BLOGPOLL BALLOT, PREWEEK ONE: WE HATE THIS BALLOT
We spaced the agonizing process of putting this monstrosity together over several posts, and even then it still reeks of hackery, half-thought, and the ramblings and self-justifications of a desperate, overmatched man. In fact, we detest this ballot, repudiate its maker, and sincerely wish to kick his ass when we see him. We’re talking to you, Swindle.
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Southern Cal | 25 |
| 2 | Michigan | 24 |
| 3 | West Virginia | 23 |
| 4 | Texas | 22 |
| 5 | LSU | 21 |
| 6 | South Carolina | 20 |
| 7 | Florida | 19 |
| 8 | Oklahoma | 18 |
| 9 | Virginia Tech | 17 |
| 10 | Louisville | 16 |
| 11 | Wisconsin | 15 |
| 12 | Georgia | 14 |
| 13 | Nebraska | 13 |
| 14 | Ohio State | 12 |
| 15 | Oregon | 11 |
| 16 | Penn State | 10 |
| 17 | Florida State | 9 |
| 18 | Oklahoma State | 8 |
| 19 | Wake Forest | 7 |
| 20 | Tennessee | 6 |
| 21 | California | 5 |
| 22 | Hawaii | 4 |
| 23 | Arkansas | 3 |
| 24 | Missouri | 2 |
| 25 | Duke | 1 |
Instant disavowal and caveat: It’s crap. It’s crap, and we know it. Your blogpoll ballot and/or top 25 is crap, too. The guy who invented these called them crap himself. Hell, Leitch knows they’re crap, which means the secret is royally out of said bag in an official way.
Instant visual corollary when looking at this ballot:
Notes, crockery, possible notes of validity.
The USC vote is the illogic of logic. A consensus number one. Stalls of blue-chippers being piped full of grass-fed beef, fine supplements of the legal sort, and protein shakes in their sleep. They decimated Michigan in the Rose Bowl. They’re USC, they’re USC, they’re USC…if you feel any unease about picking them, just say this over and over again.
And yet we know they’ll lose at least one game because everyone’s assuming they’re FSU 1993 ripping their way through a single-team conference. Keith Jackson might refer to them vis-a-vis the Pac-10 as “the only bull in a barnyard of heifers,” but they’re clearly not, losing two conference games last year to UCLA and Oregon State and winning games against lowly WSU, UW, and ASU by a combined 19 points.
That team was no juggernaut, and neither is this one, especially at wideout. They are a superb team. They were not invincible last year, and are not invincible this year. And yet…there they sit at number one for sheer lack of creativity or insight. Curses.
South Carolina at 6 still looks like stunt work on our part, but hand us that chute. We’re jumping out of that window like Dar Robinson. Someone’s going to skate through on a handful of miracles and pixie dust this year. It might as well be a Spurrier team that was extremely deficient in the pixie dust department last year, losing to Tennessee, Auburn, and South Carolina Florida by margins that could have gone either way. We’re all in and waiting on a straight flush on the river. Hit us, please.
We moved Georgia down a notch or two because we’re more and more concerned about their offensive line woes. Stafford will commit serious errors under pressure. Offensive lines that don’t block yield pressure. Pressure pressure pressure. Sense a theme? Richt can’t call enough screen passes to overcome that, though he’ll try. Perhaps shirtless levitation will help.
Duke at 25…because old habits die hard.

25 







51
Janus09 says:
Wooderson
I can’t believe a ND fan is talking trash after their performance in big games lately, but I’ll bite. Is that 13 year streak more or less impressive than Notre Dame’s current bowl losing streak?
I, personally, would go with less impressive. I think Notre Dame has shown an ability to be dominated by a wide variety of opponents in the latest streak and versatility is important.
What are your thoughts?
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:04 pm
52
Edsall is God says:
To Dave K. (42),
I will NOT TOLERATE the besmirching of Coach Randy “God” Edsall. UConn was a terrible I-AA team before he showed up. He is, was and will always be God for getting us to a bowl game and making us even a little competitive. He has landed some good recruits, our RB Donald Brown will prove that this year, and he has a knack for finding good defensive players. If Terry Caulley doesn’t blow out his knee, we would have made a bowl in 2004 and kept the momentum going. Big things poppin this year…
As for Rutgers, I don’t live in Jersey so I don’t know how agressive they’ve been in scheduling but I know WFVU & Louisville have been and made big stinks about the big boys turning them down. Kudos to Auburn for signing up to play WFVU. Rutgers is hampered by their smallish building but why can’t they play someone like Michigan at Giants Stadium (or the new building) as a home game to entice them? Like Michigan wouldn’t want that spotlight?
UConn students are douches, but in the meathead department as opposed to Duke’s pretentious variety of douches.
If they lose to Duke week one, Edsall may be a mere mortal.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:06 pm
53
Biggus Rickus says:
I would just like to go on record as saying that Notre Dame will suck a mighty wind this year (not to be confused with the way their recently departed QB sucks a mighty cock). That is all.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:08 pm
54
Dave K. says:
Wooderson,
Sorry buddy …you have exactly 3 teams ranked ahead of Rutgers on your schedule this year. Who’s it a downgrade from, Stanford? Your schedule blows as it is and your team still has a chance to lose seven games this year so maybe you should talk a little less shit.
09/01 Ga Tech 3:30 PM
09/08 at #17 Penn State 6:00 PM
09/15 at #5 Michigan 3:30 PM
09/22 Mich St 3:30 PM
09/29 at Purdue TBD
10/06 at #14 UCLA 8:00 PM
10/13 BC 3:30 PM
10/20 #1 USC 3:30 PM
11/03 Navy 2:30 PM
11/10 Air Force 2:30 PM
11/17 Duke 2:30 PM
11/24 at Stanford 3:30 PM
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:10 pm
55
Biggus Rickus says:
HA I think the Navy game will decide their bowl eligibility.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:15 pm
56
Dave K. says:
Yeah …If ND loses to GT in the opener I think they’ll have AT LEAST six losses going into Navy. Be nice to see either MSU or Purdue take them out too to get to seven losses.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:17 pm
57
Wooderson says:
Dave, tell me again who you play that’s any good? Louisville an WfVU?
You’re playing Norfolk State (1-AA) and Army, along with UConn, Cinci, and Syracuse.
Pardon me if I do’nt consider that a murderer’s row of half your season. I’d take Navy over all of them.
Nd will win 9 games minimum this year, etch it in stone.
I can’t speak to SKLM’s sched, they play good teams.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:22 pm
58
Jaroslav Hasek says:
i think notre dame’s strategy this year should be to keep choppin wood. it is a strategy that has worked before for other programs and ND will really need a good plan this year.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:26 pm
59
blazin says:
I expected to see a poll with USC at #’s 1,2, and 3 by now and yet I am still left hanging.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:27 pm
60
Dave K. says:
Wooderson…
I didn’t say our schedule was any good. In fact, I hate it. All I was noting was that Rutgers will be far from a downgrade for your own schedule.
And we are in the process of upgrading our schedule… but as Paco pointed out its hard when teams want 2 for 1 and 3 for 1 deals. We are adding another 12,000 seats to the stadium so perhaps that will help.
Also, if ND wins nine games Patron shots are on me.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:30 pm
61
Edsall is God says:
What’s so bad about ND’s schedule? 8 of their first 9 are against bowl teams. They play three top 15ish teams (PSU, UM & UCLA) on the road by mid-October and they play the consenus #1 team in the land. What’s wrong with that? Just because they end with three straight cupcakes doesn’t mean the whole schedule is easy.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:33 pm
62
Dave K. says:
Edsall,
No one said it was easy. I just said that having RU on there wouldn’t be a downgrade.
Considering they could lose to any and all of the first nine teams I wouldn’t say its easy at all.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:34 pm
63
Wooderson says:
Put simply, ND eats its cupcakes after the main meal, while everyone else is busy filling up before the Turkey hits the table.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:34 pm
64
fresh says:
#20….to be fair, Urban Meyer never won a Heisman trophy while wearing Gator Orange and Blue. Urban Meyer could win ten national championships, and he’ll still be considered the second best coach ever at Florida.
Regarding the poll, where the hell is Mississippi State? Don’t make Coach Croom come in here and smite you all with his voice.
August 22nd, 2007 at 2:51 pm
65
Out of Conference says:
SKLM – #40 – I can’t hate too much because of the love you showed USCe’s #6 ranking and you’re desire to see a USC-USC MNC game. BUT how are LSU and UGA nobodies with regards to USCe’s opening month schedule. While I’ll grant you the SC legislature-demanded USCe – SC State game is bullshit, I’ll trade UL-Laf for Idaho any day and well, comparing Wash, Nebraska and Wash St to UGA and LSU is just plain silly. If memory serves (no promises) USCe and USCw trade places at 2nd toughest strength of schedule in the country in most of the published polls. Obviously, USCw’s schedule must get tougher after their opening month.
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:12 pm
66
Rex Cramer says:
Wooderson, your talk of cupcakes, turkey, and main meals is making Weiss’ belly growl so loud I can hear out here on the west coast.
I love seeing all the ND drones beat their chests before the season starts, telling the world how relevant they are. If this year goes like the past 5-7 seasons (which it will) the Ty Willingham excuses will begin to flood these here internets.
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:24 pm
67
Wooderson says:
Rex, we won’t need to yell so loudly about the Ty willingham excuses when Washington goes 2-10. TYhen everyone will just say “Oh, I’m so sorry, I never realized.”
Keep in mind, we have 7 seniors on the team in total. The man sucked as a recruiter, and his current recruiting shenanigans in Seattle back that up.
I’m saying we’ll win 9 games despite the handicap.
And if we weren’t relevant, people wouldn’t spend so much time knocking us.
“Not relevant” would be someone like, I dunno, Arizona, who I don’t think I’ve heard mentioned once lately (no offense to UA, they play basketball better than football).
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:36 pm
68
Biggus Rickus says:
Apparently, Relevant = Undeserved Media Attention
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:38 pm
69
Gnarls Woodson says:
I think that video wins the YouTube.
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:44 pm
70
gerry dorsey says:
i woulda done a top 35.
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:44 pm
71
Wooderson says:
Rick, we didn’t ask espn to devote so much time to us. they did it because they know it’d get people like you riled up to tune in and watch them bash us.
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:46 pm
72
Biggus Rickus says:
The only time I watch ESPN anymore is when they show a game I want to watch.
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:49 pm
73
Rex Cramer says:
Not relevant = bringing up your own team after 30 posts because no one else cared they weren’t mentioned in the poll.
In all seriousness I think you end up with 8 wins this year (none against top teams or in a bowl) and Weiss’ genius label will begin to wear thin. Kind of like the leather in his belt. You know that shit is straining!
August 22nd, 2007 at 3:58 pm
74
Big Ten Joe says:
Can we have a blogpoll for best new football promos? ‘Cause I think Minnesota finally has come up with one that’s actually pretty good:
This Is Gopher Nation
August 22nd, 2007 at 4:28 pm
75
okiedomer says:
#26
No, you’re not. Wisconsin plays in the Big Televen, and thus, by law, all of your players are white and slow. All of Oklahoma’s players are black and fast. Thus, you are not better than us.
Now if you’ll let me take my OU homer hat off and put my ND homer hat on…
ND will be lucky to go 6-6 this year. This is coming from an alum (well, a grad school alum). We will suck, and suck hard. However, we will pull out one–and only one–major upset.
August 22nd, 2007 at 4:46 pm
76
Raider Red says:
So when they ask Saban for his coaches’ poll vote, does he tell them personally “IDHTFTS” or does he have his SID do it?
I don’t understand the Okie State hype. Y’all do realize they lost six games last year, including to Kansas State and Houston. Even if they have this great offense, their defense is awful: 34, 31, 32, 34, 29, 36, 24, 30, 27, 31. Thats PPG allowed in their final ten games, not Mike Gundy’s late few nines on Golden Tee. Granted, my team’s defense is no better, but I don’t see us universally acclaimed as a top 20 program.
August 22nd, 2007 at 4:59 pm
77
Jorgé the Bass Player says:
ND will win nine games-but it will take two seasons.
August 22nd, 2007 at 5:26 pm
78
Palouse says:
No way Wake Forest should be ranked behind Florida State. I love how their fans think by simply replacing Jeff Bowden with Jimbo Fisher that they’re magically transformed into the conference champion. Your QB’s are still Weatherford and Lee. Good luck with that.
August 22nd, 2007 at 5:30 pm
79
SaltyDawg says:
Dayum.
Washington plays 5 teams on that there little top 25 list, none of which are named Duke. Boise State as well for the cherry on the Sunday.
As for Wooderson – the problems at ND go far deeper than Tyrone Willingham and you damned well know it. It is not the destination it used to be, and it’s lack of conference affiliation is hurting it.
You have what, one more year to blame everything on Ty’s recruits, right? What happens after that?
August 22nd, 2007 at 5:31 pm
80
jfwells says:
As an Oregon fan, I have to say that you have the Ducks ranked too high. Can’t believe none of the geniuses above missed mentioning it.
August 22nd, 2007 at 6:26 pm
81
Stacy Keibler Luvs Me says:
Counting Game Cocks Before They Hatch Dept:
#65 – Out of Conference: It would be good to have Spurrier go against Carroll in the MNC game. But, USCe has to get by Florida, LSU and other tough games first. While, USCw has to avoid getting tripped up in the Pac 10 like last year by ucla and other hungry hippos. Though, I would prefer LSU in the MNC game against USCw, since beating that jerk Lester “The Molester” Miles would be preferable.
ND City: Seems to me ND has not recovered from the George O’Leary fiasco, followed later by the Urban Meyer leaving ND at the altar bit** slap a few years later. ND is lucky Ty came in and restored order for a year or so.
I guarantee you in 10 years, ND fans will still somehow blame Ty Whillingham for the mediocrity that ND football has become and they will still be waiting for Charlie Weis wake up them !@##$% echos.
August 22nd, 2007 at 6:57 pm
82
Polish Prognosticator says:
once again the MGO blog has failed to invite the sedge court journal. Bogus.
August 22nd, 2007 at 8:40 pm
83
Kipp says:
I’d just like to point out that Willingham managed to win at Stanford. He’s not the evil incarnate that ND fans make him out to be. There was a coach or two that preceeded him that helped with the slide . . .
Could Alabama and ND just play each other every week? As both their fan bases are convinced they are the greatest teams ever to grace God’s green earth, they can battle it out with each other for world domination. That way none of the rest of us have to listen to their delusional blabbering . . .
August 22nd, 2007 at 8:46 pm
84
DC Trojan says:
Applause, Kipp, applause.
August 22nd, 2007 at 9:03 pm
85
MiseanAUfan says:
Great post, Kipp. It’s really hard to believe that Stanford is only 8 years removed from their last PAC-10 title. The only other coach to win one there in the past 30+ years- Bill Freaking Walsh.
August 22nd, 2007 at 10:02 pm
86
Leeroy says:
Kipp,
I’d like to point out that Willingham only managed to win at Stanford for one year. It was probably the worst year in the history of the PAC10. Willingham was 11-13 his last two years at ND. Weis is 19-6. Are you really trying to say that Willingham is a good coach? The only delusional people are the ones who continue to believe that a coach with a .500 career record is good. He sucks.
August 23rd, 2007 at 7:49 am
87
Edsall is God says:
83 -
Willingham was a bad coach because ND blew so many close games they should not have lost. His last year alone, they lost two games (BC & Pitt) that were absolutely agonizing.
The reason Weis is reaching God status for the Domers is that his teams win the games they’re supposed to. Sure, a win over USC or Ohio/LSU in a bowl game would be nice, but it just feels like it’s going happen. The teams with Weis have proven a knack for winning the tight, close games (see UCLA last year, Stanford & Michigan in 2005). In fact, Weis is the first ND coach since Holtz that has his team actually crushing inferior opponents.
I say all this with a Domer of a family (dad, uncle, cousins, etc.) and they’re just happy Notre Dame is GOOD again. They want the national title but understand it’s coming in a few years. At least they feel like it’s coming. With Ty, you felt like mediocrity was the way it would always be.
Thank Edsall for Charlie Weis!
August 23rd, 2007 at 8:31 am
88
Wooderson says:
Salty Dog, how on earth does lack of conference affiliation hurt us? It’s the one thing that makes you all hate us more.
We’ll know in 9 days where the situation lies.
August 23rd, 2007 at 10:32 am
89
Stacy Keibler Luvs Me says:
Doubting Thomas Dept:
#87 – Edsall:
Coming from a family of a bunch of Notre Damers it is amazing for me to believe that they are happy with ND.
I would be happy after winning a game against a ranked rival, or any kind of bowl game or some team of note besides our much admired Academies that are made up of purely high ranking academic-type kids.
No, ND, your players are not in the same category, since they are just like every other college football factory, so there!
August 23rd, 2007 at 11:38 am
90
Wooderson says:
SKLM, our players have slightly better typing and grammar skills than the Grand Marques.
August 23rd, 2007 at 11:49 am
91
Stacy Keibler Luvs Me says:
Wooderson: You are probably right, but I bet your football players cannot rhyme as well as the Grand M, who seems to have an Ebonic vocabulary much more extensive than most…
August 23rd, 2007 at 12:01 pm
92
Wooderson says:
SKLM, one wonders if that’s the sort of life skill one should be picking up at a so-called institute of higher learning.
I bet the Marques got his grades up at the Testing for Higher Credentials center.
August 23rd, 2007 at 3:47 pm