THE RULES, 2007, PER MESSRS. BEAN AND SWINDLE
Phil Steele is off the press. Without the structure of practices and the watchful eye of coaches, player arrests are mounting. And the low-hanging fruit which are Stewart Mandel mailbags are back on our internets. (Wait… savoring that one… Okay. Stew! Love ya babe!)
Yes, college football is on the horizon. We’re not exactly close, but we’re getting close to the time when it’s close. Fall practices will kick into gear in six weeks. Conference media days won’t be far behind. Preseason polls (for 2008) should be available for perusal any day now.
We. Are. Getting. CLOSE! (Sort of.)

Our nightmare is soon to end, college football fans. Ignore the baby on the ceiling.
Before we get too close, though, and the excitement of it all overwhelms us, Peter Bean and Orson Swindle humbly offer a set of proposals, which we pledge to follow. If you’re inspired to join the Movement and sign with us, there’s more than enough room on the train.
However, as we’re suspicious of any movement that would have us as a member, don’t join. It’s surely disreputable, will cause hives, and will ruin your credit. Fair warning.–O.
Proposed:
1. We will not participate in the Conference Wars. We won’t be shy to look closely at schedule strength in talking about our dear sport and the ranking of teams therein, but we solemnly swear to avoid the tired, generic Conference War Chest Thumping.
2. We will actively abstain from 1=1 thinking/writing. Wins are good, losses are bad. You’re smart enough to figure this out on your own. We’re here for the curly fries, please, and not the standard potatoes you can find anywhere else.

Mmm. Curly fries.
3. We will abstain from constructing an All-American team. Until our requests for film of every game played gets approved by every university, we’ll politely decline the temptation to construct such a list. Truth is, we don’t know. There are better ways to talk about the keepers.
4. We will not break down a Stewart Mandel mailbag. This was a hard one for us, but damnit, we’re drawing the line in the sand. When we fry fish in 2007, we’ll be gunning for dolphins, not minnows, dig? Plus Braves and Birds has already perfected this form, anyway.
5. When referring to a team’s ranking, we will use the BlogPoll. Two years of Beta Testing were enough to let us know that the bloggin’ types pay a lot more attention to their ballots than the jaded, overworked sportswriters. Furthermore, as far as we’re concerned, the Harris Poll doesn’t exist. And let’s not even bring up coaches voting on other coaches except in the name of sporting satire.
If it’s up to us, Brian’s BlogPoll takes its giant leap forward in year three. Join the revolution, compadres.
6. We will mercilessly ridicule BlogPoll voters who fail to live up to the BlogPoll’s ever-improving standards. Wack balloteers who fail to justify their opinions will be openly mocked. Or, pending Brian’s approval, banished to Oxford to serve a one-year sentence as Ed Orgeron’s translator. LEMMETAIFOOTBAWYAW!
7. We will tirelessly promote the work of Sunday Morning Quarterback until he is rightly crowned College Football Blog King. No explanation needed here. Right?

Two chicks, at the same time: SMQ, the best in the non-business.
8. We will focus on the brutal facts of the matter. None of this nancy pants psycho-babble that’s best reserved for Reader’s Digest. You didn’t lose because of some ghostly otherworldly spectre of “intimidation.” You lost because your left tackle is not stronger and faster than the man he is facing. Readers are smart enough to accept this. If something silly like this is invoked, it will be in an admittedly silly fashion.
9. We will kneecap the weak-brained, starting with ourselves. And in the spirit of the rule, we’ll admit our errors freely. Even proudly. (Because there will be plenty of them, especially for Orson, the Harry Caray of blogging re: accuracy.)
10. We will focus on what is interesting/fun, not on what is traditionally important/powerful. If Hawaii-Boise State is The game… so be it. There’s a zillion games a weekend, not one. Find your bliss somewhere between DirectTV channels 305 and 360, because it’s a universal slate now. You truly live in golden times, reader.
11. We will challenge the paradigms which govern mainstream football thought, starting with LD’s “GameDay Recap.” You’re all on notice–especially you, um, ourselves.
12. We will never let “Did you play football?” end an argument. That. party. is. over. Surgeons don’t cut off the wrong leg and then ask you if you went to med school. They write your lawyer a check for 3 million dollars and quietly slink away to practice medicine in Belize.
13. Unless we inexplicably decide to write a post on the NBA, Bill Simmons name will never appear on this site. We’re as tired of the too-easy Simmons bashing as we are of the Simmons columns themselves. (Plus he doesn’t give a shit about the game anyway, so fuck him in the ear. -O.)
14. We are not serious. If we are, disclaimers will appear. Tuberculosis has the job of being serious. That position is taken and tired.
15. We will limit our complete ad hominem hatred of a coach to one man and one man only. Orson drafts Bobby Bowden. Peter selects Bob Stoops. You may grab your own Free Parking pass on one and one coach only.
(Why make promises you can’t keep… there is no way you cease the Phil Fulmer ad hominems… no way. –Stranko)

Oh, how we hate this man.
16. We couldn’t care less about season-end awards. The Heisman Trophy is dead to us. Unless and until they put Kyle in charge, we’re indifferent.
17. We are fans of the game, above all else. This is s’posed to be fun, y’hear? Those who try to ruin our sport will be brutalized. Amen.
Signed,
Peter Bean and Orson Swindle









101
Jerkwheat says:
#93
Last year’s Central Michigan Chippewas?
June 18th, 2007 at 5:37 pm
102
DevilGrad says:
Re #93 et supra: It’s bad enough around here to be unfunny; it’s unforgivable to be both dull and wrong.
As noted above, Central would have been in most reasonable top 50s last year, since they won the MAC and — in a concept that may be unfamiliar to you — their bowl game. Western also went to a bowl game last year.
Still, I fully understand your bug-bear against the “mid-majors.” Just for grins, I looked at old AP polls (on the theory that the writers, of all people, most love Notre Dame’s history and reputation) and discovered that only once in this century has Notre Dame finished higher in the final AP poll than the top-ranked mid-major. No wonder those guys want “your” BCS slot. Fuckin’ peasants!
(And now I promise y’all that I’ll go back to making cheap jokes. Thanks for your indulgence.)
June 18th, 2007 at 6:25 pm
103
LD says:
Week 12 in last year’s Coaches’ Poll, Central Michigan too a single vote. Good enough for 37th.
Needless to say, the initial argument was about “MAC and WAC” teams, not just the directional Michigan schools.
Limiting to just MAC and WAC schools:
In 2006’s final polls, Boise State (WAC) finished ahead of ND.
In 2005’s final polls, ND finished ahead of any MAC or WAC school.
In 2004’s final polls, Boise State (WAC), Fresno State (WAC), Bowling Green (MAC), Northern Illinois (MAC), UTEP (then-WAC), and Hawaii (WAC) all received more votes than ND.
In 2003’s final polls, Miami (MAC), Boise State (WAC), Bowling Green (MAC), Northern Illinois (MAC), Marshall (then-MAC), and Fresno State (WAC) all received more votes than ND.
So once in the last 4 years has Notre Dame finished higher in the polls than any of the MAC or WAC teams.
June 18th, 2007 at 6:30 pm
104
DevilGrad says:
BTW, I am now going to go re-read Orson’s post about escaping death at the hands of Beano Cook in case I have arouse the anger of the many-chinned god.
June 18th, 2007 at 6:32 pm
105
Jerkwheat says:
awwww—never thought I’d see such impassioned support for my alma mater here on EDSBS (Central).
June 18th, 2007 at 7:23 pm
106
NewAZTiger says:
#27 – you’re being really unfair in that equation. When you multiply anything by zero you get zero.
Saban vs Cheatypants McSweatervest: It’s clear that a Sweatervest garnishes more hate than a 4 million dollar man wearing sansabelt pants, the same suit to everything, and as a bonus, is shorter thanTerry Bowden. Oh, and he has that butt-haircut to boot.
However, I won’t take the easy road with 5aban. I’m going to think about Mike Stoops and Ty Willingham for my 15 minutes, and at the last second probably declare my hate for Gene Chizik. Fuck them Cyclones, Bitches.
June 18th, 2007 at 8:11 pm
107
NewAZTiger says:
And, where, pray-tell, are the Razorbacks declaring hatred for their own coach? This whole draft thing is not complete until some guy with a great username (Hello SwineonYouCrazyDiamond) declares his total hatred for the Cracked Nutt.
June 18th, 2007 at 8:14 pm
108
Digital Headbutt says:
I also refuse to participate in conference wars, if for no other reason than that my conference (the ACC) would get its ass kicked.
And as for a coach to hate, I’ll go with Bill Callahan. I never really liked Nebraska (who gave my team the incomparable Joe Dailey), and his hiring rendered the classic option offense extinct in major college football.
June 18th, 2007 at 9:32 pm
109
Corn Nation says:
Dan Hawkins!
Wait. How the hell you going to limit it to one coach only? That sucks.
and rules? You’re giving yourself rules? Did Orin Hatch come by your house recently? Wtf?
June 18th, 2007 at 9:35 pm
110
Erik says:
Am I allowed to hate the entire Family Stoops?
June 18th, 2007 at 10:04 pm
111
Jonathan says:
#96 I claimed him at #56, but thanks for the support
June 18th, 2007 at 10:07 pm
112
Andy says:
Urban Meyer.
June 18th, 2007 at 10:46 pm
113
DC Trojan says:
I’m running a little late to this party, but re: rule 15… I just don’t think it’s possible. I can see picking one season-long target, and then having a “Schrute-bag of the week” coaching award following the weekend’s games for someone who gave your main target a run for their money. Sort of like Huggy Low-Down’s “Bama of the week,” for those of you in the DC area…
June 19th, 2007 at 12:02 am
114
Herb says:
I’d like to say Callahan for what he’s done to the option at Nebraska, but that would mean agreeing with a Carolina fan (and I hope Harrison Beck turns out better for us than Joe Dailey did for UNC).
I’m going to have to go with Fulmer, since I actually like UT, but can’t stand him. I can still indirectly hate on Bobby Bowden by hating on Free Shoes University.
June 19th, 2007 at 8:26 am
115
Jon hates Russian spammers and UofA says:
Will UCLA fans pick Pete Carroll or Karl Dorrell?
June 19th, 2007 at 9:24 am
116
DC Trojan says:
#115, I believe they’re having an off-site meeting today in order to make a decision. They have a lot of material either way.
June 19th, 2007 at 12:41 pm
117
Raider Red says:
I can’t believe Mack Brown (aka Sherriff Rosco, Butterteeth, King Trapdoor, Mac3) lasted this long. My Schadenfreude knows no bounds when the Longhorns lose…it’s so wonderful to see someone put their hand on the back of his neck* for a change.
* A most condescending form of the postgame handshake. It says, “My what a feisty little team you’ve got. A pity we had to smoke you by 4 TDs.”
June 19th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
118
Flop says:
Tressel. For all the reasons Jebus mentioned. Grr.
June 19th, 2007 at 1:17 pm
119
John says:
Ill take a immediate no questions asked acceptance of Lllllllloyd Carr as my Hate Coach.
Id pick Bo….but….well…Carr is actually the coach. ah hell…fuck em both.
June 19th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
120
CLTDawg says:
I take one Steven O Spurrier – a load that should have been swallowed. That jerk off pwn3d us for years – and may still yet again.
And about the Richt “thing” – just a pissed off Tech nerd that knows they will never beat us as long as he is our coach.
June 19th, 2007 at 7:19 pm