BLOGPOLL BALLOT, CHAMPIONSHIP WEEK: BLUE SCREEN OF DEATH POLL
We like the top ten, at least. The rest, as usual, is a sad mess.
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio State | — |
| 2 | Michigan | — |
| 3 | Southern Cal | — |
| 4 | Florida | — |
| 5 | Louisville | 6 |
| 6 | LSU | 4 |
| 7 | Oklahoma | 7 |
| 8 | Arkansas | 3 |
| 9 | Wisconsin | 1 |
| 10 | Rutgers | 5 |
| 11 | California | 6 |
| 12 | Auburn | 4 |
| 13 | West Virginia | 6 |
| 14 | Notre Dame | 8 |
| 15 | Texas | 3 |
| 16 | Tennessee | 2 |
| 17 | Nebraska | 2 |
| 18 | Boise State | 5 |
| 19 | Wake Forest | 6 |
| 20 | Texas A&M | 6 |
| 21 | Virginia Tech | 1 |
| 22 | Boston College | 1 |
| 23 | Georgia Tech | 14 |
| 24 | Hawaii | 2 |
| 25 | South Florida | 1 |
Notes, Clarifications, and Mistakes We Made. Again.
–The hardest thing about hybrid polling–where you blend the results of matchups in the HYPOTHETICAL DEATH THEATER in your head plus a vague notion of a team’s absolute value at that point in the year–is settling on which factor to lean on for moving a team up or down.
Keeping USC at three instead of four makes the brain quake a little after watching Notre Dame blasted into teeny pieces by a team clearly intent on giving them a 10 point handicap. (The sign of a true predator: toying with its prey cruelly! The comment brought to you by David Attenborough.)

Playing with your food–something David Attenborough would approve of. Seen here vacationing with Ed Orgeron.
But yet…without a head to head or conference foes, we have to go on absolute valuation and their one shared opponent. USC and Michigan both alpha-rolled the Trojans Irish, leaving us going to the losses, which is where USC gets the analytical shaft. Michigan gets a 3 point loss on the road to the guys upstairs, and USC gets a scraping defeat to Oregon State, who contrary to popular opinion does not suck.
The top three are the top three for a reason: they’re all three standard deviations away from the norm, the best in the country not by margins, but by leagues. Everyone below them is a degree worse in terms of quality.
The next group. Call them the “merely very good.” Florida’s still winning games a la mode de Belichick, finding some way to turn every game into a 21-14ish struggle where men you’ve never heard of suddenly cause fumbles, make crucial tackles, or score touchdowns. No field goals, yet, though, since our kicker’s turned into the Rick Ankiel of the uprights. Once we get that cranking, we might win games by six points. Then there’s a jumble of other very good teams, including Louisville, the best team in the Big East, followed by LSU, a team who should have destroyed all in its wake this year but inexplicably didn’t.
Again, take the teams from 5-10 and rearrange them in random order, and this could make as much sense as our rankings. We just think Louisville wins most of the hypotheticals between these teams because of their ability to score, hold serve on defense, and their relative lack of injury at this point.
Oklahoma got up here courtesy of Pac-10 officiating and Bob Stoops’ amazing softshoe work this year. His magicianship has been truly Gob Bluth-esque. It’s been like…pennies from heaven! Losing his starting qb and running back and still [poof!]ing into the Big 12 championship game…it’s like they’re Wake Forest, except with a schedule.
The rest….…is a bleeding mess. Notre Dame has two huge losses to good competition, but has two huge losses to good competition. They beat Georgia Tech, who has Reggie Ball, who lost a pickup game of four square this morning to an eight-year old after fumbling the ball and throwing it away on back-to-back plays. And Auburn’s offense regressed as the year went on, with even their victory over Florida (blinding pain…between…the…eyes…) coming without an offensive touchdown.
There’s also the little clot of Tennessee, Texas, and Nebraska, all teams misfiring, misvalued, or just plain difficult to read. Until someone picks up that new shoulder for Colt at Home Depot, the Longhorns will remain here; until Bill Callahan dons an eyepatch and a fake mustache and convinces us that his evil twin Will Callahan is coaching the Huskers, they’ll stay down, too.
The rest is mushwork, especially the ACC teams. Virginia Tech is 10-2? How the hell does that happpen every year? They’re just setting us up for another high ranking, stunning loss, totally forgetting about them until midseason-Beamerball comeback-to-finish-10-2 again. It’s a process as regular as the Krebs Cycle, just with better special teams. And we’ll no doubt fall for it again next year.
We hate Georgia Tech because Ball looked horrible, but they probably don’t deserve the tossing they get this week. Boise State is up there because they earned a BCS slot, but will lose wretchedly to whomever they face; viewers who root for the bear in mauling videos, tune in! BYU beats Utah on a nutsoid last heave–two steps closer to heaven for them.
Finally, USF gets the official U Go Girl! 25 slot for beating West Virginia at home. Somewhere, a sixth-year business major pounded a kamikaze at a strip mall bar in celebration. Rock on, Tampa.

Google “Tampa fashion,” and this is result number one. No lie.

6
3 







1
NewAZTiger says:
Reflecting on AU’s season, I’m amazed that we won 10 games with injuries to QB, RB, WR, Center, TE, and FB. Both starting RBs were banged up from the LSU game on as was the QB. The starting TE and FB were lost for the year during or before the first game. The starting center missed 6 games…
And on the defensive side, our safeties, corners, and defensive line all had key personell injured for multiple games, combined with the disciplinary actions sidelining some of the linebacking corps for significant chunks of the season.
Add that to a 12 consecutive game schedule, and 10 wins is really impressive. The other 2 teams in the SEC that played 12 in a row finished at or below .500.
There’s that number again… 5….
November 29th, 2006 at 11:28 am
2
Orson Swindle says:
It is impressive. But after that run, they just seem completely and totally spent.
November 29th, 2006 at 11:29 am
3
oc phil says:
I’d put both USC and Florida ahead of Michigan based on who they have beaten, rather than who the loss was to.
November 29th, 2006 at 11:30 am
4
AUgrad says:
Call it a bias, but I think Auburn and Cal should swap their rankings. Cal did score a lot of points, but just like ND came up short on two of their most important games (UT and USC) while Auburn did manage to beat 2 teams in your top 6, offense or no offense.
But then again, its all from your perspective and its your poll! So I will just sit here in the corner and wait for the bowl announcements.
November 29th, 2006 at 11:44 am
5
JR says:
Check out the 1st result if you Google “Tampa culture”
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=tampa+culture&btnG=Search+Images
Wow, I love my home town.
November 29th, 2006 at 11:44 am
6
Odell 51 says:
I just don’t understand the Rutgers spot. All the teams ranked behind them from 11-17 would wax them. I mean come on. That fairy tale is so over it hurts.
November 29th, 2006 at 11:51 am
7
JDW says:
I’m not sure if Tennessee is that “difficult to read.” 9-1 with Erik Ainge and 0-2 without him. He put up All-SEC numbers for an offense with no running game to help and with the pressure of a very medicore defense that won’t shut down anyone. Not positive if Tennessee beats LSU or Arkansas with Ainge, but the 9-3 must come with some sort of asterisk.
IMO, definitely more impressive that Nebaraska’s 9-3. Texas unquestionably has more talent, but 9-3 v. this year’s Big 12 is not impressive at all.
November 29th, 2006 at 11:53 am
8
Hokie Andrew - Crosses Ocean, Lives to tell the tale... says:
Not only are we the highest ranked team in the ACC, we also have the only spotless record against OOC foes (Southern Miss who’s in the C-USA CG) and Cincinatti who beat Rutgers who beat Louisville who beat WVU which sets Tech up for the inside track to another Big East football championship. Lump that in with the #1 total defense, #1 scoring defence, #1 passing defense and #13 rushing defense the year after we lost five starters to the NFL including two All Americans who are playing in their rookie year and I call this year a massive success, especially for an 8-4 looking team in a rebuilding year.
November 29th, 2006 at 11:59 am
9
Hokie Andrew - Crosses Ocean, Lives to tell the tale... says:
Actually check that… Wake also finished their OOC snacks without getting anything on themselves.
November 29th, 2006 at 12:00 pm
10
Orson Swindle says:
Fairy tale officially done if they lose to WVU this weekend, Odell. But that’s very, very probable.
November 29th, 2006 at 12:01 pm
11
AUAlum says:
I know they punched us in the mouf last year, but what has Wisconsin done to merit remaining in the top 10?
They’ve played one good team, Michigan, and loss. It wasn’t a 72 point loss at home like the Domers, but they haven’t played two decent teams all season thanks to avoiding Ohio State.
Their Cap One Bowl match against Arkansas or Florida should be a good test for the Badgers.
November 29th, 2006 at 12:17 pm
12
That 5.0 Guy says:
I’m just happy USF pulled out a win, regardless. And btw, the business majors do that all the time for things like getting up in the morning and finding the bar. Doing another one is like putting on the other shoe in the morning.
November 29th, 2006 at 12:26 pm
13
Lilac-a-go-go says:
With only one team undefeated, why bother with the extra game at all. Crown OSU Queen for a Day and let the next eight teams in order fill the usual bowls. USC-Mich in the Rose, Gators-Lou in the Sugar, LSU-OU in the Orange, and Hogs-Wis in the Fiesta. It would probably be a better lineup than what these TV/Bowl Commitee hack-turds will jumble together and force-feed us.
November 29th, 2006 at 12:30 pm
14
PeteJayhawk says:
Somewhere, a sixth-year business major pounded a kamikaze at a strip mall bar in celebration. Rock on, Tampa.
Awesome.
November 29th, 2006 at 12:50 pm
15
matthew says:
USC and Michigan both alpha-rolled the Trojans, leaving us going to the losses, which is where USC gets the analytical shaft.
Just for the record, Michigan didn’t play the Trojans and USC hasn’t scheduled itself this year.
November 29th, 2006 at 1:07 pm
16
~CW~ says:
I agree with SMQ’s idea from last week or the week before to just have Boise State play in the title game. In the likely scenario they win, that’s a great story and they obviously defeated at least one really good team to do so. If they lose, so what? We’re all pretty sure Ohio State is the best anyway, so at least make the other BCS games interesting.
November 29th, 2006 at 1:14 pm
17
Odell 51 says:
That Slaton kind is speed on speed. Rutgers won’t even know what hit them. If Rutgers gets blown out, which I think is very probable indeed, do they fall all the way out of the top 25?
November 29th, 2006 at 1:21 pm
18
Geaux Irish says:
Orson, two comments:
1) “USC and Michigan both alpha-rolled the Trojans”…um, it was my Irish that got rolled.
2) How can you have the Irish drop 8 spots due to a loss by USC, but only drop West Virginia 6 spots for losing to USF?
November 29th, 2006 at 1:24 pm
19
Sam says:
Geaux –
You make it sound like you think Notre Dame would beat South Florida.
November 29th, 2006 at 1:33 pm
20
Dave K. says:
Odell,
What’s with the hard on for Rutgers? If Slaton was so friggin good he’d have done the same thing to USF. Rutgers has the fastest defense in the Big East and the only thing that worries me is that the game is on the road …and a dirty hillbilly filled road at that.
November 29th, 2006 at 1:44 pm
21
Bryan says:
I can’t help but think AU is getting jobbed just a tad, not only in this poll, but nationally. I know this team has looked like “dead team walking” down the stretch, but I can’t shake the fact that AU beat LSU and Florida, when both of those foes were undefeated.
To have AU ranked below a Cal (who religiously shows up small in big games), Wisconsin, and Rutgers at this point is a bit of a stretch. Not to say that any of those three couldn’t beat AU, but looking back at the body of work, I don’t see how AU can be anywhere but ahead of those three.
November 29th, 2006 at 1:49 pm
22
Orson Swindle says:
They’re getting jobbed by the finish, with a likely “bounceback” in the polls following a bowl win. Tuberville did his usual excellent job, but that’s yet another problem with polling–body of work, or current strength?
November 29th, 2006 at 1:53 pm
23
Odell 51 says:
Dave K.
Don’t take it personally. I don’t hate Rutgers. I just think there are teams ranked lower in this poll that would beat them. I think it was a great story this year. WVU is going to win that game big. I just feel WVU is a much better team. As well as ND, Cal, and Auburn.
That and I have a huge man crush on Slaton.
November 29th, 2006 at 2:02 pm
24
Bryan says:
I also think LSU is living (quite well, actually) on the belief that their “A” game is better than anyone elses “A” game (including OSU).
If you buy into that thinking, and said team fails to “bring their A game” the two times it mattered most, should that count against them a tad more than apparently it does?
November 29th, 2006 at 2:17 pm
25
MiseanAUFan says:
This may end up being the 2nd year in a row that Auburn ends up being ranked behind two top-10 teams they beat (AL and UGA last year).
Now, I’m just hoping for the Capital One Bowl- I know it would be against Wisconsin again, but the Cotton and Outback Bowls kick off at 10:30 and 10 AM Central, respectively- even earlier than the JPLFDDD game of the week.
November 29th, 2006 at 2:32 pm
26
captaineclectic says:
Your ND ranking is fair. I think we’d have a solid chance of beating many of the teams ahead of us, but it isn’t CLEAR that we deserve to be higher than 14.
November 29th, 2006 at 2:38 pm
27
Dave K. says:
Odell,
Not taking it personally. Luckily we’ll get to see about WVU. As far as ND, most Rutgers fans are trying to dream up a scenario where we could play them in a BCS game, as I’m pretty sure Rutgers would win that game.
Auburn and Cal? Depends a lot on which Auburn or Cal team showed up that day…
November 29th, 2006 at 3:13 pm
28
tzubear says:
Oklahoma is too high.
Sure they got jobbed at Oregon, but the ducks are still only 7-5. If you cont that as a win for the sooners they drop to 6-6. So then you have a 11-1 Oklahoma team with a schedule inferior to Wisconsin.
November 29th, 2006 at 3:57 pm
29
Lilac-a-go-go says:
AU’s not getting jobbed. They shattered an underwhelming LSU’s 2006 amazing 2 game undefeated streak in week 3. Methinks the polls seem to remember the homer replay officiating awarding possession changing overturns of on-field calls in red zones in both Fla & LSU games. In actuality, the Plainsmen are paying thru the butt for being completely date-raped in every statistical category while losing the Oldest Rivalry in the South late in the year at HOME to the WORST Georgia squad anyone can remember.
But have to agree they’d handle Rutgers easily and I’d think AU-Cal would be enjoyable viewing. A bowl win puts AU at 11 for a very good year plus the Thumb victory over Bama. Drink up and celebrate now, Aubies. Aren’t FLA-GA-LSU-Hogs road games next year? WDE!
November 29th, 2006 at 4:01 pm
30
Odell 51 says:
As an ND fan and a UC fan I have a hard time thinking that Rutgers would beat ND. I can see your arguement with the solid run game and solid defense. Trust me a team like Rutgers would lose to ND. Just like a team like ND falls to USC. We are talking different tiers of football hear. Rutgers needs to win some more big games before they could beat a team like ND. If they don’t lose their coach, in a couple fo years, Rutgers could beat ND. But not this year.
November 29th, 2006 at 4:47 pm
31
Odell 51 says:
Sorry. I meant here.
November 29th, 2006 at 4:48 pm
32
Chris says:
You keep my 2 loss Hogs ahead of the 1 loss Badgers…
Respek!
November 29th, 2006 at 4:50 pm
33
captaineclectic says:
ND-Rutgers would probably look a bit like ND-UCLA or ND-Georgia Tech, only with a worse opposing QB and worse wide receivers. If “risk of losing” was the only factor, ND would be dying to play Rutgers over Arkansas, Florida, LSU, or Michigan again. Dying.
November 29th, 2006 at 5:23 pm
34
Stacy Keibler Loves Me says:
Michigan in 4th Place:
I would rank the Gators 3rd. Their wins were in a conference much more difficult than the Big 2 + Little 7. (Michigan and Florida’s out of conference games are not all that different.)
USC also has better wins, compared to Michigan, and would rank them 2nd.
If USC stumbles against FUCLA and Florida beats Arky, I think the top two in the final BCS game should be OSU and Florida, not a rematch with Michigan, unless Fl and USC lose their final game.
November 29th, 2006 at 7:59 pm
35
Joshua says:
It’s funny, you genuises dropped LSU OUT OF THE poll earlier this year for “not having a win over a quality team”.
And there sits Notre Dame at 14. Everyone else in that poll can point to at least one game and say “lookit”. ND? Nuh uh.
I trying to decide what’s worse, wearing jorts and sporting a UF diploma or the fact that ND is ranked.
It’s so hard being a Tiger fan and not letting the little people get to you these days, als ,the preceeding comment.
November 29th, 2006 at 10:06 pm
36
Son of a Gunderson says:
“followed by LSU, a team who should have destroyed all in its wake this year but inexplicably didn’t. ”
LSU has played the most difficult schedule in the NCAA. Both of the losses were to top 5 teams on the road.
BTW, they played 4 top 10 on the road and split ‘em 2-2. That’s pretty damn good. Maybe they should join the Big Least. It’d be straight to the NC every year.
November 29th, 2006 at 10:49 pm
37
hounds tooth says:
Joshua,
it is easy to understand how they left LSU out of the poll earlier in the year because it wasn’t until November when they got their first quality win — against Mississippi — and barely by a score of 23-20. Or was it Arkansas by 5 or 6 the same team USC beat by a 100. Yeahhhh LSU at #6, right. Overrated.
November 29th, 2006 at 10:51 pm
38
captaineclectic says:
Joshua,
ND beat Georgia Tech, still a ranked team, the first week of the season. That’s better than anyone beaten by Wisconsin or Cal, both of whom are ranked above ND in Orson’s poll–Cal with a worse record to boot, including a loss to an unranked opponent. Actually, that Cal ranking is pretty awful–they jumped six on a bye after losing two in a row? You’d spend your time better complaining about them–that is, if you don’t have some sort of unhealthy hatred for ND.
It seems you’re an LSU fan. They’ve looked pretty darn good the last several weeks, and should give Michigan a great game if they land in the Rose Bowl. I’ll be rooting for you.
November 30th, 2006 at 1:55 am
39
Pants McPants says:
I’d have USC 2nd, UM 3rd, and FL 4th….
USC has beaten Arkansas, Nebraska, Cal, and Notre Dame, all easily…UM has beaten ND and Wisconsin…both easily as well…
Although FL has beaten more quality teams than UM, they simply lack the “winning all the games you should by two touchdowns or more” style points that actually come into play once you’ve lost, and are competing with other one loss teams…
November 30th, 2006 at 9:16 am
40
j.j. says:
Orson, 3 comments:
1. Gob kicks ass. I started watching Arrested Development on HDNet a couple months ago, and it pisses me off that I never saw the show when it was originally on.
2. You seem to put more effort into your poll than most AP/ESPN pollsters. That’s sad. And the valid concerns commenters have with everyone’s Blogpolls shows how crappy the whole polling process is.
3. VaTech will do about as well in their bowl game as lipase does on a triglyceride with 3 trans- fatty acids. They won’t even get to the CA cycle. Biochem jokes are great!!!!!! You need to start with some immunoglobulin or µ-opioid-agonist jokes next. EDSBS: the greatest mix of high-brow/esoteric humor and fart jokes anywhere!
November 30th, 2006 at 4:26 pm
41
Son of a Gunderson says:
“it is easy to understand how they left LSU out of the poll earlier in the year because it wasn’t until November when they got their first quality win — against Mississippi — and barely by a score of 23-20. Or was it Arkansas by 5 or 6 the same team USC beat by a 100. Yeahhhh LSU at #6, right. Overrated. ”
Are you %$#@ing kidding me? How about Tennessee in Knoxville? We were one bad call away from toppling Auburn before the Arkansas pigs did it. We gave Arkansas a whopping. Overratted? Try Underrated.
November 30th, 2006 at 5:25 pm
42
SF Values says:
As a Cal fan I’d have to agree with the Auburn folk and switch Cal and Auburn. Cal hasn’t beaten any top 6 teams this year. Though I take issue with the poster above who says USC “easily” beat Cal. They didn’t, really, as the game was tied going into the fourth. I’d still have Cal over Notre Dame, given that Cal beat UCLA 38-24, while the Irish needed a miracle to beat the Bruins…and Cal held on longer against USC than ND did.
November 30th, 2006 at 6:18 pm
43
Rob says:
It should be noted that Michigan has played 7 bowl bound opponents which isn’t terrible and their 3 best opponents are a combined 33-3 on the season with 2 of the losses being to Michigan which is better than the top of anybody else’s schedule this year as most feature a bunch of 2 and 3 loss teams as the best they have faced.
November 30th, 2006 at 9:07 pm
44
captaineclectic says:
Cal still lost to an unranked team, got embarassed by Tennessee, and hasn’t beated a top 25 team. Sure, they outperformed ND against common opponents, but that should be the last resort of comparing teams–I mean, ND did better against Penn State than Wisconsin, Michigan, or Ohio State did, and Ohio State did worse against Illinois than practically anyone else. It’s meaningless–trying that game in the SEC would drive you insane.
November 30th, 2006 at 10:48 pm