BLAKE MITCHELL SUSPENDED.

Blake Mitchell needs to prioritize like Taneyhill: front, business;back, party.
The tradition of bon vivant quarterbacks at South Carolina continues: Blake Mitchell, d-d-d-d-dancin’ fool, has been suspended for the opener at Louisiana-Lafayette for missing an excessive number of classes during summer session in Columbia. (ONE HUNDRED COCKTAILS in the internet marketing department for first announcing the suspensions on his website, spurrierhbc.com. That’s synergy, baby!)
Mitchell, like his predecessor Steve Taneyhill, has had trouble in social situations with alcohol and also enjoys a festive jig from time to time. The game is versus the team whose name appears as “UL-LAF” on the scoreboard in the EA: NCAA video games. And against South Carolina, even without starter Mitchell, we probably will do just that by the late second quarter.
84 Replies »
Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All












84
Such is life. I’ve had enough internets fighting for the week. And Monkey–I’m guessing we know each other if I’ve head butted you in the past….sorry about that…
I promise that from here on out, I will leave internets fighting on instate squabbles to the folks at Auburn and Bama.
And now…back to work.
Comment by RaginCajunRebel — August 24, 2007 @ 11:13 am
83
I agree, I would have stayed USL over ULL any day. But you know why they did that.
What USL should have done was drop the western and become Univ. of Southern Louisiana, ala USCw.
Comment by Unhappy Monkey — August 24, 2007 @ 10:57 am
82
The reason that the University agreed to the name change was that the president of the University wanted the name change to be part of his legacy. Not to blast Dr. Authement he has done many great things for the University. But as an alumnus I would have rather we stayed USL or became the University of Louisiana and not the University of Louisiana Lafayette.
Comment by RaginCajun — August 24, 2007 @ 10:49 am
81
RCR - I’m not worried about ULL, so there is no need to feel sorry for me on that account, on others… maybe. You brought LSU into this on your first post, uninstigated. I have always liked ULL and Lafayette, and I have read and enjoyed some of your posts in the past, including head butt stories in bars (which I am not personally unfamiliar with). I also admire the cajun hotstick story.
I thought you might have some insight in what seems to be UL’s onesided issue with LSU. I already know about the legislative/historical “struggle” ULL has “endured”, so you haven’t added anything new there.
You still have not answered why USL agreed to be ULL when it wanted to be UL?
The fact that USL agreed to be ULL, then immediately demanded, and continues to demand that it be acknowledged as THE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA, shows that the legislature was correct in seeing the need to state the obvious to all but ULL, i.e. LSU was, and would remain, the “flagship university†of Louisiana.
Comment by Unhappy Monkey — August 24, 2007 @ 10:38 am