EDSBS TOP 25: 1-3, BECAUSE WE ARE SLOW AND HUNG OVER.
Again, what you’re about to read is straight foolishness. But at least we admit that.
The preliminary, subject to all edits, clarifications, admissions of complete brain spasm:
1. USC. No cracks. Just none: USC remains a smooth, creaseless facade of sheer talent with brilliant coaches pulling the levers, ensuring that anyone with half a tank of rationality will pick them at number one. This is also the obvious pick, too, which is sad but true for those of us who really love to make the contrarian’s pick.

The Tony Robbins of football continues to inspire with excellence and synergistic practices, you angels, you.
The wobbliest piece of USC’s American Quilt of Talented Angels–we’re sure Pete Carroll calls it something like that, as opposed to the old Cartesian oppression of “depth chart”–is at wide receiver, but even there the term “wobbly” remains, well, wobbly since Vidal Hazelton and Patrick Turner fit the mold of unmanageable USC receivers: tall, fast enough, good route runners with balletic skills to bring down balls in coverage.
Defensively, Carroll continues to run a pro defense in college garb. The worst they’ve looked was against Football Jesus, and that was, after all, Football Jesus. (Praise his name!) Brian Cushing has all the makings of (backhanded compliment coming) a great college-only linebacker, and Sedrick Ellis can probably already begin writing generous checks based on the credit of a fat pro contract he’ll receive for being huge, fast, and fond of playing defensive tackle.
They play in a league that, with the exception of Oregon State, has shown little ability to catch USC and bring them back to the peleton. Throw in a road game against Nebraska and Notre Dame, two teams they still outclass in terms of talent, facilities, and coaching Q, and USC is an easy, easy, easy pick.
The skeptic interjects: Last season, far from a clean slate for USC, showed several deep cracks in the veneer of invulnerability, especially in terms of offensive output. The loss to UCLA seems potentially terrifying given how manhandled the USC offense truly was, especially on the corners where smaller, seemingly less talented cornerbacks owned USC’s wideouts. Booty’s more turnover prone than his predecessors, and the departure of Steve Sarkisian Lane Kiffin prior to the 2006 season did take something of USC’s offensive prowess away. (God damn you, tasty and free Bud Light.–ed.)
2. Michigan. Holy, gobsmacked hell, what in the living daylights is Michigan doing here? A team that lost its bowl game by mucho when its defense couldn’t figure out USC’s innovative “throw long to Dwayne Jarrett” attack, a team that couldn’t stop Ohio State from heaving its waterboy across the goal line in their rivalry game, a team that when the chips were down showed all the creativity of Futurama’s Bender minus his brain when confronted with a problem in a big game (”I am Mike Debord, please insert QB Waggle.”)…why here?

Michigan as Bender? It’s a comparison we should expand on…
A cakey road schedule helps, as does the siren song of returning starters Mike Hart, Chad “Average Michigan White Guy qb Mark XIV” Henne, and Mario Manningham. On defense they’ve got Alan Branch and Lamar Woodley to replace, but otherwise will plug holes systematically as they have been wont to do during Carr’s tenure. If this is a sucker’s pick, it won’t be exposed for many weeks after an early season matchup with Oregon at home, or at least not until the Ohio State game, which by all accounts Michigan should win, but won’t.
The skeptic interjects: Forecasting off the schedule izz dumm–Florida was supposed to have no shot with a 5.15 grade schedule last year, and yet somehow ended up by luck in the national title game with one loss. The Big Ten, like any really competitive league, tends to handicap itself in the national title race by pulling ambitious crabs back into the bucket of teams with at least one loss. And, as always, Michigan’s problems begin and end with one word: Sweatervest.

The eleventh-ranked google image result for “sweatervest,” and problem number one for Michigan.
3. West Virginia. Overranked? Sure, but if you’re gonna go, go out in flames atop the 12 cylinder Dodge Tomahawk that is the West Virginia offense and its counterpart, the wildly unpredictable Texas Hold ‘em game that is their 3-3-5 defense. Pat White, Steve Slaton, Darius Reynaud, freshman Noel Devine…all weapons in the hand of the (just one more metaphor and we’ll stop, we swear) four-armed Goro that is Rich Rodriguez’s offense. Frankly, we have to walk away from the computer for a moment to calm down.
(Punches wall, screams. Returns.)

The Mountaineers’ offense: Goro wins.
The schedule’s nice and easy, the defense will…well, whiskey-cranked WVU fans will just have to pray they hold serve a few times. This team remains the most pure fun to watch period, as evidenced beautifully by their bowl game versus Georgia Tech. Even when down 35-17 in the third, we didn’t doubt for a second they would at least threaten to win within a margin of three points or so, and for two very good reasons:
1. It’s West Virginia, and
2. Chan Gailey was coaching on the other sideline.
Their biggest rival is undergoing a change in management (Louisville), and a quick eyeballing of the schedule looks relatively bump-free. We say: Vroom, vroom, y’all.
The skeptic would like to have a word with you. Despite having a linebacker named John Holmes, little suggests West Virginia will achieve consistent penetration and stop playing roulette on defense, scoring huge on one spin of the dial and then losing it all on the next hand. The skeptic would like to have a word with himself, please Even with the disastrous performance versus Louisville, however, they still placed 28th overall in the nation…not elite, but still very good, and well beyond the “holding serve” criteria.









51
Brewster Crew says:
USC, Texas, Miami, and LSU should never have a talent issue. If they do, the coach obviously has some ’splainin to do.
July 9th, 2007 at 4:49 pm
52
SeaTrojan says:
For SC to win the MNC they will need McKnight or Moody to establish themselves as a consistent breakaway threat to bail them out of the two or three tight games that invariably happen every year. If they don’t reach that level, the Trojans will have to hope that one of their receivers is the next Mike Williams/ Dwayne Jarret. Booty is a very good quarterback, but he’s a notch or two below Leinart/Palmer. This begs the question, will the offensive line be great or just good? I also agree with DC Trojan’s concern about fullback health. When Powdrell went down last year the offense was never the same.
July 9th, 2007 at 5:09 pm
53
macker says:
Rambing comments that are apparently more important than my work deadlines:
USC- Solid pick. As an aside, Pete looks like one of those guys that you can’t imagine scruffy and disheveled in the morning. This is in stark contrast to Lawd Cah, who starts disheveled, throws on his block M cap (or does he sleep in it) and moves along to frumpy as the day progresses. Just an aside.
Meechigan- Don’t need to know the depth chart. Don’t need to know the schedule. Michigan will dissapoint early with loss to an out of conference geeked-up team or ND (which is in conference-ish). Failing that, they might even lose to MSU. Not because of talent, but because MSU likes to give their fanbase a once in a decade win that they can replay for years until the next time. Then comes the aforementioned sweater-vest game. Result 10-2 and a forgettable victory/loss in some good New Years day or thereabouts bowl game. Top ten ranking, but #2—-NO.
Talent is always there, but at least two teams a year are able to effectively scout the Lawd Cah offensive strategy of 1st down- power run, 2nd down- power run, 3rd down- pass, 4th down- harumph
3- WfVU. 10 to 11 games of the year Slaton, White and company look like they all run 4.2 40’s and the other team is on depressants. Then, something happens for one game and I still don’t know what it is. All of a sudden they don’t look as fast or the defense mails it in. Whatever. They’ll drop one. 11-1 might get them #3.
Disclaimer- Don’t care about any of the above teams. Closest link is the wife is a WVU grad.
July 9th, 2007 at 5:34 pm
54
Mitch P. says:
Why’s Louisville worse than WVU all of a sudden? Probably the best non-Hawaii passing game in college football + okay defense + Big East schedule = undefeated Cardinal squad in the BCS Championship game. Against Oklahoma. You heard it here first folks!
July 9th, 2007 at 5:49 pm
55
AP says:
Herringbone #42, are you saying that USC has underachieved? After all they only have 1 title, 2 if you count the AP title. This after pulling in all kinds of all-world talent over the last few years.
LSU hasn’t underachieved more than a Texas, Florida or any other school.
July 9th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
56
Bobby says:
#54
Maybe because the mastermind behind that passing offense now resides in Georgia? Duh.
July 9th, 2007 at 6:03 pm
57
Boclive says:
Why does Les Miles remind me of a cross between Mike Ditka and George Custer? Minus two just because he’s the coach.
He is “Shute” to my Loudon Swain. Bama is supposed to be an easy win for LSU?
I hope that is the ugliest, bloodiest game of the entire year.
And I hate him for attacking a perfectly innocent if intellectually challenged adolescent girl.
Keep talking, dumbass.
July 9th, 2007 at 6:27 pm
58
GatorKK says:
Did all the West Virginia fans forget USF? Week 4 in Tampa? That would be prime time for an early season fuckup.
July 9th, 2007 at 6:40 pm
59
PJ from NU in SF says:
Hey Bobby #55, Petrino may have moved to Atlanta, but Louisville football has been a Brohm Bros. operation for a few years now. I’m not predicting that they’ll run the table, but they’ll give it a good effort.
Maskedavenger, you’re a funny guy. That’s why I love the occasions where Northwestern does manage to beat Michigan, because you guys take it so well. OTOH, if UofM loses to Directional Mich or HotHotHot, I call Tower Plaza…
I’m OK with Michigan behind ‘SC… it doesn’t smell nearly as bad as it does behind tOSU. These are all just guesstimates, anyways.
July 9th, 2007 at 6:45 pm
60
maskedavenger says:
PJ – perhaps I was too flippant with NW seeing as they won in 95, 96 and 2001, with both the 95 and 2001 games being of the WTF variety (at least from a UM perspective). But those three wins constitute all the Wildcat wins that have occurred against UM since 1966. Sutton does come back along with 15 other starters and the game is a road game for Michigan so maybe I should move it to potentially loseable. But even if I do that doesn’t mean that our largely irrational fanbase will, so if the upset happens, flak jackets would still be highly recommended.
July 9th, 2007 at 7:18 pm
61
bigguy says:
#58-Louisville has had Chris Redman, Dave Ragone, and Stefan Lefors, all of which were first day NFL picks, before Brohm. And even after Brohm went down last year, they didnt miss a beat with whoever the hell their backup is. Louisville was/is Louisville because of the system set in by John L.(the Mike Martz of college ball, genious offensively, just dont let him actually coach) and carried out by Petrino. Thats in jeopardy now.
#55- The difference between LSU and USC is that since 2002, LSU’s Bowl game list reads as Cotton, Sugar, Capital One, Peach, and Sugar, with their record being 3-2. USC’s bowl games read Orange, Rose, Orange, Rose, Rose, which includes 2 national titles, a would be third if that Vincent character didnt have a say, and 2 other BCS victories. Oh, and 3 Heisman winners. So no, USC hasn’t underachieved.
July 9th, 2007 at 9:30 pm
62
FreeMoneyDave says:
I am Lloyd Carr please insert manssiere…
I think this Michigan = Bender thing’s got legs. 33 degrees….32 degrees…..31.
July 9th, 2007 at 9:55 pm
63
Uncle Jud says:
USC’s biggest problem…. they have a Booty at starting QB. Anyone from Louisiana will know what I mean; JD is will cost them at least one game this season they shouldn’t lose.
July 9th, 2007 at 9:55 pm
64
ThefightingFrenchman says:
Hmmm….try and convince me that Sedrick Ellis isn’t just an obese Reggie Bush.
http://usctrojans.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/ellis_sedrick00.html
July 10th, 2007 at 1:36 am
65
Erik says:
#60 – Is it just me, or is claiming “Heisman winners” in a college football supremacy argument worth about as much as a sack of assholes?
July 10th, 2007 at 8:19 am
66
Pants McPants says:
#64, I’d say that the award given to the most outstanding college football player has SOMETHING to do with college football supremacy…not the most indicative factor, but one nonetheless…
Granted, I don’t know how much you value a sack of assholes, though. I guess your post could be literal.
July 10th, 2007 at 9:01 am
67
tOSUBuckeyes says:
My take on the LSU underahieving bit is that it all started with Nick Saban; that guy got more mileage out of that 1/2 MNC than any coach in history.
July 10th, 2007 at 9:23 am
68
Odell 51 says:
What a sack of ass holes.
I love it.
July 10th, 2007 at 9:24 am
69
The Stos says:
I think you all missed the most important part of the USC breakdown…and that was the break down forced upon them by Football Jesus.
Thank you for bringing up wonderful memories.
July 10th, 2007 at 9:24 am
70
tOSUBuckeyes says:
Underachieving….still got sleepers in my eyes.
July 10th, 2007 at 9:25 am
71
tOSUBuckeyes says:
Sorry if this appears to be a thread-jacking, but I figured since there is a picture of sweatervest in this thread, along with reference to his brilliance, it would be alright to drop this on you guys. Tressel just donated 1 MILLION dollars to YSU….1 Million fricking dollars. Orson, you should do a piece on coaches’ donations just to see who’s really paying it forward and who’s just in it for the money.
http://www.buckeyecommentary.com/files/tressels-pays-forward-again.html
July 10th, 2007 at 9:32 am
72
k00laid says:
Sept. 8th, John Holmes vs. Chubb Small, the rematch.
July 10th, 2007 at 10:23 am
73
ThefightingFrenchman says:
Hmmm….well….no I just think personally that Sedrick Ellis looks like a fatass version of Reggie Bush….(I’ll provide a comparison link after finding one)
July 10th, 2007 at 10:26 am
74
ThefightingFrenchman says:
http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/407605
Same dude….(minus the fatass-ness)
July 10th, 2007 at 10:29 am
75
PeterPumpkinhead says:
Rob @ #40… AULivesn’ is a Tiger… pay attention
The hype surrounding LSU is begining to approach Auburn ‘03 levels… All we need is Leslie on the cover of the SportingNews with a #1 next to his head and their fate is sealed.
HOW DID WE GET THIS FAR DOWN THE THREAD WITH NOBODY POINTING OUT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING ABOUT THIS LIST!?!?!
Orson started at the top. Everyone else starts at the bottom, their small brains telling them that keeping people in suspense as to who’s #1 is a good thing. Nobody cares who’s #1. The good stuff comes from seeing who gets left out. The 23-25 post is going to have a squillion responses. I can’t wait!
July 10th, 2007 at 10:58 am
76
Mr. Wrong says:
Erik, I’m with you. The sportsbots on the WWL will spend the entire goddamn season boring me with their endless heisman “debates”, and I will never care which big school QB they annoint.
Just like Jarvis Moss, I don’t care about your Heismanns.
July 10th, 2007 at 11:40 am
77
oc phil says:
#65 Alabama or LSU fan? Having a Heisman winner at your school is the next best thing to winning the MNC. It’s better than winning a BCS bowl and certainly better than making the championship game but losing. I’m sure the Auburn or South Carolina fans can vouch for that.
#52 SeaTrojan. When you say that Booty is a notch below Leinart & Palmer, remember he still has a year to make his mark. Leinart had done better going into his last year, but Palmer’s USC legacy was made in his last 3 games (UCLA, ND, Iowa).
July 10th, 2007 at 11:53 am
78
Hossnfeffer says:
How can a team with the word “Fuckin” in its name NOT be in the BCS title game…
Spot on!
July 10th, 2007 at 1:09 pm
79
SeaTrojan says:
oc phil,
I was thinking that Booty is a notch below in ability. His ceiling isn’t as high as Palmer’s or Leinart’s. But I agree, the light switch didn’t go on until the middle of Palmer’s senior season. Overall, I’m just glad that it’s this difficult to nitpick this team.
July 10th, 2007 at 2:26 pm
80
Erik says:
Neither, Oc phil – Are you trying to imply that LSU has never won one of those heavy turd colored trophies?
July 10th, 2007 at 2:34 pm
81
Lloyd the loser says:
What team’s record over the last 7 years has been 9-3, 8-4, 10-3, 10-3, 9-3, 7-5, 11-2?
The most overrated team every year is Michigan. Period!
July 10th, 2007 at 2:35 pm
82
Out of Conference says:
#77 – OC Phil – Now you did it!
We, Like AU, are also at 100% rate of Heisman trophy winners that have not stabbed anybody. Maybe that’s our problem.. we need more passion!
July 10th, 2007 at 2:41 pm
83
Mitch P. says:
If a guy can win the Heisman and then suck in the last game of the season, does he really deserve the Heisman? Why isn’t it given out AFTER the bowls?
July 11th, 2007 at 6:06 pm
84
whoopspig says:
Nice picks there.
October 3rd, 2007 at 5:55 pm