EDSBS TOP 25: 1-3, BECAUSE WE ARE SLOW AND HUNG OVER.
Again, what you're about to read is straight foolishness. But at least we admit that.
The preliminary, subject to all edits, clarifications, admissions of complete brain spasm:
1. USC. No cracks. Just none: USC remains a smooth, creaseless facade of sheer talent with brilliant coaches pulling the levers, ensuring that anyone with half a tank of rationality will pick them at number one. This is also the obvious pick, too, which is sad but true for those of us who really love to make the contrarian's pick.

The Tony Robbins of football continues to inspire with excellence and synergistic practices, you angels, you.
The wobbliest piece of USC's American Quilt of Talented Angels--we're sure Pete Carroll calls it something like that, as opposed to the old Cartesian oppression of "depth chart"--is at wide receiver, but even there the term "wobbly" remains, well, wobbly since Vidal Hazelton and Patrick Turner fit the mold of unmanageable USC receivers: tall, fast enough, good route runners with balletic skills to bring down balls in coverage.
Defensively, Carroll continues to run a pro defense in college garb.
The worst they've looked was against Football Jesus, and that was, after all, Football Jesus. (Praise his name!) Brian Cushing has all the makings of (backhanded compliment coming) a great college-only linebacker, and Sedrick Ellis can probably already begin writing generous checks based on the credit of a fat pro contract he'll receive for being huge, fast, and fond of playing defensive tackle.
They play in a league that, with the exception of Oregon State, has shown little ability to catch USC and bring them back to the peleton. Throw in a road game against Nebraska and Notre Dame, two teams they still outclass in terms of talent, facilities, and coaching Q, and USC is an easy, easy, easy pick.
The skeptic interjects: Last season, far from a clean slate for USC, showed several deep cracks in the veneer of invulnerability, especially in terms of offensive output. The loss to UCLA seems potentially terrifying given how manhandled the USC offense truly was, especially on the corners where smaller, seemingly less talented cornerbacks owned USC's wideouts. Booty's more turnover prone than his predecessors, and the departure of Steve Sarkisian Lane Kiffin prior to the 2006 season did take something of USC's offensive prowess away. (God damn you, tasty and free Bud Light.--ed.)
2. Michigan. Holy, gobsmacked hell, what in the living daylights is Michigan doing here? A team that lost its bowl game by mucho when its defense couldn't figure out USC's innovative "throw long to Dwayne Jarrett" attack, a team that couldn't stop Ohio State from heaving its waterboy across the goal line in their rivalry game, a team that when the chips were down showed all the creativity of Futurama's Bender minus his brain when confronted with a problem in a big game ("I am Mike Debord, please insert QB Waggle.")...why here?

Michigan as Bender? It's a comparison we should expand on...
A cakey road schedule helps, as does the siren song of returning starters Mike Hart, Chad "Average Michigan White Guy qb Mark XIV" Henne, and Mario Manningham. On defense they've got Alan Branch and Lamar Woodley to replace, but otherwise will plug holes systematically as they have been wont to do during Carr's tenure. If this is a sucker's pick, it won't be exposed for many weeks after an early season matchup with Oregon at home, or at least not until the Ohio State game, which by all accounts Michigan should win, but won't.
The skeptic interjects: Forecasting off the schedule izz dumm--Florida was supposed to have no shot with a 5.15 grade schedule last year, and yet somehow ended up by luck in the national title game with one loss. The Big Ten, like any really competitive league, tends to handicap itself in the national title race by pulling ambitious crabs back into the bucket of teams with at least one loss. And, as always, Michigan's problems begin and end with one word: Sweatervest.

The eleventh-ranked google image result for "sweatervest," and problem number one for Michigan.
3. West Virginia. Overranked? Sure, but if you're gonna go, go out in flames atop the 12 cylinder Dodge Tomahawk that is the West Virginia offense and its counterpart, the wildly unpredictable Texas Hold 'em game that is their 3-3-5 defense. Pat White, Steve Slaton, Darius Reynaud, freshman Noel Devine...all weapons in the hand of the (just one more metaphor and we'll stop, we swear) four-armed Goro that is Rich Rodriguez's offense. Frankly, we have to walk away from the computer for a moment to calm down.
(Punches wall, screams. Returns.)

The Mountaineers' offense: Goro wins.
The schedule's nice and easy, the defense will...well, whiskey-cranked WVU fans will just have to pray they hold serve a few times. This team remains the most pure fun to watch period, as evidenced beautifully by their bowl game versus Georgia Tech. Even when down 35-17 in the third, we didn't doubt for a second they would at least threaten to win within a margin of three points or so, and for two very good reasons:
1. It's West Virginia, and
2. Chan Gailey was coaching on the other sideline.
Their biggest rival is undergoing a change in management (Louisville), and a quick eyeballing of the schedule looks relatively bump-free. We say: Vroom, vroom, y'all.
The skeptic would like to have a word with you. Despite having a linebacker named John Holmes, little suggests West Virginia will achieve consistent penetration and stop playing roulette on defense, scoring huge on one spin of the dial and then losing it all on the next hand. The skeptic would like to have a word with himself, please Even with the disastrous performance versus Louisville, however, they still placed 28th overall in the nation...not elite, but still very good, and well beyond the "holding serve" criteria.
0 recs |
84 comments
Comments
Couldn’t be happier to see those two on top, especially considering my first round coach-hating draft pick this year.
by Domer Guy on Jul 9, 2007 3:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s Lane “Lose-Lose Situation” Kiffin who left for Da Raiders; Sarkisian is now the OC.
by Pac10Wonk on Jul 9, 2007 3:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We can’t show all the leg at once—this fan dance requires some teasing. But the SEC’s gonna have some crab/bucket dynamics this year, too, especially in the East.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 9, 2007 3:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What, coverage of WVU and no mention of Owen Schmitt? Did his restraining order finally come through, Orson?
by Herb on Jul 9, 2007 3:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ooooh look at the topical/timely use of the word “Peleton.” Someone tell me why the first stage of the Tour de France went through England.
by Brian on Jul 9, 2007 3:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey, Pete? Betty White called, she wants her arms back.
by jebushchrist on Jul 9, 2007 3:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Three things about WFVU.
1. Indeed the most fun to watch. I am tatooed on Steve Slaton’s balls I love them so much.
2. WFVU raided the JUCO ranks to improve the D. Don’t worry. They will hold serve more than we think. I would actually be shocked if they don’t play in the MNCG.
3. Whoooooo!!!!!!
by Odell 51 on Jul 9, 2007 3:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is today National Crab Bucket Metaphor Day? Because I thought that wasn’t until August 15th. I need to know these kinds of things.
by Aaron on Jul 9, 2007 3:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
great, Crab/Bucket dynamics in the east and crab pinching dynamics from a crazed weasel in the west
by Stephen Colboar on Jul 9, 2007 3:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Crab/bucket: place a bunch of crabs in a bucket. When you pull one out, one inevitably grabs the other with its claw before it can escape. Metaphor for a situation where no one can get a clear advantage due to infighting/intense competition.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 9, 2007 3:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m a Michigan fan, so trust me when I say two is too high. The secondary was a major weakness last year primarily because Morgan Trent couldn’t cover the side opposite Lock-Down Leon Hall. The other CBs were a disaster. A few teams poked at this deficiency but had their QB sacked by Woodley or pressured by Branch before they could get too far. OSU and USC were the only teams who had the talent to take advantage of what was a major and (in hindsight) obvious flaw.
Its no comfort that Trent becomes the top CB this year and inexperience and limited talent follow on the depth chart. The fanbase’s hope rides on a true freshman to step up. Even if he is Neon Deon the Second, the nickel and dime backs will be a weakness. Now that teams have seen the OSU/USC tapes they would be wise to go 4 wide and pass like mad.
The front 7 should still be good, the offense should be excellent, but in order to win all the challenges we are supposed to win (Oregon, Wisconsin, Penn State, Notre Dame, etc.) we’ll need to score 40+ points some weeks. With DeBord and Carr it seems unlikely that one or more of these quality opponents won’t find a way to trip us up. And yeah, theres those OSU guys.
MSU by the way has a clock counting down to the Michigan game. Not sure its relevant but their potential to upset based on rabid rage alone shouldn’t be discounted. At least we can laugh at those guys while OSU (please god temporarily) has their chuckles.
by Mat on Jul 9, 2007 4:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry Orson, but must disagree with not having LSU #2. There defense will be scary good and the offense has enough weapons to score the 14 or slightly less points the defense will need to win. Matt Mauck…..err Flynn may actually do a better job than Jamarcus, who’s head would implode on a regular basis in crucial situations last season.
Sure they will get one loss during the season (hopefully circa 2003 style), but playing the SEC schedule and the Va Tech game should get them to the BCS Champ.
by Mike Honcho on Jul 9, 2007 4:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I will compare myself to Michigan, but I will not kill myself.
by NoleinTexas on Jul 9, 2007 4:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Somebody will play the Baraka/Sub-Zero/Johnny Cage to WVU’s Goro this year and keep them out of the BCS Championship Game. Whenever a top 25 Big East team steps away from its home stadium, it turns into a MAC team.
by AUAlum on Jul 9, 2007 4:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Orson, are these based on how good the teams seem to be going into the season, or how you think they’ll finish?
by RedDevilEA on Jul 9, 2007 4:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mat, you beat me to it.
Morgan Trent is awful. I watched the bowl game with a UM player’s brother; the brother alerted me to Trent’s presence and went on to explain that most of the completions to wide receivers would come against Trent.
He was absolutely right.
Michigan is awfully talented. That is beyond discussion. But if any team’s one true liability is at one of the corner spots, it can spell disaster when the opposition goes out of their way to exploit it; just look what Indiana and James Hardy did to Iowa and Adam “Shutdown” Shada (which is like nicknaming a fat guy “Tiny”) last season.
by Oops Pow Surprise on Jul 9, 2007 4:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hate to nit-pick, but a Tomahawk perches you upon a V-10, not a V-12.
The only reason I know htis is because it’s a Dodge Viper engine, and Dodge Vipers kick major, major ass.
Too bad detroit dropped the ball and didn’t go all out for a V-12. Go Big or Go Home, guys.
by Wooderson on Jul 9, 2007 4:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Somewhat agree with Mike @ # 14. LSU is almost so good that they are scary. The defense will be awesome, but the offensive personnel changes could be shades of Gerry Dinardo/Lou Tepper. Will be holding my breath, but not as much as last couple of seasons, when they seemed to steal a few wins where the games should not have even been close with all of the offensive firepower they had.
by Southern Papa on Jul 9, 2007 4:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Does mp stand for “methed pecker”?
by LemmeHearYaSayWarEagle on Jul 9, 2007 4:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
- Brian,
Because if a large group of people came in from Germany, everyone would start surrendering?
by Brewster Crew on Jul 9, 2007 4:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Listen Orson, with Les Miles verbal smackdown of Hayley Lafontaine causing reverberations coast-to-coast, I just don’t see how you can’t have LSU #1. That team is gonna be fired-up after Les metaphorically bitch slapped that 11 year old.
by Nick on Jul 9, 2007 4:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
- Since Orson is taking schedule into account, it shows that his rankings are predictive. I dislike this method and think that a good pre-season poll should show which teams are best at the beggining of the season, not who has the easiest schedule.
by JoesDeliGatorTail on Jul 9, 2007 4:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I am not convinced that losing Lane Kiffin to the Raiders is the end of the world, offensively. IIRC, it was Sarkisian who came up with the innovative half-time adjustment of “Stop running and start throwing” in the most recent Rose Bowl, and he is also more clearly a Norm Chow kind of guy – having played for him in college, and been the QB coach under Chow at SC…
If the O-line can do a better job of keeping pressure off Booty, if the coaches adjust their calls to his throwing style, if the defense can actually score some points this year, if the WRs actually deliver on their apparent promise, and if the Mongolian horde of running backs actually get some decent run blocking – in other words, if SC actually has a walking fullback or two after September… well, then the pre-season #1 ranking might be justified.
In the meantime, it’s more a reflection of the number of question marks for all the other usual suspects.
by DC Trojan on Jul 9, 2007 4:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s semi-predictive, meaning we take schedule somewhat into account, but try to mix a good dose of absolute value in there, too.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 9, 2007 4:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with DC. The real problem in the UCLA game last year was the lack of a running game, which went back to the lack of a fullback. Even a team with the depth of USC is going to have issues when you are down to your #5 guy.
by oc phil on Jul 9, 2007 4:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
At least you adhered to the ESPN mandate that the winner of the Rose Bowl would be number 1 to start the year. They only mentioned that roughly 2,000 times while failing to show the OU-BSU highlights.
by letsplaytummysticks on Jul 9, 2007 4:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you’re spot on with West Virginia, Orson Their 3-3-5 defense doesn’t have to be great, just good enough. Their offense should be worse than Goro, more like Akuma (if you allow me to switch fighting game franchises) – frighteningly fast and powerful.
They’ll should win the Big East again. They should run the table within the conference – including Rutgers on the road.
I’m trying as hard as I can to think of why they won’t; but I got nothing short of a comical upset by, let’s say Cincinnati.
by John F on Jul 9, 2007 4:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That definitely means we have to revise, then, Tummysticks.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 9, 2007 4:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Noel Devine.
you think he plays right off the bat? dude looks like he’s 30 so im guessin maybe, if deion is ok with it.
by fife in pdx on Jul 9, 2007 4:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How many more years do we have to hear about the “LSU has so much talent they should win every game by a half-hundred speech?” For all of that talent and annual hype, they could be the biggest underachiever over the last 10 years in college football…IMO
It is a bit tired boys…
by Herringbone on Jul 9, 2007 4:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Since Michigan’s chances are almost all schedule related, a couple of notes. MSU (road), ND (home), Wisconsin (road), OSU (home) , and Minnesota (home) all start new QBs this year.
The teams with returning QBs are Northwestern (road – Bacher 59%, 6 td and 8 int), Oregon (home – Dixon 6%, 12 td and 14int), PSU (home – Morreli 54%, 11td and 8int), Purdue (home – Painter 59%, 22td and 19 int), and Illinois (road – Williams 40% 9 td, and 9 int).
I didn’t list EMU or Hot! Hot! Hot! University because it shouldn’t matter who quarterbacks those teams.
For comparison sake, Henne completed 62% of his passes with 22tds and 8 ints.
The point of all this is that Michigan’s most glaring weakness (pass defense) is obvious to all, but there are no proven great QBs on the schedule.
I still think that Michigan is likely to trip up once or twice somewhere since its defense is so unproven, but given the relatively soft schedule this year, a championship game appearance is not entirely out of the question.
Baseline is 10-2 with Wisconsin, OSU, Oregon, PSU being the toughest games and Purdue, ND, MSU, and Illinois being potentially loseable. Losses to Northwestern, EMU, Hot, Hot, Hot or Minnesota will lead to sniper fire from campus landmarks.
by maskedavenger on Jul 9, 2007 4:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Crab bucket metaphor = genius.
by Kevin @ Fanblogs.com on Jul 9, 2007 4:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
“For all of that talent and annual hype, they could be the biggest underachiever over the last 10 years in college football”
Sadly, you’re dead-on here. Not that I’d turn in the last 10 years of underachieving – which include a MNC and two Sugar Bowl titles – for anything in the world.
by TigerNacho on Jul 9, 2007 5:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey Michigan fans, please keep LLLLLoyd there forever!
by AnnArborIsAWhore on Jul 9, 2007 5:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ALABAMA WILL WIN 2 NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS THIS YEAR, MARK IT DOWN BITCHES
by AULIVESNFTWORTH on Jul 9, 2007 5:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Carr’s has a 9.41win and 3 loss average over 12 seasons. So it is supposed to be WWWWWWWWW.41WLLLoyd?
by maskedavenger on Jul 9, 2007 5:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The newspapers in Tuscaloosa and Birmingham don’t count as national championships.
by Rob on Jul 9, 2007 5:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
- re:Big East on the Road.
You mean, like when WfVU embarassed UGA in the Sugar Bowl for which they were given no chance to compete?
I can’t figure out SEC-instigated bashing of the Big East. They get crapped on because they don’t draw as well as SEC teams (doye), but now apparently they are dependent on sleeping within the coziness of their own 500-thread count Egyptian cotton sheets to be able to win.
by jon on Jul 9, 2007 5:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tiger – #35
I am downplaying any of LSU’s accomplishments, but it just seems that every year LSU is supposed to be a MNC contender just on talent alone…it doesnt work that way from my recollection…otherwise USC and Texas would win every game.
by Herringbone on Jul 9, 2007 5:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
“Linebacker named John Holmes…penetration”. Truly breathtaking, sir. Literary genius.
by adam on Jul 9, 2007 5:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Obviously, Dixon is not a 6% passer; rather, he is a 61% passer.
by maskedavenger on Jul 9, 2007 5:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The WVU player named John Holmes is from my high school in Rockledge, Florida.
No word on his penetrative abilities, but, hey, he is a hybrid LB/DE.
by GatorWriter on Jul 9, 2007 5:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Then we would be talking about Reggie Ball, sir.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 9, 2007 5:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Understood Orson, btw I agree with your schedule but would swap LSU for Michigan. That whole speed thing.
by JoesDeliGatorTail on Jul 9, 2007 5:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Lane Kiffin was still at USC during the 2006 season; a year under Al Davis will likely make him wish he could go back in 08.
by bruinhoo on Jul 9, 2007 5:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Orson, as to LSU being left out of the top 3, I think you are dead on with that one…LSU might not be lacking in the talent department, but in the coaching arena, he of "le tres mal chapeau " will gift a game or two to a lesser opponent.(ie Auburn 06).
So your punditry is twice as smart as the rest of the world’s, but only by half.
by ness on Jul 9, 2007 5:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Drop LSU down any further than #4, Orson, and see what happens. I’ll beat your scrawny bloggin’ ass into next week.
And BTW, what a piss poor way to handle the unveiling of a pre-season Top 25 poll. THREE at a time? Jesus, son. Put some Goddamn effort in. Your cooter hurt or something?
by Les Miles on Jul 9, 2007 5:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
USC, Texas, Miami, and LSU should never have a talent issue. If they do, the coach obviously has some ’splainin to do.
by Brewster Crew on Jul 9, 2007 5:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
For SC to win the MNC they will need McKnight or Moody to establish themselves as a consistent breakaway threat to bail them out of the two or three tight games that invariably happen every year. If they don’t reach that level, the Trojans will have to hope that one of their receivers is the next Mike Williams/ Dwayne Jarret. Booty is a very good quarterback, but he’s a notch or two below Leinart/Palmer. This begs the question, will the offensive line be great or just good? I also agree with DC Trojan’s concern about fullback health. When Powdrell went down last year the offense was never the same.
by SeaTrojan on Jul 9, 2007 6:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rambing comments that are apparently more important than my work deadlines:
USC- Solid pick. As an aside, Pete looks like one of those guys that you can’t imagine scruffy and disheveled in the morning. This is in stark contrast to Lawd Cah, who starts disheveled, throws on his block M cap (or does he sleep in it) and moves along to frumpy as the day progresses. Just an aside.
Meechigan- Don’t need to know the depth chart. Don’t need to know the schedule. Michigan will dissapoint early with loss to an out of conference geeked-up team or ND (which is in conference-ish). Failing that, they might even lose to MSU. Not because of talent, but because MSU likes to give their fanbase a once in a decade win that they can replay for years until the next time. Then comes the aforementioned sweater-vest game. Result 10-2 and a forgettable victory/loss in some good New Years day or thereabouts bowl game. Top ten ranking, but #2——NO.
Talent is always there, but at least two teams a year are able to effectively scout the Lawd Cah offensive strategy of 1st down- power run, 2nd down- power run, 3rd down- pass, 4th down- harumph
3- WfVU. 10 to 11 games of the year Slaton, White and company look like they all run 4.2 40’s and the other team is on depressants. Then, something happens for one game and I still don’t know what it is. All of a sudden they don’t look as fast or the defense mails it in. Whatever. They’ll drop one. 11-1 might get them #3.
Disclaimer- Don’t care about any of the above teams. Closest link is the wife is a WVU grad.
by macker on Jul 9, 2007 6:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why’s Louisville worse than WVU all of a sudden? Probably the best non-Hawaii passing game in college football + okay defense + Big East schedule = undefeated Cardinal squad in the BCS Championship game. Against Oklahoma. You heard it here first folks!
by Mitch P. on Jul 9, 2007 6:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Herringbone #42, are you saying that USC has underachieved? After all they only have 1 title, 2 if you count the AP title. This after pulling in all kinds of all-world talent over the last few years.
LSU hasn’t underachieved more than a Texas, Florida or any other school.
by AP on Jul 9, 2007 6:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
#54
Maybe because the mastermind behind that passing offense now resides in Georgia? Duh.
by Bobby on Jul 9, 2007 7:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why does Les Miles remind me of a cross between Mike Ditka and George Custer? Minus two just because he’s the coach.
He is “Shute” to my Loudon Swain. Bama is supposed to be an easy win for LSU?
I hope that is the ugliest, bloodiest game of the entire year.
And I hate him for attacking a perfectly innocent if intellectually challenged adolescent girl.
Keep talking, dumbass.
by Boclive on Jul 9, 2007 7:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Did all the West Virginia fans forget USF? Week 4 in Tampa? That would be prime time for an early season fuckup.
by GatorKK on Jul 9, 2007 7:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey Bobby #55, Petrino may have moved to Atlanta, but Louisville football has been a Brohm Bros. operation for a few years now. I’m not predicting that they’ll run the table, but they’ll give it a good effort.
Maskedavenger, you’re a funny guy. That’s why I love the occasions where Northwestern does manage to beat Michigan, because you guys take it so well. OTOH, if UofM loses to Directional Mich or HotHotHot, I call Tower Plaza…
I’m OK with Michigan behind ‘SC… it doesn’t smell nearly as bad as it does behind tOSU. These are all just guesstimates, anyways.
by PJ from NU in SF on Jul 9, 2007 7:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
PJ – perhaps I was too flippant with NW seeing as they won in 95, 96 and 2001, with both the 95 and 2001 games being of the WTF variety (at least from a UM perspective). But those three wins constitute all the Wildcat wins that have occurred against UM since 1966. Sutton does come back along with 15 other starters and the game is a road game for Michigan so maybe I should move it to potentially loseable. But even if I do that doesn’t mean that our largely irrational fanbase will, so if the upset happens, flak jackets would still be highly recommended.
by maskedavenger on Jul 9, 2007 8:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
#58-Louisville has had Chris Redman, Dave Ragone, and Stefan Lefors, all of which were first day NFL picks, before Brohm. And even after Brohm went down last year, they didnt miss a beat with whoever the hell their backup is. Louisville was/is Louisville because of the system set in by John L.(the Mike Martz of college ball, genious offensively, just dont let him actually coach) and carried out by Petrino. Thats in jeopardy now.
- The difference between LSU and USC is that since 2002, LSU’s Bowl game list reads as Cotton, Sugar, Capital One, Peach, and Sugar, with their record being 3-2. USC’s bowl games read Orange, Rose, Orange, Rose, Rose, which includes 2 national titles, a would be third if that Vincent character didnt have a say, and 2 other BCS victories. Oh, and 3 Heisman winners. So no, USC hasn’t underachieved.
by bigguy on Jul 9, 2007 10:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I am Lloyd Carr please insert manssiere…
I think this Michigan = Bender thing’s got legs. 33 degrees….32 degrees…..31.
by FreeMoneyDave on Jul 9, 2007 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
USC’s biggest problem…. they have a Booty at starting QB. Anyone from Louisiana will know what I mean; JD is will cost them at least one game this season they shouldn’t lose.
by Uncle Jud on Jul 9, 2007 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm….try and convince me that Sedrick Ellis isn’t just an obese Reggie Bush.
http://usctrojans.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/ellis_sedrick00.html
by ThefightingFrenchman on Jul 10, 2007 2:36 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
- - Is it just me, or is claiming “Heisman winners” in a college football supremacy argument worth about as much as a sack of assholes?
by Erik on Jul 10, 2007 9:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
#64, I’d say that the award given to the most outstanding college football player has SOMETHING to do with college football supremacy…not the most indicative factor, but one nonetheless…
Granted, I don’t know how much you value a sack of assholes, though. I guess your post could be literal.
by Pants McPants on Jul 10, 2007 10:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My take on the LSU underahieving bit is that it all started with Nick Saban; that guy got more mileage out of that 1/2 MNC than any coach in history.
by tOSUBuckeyes on Jul 10, 2007 10:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you all missed the most important part of the USC breakdown…and that was the break down forced upon them by Football Jesus.
Thank you for bringing up wonderful memories.
by The Stos on Jul 10, 2007 10:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Underachieving….still got sleepers in my eyes.
by tOSUBuckeyes on Jul 10, 2007 10:25 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry if this appears to be a thread-jacking, but I figured since there is a picture of sweatervest in this thread, along with reference to his brilliance, it would be alright to drop this on you guys. Tressel just donated 1 MILLION dollars to YSU….1 Million fricking dollars. Orson, you should do a piece on coaches’ donations just to see who’s really paying it forward and who’s just in it for the money.
http://www.buckeyecommentary.com/files/tressels-pays-forward-again.html
by tOSUBuckeyes on Jul 10, 2007 10:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sept. 8th, John Holmes vs. Chubb Small, the rematch.
by k00laid on Jul 10, 2007 11:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm….well….no I just think personally that Sedrick Ellis looks like a fatass version of Reggie Bush….(I’ll provide a comparison link after finding one)
by ThefightingFrenchman on Jul 10, 2007 11:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/407605
Same dude….(minus the fatass-ness)
by ThefightingFrenchman on Jul 10, 2007 11:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rob @ #40… AULivesn’ is a Tiger… pay attention
The hype surrounding LSU is begining to approach Auburn ’03 levels… All we need is Leslie on the cover of the SportingNews with a #1 next to his head and their fate is sealed.
HOW DID WE GET THIS FAR DOWN THE THREAD WITH NOBODY POINTING OUT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING ABOUT THIS LIST!?!?!
Orson started at the top. Everyone else starts at the bottom, their small brains telling them that keeping people in suspense as to who’s #1 is a good thing. Nobody cares who’s #1. The good stuff comes from seeing who gets left out. The 23-25 post is going to have a squillion responses. I can’t wait!
by PeterPumpkinhead on Jul 10, 2007 11:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Erik, I’m with you. The sportsbots on the WWL will spend the entire goddamn season boring me with their endless heisman “debates”, and I will never care which big school QB they annoint.
Just like Jarvis Moss, I don’t care about your Heismanns.
by Mr. Wrong on Jul 10, 2007 12:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
- Alabama or LSU fan? Having a Heisman winner at your school is the next best thing to winning the MNC. It’s better than winning a BCS bowl and certainly better than making the championship game but losing. I’m sure the Auburn or South Carolina fans can vouch for that.
- SeaTrojan. When you say that Booty is a notch below Leinart & Palmer, remember he still has a year to make his mark. Leinart had done better going into his last year, but Palmer’s USC legacy was made in his last 3 games (UCLA, ND, Iowa).
by oc phil on Jul 10, 2007 12:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How can a team with the word “Fuckin” in its name NOT be in the BCS title game…
Spot on!
by Hossnfeffer on Jul 10, 2007 2:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
oc phil,
I was thinking that Booty is a notch below in ability. His ceiling isn’t as high as Palmer’s or Leinart’s. But I agree, the light switch didn’t go on until the middle of Palmer’s senior season. Overall, I’m just glad that it’s this difficult to nitpick this team.
by SeaTrojan on Jul 10, 2007 3:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Neither, Oc phil – Are you trying to imply that LSU has never won one of those heavy turd colored trophies?
by Erik on Jul 10, 2007 3:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What team’s record over the last 7 years has been 9-3, 8-4, 10-3, 10-3, 9-3, 7-5, 11-2?
The most overrated team every year is Michigan. Period!
by Lloyd the loser on Jul 10, 2007 3:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
- - OC Phil – Now you did it!
We, Like AU, are also at 100% rate of Heisman trophy winners that have not stabbed anybody. Maybe that’s our problem.. we need more passion!
by Out of Conference on Jul 10, 2007 3:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If a guy can win the Heisman and then suck in the last game of the season, does he really deserve the Heisman? Why isn’t it given out AFTER the bowls?
by Mitch P. on Jul 11, 2007 7:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 







