Comments on: LEPRECHAUN TELLS US STARTING QB FOR ND IN WEEK ONE

By: Chelcie

Chelcie — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:31:00 +0000

Hey, i wanted to give a shout out 2 the guy who plays the Leperchaun i love this Movie!!!

By: Black Liberace

Black Liberace — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 21:52:43 +0000

glad I finally found EDSBS, but could do without pissing my pants from laughing so hard.

Stanford might have a chance against the Irish this year

By: J. Plott

J. Plott — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:29:19 +0000

Kenny Irons do has Leprechaun in sootcase?

By: walkernd95

walkernd95 — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:13:36 +0000

PAKND’00 I agree with you. Think Weis is protecting the starting QB.

By: canuck

canuck — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:05:12 +0000

#32 Primary reason or not the Robot Genius called a screen and drew the coverage.

By: Scalz1

Scalz1 — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:02:17 +0000

You have Reggie Ball in your bunker?

By: PAKND'00

PAKND'00 — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:57:31 +0000

The problem for Crennel is that both of his potential starters are the same guy. Does anyone *really* care if Frye or… whoever the 2nd string dude is starts? Nah. The offense wouldn’t change either way. Even Quinn doesn’t make the offense different. He just makes it better.

I think Weis’s decision to not reveal his starter until gametime isn’t motivated by arrogance or a need to stick it to the media or even really to confuse Gailey and Tenuta – I think, and BGS has a convincing post to this effect, that he did it so in the runup to the opener, there would be endless stories about what an arrogant piece of shit Charlie Weis is, and not about how unprepared the Irish starting quarterback is, how he has such big shoes to fill now that Quinn is gone, how will he handle the pressure of being the ND QB, the string of magazine covers, etc, etc, etc. All of that hoopla gets ridiculous around the ND quarterback and Weis defused it to a certain extent.

Instead the whiny sportswriters of the world throw a temper tantrum about Weis and then go home.

By: John

John — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:31:57 +0000

It could be a crack head who gotta hold of the wrong stuff…

By: RowdyRoddyPiper

RowdyRoddyPiper — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:32:48 +0000

Apologies for cocking up the “artist’s sketch”. It was and is in fact an “amateur sketch” as if one needed a caption to figure that out. It kind of looks like Glow Worm or a not yet developed Jiminy Cricket.

By: RowdyRoddyPiper

RowdyRoddyPiper — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:28:21 +0000

This whole entire “I’m a geeeenious you will not know which inexperienced QB wil start” thing seems to be contagious in the Belichick coaching tree. Romeo Crennel is refusing to announce a starter for the opener against the Steelers. Maybe Charlie and Romeo are like Super and Bizarro Superman. One is black, the other is white. One is an offenisve mastermind, the other defensive. Both are terrifyingly fat…there goes that theory.

A thousand pardons for bringing this whole “professional football” angle to EDSBS. Also, the guy that says “anybody seen a leprechaun say yeah” guy is not old, he’s young, just got the old man teefs. He’s definitely responsible for the artists sketch of the chaun.

By: DC Trojan

DC Trojan — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:34:07 +0000

I read this too quickly the first time and thought that Galoshes was the starting QB for the Irish. Then I realized that’s ridiculous, he’s at least 6″ too short.

Perhaps he hurt his hands clawing his way out of Kenny Irons’ suitcase?

By: Holly

Holly — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:21:08 +0000

I’m not sure how to feel about the implication that I just had those pictures lying around, but I’m going with “delighted”.

By: Stacy Keibler Luvs Me

Stacy Keibler Luvs Me — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:48:20 +0000

Wet Song Girls Dept:

#23: Ryno: Excellent work, excellent babes of the SEC. Besides Tebow’s #1 ranked babe, my next favorite was the Oklahoma babe, picture number five.

PAC – 10 Representation: A blog asks, “What is better than USC Song Girls?”—-> Wet Song Girls! Here are the pictures….

http://wearesc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3104

By: Domer Guy

Domer Guy — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:48:14 +0000

fully = funny

By: Domer Guy

Domer Guy — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:47:02 +0000

Fully, but what’s with all the “n****” references? Just a joke? A bad Ty Willingham poke? Me confused…