<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MYLES BRAND WORRIED ABOUT SALARIES. HA.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:34:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J.J.</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215585</link>
		<dc:creator>J.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 02:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215585</guid>
		<description>Where do you work, Meg? My company would have control over any patents I file.

Musicians rarely own their own music (but somehow I&#039;m &quot;stealing from artists&quot;  according to the RIAA whenever I download a song off the internet or listen on YouTube).

Almost nobody owns their own work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you work, Meg? My company would have control over any patents I file.</p>
<p>Musicians rarely own their own music (but somehow I&#8217;m &#8220;stealing from artists&#8221;  according to the RIAA whenever I download a song off the internet or listen on YouTube).</p>
<p>Almost nobody owns their own work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogers Redding</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215583</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogers Redding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 01:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215583</guid>
		<description>Brand gets his nightly pleasures from photoshopped pictures of Mike Dubose, Andy Sorensen, and Gene Marsh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brand gets his nightly pleasures from photoshopped pictures of Mike Dubose, Andy Sorensen, and Gene Marsh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215454</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215454</guid>
		<description>for what it is worth, athletes aren&#039;t the onlt ones getting the shaft. Any research that goes on at a college is the property of that college. So if you come up with a very profotable invention/discovey, guess who has the rights to making money from it. That&#039;s right- the university. However, since they put up a lot of the starting costs, even if the grant money pays most of the running costs, then I guess I can see the logic. Athletics work the same way. The school is giving them the best equipment, the training table, and the expert coaching, not to mention the marketing exposure that allows them to gain access to the top draft status that mythical cash cow, the signing bonus which is the only guaranteed money in the NFL.  Football is a completely different game from Bball. I think very few NFL teams would pony up the big bucks to a skinny 18 year old kid with no technique when it would mean they would then have to coach them up for 2-3 years before they would really being able to contribute to the pro teams. They would need a minor league like MLB. But why bother with that expense when the colleges are doing it wfor you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for what it is worth, athletes aren&#8217;t the onlt ones getting the shaft. Any research that goes on at a college is the property of that college. So if you come up with a very profotable invention/discovey, guess who has the rights to making money from it. That&#8217;s right- the university. However, since they put up a lot of the starting costs, even if the grant money pays most of the running costs, then I guess I can see the logic. Athletics work the same way. The school is giving them the best equipment, the training table, and the expert coaching, not to mention the marketing exposure that allows them to gain access to the top draft status that mythical cash cow, the signing bonus which is the only guaranteed money in the NFL.  Football is a completely different game from Bball. I think very few NFL teams would pony up the big bucks to a skinny 18 year old kid with no technique when it would mean they would then have to coach them up for 2-3 years before they would really being able to contribute to the pro teams. They would need a minor league like MLB. But why bother with that expense when the colleges are doing it wfor you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215445</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215445</guid>
		<description>&quot;Our point is exactly that–it’s not an amateur operation. It’s a professional operation with a semi-pro mask.&quot;

Fair enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our point is exactly that–it’s not an amateur operation. It’s a professional operation with a semi-pro mask.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fair enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.J.</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215369</link>
		<dc:creator>J.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215369</guid>
		<description>Orson,
What reason do you have to believe that Myles&#039;s motives aren&#039;t what he says--namely, to support the integrity of the game and help our student-athletes? You&#039;re just so...so cynical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orson,<br />
What reason do you have to believe that Myles&#8217;s motives aren&#8217;t what he says&#8211;namely, to support the integrity of the game and help our student-athletes? You&#8217;re just so&#8230;so cynical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Out of Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215335</link>
		<dc:creator>Out of Conference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215335</guid>
		<description>Baconboy (re: your #32 post) - I&#039;m not even clicking on that link for fear of seeing Jimmy Clausen in a speedo.  Believe me, Yost and Benny&#039;s coverage of a mistaken Clausen pic on MZone the last couple days has burned my retina quite sufficiently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baconboy (re: your #32 post) &#8211; I&#8217;m not even clicking on that link for fear of seeing Jimmy Clausen in a speedo.  Believe me, Yost and Benny&#8217;s coverage of a mistaken Clausen pic on MZone the last couple days has burned my retina quite sufficiently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterPumpkinhead</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215333</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterPumpkinhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215333</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great for everyone to get on their white horse and mourn the loss of CFB&#039;s virginity and how we should really do something about having CFB sign a Second Virginity Vow by reeling in coach&#039;s salaries. However, while the athletes may be amatuers, for the school it&#039;s a business and a really important one. If you aren&#039;t Harvard, Princeton, or Yale, you aren&#039;t putting butts in the lecture halls and $$s in the coffers on your academic reputation. You&#039;re doing it with marketing. For major state-assisted (what a joke) schools, the way they get their names out there is through athletics. At schools with very successful &quot;brands&quot;, they collect huge revenues which are used not only to support the athletic programs of the 90% of student athletes whose sports bleed money, they also support things like faculty salaries, which some people consider important. 

These revenues come from TV money, Ticket sales/allumni &quot;gifts&quot;, and licensing revenue. You drive all of those by having people want to buy your brand, just like any other business. And just like any other business, if you want to make the most money, you&#039;re going to have to pay for the best people. 

Kevin Garnett make $25M a year at 18 coming out of high school for playing basketball IN MINNESOTA. Yes, what we as Americans place value on is f*cked up, but why does everyone feel the need to point college coaches out as special for some reason? They work for businesses that need to make money to support the part of the business (the actual educational institution) that is seriously lacking in money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great for everyone to get on their white horse and mourn the loss of CFB&#8217;s virginity and how we should really do something about having CFB sign a Second Virginity Vow by reeling in coach&#8217;s salaries. However, while the athletes may be amatuers, for the school it&#8217;s a business and a really important one. If you aren&#8217;t Harvard, Princeton, or Yale, you aren&#8217;t putting butts in the lecture halls and $$s in the coffers on your academic reputation. You&#8217;re doing it with marketing. For major state-assisted (what a joke) schools, the way they get their names out there is through athletics. At schools with very successful &#8220;brands&#8221;, they collect huge revenues which are used not only to support the athletic programs of the 90% of student athletes whose sports bleed money, they also support things like faculty salaries, which some people consider important. </p>
<p>These revenues come from TV money, Ticket sales/allumni &#8220;gifts&#8221;, and licensing revenue. You drive all of those by having people want to buy your brand, just like any other business. And just like any other business, if you want to make the most money, you&#8217;re going to have to pay for the best people. </p>
<p>Kevin Garnett make $25M a year at 18 coming out of high school for playing basketball IN MINNESOTA. Yes, what we as Americans place value on is f*cked up, but why does everyone feel the need to point college coaches out as special for some reason? They work for businesses that need to make money to support the part of the business (the actual educational institution) that is seriously lacking in money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newspaper Hack</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215320</link>
		<dc:creator>Newspaper Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215320</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who gets nervous when a bunch of fired-up Southerners threaten secession? Would this make Myles Brand the James Buchanan in this analogy?

C&#039;mon -- I want to see a post on compact theory as applied to D-IA (or, as it&#039;s now called, the Football Bowl Subdivision) conferences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who gets nervous when a bunch of fired-up Southerners threaten secession? Would this make Myles Brand the James Buchanan in this analogy?</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon &#8212; I want to see a post on compact theory as applied to D-IA (or, as it&#8217;s now called, the Football Bowl Subdivision) conferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Trojan</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215311</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Trojan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215311</guid>
		<description>Baconboy, glad to hear that your injury worries are more esoteric than having a bad limp for life. 

JohnWA, you&#039;re no doubt right about the overhead costs of a football player being higher than that of a graduate student. However, both of them have some potential economic value to the university, and a successful football program probably yields direct and indirect returns over the investment cost.

Most PhD students wouldn&#039;t bother if there wasn&#039;t some form of tuition remission because the career economics don&#039;t support it - in other words, only a very few would put themselves into that degree of debt to earn less than $40k / year to start in the humanities. 

So, the university is giving up very little by not charging the apprentice academics, because they don&#039;t represent much in the way of lost revenue. What they do represent is cheap labor in the form of people who are willingly taking a pittance to be an apprentice because they hope to join the guild.

But there&#039;s variation in grad student pay rates depending on the popularity and outside funding support of their field. The only semester I broke into making a fourth figure a month (before the decimal) was when I was working a second teaching job. My friends in physics and applied math earned something closer to a living wage, partly because they brought grants money to the university that could be skimmed to cover &quot;overhead.&quot;

By that standard, you could argue that apprentice athletes, which is what football players mostly are at larger universities, are entitled to a decent stipend, possibly greater than they make now, even if it&#039;s not pro-levels of compensation. There&#039;s already market variations in salaries on the academic side based on revenue for the university, so it&#039;s not like it would be grossly unfair to do the same thing for student athletes. 

If you accept the notion that certain athletes can get stipends while others do not, then you&#039;ve already accepted that they can get paid, which makes them semi-professional in my book. From there, it&#039;s more of an ethical or aesthetic argument about how much they get paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baconboy, glad to hear that your injury worries are more esoteric than having a bad limp for life. </p>
<p>JohnWA, you&#8217;re no doubt right about the overhead costs of a football player being higher than that of a graduate student. However, both of them have some potential economic value to the university, and a successful football program probably yields direct and indirect returns over the investment cost.</p>
<p>Most PhD students wouldn&#8217;t bother if there wasn&#8217;t some form of tuition remission because the career economics don&#8217;t support it &#8211; in other words, only a very few would put themselves into that degree of debt to earn less than $40k / year to start in the humanities. </p>
<p>So, the university is giving up very little by not charging the apprentice academics, because they don&#8217;t represent much in the way of lost revenue. What they do represent is cheap labor in the form of people who are willingly taking a pittance to be an apprentice because they hope to join the guild.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s variation in grad student pay rates depending on the popularity and outside funding support of their field. The only semester I broke into making a fourth figure a month (before the decimal) was when I was working a second teaching job. My friends in physics and applied math earned something closer to a living wage, partly because they brought grants money to the university that could be skimmed to cover &#8220;overhead.&#8221;</p>
<p>By that standard, you could argue that apprentice athletes, which is what football players mostly are at larger universities, are entitled to a decent stipend, possibly greater than they make now, even if it&#8217;s not pro-levels of compensation. There&#8217;s already market variations in salaries on the academic side based on revenue for the university, so it&#8217;s not like it would be grossly unfair to do the same thing for student athletes. </p>
<p>If you accept the notion that certain athletes can get stipends while others do not, then you&#8217;ve already accepted that they can get paid, which makes them semi-professional in my book. From there, it&#8217;s more of an ethical or aesthetic argument about how much they get paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orson Swindle</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215309</link>
		<dc:creator>Orson Swindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215309</guid>
		<description>Our point is exactly that--it&#039;s not an amateur operation. It&#039;s a professional operation with a semi-pro mask. 

Brand&#039;s fretting over salaries strikes us as hypocritical a.) because of the huge salary he pulls down, and b.) the NCAA&#039;s very professional sale and sponsorship of basketball&#039;s big playoff.

He then has the gall to fret over the money boosters happily put up from their own pockets to fund these semipro teams.

Again, don&#039;t put us there with the academic integrity protesters. It&#039;s well past that point now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our point is exactly that&#8211;it&#8217;s not an amateur operation. It&#8217;s a professional operation with a semi-pro mask. </p>
<p>Brand&#8217;s fretting over salaries strikes us as hypocritical a.) because of the huge salary he pulls down, and b.) the NCAA&#8217;s very professional sale and sponsorship of basketball&#8217;s big playoff.</p>
<p>He then has the gall to fret over the money boosters happily put up from their own pockets to fund these semipro teams.</p>
<p>Again, don&#8217;t put us there with the academic integrity protesters. It&#8217;s well past that point now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215307</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215307</guid>
		<description>Miles is a hipocrate and doesn&#039;t endear himself to anyone in the sporting public, and the NCAA is universally unpopular.  But does anyone else here believe the NCAA performs (however badly) a necessary function?  Do we really want unlimited booster cash determining where recruits go?  Athletes who don&#039;t have to go to class at all?  Coaches who require 50 hours of practice and film a week?  All pro, international, olympic, and youth sports have governing bodies that set rules and enforce them to attempt to keep the playing field relatively level.  The NCAA is seriously flawed, but the dirty little job has to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miles is a hipocrate and doesn&#8217;t endear himself to anyone in the sporting public, and the NCAA is universally unpopular.  But does anyone else here believe the NCAA performs (however badly) a necessary function?  Do we really want unlimited booster cash determining where recruits go?  Athletes who don&#8217;t have to go to class at all?  Coaches who require 50 hours of practice and film a week?  All pro, international, olympic, and youth sports have governing bodies that set rules and enforce them to attempt to keep the playing field relatively level.  The NCAA is seriously flawed, but the dirty little job has to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215305</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215305</guid>
		<description>&quot;He draws a huge salary for doing…something, while slamming football coaches who actually could tell you their job description.&quot;

I agree, and that sucks, but somewhere in there, Brand is making a decent point. I love college football, something just isn&#039;t right about it. As you guys say all the time, recruiting is creepy, but so is the vast quantities of money changing hands in an ostensibly amateur operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He draws a huge salary for doing…something, while slamming football coaches who actually could tell you their job description.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree, and that sucks, but somewhere in there, Brand is making a decent point. I love college football, something just isn&#8217;t right about it. As you guys say all the time, recruiting is creepy, but so is the vast quantities of money changing hands in an ostensibly amateur operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnWA</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215304</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215304</guid>
		<description>I thought a lot of athletes did get some kind of stipend from some sort of grants and such.  There is a big difference between getting compensated with a small stipend and getting paid commensurate with the money they bring into the school.  One merely puts them on the same relative scale as their peer group.  The other makes them professional athletes. 

I would also say that supporting a top athlete on a full scholarship costs a lot more than the $28K or so you get in tuition as a grad student.  Even taking away the coaching staff salaries, between equipment, food, travel ,and tutors, a university is well beyond the cost of tuition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought a lot of athletes did get some kind of stipend from some sort of grants and such.  There is a big difference between getting compensated with a small stipend and getting paid commensurate with the money they bring into the school.  One merely puts them on the same relative scale as their peer group.  The other makes them professional athletes. </p>
<p>I would also say that supporting a top athlete on a full scholarship costs a lot more than the $28K or so you get in tuition as a grad student.  Even taking away the coaching staff salaries, between equipment, food, travel ,and tutors, a university is well beyond the cost of tuition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bama_buck</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215302</link>
		<dc:creator>bama_buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215302</guid>
		<description>Bama Fan Chip On Should Alert!

It&#039;s okay when Oklahoma and ND pay a coach over three million a year, but as soon as Bama pays four a year there&#039;s a problem.

thanks EDSBS for exposing their ridiculous hypocrisy as it relates to basketball.

I&#039;m more than ready to secede from the NCAA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bama Fan Chip On Should Alert!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s okay when Oklahoma and ND pay a coach over three million a year, but as soon as Bama pays four a year there&#8217;s a problem.</p>
<p>thanks EDSBS for exposing their ridiculous hypocrisy as it relates to basketball.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more than ready to secede from the NCAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Because They Can</title>
		<link>http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2007/03/30/myles-brand-worried-about-salaries-ha/comment-page-1/#comment-215301</link>
		<dc:creator>Because They Can</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/?p=3270#comment-215301</guid>
		<description>**RED ALERT**

Just saw on another site that &quot;Tim Tebow and two other big guys decked out in UF stuff&quot; were spotted on the UGA campus in Athens. Better hope nobody gets the urge to take a less than private tinkle or whip out a fake ID...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>**RED ALERT**</p>
<p>Just saw on another site that &#8220;Tim Tebow and two other big guys decked out in UF stuff&#8221; were spotted on the UGA campus in Athens. Better hope nobody gets the urge to take a less than private tinkle or whip out a fake ID&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
