SILLY SEASON, BEGIN
Before we write anything else today:
The silly season is the British term for the portion of the year–usually the first half of the summer–where stories about dogs that can type and wacky German festivals involving beer, marksmanship, and tragic combinations thereof make up the majority of the stories you see in the news. That is because, in lieu of actual events, you are fed fake ones.

We call this image “the 2005 Orange Bowl.”
A very legitimate event occurred this weekend: the Rutgers/Cincinnati game, where the Bearcats mauled (get it! silly season punnery begins!) the Scarlet Knights and thus ended the possibility of the Big East having an undefeated team. Oh, and that Ohio State-Michigan game, too, which in pre-BCS days would have qualified as the national championship game. This would have sucked of course: the Big Ten champ would have gone to the Rose Bowl, faced USC, and likely beaten them in a largely meaningless game that would have ended up with a crap split national championship, or even worse, a spuriously claimed single champion with one loss.
The real storylines end in early December with the conference championship games if your conference has one; if not, sadly, your season of actual relevant events is almost over or is in fact completely done. The brief window of addicted and happy is closing, and nothing but cold winter and the warm, woozy embrace of scotch on the sofa waits to comfort you. Good luck with that: college football is a short vacation from the rest of the year, a three to four month window of sudden, relentless competition with no preseason and a convoluted exhibition at its conclusion. The rest is silence…

That’s you around January 6th.
The silly season may begin, though, where marketeers take over and rig up a ramshackle fix of a playoff where once there were only fluffy exhibition games. These exhibition games occasionally take the form of meaningful games, as in last year’s mindbending Rose Bowl between Texas and USC, where the two best teams just happened to meet up in a stadium and play a football game.
Then there are years where math, human foibles, and fate refuse to cooperate and reduce the silly season to an event worthy of its name: something truly silly like this year’s impending matchup between USC and Ohio State, or Notre Dame and Ohio State, or even the much-touted rematch of Ohio State and Michigan.
Your absurdity in quintuplicate:
USC/Ohio State. USC has one loss to a mediocre Oregon State team, a loss which put them out of national title contention in the minds of anyone with half an iota of reason in their souls.
Notre Dame/Ohio State. The team who was beaten dizzy by Michigan will play the team that just beat Michigan and who strutted through their bowl game last year by beating…Notre Dame, the team we started out talking about in this very elliptical sentence. If this makes sense to you, you are on peyote, and it is working.
Florida/Ohio State. Murder. Simple murder. No one wants to see this, unless they take joy from the details of killing as told by the killer. Which no one likes, right?
Arkansas/Ohio State. Another profoundly silly scenario, since you bump a team that simply molested Arkansas in a game earlier this season.
Michigan/Ohio State. A rematch! The people’s choice! Drama! Jer-ry! Jer-ry! Jer-ry! Except the Michigan/OSU game was in retrospect not even that close, with a pair of gift-wrapped turnovers keeping Michigan in the game. Even with those TOs, only a last minute TD and 2 point conversion turned it into the +3 win you would expect by the home team in an even matchup. It’s not a blowout, but OSU’s been the consistently superior team between the two for the past five years. Nothing changes in a rematch.
It’s not the pure beauty contest of the past system, but it’s not in a different zip code, either. Whatever happens will be messy, stupid, poorly governed, and loaded with advertising. This describes most sport, sure; after all, the hamfisted blind ogres who run NASCAR would kill to have something that ran as “efficiently” as college football does. The guys from the NHL would probably have to be talked off the ledges if they really thought about it in comparison.
Yet it’s not anything close to logical or systematic. For a fan with even a faint loyalty to logic, clinging to the primacy of the conference championships as a system of valuation remains your only hope at seeing something resembling clarity. (You think we’re gonna run out of modifiers here? Got a whole bag waiting, man.) The rest, BCS or no, is silly season. And if you enjoy squirrels on waterskis, you’re in luck, because after Dec 3rd or so, that’s all you’re getting.

How bad is it going to get in February? Two words: Mel Kiper.









1
zzgator says:
You are so wrong about UF-tOSU…so so wrong.
November 20th, 2006 at 10:46 am
2
Futbawl Fan says:
Wonderful remote viewing of the potential BCS matchups… but I will take a small amount of umbrage on one matchup… Ark vs OSU
To look back almost 3 months and say that Arkansas was the same team that got manhandled the first week is to imagine that college football is a sport with any consistancy. Check with the local bookie… betting on college is just this side of Russian roulette for leaving you a little anxious over the outcomes.
Arky has changed… yes, they had a lesser game this week, but EVERY college team will have an off week, but the overall quality of the team does not falter. We will surely get a better yardstick of just who plays in front of fans yelling pig calls in the next two weeks.
Given that Fla crushes FlaSt next week (can they have, *ahem* ANOTHER letdown?) and Arky manages to keep Gigantor at LSU in check, then the SECCG becomes a magnificent yardstick of who the better team from the Southeast is, a team that has been hardened by playing QUALITY opponents for a full season (that’s 13 weeks for you non-conf-champ -game weenies)
I will even buy into the Tebow Kool-Aid theory if they can sneak Marcus Thomas back into the game and stop Arky’s running game. Fla is more fun to watch, but they have problems that will come to light under the withering assault of a good running offense.
OSU and Mich are both great teams. They have played. That game is over. Lets’ find someone to play OSU who has a chance to win.
Nuff’ said.
November 20th, 2006 at 10:47 am
3
Orson Swindle says:
ZZ, they would kill us. And Floating Leaf–that’s Troy Smith’s zen master name–would make Blake Mitchell’s scalpel work on us look amateur in comparison.
November 20th, 2006 at 10:49 am
4
canuck says:
I’m all in favor of a tOSU-Michigan rematch… as long as the Rose Bowl replaces tOSU with ND so that we can have a ND-USC rematch. The Sugar Bowl picks next and should go with the SEC loser so that we can have a SEC championship rematch as well.
If Arkansas has changed since they were thrashed by USC why not a one loss ND after a win over USC?
Right now I should think either a one loss USC or Florida would have the best cases.
I’m hoping Michigan goes to the title game and tOSU does it over WITHOUT the three turnovers leading to a 4 team playoff ASAP.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:03 am
5
JR says:
Hey, if February ushering in Mel Kiper means we no longer have to listen to the nonsense spewing from Mark May’s crap chute for a few months, then bring it on!!!
November 20th, 2006 at 11:05 am
6
Steve says:
Mike Hart, You’re right. It would be a different game if OSU played Michigan again… OSU doesn’t turn it over 3 times and the country turns the channel after the thrid quarter…
Logical line of argument:
Anyone who runs the gauntlet of the SEC and escapes with only one loss deserves a shot in the Championship. The Country deserves to see a north vs south battle.
At this point , there are no common opponents between the class of the Big Ten (OSU and Mich) and the SEC. As an OSU fan I would love to see a one-loss SEC team, and not because I fear them less than Michigan. You cannot say, right now, that the SEC Champions aren’t as good as Michigan, and therefore said team should get the bowl bid.
No one can say Michigan was denied a chance at the title if they don’t get in; you can, however, say that a one loss SEC team was denied a shot if they were refused that bowl bid with the possible exception of USC winning out …
November 20th, 2006 at 11:10 am
7
Hokie Andrew - Crosses Ocean, Lives to tell the tale... says:
If only because ND’s resume also includes near losses to choke artist Michigan State, underachieving UCLA and a clean sweep clinching of the Commander in Chief trophy to round out the season.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:12 am
8
zzgator says:
Orson…let’s just hope we get the chance to see which one of us i right. I’m not booking the Bucks for murder just yet.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:16 am
9
Dave says:
As a Michigan fan, I don’t really want to see a rematch for all the usual reasons that have been brought out.
However, I take exception to the postmortem Buckeye cherry-picking: “Gee, if we didn’t improbably turn it over three times we would have REALLY won!”
Well, no shit, but if the #1 rush defense in the country hadn’t improbably missed tackles that led to two cheap OSU touchdowns, then maybe Michigan wins.
There were a lot of ifs in that game, you know, but in the end it was what it was. The better team did win, but I can’t stand listening to how it was really a blowout when it wasn’t. Only in the mind of a Bucknut.
Troy Smith’s gone now, bitches. See you next year.
And the only thing I really couldn’t stand at this point would be to see ND in the title game. That would just be salt in the wound.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:18 am
10
Ohiodawg says:
Steve nailed it.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:20 am
11
Drogue says:
As a fan of SEC and BIg 10 futbal, and a Hog fan, I have to agree that either Michigan or OSU would wipe the floor with either FL or AR. The Hogs have indeed come a LONG way from the team that rolled over and played dead, at home, against USC. Arkaloids would have been happy with a .500 year and a couple of good SEC wins. They aren’t the same team that USC played and have a little magic going on. But, that still doesn’t put them in the same class as Michigan or Ohio State. USC would beat the Hogs in a rematch and would smoke Florida.
Florida is very beatable, and the are the same team they were at the start of the season, just like ND is the same team that started this season, and the same team that Ohio State destroyed in last year’s bowl game.
Arkies should be ecstatic that they’re even being mentioned at this time of the year, but any thought of playing for the big chicken dinner is bafoonery.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:24 am
12
AllWhoYonder says:
Dave, on the same token, it pains me to think that if ND beats USC this weekend we will probably get Michigan to that rematch. It was bad enough having to (somewhat) hope that Michigan won on Saturday for ND to have any shot at the title. Now I guess we get to play poodle killers.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:27 am
13
captaineclectic says:
Steve,
Does your logic extend to ND? That is, assuming
1) Notre Dame beats Southern Cal, and
2) No SEC team finishes with one loss,
should ND pass Michigan since Michigan has already had its shot at the title game? I’m not asking for your opinion on how likely either or both of my conditions are–just for whether your principle has room for ND in the discussion.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:27 am
14
Dave says:
An ND-Michigan rematch would be intriguing. Pantsing you guys twice in one year would be some consolation, I guess.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:32 am
15
Brandon says:
Dave-
Missed tackleS? Watch the highlights again. There was one missed tackle in the backfield on the Wells run. And really Wells just ran him over and spun off the hit. Pittman went the distance without having a hand laid on him. Great play calls, great blocking schemes, and a underrated ability to hit the hole quickly is what caused those two “cheap touchdowns.” Don’t be bitter.
The bottom line is that the Buckeyes made tons of mistakes and still never trailed after the opening touchdown. Three turnovers, a stupid roughing the center penalty when they had UM backed up, a questionable, yet stupid either way, pass-interference on a 3rd and 17… I’m not usually one to talk about coulda’s and shoulda’s….but there was never a question who the better team was.
Time for USC or Florida to get a shot.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:33 am
16
canuck says:
Hokie Andrew,
Before their games against USC and Florida: ND SOS=30, Arkansas=73, Air Force and Navy are bowl teams unlike Southeast Missouri State and Louisiana-Monroe.
Steve, Your lack of common opponents argument dies if ND beats USC and Arkansas beats UF: ND>USC>Arkansas.
UF has a great claim if USC is out, but only an SEC fan would suggest that the best team from the SEC-ACC-Big 12 Confederacy gets to play the best team from the Pac10-Big11-Big East Union.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:39 am
17
captaineclectic says:
You know, I think Michigan fans are having a difficult time with creative thinking here. Imagine, if you will, Michigan dropping an early-season game to ND but winning out up until the Ohio State game. Not only do you convincingly beat Ohio State, but Notre Dame loses to an undefeated, title-game bound Southern Cal.
Are you really telling me Michigan fans would just graciously accept that, since they lost head-to-head to ND earlier in the year, ND should rematch with Southern Cal for the title? Seriously?
November 20th, 2006 at 11:41 am
18
Pants McPants says:
No rematch….
Please, for the love of all that is Holy, someone step up in the next two weeks and convince everyone you are better than Michigan…
November 20th, 2006 at 11:45 am
19
D says:
You guys can scratch Florida from the National Title game. Urban Meyer just went and committed the cardinal sin of coaching … complaining about being snubbed by the BCS with games still left on his schedule.
http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=150759
Karma’s a bitch, Urban.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:49 am
20
Drogue says:
How good could a rematch really be if both teams are sitting on their asses for 50 days?
What we saw Saturday is as good as both teams can get.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:50 am
21
canuck says:
McPants is on the right track.
USC probably just needs a win.
UF needs offense AND defense vs. Arksansas. It won’t help if it looks like Arkansas lost rather than UF winning.
ND and Arkansas probably need to make it look like the USC or UF never had a chance.
Those 2 games are pretty much New Year’s games for the polls.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:54 am
22
Jack says:
Blowing a Red Zone opportunity and subsequent undefeated season against Auburn – Heartwrenching
Watching OSU’s defense give up more points to Michigan than Louisville gave to West Virginia while being forced to listen to the sloppy metaphorical blowjob given to OSU AND Michigan during the entire broadcast – Nauseating
Having to sit quietly while Notre Dame gets heaved out of the National Championship picture then crawls onto the radar and cuts in front of you like that great-big-jerk in 3rd grade – Depressing
Watching Cal get a safety on USC and keep it 9-9 for three quarters, and then blow the game, Only to see a postgame show celebrating the greatness of an unchallenged (sadly, they’re actually one of the more challenged contenders) shell of a football team – Physically Draining
Turning on sportscenter no matter how terrible your life is and Knowing beyond a shadow of a doubt, that despite anything that might go wrong in your life at any time, at the very least you won’t have avoid the flash flood of diarrhea that consistently spills out of Mark May – Priceless!
November 20th, 2006 at 11:57 am
23
zzgator says:
Hey D…that karma seems to have played out pretty well in the years since pretty boy Pete bitched about the whole process…and allowed Matt “the golden boy” Leinart to wear a “F**k the BCS” shirt on national television.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:58 am
24
NoleinTexas says:
There are only two teams that can beat OSU this year, and they’ve already taken care of one. As a fan, I don’t want to see a rematch – Michigan had its chance and didn’t get the job done. Bring on the Nuts v. Trojans.
Besides, a team shouldn’t have to beat the same team twice to win a title, as Meyer pointed out. Hey, that’s interesting. I’m not sayin’ anything….I’m just sayin.’
November 20th, 2006 at 11:58 am
25
Stranko Montana says:
Who cares about this football stuff. I can’t get enough of looking at that cute squirrel… and he skis too!
November 20th, 2006 at 11:58 am
26
Dave says:
Well, I won’t get into a pissing match here, but I still think it is pretty lame that some Buckeye fans can’t just be happy that OSU won. They have to OMFG WIN MICHIGAN SUXX0RZ!!!!1
You won, you were the better team, but you know we gave you guys the best game of anyone the entire season and that, with only a slight shift in karma points, you very well could have lost. So let’s not pretend otherwise.
Anyway, congratulations to your team. I will have to be rooting for USC since I don’t think any other team will have much of a chance in a title game. (And I’m not exactly sure about USC either.)
We’re #2 and Rose Bowl bound — not a bad season. We have another year to nurse our wounds and take revenge in Ann Arbor. See you then.
November 20th, 2006 at 11:59 am
27
matthew says:
January 8, 2007 (and maybe a bit into the 9th out East):
USC: 38
tOSU: 24
Just sayin’.
November 20th, 2006 at 12:04 pm
28
canuck says:
McPants,
Back in the day if #1 met #2, #3 met #5, #4 met #6 on New Year’, the new #2 would depend on how convincing the wins were.
Only of one of those three games has been played. Let’s see if someone can make a case in the other 2 games. USC should be #2 if they win. Beyond that there are a load of ifs that should give way to whoever makes the best case on the field.
November 20th, 2006 at 12:04 pm
29
yz says:
wondering, if the tOSU -mich rematch occurs, is mich the national champion? when they play twice and split, how do you say one’s better?
November 20th, 2006 at 12:08 pm
30
yz says:
duh, if mich wins, that is.
November 20th, 2006 at 12:08 pm
31
OmarBradley says:
At least there’s no more Rutgers noise in the system.
As a Florida fan, I can’t help but blame F$U. Of all the years to not dominate your punch line of a conference!
The Semenholes will play their best game of the year vs. Florida, and if the Gators do manage a win, no style points will be awarded. No jumping of Michigan allowed.
Moving on, I proudly present Herbstreits’ AP poll this week:
1 Ohio St.
2 Michigan
3 Southern Cal
4 West Virginia
5 Arkansas
6 Notre Dame
7 Florida
8 Louisville
9 Oklahoma
10 Wisconsin
11 LSU
12 Texas
13 Georgia Tech
14 Boston College
15 Auburn
16 California
17 Virginia Tech
18 Tennessee
19 BYU
20 Boise St.
21 Texas A&M
22 Penn St.
23 Clemson
24 Wake Forest
25 Arizona
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/specials/collegefootball_front/votes/10041.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME
November 20th, 2006 at 12:11 pm
32
DC Trojan says:
USC has one loss to a mediocre Oregon State team, a loss which put them out of national title contention in the minds of anyone with half an iota of reason in their souls.
Yeah, I suppose so, but it’s not every day that you see a zombie put their head back on. Surely that should count for something in the silly season.
November 20th, 2006 at 12:16 pm
33
Pants McPants says:
canuk-
I actually agree (shudder), I only hope the voters can see that….I worry that a USC loss will only strengthen UM’s case, since their win over ND would be an even “eliter” win…
And I worry that even if Florida wins out, they will do it in a way more akin to the comedy stylings of Jim Belushi, rather than John…
So Notre Dame, do everyone a favor and lose, please…You”ll likely keep UM out of the NC game, so it’s not all bad…
November 20th, 2006 at 12:21 pm
34
J-skool says:
UF’s championship in ‘96 is quite different from this year’s Michigan – Ohio State rematch.
Unlike today, Florida and Florida State did not hold the 1-2 spot in the polls after the Noles won at Doak. FSU was not in line to win the Nat’l title should they had beaten UF again. Arizona State and Nebraska helped the winner of the ‘96 Sugar Bowl to the Nat’l Championship — and that just happened to be the Gators.
Seminoles, get ready to be ripped. Next year’s FSU media guide will read a new record for margin of defeat to the Mighty Gators. Enjoy it.
November 20th, 2006 at 12:22 pm
35
osu8490 says:
The problem with an OSU v. tsun rematch – OSU has to beat tsun twice to be National Champions, but tsun only has to win once? I don’t buy it. The lack of potentially interesing opponents is why I spent my $$ on tickets to The Game and won’t be going to the BCS title game this year. No potential opponent is all that interesting to me – with the exception of USC. The old Big 10 v. Pac 10 champions has some old school appeal, although they won’t be meeting in the Rose Bowl.
November 20th, 2006 at 12:27 pm
36
Daniel Adams says:
“The bottom line is that the Buckeyes made tons of mistakes and still never trailed after the opening touchdown. Three turnovers, a stupid roughing the center penalty when they had UM backed up, a questionable, yet stupid either way, pass-interference on a 3rd and 17… I’m not usually one to talk about coulda’s and shoulda’s….but there was never a question who the better team was.”
Infuriating. So OSU runs a spread out of the shotgun (with a center who was nursing a banged up hand) to neutralize Michigan’s front four, successfully runs this for two halfs, and when the risk of the shotgun manifests itself twice, these are “gift” turnovers.
Bullshit. This was a three point game. Both teams got some breaks, and it was a three point game. If that makes OSU a better team, so be it. But to say that OSU is a better team because it COULD have been worse for Michigan? Give me a break.
November 20th, 2006 at 12:41 pm
37
Futbawl Fan says:
I have gone to the top of Mt Cheaha and consulted with the gods (Bear, Knute, Schembo, Woody and JoPa *he had one leg in, one out)… they have sent me back with a dry erase board with their thoughts…
Ten Commandments of College Football Championships
- Thou shalt play the game with good players, not thugs
- Thou shalt be allowed one loss early, but a late loss makes the Holy Crystal Football a false plastic copy
- Playing a weak schedule makes for hollow claims to superior status…. the demon of ratings will make you suffer in the end
- Shun not the wins over average opponents … for they are wins
- Thou should not have to beat the same team twice to claim the Flag from the Hill… if it occurs, beat them like a jailhouse snitch or sufffer permanent humiliation
- Championships won without strong defense equate to marrying transsexuals… something is wrong with the act and your win will always be scorned
- Complaining about the championship process will bring a hex upon your house…shut up and play
- Bragging about championships more than 3 years in the past is the act of fools and deluded sycophants
- Claiming a win from the previous year has any affect on the new season is a fool’s task… pity the moving mouth
and finally…
- Championships awarded by sports writers and coaches polls are false idols… play on the field and WIN or brag not about what could have been
Amen
November 20th, 2006 at 12:48 pm
38
canuck says:
McPants,
Any USC win, any UF win with offense, two digits blowouts for ND or Arkansas. Other than that the BCS is in the twilight zone, which might be a good thing for those who want a quick change from a 2 team playoff to a 4.
November 20th, 2006 at 12:52 pm
39
NoleinTexas says:
Wait, wait, wait. Just because UF was #3 in 96, Ohio State playing Michigan in a rematch wouldn’t be the same? Eh? Here, let put on some coffee – Columbian roast anyone? – and see where this goes. I’m sure this will be fascinating.
November 20th, 2006 at 12:53 pm
40
shortSleeves&sweaters4ever says:
Loved the game. Michigan looked terrific. “What if?” is a losers card. 3 turnovers and missed tackles are part of the game. The whole game is “What if’s”. On behalf of Buckeye fans who don’t get it I appologize to the rest of you. Great game UM.
Only 2 teams make me nervous; Florida since I believe Meyer signed the same contract with the Devil as Tressel. USC because their 3 year “dynasty” is so intimidating.
I’d prefer to play USC because they have the Song Girls and the slight chance USC could get blown out.
November 20th, 2006 at 1:02 pm
41
Stranko Montana says:
It is different because of all the late hits. You see, FSU cheated to win the first time.
November 20th, 2006 at 1:12 pm
42
Stranko Montana says:
Actually, what is different is that UF was out of it after FSU won. Only a bizzare series of events which ultimately, and improbably, came to fruition made the game a possibility.
November 20th, 2006 at 1:13 pm
43
Geaux Irish says:
Nice touch by Herbstreit to not have Boise State anywhere in his top 25.
November 20th, 2006 at 1:17 pm
44
Geaux Irish says:
Scratch that….they’re in there at #20. My bad.
November 20th, 2006 at 1:18 pm
45
Dave says:
Sort of like this year. I guess. If a rematch happens, it won’t be because UM “deserves” it. Computers apparently don’t consider “deserves.”
Anyway, silly season is right. Our season’s done. Next Saturday is going to be some sort of Bizarro World for me where I have no idea who to root for or why.
November 20th, 2006 at 1:22 pm
46
NoleinTexas says:
I guess that’s why it’s technically different, but Meyer said that a team shouldn’t have to beat another twice, expecially in a championship game….so….where’s my ring?
November 20th, 2006 at 1:25 pm
47
Albino Tornado says:
OmarBradley:
I guess Herbie didn’t notice:
1. A Big 12 North team went to a Big 12 South teams place last weekend and won. He must have considered the score to have been an error or that it happened in Bizarro Universe — that’s the only reason I can think of that 8-3 Nebraska isn’t on his ballot and eATMe is.
2. Wake Forest getting pantsed by Virginia School of VCR and Gun Repair.
3. That Wisconsin wasn’t competitive against the only good team they played.
Did he let Corso fill out his ballot or something?
November 20th, 2006 at 1:29 pm
48
atepesm says:
Hokie Andrew
Read More . . . Post Less. The best way to let everyone know you are an idiot is for you to say something.
In reviewing the updated BCS rankings, there are 7 teams on ND’s schedule in the Top 40 of the Rankings:
2) UM
3) USC
16) Georgia Tech
25) Penn State
32) UCLA
36) Purdue
39) Navy
Comparatively, Arkansas and Florida, with their schedule of D1 AA teams, doesn’t really have the much of an argument for scary schedules (Florida has 6 top 40; Arkansas has 5 top 40; both have played a team with a top 200+ ranking).
Quite frankly, the SEC has yet to prove they aren’t overrated.
By the way, tOSU has only played 3 top 40 teams. I think there’s an outside chance they could get caught on an off day.
http://www.tellshowbcs.com/
November 20th, 2006 at 1:29 pm
49
S says:
who was that guy that lambasted mel kiper back in the 80s. bill polian??
November 20th, 2006 at 1:31 pm
50
atepesm says:
Oh yeah, one more thing, USC has 10 top 40 teams on their schedule. If they win out, they deserve to be in the NC game WAY more then UMich.
November 20th, 2006 at 1:32 pm