ROSE BOWL WRAPUP: WINDSHIELD, BUG. MICHIGAN’S BEEN BOTH.
Sometimes you’re the windshield. Sometimes you’re the bug. And sometimes you’re the bug who, after hitting the windshield, is immediately drowned in a bluish ammonia solution while still alive, tossed to the side by the edge of a wiper, and then run over while still weakly conscious by an onrushing semi.
Michigan’s been all three: windshield (most notoriously in the Yakety Sax Notre Dame game), bug (against Ohio State), and then mangled bug against USC. A 3-3 game at the half turned to a 32-18 loss of definitive nature. How, when Michigan seemed so poised to confound the BCS system with a potential dual claim to the national title, did Michigan get hammered so badly in a crucial spot?
Hypotheses, in order of probability.
Michigan couldn’t block. Like a heart attack: simple, fatal, and quick. On both sides of the ball Michigan slid backwards all day like they were on carpet skates. Our best guess why? USC’s stronger than Michigan, a hypothesis that will infuriate Michigan fans already fuming at their conditioning program, which has been described as being so antiquated we always imagine their facilities to look a lot like the video for “Physical” by Olivia Newton-John, though not as gay.
Culpability:Robert Blake-killing-his-wife certainty. You can see it all game long–USC’s pushing Michigan off the ball on nearly every play. Verifiable, doom-spelling, and damning.

Carpet skates: Michigan had them on at the Rose Bowl.
USC’s defense and Michigan’s offense= water, meet silver nitrate and magnesium. USC’s marauding, blitz-giddy defense and Michigan’s stodgy, run-first 1982 hottness attack probably meant disaster from the start. Michigan could not pass block. Michigan could not run block. Their counters to the pressure–screens and draws, just like Lee tells us to do on NCAA 2007–were eaten alive by linebackers. Slants, the great prophylaxis against blitzes in the passing game, either never happened or were never called.
Hot reads vanished in the fog of indecision and panic. All of that equalled a mini-Enschede for the Michigan offense, who came out flat and received zero help from playcalling or halftime adjustments.
Culpability: Super-string theory certain. Certainly sounds complex and interesting, and definitely requires an understanding of the subject we can’t possibly hope to have. Occam’s suspicious.

You’re living in your own private Enschede, Michigan.
Michigan got out-coached. Not really a point of debate. USC came out, racked up 16 points in the third, and changed what they were doing to win the game. Michigan’s offense tried to gamely keep up, but it was like watching a hippo run windsprints to see the Wolverine offense keep pace (or not) with USC. Waggle; run. Run; waggle. Michigan showed nothing new, showed no desire to destroy its opponent in its game-planning, and in total had us sounding like Merrill Hoge on the couch. (You must be a killer to play this game!!! A mad, bloodthirsty, hard killerman!!! Killerman yarrrrrrr!!!!)
By points alone USC’s halftime adjustments were at least twice as good as Michigan’s. Halftime adjustments for Carr mean a change of pants and a cup of coffee; for USC they meant redesign, a slew of new blitz looks, and taking more chances offensively in the name of forcing Michigan into a corner. It wasn’t rocket science; they just couldn’t guard Dwayne Jarrett, who solved the problem of the Cover 2 umbrella by sprinting straight through the gap in coverage and daring the Michigan secondary to knock him on his ass. Who dares wins–and USC did.
Culpability: Tommy Lee gave Pam Anderson Hep C Certainty. Certainly makes sense on a gut-level, right? Then again: unprovable, really. Maybe Michigan just didn’t execute all the great ideas Debord and English had. Then again: they’re responsible for getting those across, right? And really, Pam could have gotten that from any number of ex-boyfriends, right?
Pete Carroll was doin’ it for the kids in Darfur. You just can’t win a karmic battle with a noted humanitarian like Pete.
Culpability rating: Oh, like-gravity-certain. He’s out there right now in an old Huey dropping MREs into Burmese rebel camps while texting recruits on his Blackberry.
59 Replies »
Pages: [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
Pages: [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All












59
Tbone: The discussion regarding Carr’s record was clearly stated as being in terms of final rankings (and the record was brought up by a ND fan) . Check back to #31.
I wonder how the domers would be feeling had MSU and UCLA not choked away those games? But in that case ND might have gone to a more appropriate bowl and had a chance to end the losing streak.
I’m all for ND having an elite team again. I just think it would be nice if they showed it on the field before they get credit for it. So far they kick ass when competing for the CIC trophy and get crushed when they play with the big boys. And the big boys are not a single loss away from being knocked all the way out of the top 25.
Sea Trojan: Maybe it helped that I was playing soccer over there and some of those teams would have kegs in the clubhouse after games. Seeing a pair of twins up on the tables lip synching “Sympathy for the Devil” into beer bottles was more fun that I’ve ever had in an Olive Garden.
PCB: Yeah, the real life ND fans are way classier than the UCLA people for the most part. The older UCLA alums tend to be OK but many of the younger ones have been so twisted by jealousy over the last few years that there isn’t much hope for them.
Comment by oc phil — January 4, 2007 @ 3:55 am
58
On the subject of rivals from another Trojan’s perspective:
1. My ND friends probably enjoy beating Michigan more because there are more of them in their neighborhood; the same goes for USC as it relates to UCLA.
2. ND and USC play EVERY year and all Trojans eventually grow up to realize ND is a much bigger rival even if we hate losing to the fbruins more than the Irish. Historically, we expect to beat UCLA and hope to beat ND.
3. Whether USC wins or loses, my ND friends are stand up guys. When the bruins lose, they are like cockroaches when the light comes on……skittering for the cracks. But when they win……..ugh…..they just don’t know when to shut up (…and it’s going to be a long year until order is restored in 2007).
4. I think ND and Michigan have only played around 30 times and it has not been continuous. SC and ND now have more than 75 games in the series. No contest.
Fight On!
Comment by PCB — January 3, 2007 @ 10:08 pm
57
DC Trojan,
That reminds me, I have to pick up some “freedom fries” when I go to that great Scottish hamburger joint, McDonald’s.
oc phil, I’ve spent some time in Germany and I don’t remember them treating me like I was family at an Olive Garden in Huntington Beach. But, most of the Germans I’ve met travelling have been cool and interesting people. I didn’t mean to give off the impression I was bashing them in my previous post. I guess it’s just unintentionally easy to do so. Maybe I’m just good at bashing and offending people. I’ll test this theory out on the Domers at the bar tonight.
Comment by SeaTrojan — January 3, 2007 @ 6:13 pm
56
Threadjack continues:
i’m just stating the facts. Weis’s record vs ranked teams was mentioned in the context of the discussion about Lloyd’s record. A record that, I assure you, is measured as per the opponents record at the time of the game. Hence, my answer.
Your delving into the ESPNesque realm of “quality wins” which is completely subjective and a moving target.
If ND had beaten USC or Michigan or pulls one out and beats LSU…by the end of the year they still wouldn’t have beaten any top10 teams. Unless you’re dealing with atoms, its stupid to have a statistical criteria where the very measurement affects the data. But whatever, thats the phd speaking.
I’m not hanging my hat on shit. I don’t think any rational ND fan is happy with how the Irish have played in big games since the Fiesta Bowl. But you’re just showing your panties if you think that Weis isn’t making a huge directional upgrade in what was a completely floundering program. And yeah, that makes most ND people happier. Not delusional, but happier.
Germans are way too lazy now to take over the world. Bet Chinese.
Comment by tbone — January 3, 2007 @ 5:33 pm
55
I’d expect somebody else to be the bad guys in 20 years.
The French!
Comment by DC Trojan — January 3, 2007 @ 5:04 pm
54
SKLM: We can just agree to disagree on TJS. I thought SeaTrojan summed him up well as “A one-note joke repeated over and over in smug fashion”.
tbone: sure beating a team lowers thier rankings. But Charlie hasn’t beaten anybody in the top 25 yet, so it isn’t like the loses of Georgia Tech, or Tenn and Michigan last year knocked them out of the top 10. Charlie has gotten a ton of hype out of beating a bunch of weak to mediocre teams and having one close loss to an elite team (as well as 3 other thumpings and a loss to MS freaking U).
Hanging your hat on early season games to teams that proved to be way over rated is sad. Michigan and Tenn had down years last year. Maybe PSU will sneak into the final top 25 this year though and Charlie will end the year with a decent (but no really good) victories on his resume (unless he pulls off an upset in the Sugar Bowl, of course).
PAK: The USC-ND is played on Thanksgiving weekend to make it an easier trip out for the ND fans who want to go to LA. I was told that was the “senior class trip” for the domers every other year.
SeaTrojan: I’ve spent some time in Germany. I found the younger generation to contain lots of cool people. I’d expect somebody else to be the bad guys in 20 years.
Comment by oc phil — January 3, 2007 @ 4:34 pm
53
DC Trojan,
My guess is about 20 more years. As soon as those who remember the stigma of the holocast(SP?) are out of power.
Comment by tzubear — January 3, 2007 @ 3:39 pm
52
Is “Two World Wars and one World Cup, doo-dah, doo-dah†a chant from your past?
Funny, but no; being Scottish, I’ve as much chance of celebrating a World Cup win by Scotland as I have of a week’s debauchery with the Song Girls and Texas Pom Squad.
Actually, Scotland has a better chance of winning the World Cup.
But when Germany reunified in 1990, some people said hurrah for freedom; in my house it was more a case of “how long until the bastards try it again?”
Comment by DC Trojan — January 3, 2007 @ 2:34 pm
51
SKLM and oc phil,
I think Simers is a mixed bag. I appreciate his willingness to take on sacred cows, but I also feel he is often a formulaic hypocrite, a one note joke repeated over and over in smug fashion.
Simers’ best piece of work was an article on Pat Tillman after he was killed. A very thoughtful article with an interesting angle. I don’t understand why he doesn’t produce more work like it.
Comment by SeaTrojan — January 3, 2007 @ 1:57 pm