ROUT 66: A DECADE AGO
Witness a rout, and you will never forget it. It sears itself into the memory like walking in on your parents having sex, or seeing your dog hit by a car, or walking in on your parents having sex with your dog before all three are crushed by an 18-wheeler careening through the wall of the bedroom. (The last in that series only comes close to describing the 1996 Fiesta Bowl.)
Burnt Orange Nation reminds us to never forget these moments by commemorating the anniversary of “Rout 66,” the 66-3 taxidermy of the Mackovic-era Texas Longhorns by the UCLA Bruins in Austin. Texas committed eight turnovers that day in losing what might be the greatest beatdown ever between two major, respectable D-1 programs ever. It also induced instant allergic reactions to Skip Hicks’ name from Texas fans, showing that one man’s laughable NFL flop is another’s anthrax.
Now in jumboretropixelvision!
The game also should mark the hazard of prognostication from a single data point. Defeat can be a deceptive thing for all concerned: Mackovic left in a maelstrom of flames, his career trajectory stunted for good by the 4-7 season. He yielded the field to Mack Brown, whose departure from the UNC program put the still-sleeping giant of the ACC in a trough of much mediocrity and few peaks from that point to the present. Brown built a corporation in the wake of the loss: Longhorns, Inc., eventually shedding the reputation as a big game choke artist on the legs of Vince “Football Jesus” Young and cementing his place in the coaching firmament on the way.
Success deceives, too: UCLA would win the Pac-10 title in ‘98, but UCLA peaked on the national scene with the game. Bob Toledo would ride four straight mediocre seasons to his resignation in 2002, eventually ending up at Tulane and handing the program over to Karl Dorrell, who has spent his entire coaching career in the shadow of the Golden Unicycle-riding Humanitarian, Pete Carroll and the official team of ESPN, the USC Trojans.
Beware false narratives is the point: what should have been a landmark game turned out to have effects far less predictable than one might think. In the end, it gave Texas a national championship and left UCLA in much the same spot they were in before, program-wise. Texas did do UCLA one favor in return, of course—they beat USC in the process of winning the title.









1
dave says:
So academic.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:15 pm
2
HeadThief says:
Oh, how I loved that game. Part of the prob here was the overhype of Texas that season. The previous year, after upsetting the Huskers in the B12 championship game, they were pasted by the Hokies in the Sugar Bowl. They lost a lot of defensive starters to graduation, if memory serves me correctly. But somehow after laying an egg in the polls and losing a lot of talent to graduation, they moved up in the polls in the offseason. Wow, history repeats itself, doesn’t it?
September 13th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
3
Orson Swindle says:
We have to get that way every now and then to keep our dork license current.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
4
M says:
Whatever. Texas still sucks. So does Mack Brown. How’s that for academia.
What have they done in a decade? Take away VY and you have just another overrated, archaic Big 12 team with snotty fans.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
5
Papa Lou BSU says:
Thanks a lot, Orson.
You just gave every Chicago Bears fan on here a rage seizure by unknowingly having us watch a clip of that fraud Cade McNown…
“QB most ready for the NFL in the ‘98 draft,” my ass.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:27 pm
6
Chris says:
Ah, Route 66. I was a bright-eyed, idealistic, hung-over sophomore. The hype for this game was huge. You see, Texas football had just made it back to the national scene.
What I do remember is that it was the longest, most horrific sporting event imaginable. Combining 95 degree Texas heat with direct sunlight, with 9 UCLA touchdowns, and ABC’s endless media timeouts made for hell on earth.
After the game, the students who stayed the whole 4.5 hours with the sun beating down from one side looked like a genetic experiment between lobster and man: Half bright red, half normal skin.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:34 pm
7
John says:
Oklahoma beating Texas A&M 77-0 is the biggest beatdown between two respectable schools in recent years with the 2005 Big Twelve title game as second.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:35 pm
8
oc phil says:
I think that game just proves that programs tend to drift back to their natural level. Texas is part of the “college football royalty” (to use Mandel’s term) and they returned to their natural position based on brand name and talent pool of contending for a MNC most years.
UCLA has been a mid-level school and while it is going to have good years from time to time it isn’t part of that College Football Royalty. They were in USC’s shadow when USC was winning MNC’s in the 1920’s and 30’s and 60’s and 70’s and today. They are going to contend for the Pac 10 some years and once in a great while they are going to be in the running for a MNC. But there is no reason to expect them to ever join the top tier of programs.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:37 pm
9
Chris says:
Texas has been just fine over the last decade. Aside from a couple of goof-ups in conference championship games, Texas is at the top of almost any metric you can devise for judging football teams. Nice troll.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:39 pm
10
dc bruin says:
Awesome. Thanks for the memories.
I’ve still got my “UCLA: Texas State Champs, 1997″ T-shirt. The back says “UCLA 161, Texas schools 36″ because we beat Houston 66-10 and Texas A&M (Cotton Bowl) 29-23 that year.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:43 pm
11
M says:
You’re right. After their fantastic finish last season… and the amazing athleticism of “Colt McCoy” they really did deserve to be ranked so highly this year. /troll
September 13th, 2007 at 1:46 pm
12
Frenzy says:
I can no longer think about John Mackovic without thinking of Lee Corso inexplicably gushing about how he is “the most handsome coach in the NCAA.”
September 13th, 2007 at 1:46 pm
13
Mo'Cee dranking da fordee says:
#4. Take away any team’s top player and they all turn into a mediocre team with snotty fans.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:48 pm
14
gerry dorsey says:
i don’t know….i think #4 is on to something.
September 13th, 2007 at 1:54 pm
15
Terry says:
Just asking – of the 22 starters for Texas on that day, how many got their degrees? Same for UCLA.
Just asking – I really don’t know.
Does it make a difference?
September 13th, 2007 at 1:57 pm
16
Brian says:
Johnny Mack’s latest stint was as the coach of the American Football world cup, which we easily won, with quite an eclectic group of players. What DUMB competition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Football_World_Cup
September 13th, 2007 at 2:01 pm
17
Brewster Crew says:
#7-
Does that make Minnesota George IV of Ireland?
September 13th, 2007 at 2:01 pm
18
Brewster Crew says:
#7-
Does that make Minnesota George VI of Ireland?
September 13th, 2007 at 2:01 pm
19
okiedomer says:
Orson,
Thank you very much for reminding us all of how much texass sucks. They are perennial pre-season contenders who inevitably give up mid-way through the season. Desipte tons of talent, they have no heart (except Vince Young) and thus they rarely compete for a MNC, much less for a Big XII Championship. It is good to remind your average football fan–who is well acquanted with texass’ season-ending give ups to OU, A&M, the Leach Pirates and K-State–that texass is perfectly capable of giving up in an OOC game.
I predict that Sam Bradford will systematically disect what they laughably claim to be a secondary and hand the Bonghorns their third 50ish point loss to the Sooners this decade. I look forward to the cry out of Austin afterwards and the less-than-loyal Bonghorn fanbase rekindling the calls for Mack Brown’s head that were only temporarily suspended by virtue of Vince Young.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:02 pm
20
Jeff from LA says:
#12, I don’t really know if that is true. Which player on LSU, OU, or USC which you take away to make them into a mediocre team? I think you could take almost any one player on any of those teams, replace them with an average player at their position, and they would still be an above average team.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:03 pm
21
Orangeblood says:
At least one of the four wins that season was over Mobilehoma. Ah, hate week. Catch the fever!
September 13th, 2007 at 2:03 pm
22
Ben Million says:
Indeed, I’ll never forget the first time I witnessed an almighty beatdown: Washington State 77, Southwestern Louisiana 7. Granted this was not a matchup of two bigtime programs; it was a Rose Bowl team against a university that had to CHANGE ITS NAME shortly after this defeat.
Oh, and another memorable ass-whooping was my friend Jared vs. Generic Varsity Quarterback after an 8th grade dance.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:04 pm
23
Sabanite says:
FYI:
Mack Brown coached at Tulane prior to the stint at UNC. So the UCLA-Texas whipping could be considered the best thing to ever happen to both a former Tulane coach (opened the door to Texas for Brown) and the current Tulane coach (monumental victory for Toledo)….
The point? Whether you are a current or former Tulane coach, the highlight of your career will occur somewhere else…unless you are a Bowden
September 13th, 2007 at 2:05 pm
24
R.D. Baker - Retired Blogger says:
I knew I recognized M from somewhere…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pop_Muzik
Which begs the question… what the hell does a British New Wave 1-hit wonder know about American football?
September 13th, 2007 at 2:07 pm
25
dave says:
I was seriously hoping that we could get some more Walt-isms on this post. There’s so much Orange around these parts for hate week…
September 13th, 2007 at 2:11 pm
26
okiedomer says:
#19
Yes, you are correct–one of your 4 wins (and one of our 8 losses) that year was to texass. You were able to accomplish the same feat as KU the week before: beating a very bad OU team by 3.
Of course, your only VY-less Big 12 title came the previous season when you shamed the whole state of texass by losing to John Blake, giving him 1/3 of his total wins that season. This will never not be funny, and you should still be ashamed of losing to the worst coach in the history of college football.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:14 pm
27
Dexy's Midnight Runners says:
#23: You’d be surprised.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:16 pm
28
Rex Cramer says:
Orson you neglect to mention that fucla had it’s own 66 point beat down (66-19) a couple years ago at the hands of USC.
Ok, that’s not really relevant to the discussion. But after last years choke against the gutty little cubs I’ve got nothing else.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:22 pm
29
okiedomer says:
#24
Walt wouldn’t fit in with the texass crowd. His blend of unbridled anger and ignorance doused with middle school insults is more suitable to an Aggie, be it of the texass or Oklahoma variety. Bonghorns, on the other hand, get a lot of practice at sounding knowledgable and pretentious due to their many late-night debates on whether Afghan Kush Berry is indeed danker than the Northern Lights/Trainwreck hybrid they got from some heady brah on 6th Street, or which String Cheese Incident jam from the Fall ‘98 Tour was the headiest.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:24 pm
30
Tim says:
Tex-ass — nice one!!
Why does Texas where that T on their helmet? It stands for tool. Texas TOOLS.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:25 pm
31
Tim says:
I didn’t think I had it in me to compete with Walt, but then I realized I spelled “wear” wrong. That makes it pretty good overall, in my opinion.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:26 pm
32
cw says:
Oklahoma beating Texas A&M 77-0 is the biggest beatdown between two respectable schools
as a texas fan, “respectable” is not an recognized term that can be applied to either of these so-called institutions.
i always thought USC’s 55-19 beatdown of OU was the biggest rout ever. it was the freakin’ national title game and OU never even got off the bus.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:27 pm
33
Orangeblood says:
okiedomer,
Oh, you clever okies and your play on words.
It’s nice of you to take the time to post for us between your court dates for that scrotum-ripping incident.
You’ll always have a losing record to Texas.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:28 pm
34
okiedomer says:
#31
If you don’t think OU is a respectable program, does that mean you don’t think 7 is more than 4?
#32
Congratulations on dominating the 1920s. Everytime a Bonghorn pulls out the all-time record, a Yale undergrad with championship banners from the 1890s in his dorm thumps his chest.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:32 pm
35
Papa Lou BSU says:
Thanks for reminding all of us Chicago Bear fans of that incredible fraud, Cade McNown, Orson. Like we needed to re-live that era.
“Most NFL-ready QB in the ‘98 Draft,” my ass…
I remember this game, but I really don’t remember it being that big of a deal in the Midwest, other than the score. Aside from the previous season, Texas had sucked dead bunnies for the better part of a decade, so the ‘Horns laying an egg in a high-profile game didn’t really seem that out of sorts at the time. Texas getting beat like that would be jaw-dropping now, however.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:37 pm
36
R.D. Baker - Retired Blogger says:
#29: Actually it’s Texas Tech that has the Double T on the helmet, Texas just has a cow head.
Now, I don’t know whether or not that makes Texas Tech a bunch of tools, but the Aggie fans seem to think it makes us classless clowns.
Incidentally, A&M has a single “T” on their Helmet
September 13th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
37
DisplacedTexas says:
I’ve been of the opinion that you take rivalry histories 1 of 2 ways.
1 – you take the entire history. The ENTIRE history – even that part you just don’t really like. Sorry if you don’t like the fact that you got fucked up for 60 years before you could field a respectable football team. Them be the facts and that’s the history.
2 – the now. And I don’t mean selective bits of history. You won the last 5 years? Congrats. Hey one time we won 4 times in a row in 19xx. Oddly enough that doesn’t mean shit in the here and now. So if you win this year (which with the way Bradford is playing… a frightening reality) kudos! You get bragging rights and all the nuts you can rip off other guys for the next 12 months.
But the “zomg my 10 year wang is bigger than your 10 year wang” is a pointless argument.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
38
Bonghornio says:
Hey Okiefanokie …. why don’t you go vacate some more wins and give your QB another job that he doesn’t need to show up to.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:42 pm
39
Scalz1 says:
#14
Ask Jim Harbaugh, he might know.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
40
okiedomer says:
#37
You make a very good point, to which I’ll add the following:
A fair way to look at historical records, in my opinion, is to start with the post-WWII games. This pretty much limits the debate to the modern era of football. If the players were wearing facemasks and knew what a forward pass was, it counts. I don’t know where this leaves the RRS, but I’d bet it still gives texass a slight edge due to their total domination of the 1960s.
Another way is to look at the coaches. This is probably a fairer way to view recent history than comparing 10 year wangs. For the RRS, Stoops lead Mack 5-3.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
41
okiedomer says:
#37
Good points, and I’ll add this to it:
On historical records, a fairer place to start is the post-WWII years. Basically, if the players were wearing facemasks and knew what a forward pass was, it counts. My guess is texass still has a slight edge due to their total domination of the 1960s.
On avoiding the ten year dong arguments, a fairer way may be to compare coaches. Mack Brown is 3-5 vs. Stoops.
September 13th, 2007 at 2:56 pm
42
gindole says:
How can so many overlook what Neb. did to UF in the Fiesta Bowl. To me…that is the biggest ass waffling ever.
Agree with 32 that USC had the same kind of effect on OU.
When there’s that much difference between 1&2 it needs to be recognized.
September 13th, 2007 at 3:05 pm
43
DisplacedTexas says:
#40
I’ll accept those points. I think coach v. coach comparison is completely fair. I’m Bob Stoops biggest fan when it comes to taking an NFL job. Seriously. Go Bob-o.
And I don’t really know enough about football history to say when we entered a more modern era – so Post WWII sounds great.
September 13th, 2007 at 3:24 pm
44
macker says:
Mackovic era ‘horns = weird
The guy won at Illinois of all places. Then he comes to Texas where all you have to do is convince 50% of the top recruits in the state that the team that they have loved since birth is actually where they should go to school. You do that and you are golden.
With this little bit of info in hand, Jonny Mack starts recruiting in………… California. Not a bad recruiting state, but kind of like hitchhiking to Baltimore for a lobster when you live in Gloucester, Mass.
He then proceeded to take said “talent” and make them in to the biggest, fastest bunch of pansies you’d ever want to play. This UCLA game was one example. I also attended their trip to Charlottesville, VA where UVA hung over 40 on them and was the more physical team. Yikes.
BTW, I’m neither a Texan nor a UT fan. However I was always intrigued by the ’90’s horns for these reasons.
September 13th, 2007 at 3:34 pm
45
R.D. Baker - Retired Blogger says:
41: USC-OU… Further Proof that Auburn should have been in the “national championship game” that year
September 13th, 2007 at 3:38 pm
46
them oklahoma says:
#26 and #32 – I more often than not love seeing texas lose, but not by that much. As an OU fan and alumn (grad. college ‘05) I’d rather be able to watch Oklahoma wreck the national title hopes of the ‘horns than simply beat a team that already has no purpose. First off, Oklahoma did not lose to texas by 3 in ‘96. They beat texas in the first ever over-time game in the Big 12 with a score of 30-27 (three yard td run by James Allen, the all-world blue chip from Winnywood, OK that had a productive but dissapointing career at OU and later went on to play for the Chicago Bears…I know my football history). Second off, I don’t think that the UCLA-texas game is the biggest whoopin’ in recent history. I’d have to say that the Orange Bowl disgrace is up there, along with the 63-14 and 65-13 OU texas games (poor poor The Major Chrissy Applesims.). As for the ball-ripper that happens to be an OU fan, I have serious doubts that he has so much a set foot on campus let alone leaving Norman with a degree. OU fans with degrees are more often than not good fans that know football. OU fans that did not go to OU can be broken into two groups: the 65% that are fairly normal and the 35% that are, as Bill Callahan would say, “fucking hillbillies”. Take a wild guess as to which one Captain Ballripper is.
September 13th, 2007 at 3:39 pm
47
Edsall is God says:
The Rout 66 game is one of my favorite games as a fan up in Connecticut with no connection to either team. Why?
1) An awesome, awesome nickname for a game, maybe the best ever.
2) I loved that UCLA team, with the same guys going at it in 1998, for no particular reason other than they scored like crazy.
3) It was a beatdown of such epic proportions that it defied logic. Texas shouldn’t lose like that to anyone up to and including the Dallas Cowboys.
4) As someone mentioned, there was hype attached to the game. It wasn’t like A&M’s 77-0 loss where everyone expected a beatdown and it was just a lot worse. This was supposed to be a close game. I can’t even come up with another game that is similar.
September 13th, 2007 at 3:40 pm
48
them oklahoma says:
#44- but isn’t it so much more fun to see Auburn have a parade down mainstreet of the armpit of the western hemisphere for a fake national title? Also, is it a stretch to think that they would have had their asses handed to them by the best college players money can buy (USC, of course)?
September 13th, 2007 at 3:42 pm
49
okiedomer says:
#45
It’s been reported that neither the ball-ripper nor the ball-rippee were alums of the respective schools they were fighting over. Also, the ball-ripper is apparantly a church deacon. My guess is his Sunday School kids have become very well-behaved.
September 13th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
50
Raider Red says:
#36, it’s also the cross-section of a uterus.
I came home that Saturday pissed off that I’d had to go into work. Flipping on the TV and watching Rout 66 made it all worthwhile.
Most vicious beatdowns witnessed in person:
3. 1994 Fiesta Bowl, Arizona 29, Miami 0. I think when he was facing a 3rd and 43, .23 Erickson decided to start looking elsewhere for employment. The apex of Desert Swarm.
2. 1995, Texas 48, Texas Tech 7. Thanks, Tony Brackens.
1. 2000, Nebraska 56, Texas Tech 3. No misdirections or end arounds, just “here we come, try and stop it.” We didn’t. I think they had over 500 yards rushing.
Honorable mention, self administered beatdown category: 2004, Nebraska’s offense 7 turnovers vs. Texas Tech. Bill Callahan realized Jammal Lord was not the answer at QB. We scored 7 touchdowns in the 2nd half, only two TD drives were longer than 41 yards.
http://texastech.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2004-2005/tt06.html#GAME.DRV
September 13th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
51
C Montgomery Burns, Yale Class of (18)96 says:
#34, you bet your keister we do!
September 13th, 2007 at 4:20 pm
52
razorblazer says:
Auburn fan just saw a mirage of Fred Talley running down the road from Jordan-Ohare
September 13th, 2007 at 4:31 pm
53
R.D. Baker - Retired Blogger says:
#47. Actually considering USC *and* the SEC are the best players money can buy, USC-Auburn probably would have been a closer matchup.
(P.S. Yeah, everyone gets extra benefits, I’m just razzing on them for getting theirs made public
)
September 13th, 2007 at 4:39 pm
54
LSUJoshua says:
Yeah, that 77-0 Oklahoma televised prison sexing of A&M is still impressive.
Any time you attain 77 points in 3 quarters and the opposing, losing coach asks for a running clock in the 4th, well, that’s just terrible.
September 13th, 2007 at 4:50 pm
55
gindole says:
Just remembered another to add to #41. Miami over A&M in the ‘91 Cotton Bowl.
A complete and utter anal aeration. Da U runs up about 246 penalty yards enroute to humiliating A&M 46-3.
We’re not talking about false starts and holding, we’re talking about dividing two hundred and fucking forty six by 15, made up of personal fouls, late hits, blows to the head, taunting, battery with a wiffle ball bat, raping the mascot, and a still court sealed violation of the someones step sister.
It was the closest thing to prison you’ll ever see on the football field.
September 13th, 2007 at 4:58 pm
56
R.D. Baker - Retired Blogger says:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_Bowl_%28game%29
Miami beat Texas in ‘91
September 13th, 2007 at 5:38 pm
57
Papa Lou BSU says:
#43:
Mackovic “won” at Illinois at a time where the Big Ten was probably at its weakest point of the past 50 years. Think about what the Mackovic era (’88-’91) at Illinois coincided with:
-Ohio State being at an all-time nadir, routinely beaten by the likes of Indiana (!) and Air Force. The Buckeyes were a mortal 27-18-2 during the John Mackovic era.
-Wisconsin still in transition from perennial doormat to the first couple years of the Alvarez era.
-No Penn State in the conference yet.
-Purdue completely abysmal, averaging 2 wins per season under Fred Akers.
-Northwestern one of the worst programs in Division I, instead of the moderately competitive program it is today.
Indiana was at their pinnacle under Bill Mallory at the time, but still, it was a one-team conference then (Michigan).
Yet, despite this, Mackovic only took his team as high as the Citrus Bowl once during his tenure in Champaign. If that wasn’t a red flag to the folks in Austin, I don’t know what is.
Mackovic’s era at Illinois also wasn’t of the squeaky clean variety, either, if you talked to anyone that played there then (two of my h.s. teammates and another pal from a rival h.s. all donned the navy and orange for John M.)…
September 13th, 2007 at 5:39 pm
58
Justin Cliburn says:
Obligatory Cliff Claven moment:
The Texas QB that started that game (his name escapes me) was relieved in the second half by some guy named Major Applewhite. When he went to the sideline, the tv crew zoomed in on him and some talent manager in California saw a close up of his face. He eventually contacted him and signed him on as a male model, ending his UT QB career and igniting the fire that was Opie Applewhite.
September 13th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
59
gindole says:
oops…wrong team. same hateful beatdown.
September 13th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
60
horntothegroin says:
the only thing #45 is that only 4.7% of OU fans are educated, per USA today. So yeah, most of your fans are fucking hillbillies.
September 13th, 2007 at 6:41 pm
61
nutt again says:
70-17
USC over Arkansas two years ago.
In the first quarter SC possessed the ball for 92 seconds, ran 8 plays (for 241 yards), and scored four touchdowns.
ouch.
September 13th, 2007 at 7:30 pm
62
them oklahoma says:
57- The qb at texas for that game was James Brown, and he sucked. Fun note on Major Applewhite. When he first came to austin, things went pretty well. Then, Mack Brown convinced him to sleep with Phil Sims. For reasons not yet known to science, Phil Sims gave birth to The Major Chrissy Applesims. In a scene not unlike that of Greek mythology, Phil’s head started to swell…then stretch like a water balloon…and then crack like a walnut. What pops out? The Major Applesims. Promptly after the shocking event, a young Roy “Superman” WIlliams (not ut’s Roy “I’m a scared of dogs” Willaims) leaped over the gathered crowd and ripped the infant Applesims from Phil Sim’s disfigured skull.
September 13th, 2007 at 8:19 pm
63
them oklahoma says:
#59- Sorry, we (those who graduated from the University of Oklahoma) can’t help it if a solid 90% of our fans are texans who never went to OU. texas is a big state, both in terms of population and geography. Oklahoma is more your average size for the two. The alternatives for the overflow texan without a team(the michigan of the south -slightly arrogant with little or no reason to be so {noted exception of ‘05}- or those lunatics in College Station) give them little choice. For our sake, at least the really “special” ones tend to gravitate towards LSU and Arkansas. But anyway, how’s that secondary coming along?
September 13th, 2007 at 10:39 pm
64
Cincy says:
ah… RRS smack… and its only week 3.
There are few things in life as gratifying as seeing saxeT lose by more than 50 points.
7 will always be more than 4.
40 will always be more than 27.
sexaT fans can trumpet the all-time record against OU all they want, but the gap is narrowing and they know it.
September 14th, 2007 at 9:48 am
65
Justin Cliburn says:
No #57, it wasn’t James Brown. James Brown graduated the year before after the BigXII title game shocker.
September 14th, 2007 at 9:54 am
66
Justin Cliburn says:
It was Richard Walton. It wasn’t Major Applewhite who replaced him though; my bad.
September 14th, 2007 at 10:12 am
67
macker says:
Are you sure it wasn’t Todd Doge. By my recollection, Dodge was the QB from 1978-1994
September 14th, 2007 at 11:19 am
68
Beergut says:
#58,
The texas QB you are referring to is Marty Cherry.
I don’t think he ever played in a game for texas, much less started one.
September 14th, 2007 at 4:13 pm
69
WhoooTex says:
Starting QB that day was Stephen F Austin
September 14th, 2007 at 4:47 pm
70
KongHorn says:
This therad is proof that no matter how many smart professors David Boren hires, inserting an okie into any discussion automatically and instntaneously makes it dumber. Run along children and practice your defense of the Hook and Lateral and Statue of Liberty plays.
The ‘91 Cotton Bowl was a disaster. 45 degrees and drizzling all game. The concession stands were out of coffee and hot chocolate by halftime. I was willing to light that f’ing ibis on fire for warmth, but couldn’t goad him close enough to douse him in kerosene.
September 15th, 2007 at 9:41 am
71
Taco Bell Soft Tacos says:
Does anyone else remember UT being heavily favored to win this game? Like by at least 21 points I think…
I was into a little sports book enterprise in high school and remember not accepting bets on this game because the Vegas spread favored UT by too much.
I distinctly remember hearing the score over the radio and not being shocked that it was a blowout, but shocked it was a blowout in UCLA’s favor.
Am I making this up in my mind? Someone help me out here…
September 16th, 2007 at 11:49 pm