseed by a werewolf with a chainsaw for a dick wearing purple and yellow. And if that image of Steve Spurrier in a hoop dress being chased by whatever you imagine said werewolf to look like through flames and toppling white columns doesn’t run in your head all day…then we haven’t done our job, dammit.
|
||
![]() |
||



You can’t leave, Rhett!








101
Out of Conference says:
Phil (God bless him) has SC losing to UGA (didn;t happen) and us playing at the Swamp this year even though the game is officially in Columbia this year. Something big is about to happen.
Regarding Fred Thompson – a local county (Spartanburg, SC) GOP chairman called Fred’s wife a “Trophy wife” and Fred took offense earlier this week. Fred should stick with making sure Jack Ryan gets on the Dallas and leave politics to others.
September 19th, 2007 at 12:30 pm
102
Slims says:
I think Phil Steele’s a genius, but he phoned that bullshit in.
As a Cal alum, I’ve got to give him credit. It is true that the Tedford Bears have never won a game at Oregon or at UCLA. It is also true that November at ASU is a definitive “upset special”. It is also true that USC is… USC. Those are the four losses that are predicted for Cal. But when you look at the facts…
- ASU has NEVER beat Cal with Tedford at the helm.
- The last two games at Oregon were night games (Eugene is dangerous at night with crowd noise and fog) and were decided by less than 10 points – this game takes place at noon.
- The last two UCLA games in Pasadena have been decided in the fourth quarter and were lost due to special teams blunders that have been so far non-existant in Cal games.
When you couple that with the fact that ASU is dramatically overhyped and Oregon is getting credit for dismantling a Michigan team that is, well, awful, it just doesn’t make sense.
There are other HUGE discrepancies, including a projected Michigan victory over Penn State in the Big 10/11, Boston College going undefeated, Alabama finishing out 7-1 in conference play, and an unheard of amount of symmetry in the conference rankings that just makes little to no sense.
Maybe this is Phil Steele’s mid-season joke report.
September 19th, 2007 at 1:34 pm
103
Joey Jo-Jo Jr. Shabadoo says:
those ut players look like they’re doing the african anteater ritual.
September 19th, 2007 at 2:10 pm
104
NoleinTexas says:
Wooooo….Morehead!
September 19th, 2007 at 2:17 pm
105
Mr Pelican Pants says:
#103
Man, me and you are telepathic. I was thinking about “Can’t Buy Me Love” scene after I watched the vid. The only thing missing was the dance move where they are shaking their hands in their hair, or, er , dreads. Why are dreaklocks making a comeback? Is there that much weed available that you have to become Rastafarian to smoke it? Oooo do dat Rasta Boy…
September 19th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
106
I've Got a Herd On says:
There’s no way it will happen, but I really hope Steele’s predictions come true.
1 undefeated team from every BCS conference? There would be immediate unanimous support for a playoff in ‘08.
September 19th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
107
skinnyphatman says:
You almost had me on that Texas video. Kudos to who ever put together the photo shop or whatever media used to fake up that video…
What?!!?!…
No way…
Seriously?!?!..
That shit is real?
I am… Well.. I am fuckin speechless. Perhaps if the UT D, put as much time into their football practice as they did to Crank dat soulja boy!… Well, you know…
September 19th, 2007 at 5:41 pm
108
oc phil says:
#102 & #106: I think is is clear that the methodology is to take Steele’s pre–season rankings for the conference and then just assume that there are never any deviations from them. Then he corrects for the games that have been played to this point in the season. That will make the table look less orderly later in the season, since obviously in the real world upsets are going to happen.
Cal was the team that I disagreed with most. I could see them losing to ASU or Oregon or UCLA (before last weekend at least) but not all 3. There are a whole lot of plausible scenarios for the Pac 10 though. I’m hoping for an unbeaten USC and one loss Cal to both make BCS bowls.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:22 am