BLOGPOLL, WEEK 12: THE STODGENING
Blogpoll week 12: kind of like week 11, just less interesting. A week of epochal action did little to shuffle the rankings. In fact, we could not in clear conscience bump Michigan from the two spot, so valiant was their fight against this year’s football Galactus, Ohio State. (If the skies turn to flame above you, Troy Smith is just down the block. He may just be getting a latte at Starbucks or something, though, so just chill and see what happens.)
Apologies and outright equivocations follow. Hey, at least we’re relying on the magnificently flawed machine that sits between our two ears–whatever you may think of it, at least it doesn’t run on FORTRAN.
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio State | 25 |
| 2 | Michigan | 24 |
| 3 | Southern Cal | 23 |
| 4 | Florida | 22 |
| 5 | Arkansas | 21 |
| 6 | Notre Dame | 20 |
| 7 | West Virginia | 19 |
| 8 | Wisconsin | 18 |
| 9 | Georgia Tech | 17 |
| 10 | LSU | 16 |
| 11 | Louisville | 15 |
| 12 | Texas | 14 |
| 13 | Wake Forest | 13 |
| 14 | Oklahoma | 12 |
| 15 | Rutgers | 11 |
| 16 | Auburn | 10 |
| 17 | California | 9 |
| 18 | Tennessee | 8 |
| 19 | Nebraska | 7 |
| 20 | Virginia Tech | 6 |
| 21 | Boston College | 5 |
| 22 | Maryland | 4 |
| 23 | Boise State | 3 |
| 24 | Oregon | 2 |
| 25 | Brigham Young | 1 |
Apologies and equivocations
Michigan goes nowhere. Did nothing to suggest they aren’t the second best team in the country, while USC made a very tiny case to move up. Thus, they stay at the two spot after losing by three to the clearly supreme team in the land.
USC plays defense. Cal’s offensive line is a nightmare, or at least had some nightmarish moments against USC. They allowed Carroll to get savage with the blitz and keep coming with it. This will not happen against Notre Dame–Weis made sandwiches out of the slant all game last year, taming the freely blitzing linebackers and forcing USC to adjust. Given ND’s passive blocking, though, Carroll may just alternate coverages and let the front four do the scary work. Either way, they don’t play Chowball anymore. If the defense doesn’t run rabid, that team don’t work right, Cletus.
Rutgers gets sent to purgatory for losing to Cincinnati. On the verge of clusterfucking the whole system in one move, and they lose to the Red Pandas. For not sating our lust for anarchy, you take a dive, Rutgers.
Ditto for Cal. Their o-line buckled, warped, and finally splintered under the pressure of reckless blitzing. Longshore, not an unshakeable sort to begin with, got football tremors early and often, and poor Marshawn Lynch was left making Jet Li backflips just to get back to the line. We’d like to be the first to get on the Cal breakthrough year bandwagon ‘07–the year of the Golden Bear for the fourth year in a row! Unless they wait until next year!
Other notes:The ACC continues to clump, with Wake taking a bit of a downer, VT edging up slightly, and Maryland finally ending its marginal dominance. Georgia Tech? Sure, why not. They’ll likely lose and thus complete our season long preference for listing five ACC schools in a row from 14-19.
–West Virginia shaves the Wannstache, earns elevation for rushing badness and Pat White’s meowing.
–LSU and Oklahoma hang around, salvaging seasons nicely.
–Boise and BYU? The Mountain West and WAC affirmative action picks. Don’t tell Michael Richards!

25 










28
The BCS poll looks right to me, Michigan is by far the best one loss team out there right now. Only USC can overtake them and thats even a question mark if they dont blow out Notre Dame.
Comment by Mark — November 23, 2006 @ 11:25 pm
27
Dissing Fortran? We should give you WatFor!
Dang, my joints feel creaky all of a sudden……
Comment by PSU Guru — November 23, 2006 @ 2:30 am
26
is it too late to implement a +1 bcs game?
Comment by BC Eagle — November 22, 2006 @ 6:37 pm
25
sklm thinks Arkansas can get the trashing by U$C overlooked with a win over Florida, but ND can’t do the same with a win over U$C. Odd. If ND can’t go ahead of Michigan based on September then Arkansas can’t go ahead of an ND that beats U$C.
ND and Arkansas both need to put those games out of reach before the 4th quarter to be considered. Narrow wins won’t be enough to overcome the early season blowouts.
Comment by canuck — November 22, 2006 @ 6:34 pm
24
Yes, the MS-DOS thing. But FORTRAN’s not “a” program…it’s a programming language.
OK, I’m scaring me. FOOTBAW FOOTBAW FOOTBAW FOOTBAW BOOBS BEER FIGHTING. There, that’s more like it.
Rock Chalk Jayhawk! Muck Fizzou! Fucking slaveowning bastards.
Comment by PeteJayhawk — November 22, 2006 @ 6:28 pm
23
Looks like somebody’s been cutting and pasting from the hated BCS standings.
Comment by BJ Strykker — November 22, 2006 @ 5:58 pm
22
I realize that in the scheme of issues that matter in college football, the relative rankings of teams in the high teens does not matter, but I must ask anyway: How can every human poll justify rating Virginia Tech one slot above Boston College? Given their records, and the seemingly consequential fact that BC pounded Tech when they played, how can any voter take it upon themselves to decide that their opinion is more important than what actually happens when the games are played?
Again, a minor point but one that has bothered me ever since Virginia Tech who lost to BC vaulted BC a few weeks back.
Comment by dcat — November 22, 2006 @ 5:46 pm
21
Michigan at Number 2????
I think Urban Meyer would have you running laps AND reading BlueGraySky’s summaries on ND vs. Academies to make up for that obvious mistake in judgement.
1. theeeeeeOSU.
2. USC. If they win out, they should play theOSU.
3. Florida: If they win out beating Arky at the end and USC loses during the next two weeks they should play the OSU.
4. Arky: If they win out beating Florida at the end and USC loses during the next two weeks, they should play the OSU.
5. Michigan: If USC, Florida and Arky loses their second game, they should get a rematch ahead of ND.
Everyone else should plan on going to a Tidy Bowl.
Comment by Stacy Keibler Loves Me — November 22, 2006 @ 5:36 pm