BIELEMA: CHALLENGING THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL ASSUMPTIONS OF THE 20TH CENTURY
Bret Bielema, EDSBS Man of the Year 2006, takes on the most controversial assumptions of the 20th century in an AP interview earlier this week. Say what you will about him–he’s a man of range and intellectual depth.
“I understand why certain teams get exemptions.
I understand the theory of relativity, too, and think it’s got serious holes that even superstring theory doesn’t explain adequately. I’ve published several impressive peer-reviewed papers on this, too.*
But on getting football exemptions? I don’t understand why Notre Dame does,” Bielema said in an interview with The Associated Press this week. “If they want to play by conference rules, join a conference.
It’s like the Laffer curve. Everyone just assumes it works. Not this coach. Show me the empirical data, and I’ll show you a believer. ‘Till then it’s dogma on a cocktail napkin. **
But yeah, Notre Dame. They don’t take, maybe, into consideration past bowl history. Notre Dame hasn’t won in the last nine bowl appearances, or whatever it is. And to me, we’ve proven over time that we deserve the opportunity.
Oh, and Fermat’s Last Theorem? Someone’s solving that bitch someday, and that someone is gonna be me.”***
And…INCOMING!!!

Most anyone paying attention to college football tends to get postmodernish about Notre Dame. They’re football Russia: once great, hit by a long, long, long slide, and now building for a comeback using their single natural resource (the brand) with a skilled despot at the helm. (Unfamiliar with Russian petrochemical diplomacy? Good on ya for having a life.)
Bashing them for easy ins to the BCS, though…that’s so 1999, no? We know why Notre Dame gets in–Lucini, lucre, loot, simoleons, yuan. That’s passe, given. Kevin’s got the valid points re: Wisconsin’s weak in-conference schedule and their worse out-of-conference slate, but we’re far more interested in why people still get furious about this when nothing changes without a playoff.
And getting even more postmodern, hasn’t the richest postmodernish storyline of post-2000 football been the perpetual comeback/death/comeback of zombie Notre Dame football? For the fan, it may be better to have Notre Dame continually on the cusp of return, since the annual Irish Bowl Game sponsored by “When Animals Attack!!!” and the Discovery Channel’s Huge Predators Toying With Prey in Sick Slow-Motion Fashion makes for some of the more extreme viewing of the largely irrelevant postseason.
Barring a sensible system, a fan has to mine absurdity for entertainment. We actually fault the BCS for setting up such poor matchups for Notre Dame. After all, they’re working on it. Improving facilities. Upgrading coaches. Going to counseling. Attending 12-step meetings. Installing a whole new CRM system. Not cheating on you at the convention by giving a sales rep from Kokomo the Shaky Fireman after seven Long Island Iced Teas. They’re really, really trying here.
But you keep setting them up against teams they cannot possibly beat for the amusement of the masses, which is…awfully and horribly entertaining at times. We got no joy from OSU/Notre Dame last year. Yet we would be lying if we said we did not enjoy watching huge, fast SEC overlords LSU run Notre Dame off the field, most notably because we love watching predation done right.
(Apologies to Big Daddy Drew for moving in on his “kill kill kill” territory.)
It’s just an excuse to work them in because people will watch, and the absurd system allows them in the front door. And that’s just fine, because people know what they’re getting. We predict the introduction of the 2nd seed in the AFC playoffs into the BCS equation any day now just to boost the ratings. (Notre Dame versus the Patriots! Now that’s entertainment! Is that young man broken in half? Get that fucking Dr. Pepper challenge asshole now before someone zooms in…)
Therefore: until the playoff Leviathan arrives and the absurd quotient ramps down a bit, long live the Irish exception. The only thing more entertaining than watching public schools run vert routes with impunity on them in bowl games would be watching them irk the universe by actually winning a bowl game. This is an idea which after nine straight losses seems just as absurd as any.
*Bret Bielema did not say this.
**And he definitely did NOT say this.
***Have you seen his hair? No way he said this.












63
tOSUBuckeyes - dude, you make me laugh. No really, I’m not being funny, I’m just saying. A Buckeye talking smack about the SEC not playing a tough OCC schedule. I supposed as much as the SEC owns tOSU everytime tOSU plays an SEC team, that if you were in the SEC, you’d be bitching about the SEC’s weak-ass in-conference schedule.
Comment by Out of Conference — April 22, 2007 @ 1:35 pm
62
What is a buckeye doing on a Florida site? Well did you think we would crawl under a rock after losing one game badly to Florida? Did Florida fans go under a rock when Nebraska and Tommy Frazier hung 60 something on them to win the NC back in the 90’s? Yeah, we haven’t beaten an SEC team in a while, but every team has its struggles against someone or another. Look at Bama, 1-5 against ND, 0-7 against Texas, and 1-2 against Michigan. That’s a combined 2-14 against Big Boys, hardly a great representation of SEC football, yet Bama is considered the bell cow of the SEC.
I’ve got 7 National Championship reasons to still be a Buckeye fan and the best winning percentage in the last 80 years. One bad game played 8 weeks after the regular season is not enough to break me.
http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http%3A%2F%2Ffootball.stassen.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Frecords%2Fcalc-wp.pl%3Fstart%3D1927%26end%3D2006%26rpct%3D90%26min%3D5%26se%3Don%26by%3DWin%2BPct&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=o-zone+forum&source=m&site=search
Comment by tOSUBuckeyes — April 22, 2007 @ 12:06 am
61
#38: ND will never join a conference. Ever. Why? bc they’d lose their TV deals and a lot of money that comes with independence? What would they get? nothing. ND joining a conference = boon for that conference and suckhole for ND.
Plus who wants to join a moribund B10? too bad ND’s in IN and not someplace in the south. SEC all the way baby. And someone above was right, SEC does have the best assemblage of Coaches in history. They should drop MS schools, KY and add USC, ND, UM, tOSU. all but about 20-25 other schools could drop to 1AA. These 20-25 schools could be another conference or two.
Comment by tom — April 21, 2007 @ 4:01 pm
60
Why is everyone knocking the conference championship game?
According to the media, the Big 10 had a 3 way race at the end of the season, USC and Cal had the same in-conference record, and one could have argued that Rutgers or WVU could have beat Louisville for the Big East championship.
All teams schedule weak OOC opponents, it’s not only the big 12 and the SEC.
Comment by iluvtexasgal — April 21, 2007 @ 3:46 pm
59
CBG,
You can hate us dirty whores all you want, but we’ll still have the smile on our face when all is said and done. And I guarantee you WVa will be picking up some of those Big Least games, especially since Fredo flew the coop.
and tOSU buckeyes, I had to do a double take when you complimented us. that was out of left field.
Comment by Wooderson — April 21, 2007 @ 2:24 pm
58
Notre Dame should always get the worst BCS matchup. You’d make Irish fans happy by giving them a chance to win. It won’t hurt ratings, because fans will watch the game regardless of who ND’s playing.
And if the mid-major gets an upset (like Boise) it’ll make the ND haters even happier than watching ND lose to a team that they all knew ND had no chance of beating (LSU).
Comment by Kakistocrat — April 21, 2007 @ 10:17 am
57
First, I thought the official term was the Big 10 (can’t count).
Second, OOC is just a red herring that the media relies on when the media markets and advertising dollars don’t line up with the on-the-field play.
Third, the Buckeyes can start talking trash about the SEC OOC schedule when they actually beat an SEC team in a meaningful game. tOSU is 3-14 all-time vs the SEC, 3-4 at home, and O-fer anywhere else. tOSU=tSEC’sBitch.
Fourth, it’s the 21st century. Orson, put down the parachute pants and join us on myspace.
Fifth, what the hell is a Buckeye doing talking smack on a Florida Blog?
Sixth, what the hell is a Buckeye doing talking on a Florida Blog when not finishing every phrase with, “yes master”?
Seventh, SEC teams have a hard time getting OOC games because certain teams don’t want home-and-homes. Just in the last 2 years, Michigan and ND have both turned down home and homes with AU. We have 2 OOC BCS schools on the schedule this year, but no one will talk about that. We probably play Mid-Central-Ohio-State for homecoming, which will be the focus game for the national media.
Eighth, has anyone really looked at the SEC coaches? Best assemblage of coaching talent in one conference evAr.
Comment by NewAZTiger — April 21, 2007 @ 8:01 am
56
As to the ND aspect of this topic, I think that it’s fair to say that until the rest of the big boys, Ohio State included, raise their academic standards and graduation rates, no one should give ND shit over their place in the BCS or college football.
Now should the rest of us be penalized because ND has some of the highest academic requirements and probably the highest graduation rate in the country? No. But just like the rest of college football, with its MYTHICAL national championships and bogus bowl season that makes the players and fans wait 6-8 weeks to see the best games, it’s all about the money. You know it and I know it.
Back to ND for a second. Imagine if the rest of the power schools in college football lived up to the same academic standards. Not to blow BQ, but he did carry a double major, graduated on time, and scored a 29-something on the wonderlic test. The kid’s talented, smart, and should make a solid QB at the next level. And just how much extra is he worth for carrying the class load of the double major and graduating on time? What did Russell major in at LSU?
Problem is the ceiling on pro athlete salaries are way too high, and everything trickles down from there.
Okay enough ranting on this topic, there’s cheesecake to be had.
Comment by tOSUBuckeyes — April 20, 2007 @ 9:48 pm
55
Well, of course, by my own measurement, USC had only a few of those as well, depending on where you ranked Michigan, Arkansas, ND, and Nebraska.
Comment by Jeff from LA — April 20, 2007 @ 8:32 pm
54
And by quality win, I mean a win against a prestigious team.
Comment by Jeff from LA — April 20, 2007 @ 8:13 pm
53
I’m not known around here for having any love of ND (see Weis jokes). However, I will stand up for Domers on this one. I’m not sure that Wisconsin’s coach should be the one ripping ND this time. I mean, the Big 10 was hardly a devastating monster of a conference this last year. Its best two teams went 12-0 and 11-1 in the regular season and really just did not show very much during the bowl season.
So yes, Wisconsin did only lose one game, but did that really mean that much? I only count Tennessee in the column of quality wins last year.
Comment by Jeff from LA — April 20, 2007 @ 8:12 pm
52
Whatever my rants against ND, it’s not their fault that they keep getting offered huge paydays in January. I won’t bash them for that.
I agree with the Buckeye who wants to get rid of conference championships. Let’s have an eight team playoff with the first round games taking place at the higher seeded team’s stadium; then use the BCS Bowl games as neutral sites.
Comment by SeaTrojan — April 20, 2007 @ 7:04 pm
51
#21 - Yeah 98 was a joke, it was also almost 10 years ago and that was an 8-4 wisconsin team georgia beat up on. Back to back wins against top SEC teams the last two years should prove wisky’s worth giving an opportunity.
As for the OOC schedule, we all know the SEC is notorious for a weak OOC schedule. The proof, an undefeated 2004 Auburn team being left out of the NCG and a 1 loss 2006 Florida team needing the upset of the decade to happen to get in. Or have you guys forgotten that had USC not blew the UCLA game SEC fans are not walking around with their man feathers puffed out and beating their chests.
In both cases that SEC championship game really went a long ways to solidify a spot in the NCG. It’s a joke and it does a disservice to college football as a whole. Conference championships are worthless and making the big ten add ND and have a championship game solves absolutely nothing, in fact all it might do is further delude OOC scheduling. Ohio State has scheduled Texas (played already), Miami, Fl., USC, and VT for OOC home and home series over the next 8-9 years.
Now I will give you gators some credit because you do have to play Florida St., but the rest of the SEC is an absolute joke. You place no one out of OCC and then when you do beat someone out of conference in a bowl game played weeks and weeks after the regular season you never let us hear the end of it.
Comment by tOSUBuckeyes — April 20, 2007 @ 6:34 pm