REINHOLD MESSNER WOULD DO IT.
Orange and Blue Hue, for your viewing buck, is simply a better Gator blog than we can ever hope to be–honest with sound correction for homerism, funny, and solely and exclusively focused on the finest football team named after a carnivorous lizard in the land. The honesty part may be found here, where they assault Florida’s scheduling with cold, calculated reason. (Why they’re blogging while logical, well, we’ll never know.)
Hypothetically, had we turned down the allure of dominating the Western Carolina Catamounts, or Southern Miss, or UCF, and actually scheduled a team without a directional modifier in the name and a solid stake in the top 25, Florida would be a much larger spanner in the works for the BCS and a muscular candidate for the title game. But they’re sooooo sweeeeeet! And cakey yum yum! And they’re rotting Florida’s teeth schedule-wise, leaving our beloved Gators as a toothless interlocutor in the national title debate.

We’ve still got that old problem. Our chef isn’t helping.
Take a look at week two alone. Florida played UCF, who managed to cross the fifty once or twice on the way to losing 42-0 at home. Miami–just down the Ronald Reagan Turnpike Miami–was drinking margaritas from the skull of Florida A and M. Louisville, the closest current simulacrum of Spurrier’s mid-90s banditos, was texting hoochies early in the third quarter of a 62-0 murder of Temple. West Virginia could have made for the Spread Option bowl of the century, but was instead giving the Rod to Eastern Washington. Any one of these randomly selected games would have been first-rate games with gobs of scoring and national implications, cooling apple pies of recruiting appeal left on the windowsill for visiting prospects to steal and devour.
Yet the siren call of an easy home game and the very short-sighted economics of snap scheduling gave us a beatdown. We adore the sight of slain patsies as much as the next fan, especially when the backups are romping and tossing flea-flickers with a thirty-point lead. (Bread and circuses! We love ‘em.)
The long-term profit to be made from burly scheduling, though, ultimately outweighs the negatives of the fiscal push of a home-and-home; this is especially true for a program 4 mil in the black, as OBH rightfully points out. The bowl bid you’d nab with the gamble, the recruits you could attract, the national publicity…all of it adds up to potential long-term gains outpacing the popcorn and parking passes you sell for the ritual sacrifice of Western Carolina.

Those Aztecs were savages. They also would have appreciated scheduling trends for some big time programs.
USC, for all the joking we may make about humanitarian Pete Carroll and his golden unicycle, is the best program in the known universe right now because they schedule out of conference games aggressively and without an iota of fear. It is no coincidence that when the carcass of the season gets its autopsy, the Pac-10 champ may with confidence say that it beat the doors off a team that is right now at worst the second best team in the conference (and potentially its champion.) They also beat a quality Big 12 team playing for its conference championship, too, and hammered its traditional OOC rival in drastic fashion in front of a national television audience.
USC’s been Microsofting the college football world one game at a time, building a semantic monopoly whose shares are cashed in with each victory. If the national picture–if you believe in a national picture–matters at all, then field a competitive business plan to USC’s. Ohio State’s already begun the process; for christ’s sake, even Georgia’s beginning to earn rewards miles now, and they’re the ones renowned for griping about going all the way to Baton Rouge for games.
Florida fans may bitch all they like, but they cannot complain, at least by terms of the second definition:
To make a formal accusation or bring a formal charge.
This is something Florida fans cannot do, since in the anarchic world of college football, the team with the biggest heads on their pikes wins. At the moment, an unbelievably tough Florida team loses this comparison with USC, who laughs at the lolling tongues of the midget skulls of UCF and Western Carolina we’re carrying around in our schedule. If you don’t care about the national picture, fine; yet if the sports bar discussion turns to a Gator claim on a title shot, take the stool you sit on and saw one of the legs off before you begin, since you might as well begin where Jeremy Foley’s put us schedule-wise.
Reinhold Messner said in this month’s edition of National Geographic: “Without the risk of death, adventure is impossible.” A team that’s cheated death this many times in a single season and its ballsy coach surely wouldn’t fear another Nanga Parbat on their schedule, would they? USC hasn’t. We shouldn’t either. With the pick of the litter in Florida and all the tools a program could ask for, there’s no reason why Florida should ever have to run into this problem again. Ever.

Reinhold would do it.
PS. WATB thinks this is crap, but doesn’t say why. The only compelling reason to argue for Florida in the BCS crapshoot: we’re on the same side of the fence as Matt Hayes, meaning the horsefaced and hectoring side. We’ll wear the bridle and saddle on this day, we guess.









1
AllWhoYonder says:
Related to your reference, but definitely off topic: who wins a fight between Messner and the Orgeron? I’m going with Messner. That dude is a badass like nobody else.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:04 am
2
Orson Swindle says:
Is it above or below 26,000 feet?
December 1st, 2006 at 11:07 am
3
AllWhoYonder says:
take your pick.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:10 am
4
AUgrad says:
Just FYI – Nanga in Hindi (Indian national language, yes, its not called Indian) means naked.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:13 am
5
italiangator says:
Anytime the debate goes to the schedule it only reveals the insanity that is CFB. Here’s what happens if we scrap the first 2 games for H/H matchups with a big name team: first year it happens, we lose 1 of 2, and everyone bitches about why the hell Foley would take us out of the national picture in the first month of the season. Now, I realize and agree that this would mean that we shouldn’t be in the picture anyways, but the point is that making a schedule is a crapshoot. We were told in August that our schedule was likely the most difficult in the history of CFB. How it played out, it wasn’t, but how is anyone to know that 4, 5 years ago? The problem is not our schedule. The problem is the system.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:13 am
6
Orson Swindle says:
Sure. But in a crooked system, you stack your deck, since no one’s going to slap your hand when you pull as many aces as possible. You play it, or pick a new game.
Until le playoff arrives around 2012, this is the system. Work it.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:15 am
7
Rob G says:
I don’t even think we need to schedule a national contender early in the season, just stack the non conference schedule with mid level BCS teams. And NEVER 1-AA teams.
Instead of Western Carolina, UAB offered us 2 in Gainesville, 1 at them. I think that would have been a much better call (not ideal, but better than the “Catamounts”)
December 1st, 2006 at 11:18 am
8
Orson Swindle says:
Messner at 26 plus by ice axe, provided he can run around and avoid the Orgeron as he holds his breath. This could go on as long as an hour, though, so Messner’s still in danger of a gory loss.
The Orgeron below 26K by sudden devouring. If he swallows Messner whole, though, he loses when Messner hacks his way out of Ed’s stomach.
Either way this fight will confirm Messners’s long-held belief tha the Yeti exists.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:20 am
9
oc phil says:
I think the article is right. That attitude is what has gotten USC in position for the titlte game again this year. And they have the rivalry with ND that is equivalent to the FSU game for the gators.
Had Texas not folded down the stretch, they would have been at the top of the list of one-loss teams thanks to playing tOSU, even though they lost the game.
I’d put the over/under one Meissner-Ogeron at 22,000 feet.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:24 am
10
Vilano28 says:
Sometimes its hard to see the numbers from way up in that ivory tower that Bull Gators reside in..however, if you look introspectively you will realize the following.
One of your cupcakes, So Miss, a non SEC flunkie, had better stats against UF than your SEC brethren Tennessee, Georgia, Kentucky and rival Florida State.
Oh yeah, also noticed that you guys won 3 games when you actually had less total offense that your opponents-Vanderbilt, LSU and Alabama.
Not dominating in your wins has been your nemisis–nothing to do with the Catamounts..
December 1st, 2006 at 11:40 am
11
AUAlum says:
I’m not hating on Southern Cal especially after they came to Jordan-Hare and almost got Tuberville fired. However, if you forget about in-conference or OOC games, their schedule looks similar to Florida’s, especially when adding the Championship game which is appropriate for comparisons. Sorry in advance for any formatting problems.
Southern Cal vs. Florida
Arkansas Arkansas
Nebraska Georgia*
Arizona* Southern Miss
WSU South Carolina*
Washington* Vanderbilt
ASU* Kentucky
Oregon State* Alabama
Stanford Western Carolina or UCF*
Oregon Auburn*
Cal Tennessee*
Notre Dame LSU*
UCLA Florida State*
Taking away the Arkansas game, if you lined these teams up, Florida’s scheduled teams would go 7-4. Florida may play the two weakest teams listed (although Western Carolina or UCF could beat Stanford) but they also play the three hardest.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:43 am
12
rjsplow says:
“Take a look at week two alone. Florida played UCF, who managed to cross the fifty once or twice on the way to losing 42-0 at home.”
Isn’t that about how many times Alabama crossed the fifty against us as well?
December 1st, 2006 at 12:00 pm
13
Vilano28 says:
Again, I know it’s hard to see from the Ivory Tower, but your close, try 7 times…
December 1st, 2006 at 12:12 pm
14
DevilGrad says:
Mmmmmmm. Cupcakes.
Are those Magnolia Bakery specials?
December 1st, 2006 at 12:31 pm
15
italiangator says:
Also, the idiocy that is the 12th game has led to alot of this debate- if we didn’t have the 12th game, we don’t play WCU, and this conversation isn’t happening, largely because USM is a respectable program, and no one could fault us an in-state UCF matchup. I agree with you, Orson, in the need to play within the system that exists, but I also think that anyone who questions our schedule strength is putting a way too much emphasis on the WCU game that I’m pretty sure most Gators would rather have seen be a simple bye week.
December 1st, 2006 at 12:35 pm
16
AUgrad says:
but I also think that anyone who questions our schedule strength is putting a way too much emphasis on the WCU game that I’m pretty sure most Gators would rather have seen be a simple bye week.
a la The Citabel for Auburn 2004, even though to be fair to my Tigers, we had scheduled Bowling Green who backed out at the last minute to play Oklahoma.
December 1st, 2006 at 1:31 pm
17
Bryan says:
I guess what AU learned in 2004, didn’t quite sink in like I thought it might. Maybe the SEC coaches should get together and have a Power Point slide show or something…..
Has any team in the BCS era made it to the BCS title game with a I-AA team on its schedule? I’m too lazy to to the research, but it’d be interested in knowing.
December 1st, 2006 at 2:21 pm
18
Chris says:
GAH!
I wish they’d just forbid scheduling a 1-AA team. I hate seeing teams like SE Missouri State on the schedule every year. There are plenty of cupcakes to be found at the 1-A level. Someone has to fund Buffalo and the formerly Directional Louisianas
December 1st, 2006 at 2:32 pm
19
Run Up The Score says:
Penn State has FIU, Buffalo, Temple AND Notre Dame next year. You couldn’t find a bigger bunch of pansies at the Philadelphia Flower Show.
December 1st, 2006 at 2:35 pm
20
italiangator says:
#17, simple answer is yes, although I don’t feel like searching through all the schedules- LSU in ‘03 played Western Illinois, so it has happened.
December 1st, 2006 at 2:39 pm
21
yz says:
um, didn’t nd beat penn st this year? by alot?
December 1st, 2006 at 2:46 pm
22
Geaux Irish says:
Penn State will roll us next year.
December 1st, 2006 at 2:55 pm
23
Bryan says:
I dug around a bit. Add VT, MIAMI and NEB to the list.
VT beat James Madison in 1999. MIAMI and NEB both beat Troy in 2001. MIAMI also beat Florida A&M in 2002.
So, I guess having a I-AA team on your schedule isn’t exactly the kiss of death, but I’m sure it doesn’t help.
December 1st, 2006 at 3:15 pm
24
Orangeblood says:
Mr. Pibb + Red Vines = Crazy Delicious!
December 1st, 2006 at 3:35 pm
25
tOSU_radar says:
I dare contemplate tOSU’s poll/blog fate after the beating of the mighty I-AA Youngstown State Penguins in 2007. I suppose the money YSU gets covers Tressel’s dowry.
December 1st, 2006 at 3:42 pm
26
Jeff from LA says:
I admittedly am biased, but here’s one point I think we all can agree on. I believe that few of us really get pumped up before the season to see our team beat up on a directional cupcake or a Div. 1-AA team. I know that I was super excited about USC playing Nebraska before the season. Can you really tell me that you wouldn’t be excited if your team was going to play a big-name program such as Ohio State, USC, or Texas? Wouldn’t those games be a sure sell-out? I know I would love to see USC-UF, or USC-Auburn. So, if you’re just a big fan of college football, you should also be against the scheduling of OOC cupcakes. Big name programs playing for high stakes during the season just makes for better football for all of us.
December 1st, 2006 at 4:27 pm
27
J-skool says:
I tend to agree with ItalianGator but for a slightly different reason.
It’s pretty simple. As long as Florida doesn’t blow a load at Auburn, this debate would not arrise. The Gators would play, tomoroow, for the SEC title AND a crack at the BCS title. Yes, I know, USC and any other school can play ifs, but just hear me out.
Come August, teams MUST expect the ONLY path to the title game is an undefeated season. It’s just the way, I think, the BCS functions.
A BCS conference school has two choices:
1.) Schedule wins for OOC and *hope* you are one of two (at most) undefeated teams come January, or
2.) Schedule tough games for OOC, risk an early loss, and *hope* your SOS puts your 1-loss ahead of the other X# of 1-loss squads.
I’m all for great games and “the best beating the best,” but ask yourself which of the two options will take you to more BCS title games. It’s not hard.
December 1st, 2006 at 4:43 pm
28
oc phil says:
#11 The method of pairing up teams like that includes a ton of judgment calls and does not say much. That really boils down to a rehash of the old “the SEC is hard so we need to play cupcakes” arguement. There is no real data from year to year as to how a conference is. When teams only feast on cupcakes ooc you just can’t say anything about the conference. For example FSU-Miami this year could have actually been a matchup between good teams as some were claiming early in the year.
A team’s conference schedule is whatever it is. No they are not equal but there is no real way of judging that from year to year. Probably the SEC did screw up by leading the charge to 12 team divisional conferences, but they went for the greed of scheduling a conference game. People from outside the SEC’s area are NEVER going to give the SEC as much credit as the SEC fans think they deserve. Deal with it. You have to schedule more meaty treats or you are going to lose out to teams from other conferences come BCS time.
tOSU may have a weak OOC slate next year, but considering that they just finished a series with Texas and have USC on the schedule for the next two years, I think the system might give them a pass. But they could also get the short straw next year for that very reason if they are part of an unbeaten or one-loss logjam.
December 1st, 2006 at 4:43 pm
29
oc phil says:
Choice #3. Schedule tough OOC games and win them.
That has worked pretty well for USC, except maybe in 2002. But that team still claimed a Heisman and kicked off the current run, so I wouldn’t have wanted anything done differently.
December 1st, 2006 at 4:46 pm
30
J-skool says:
Touche`, phil. The point is still clear: Go Undefeated!
December 1st, 2006 at 4:49 pm
31
oc phil says:
Yeah, obvioiusly undefeated is best.
Though in USC’s case this year the loss was in conference and it was scheduling the 3 tough OOC games that has gotten them into the final game (and Arkansas and Nebraska coming through with big years certainly helped too). If Texas hadn’t lost the two conference games the single loss to tOSU would have put them in title game. Likewise if Oklahoma had run the Big 12 schedule with only the dubious loss to Oregon, they’d be in the big game. If Cal hadn’t blown the game to Arizona, they’d be in the Rose Bowl even with the losses to Tenn and USC. I think there is still an upside, win or lose, to those sorts of games.
The big thing is that it makes for a better sport overall. I was looking foreward to the Tex/tOSU and Cal/Tenn games all summer.
December 1st, 2006 at 5:41 pm
32
J-skool says:
Agreed. I vote for the USC-UF home and home. Foley, for better or worse, views the BCS through lenses tinted with Option 1, above.
Here we are, trying to place logic behind the inexplicable. Ain’t it grand? But the banter keeps us coming back for more.
December 1st, 2006 at 6:03 pm
33
Leopold Stotch says:
Wait, Southern Miss is a cupcake? (In Chuck Amato’s voice)
December 1st, 2006 at 6:05 pm
34
J-skool says:
NICE!
December 1st, 2006 at 6:24 pm
35
oc phil says:
I think USC still has an open date next year. They had scheduled cupcake Idaho as a favor to coach Holt who left USC to take the head coach job in spud country. Then when Holt came back to USC this year, Idaho cancelled the game. It will be interesting to see who USC ends up playing in that slot.
I think a UF/USC game would be great. Though I think the last time that series was scheduled USC didn’t fare too well. Maybe that could help spur Foley into action to get it done.
I agree BTW that Southern Miss is a legitimate team. But I think the OOC gmes that help a team the most are the sort that have College Gameday at least considering a stop there. The national spotlight can give recruiting advantages even for the losing team.
December 1st, 2006 at 7:12 pm
36
Celeste says:
However you feel about the merits of weak OOC games, if Tennessee and Georgia–the other strong SEC East teams–are scheduling OOC games with genuine opponents, Florida looks weak by comparison.
December 1st, 2006 at 7:18 pm
37
asimperson says:
Still, though, the odds of winning all your games with DI-A schedule are slim, no matter how many cupcakes you play. The odds are that you will lose at least once. Why not try to compensate for that instead?
December 1st, 2006 at 7:28 pm
38
GoneGator says:
Florida has had the winningest team in Division 1 for the last 25 years (FSU) on its schedule every freaking year for the last 25 (actually 51) years. They schedule Miami (a top 5 winning percentage) 2 out of 8 years, or some such wierdness. They had C-USA’s 1st and second place teams on this year’s schedule. Of their 13 opponents, I think 10 or 11 are bowl eligible. Moreover, they play an extremely tough extra game on a neutral field this season, something the Big 10 and Pac 10 have avoided. No apologies needed.
December 1st, 2006 at 7:56 pm
39
oc phil says:
I agree that the SEC schedule plus FSU puts UF with the best of the best in most years. Playing Miami is also great for the sport. But while FSU might have had a good run for the past 25 years, they didn’t help much this season and Miami wasn’t on the schedule. I’m not impressed by C-USA teams as a claim of toughness.
I’m a USC fan so I like the idea of them going to the championship game. But I hate the idea that if USC loses then Michigan will probably go. In my mind the Florida/Arkansas winner should get the shot over the Wolverines. Maybe if it comes down to it that might happen, you never know with the BCS.
December 1st, 2006 at 8:37 pm
40
AUTigers99 says:
Re: 27 An undefeated season for an SEC team would seem to be a certain bid to the BCS title game. Unless… how about you start the season ranked 17 and two other BCS conference teams also go undefeated and started the preseason (bullshit) rankings in the top five? That probably means in the beauty pageant of CFB that you’re fucked six ways from Sunday and you get to play VT in the Sugar Bowl.
If everyone who was a fan of any SEC team was as pissed off about AU getting the shaft in 2004 and UF getting the shaft this year as they would be about their team, then maybe this wouldn’t keep happening.
And maybe Mike Slive will get some balls.
December 1st, 2006 at 9:29 pm
41
uflakis says:
No apologies needed for UF’s schedule. FSU ooc plus the SEC schedule always means the schedule is good. When the conference is really good, the schedule is great. This year, the Gators have the best win (over #5 LSU) among anyone outside of OSU. The problem is the perceived weakness because of the close wins. It is not the schedule.
Also, schedules are made years in advance. USC scheduled Nebraska and Arkansas 8 years ago, back when Humanitarian Pete was still in the NFL. So credit Paul Hackett if you must credit anyone.
December 1st, 2006 at 10:49 pm
42
Jeff from LA says:
Speaking of AU 2004, had AU not played the Citadel that year in their OOC game, they probably would have had a stronger argument for being in the MNC game. It really comes down to the fact that the SEC should schedule some more meaningful OOC games.
I, for one, would love to see USC play Auburn again. Anytime, anywhere. Its unfortunate that we only played in 02-03. Hopefully, USC will have a chance to play you guys again sometime soon during the regular season.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:19 pm
43
J-skool says:
I realize Auburn ‘04 puts it all to shit, but it is an outlier in the history of the BCS. I cannot use an outlier as the basis of a hypothesis.
December 2nd, 2006 at 1:00 pm
44
AUTigers99 says:
The BCS is fundamentally a screwed up system because it is based on a bowl system that is designed to reward half of the 1-A teams in the country with an end of the year bonus game and make the most money possible for the big power conferences, NOT determine the best team in the country. The mythical national champion as determined by the BCS or the old bowl setup is still a giant beauty pageant. There is not another sport that I follow that has a champion not determined by actually having teams, players, drivers, etc. face off against each other at the end of the season. It puts CFB squarely in the realm of judgement sports like figure skating or synchronized swimming because no matter how you spin it, you are still comparing how UF would have matched up with USC or Michigan instead of actually seeing it on the field.
The only way the BCS “works” is if there are two undefeated teams (or two one-loss teams) at the end of the year. Obviously that doesn’t include teams like Boise State or Utah or even Rutgers this year. Even if Rutgers had gone undefeated they didn’t have a chance to play tOSU because the judges (pollsters) would never have moved them up high enough in the beauty pageant rankings.
Don’t think thats relevant? How about NC State or Villanova winning games they weren’t supposed to in the NCAA basketball tournament? How about George Mason making the Final Four last year? Upsets like those are more likely in college sports than in any pro sport but we may never see it happen in CFB because every “big” school/conference/university president is greedy and wants their piece of the money.
Problem is they screw themselves every year. Auburn is the only outlier? Ask Oregon or Miami about that. It’s hard to consider any year an outlier in a system that has been around for five or six years.
December 2nd, 2006 at 1:34 pm