EDSBS PERSON OF THE YEAR: BRET BIELEMA
Above all else, the Devil cannot stand to be mocked.
–C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters.
Rule 3-2-5e, the rule shortening games, is a stinking abomination on the game of college football. Worse still, it wasn’t even proposed and approved in a manner consistent with logic, sense, rule, fairness, or the slightest shred of intelligence. It hasn’t even been defended coherently, either, since the people behind its inception a.) don’t seem to understand what they’ve done, or b.) understand fully, and don’t care to make a scene by airing the dirty truth of the game in public, which is that it makes this “amateur” game a more telegenic and manageable product for networks.
It’s reduced the amount of football every fan of the game sees by six percent or so. This may seem inconsequential when you’re talking about football, but we here at EDSBS are awfully touchy about the margins people live and die by. (If you saw our car, you’d understand why.) You’d miss six percent of your paycheck, right? Okay, well if your six hours on the couch each Saturday are a benefit of your working your ass off all week, you just had your benefits reduced by six percent. If you prefer another metaphor, you’re getting six percent less content for the time and energy you invest in sending your wife/husband on elaborate errands, getting up super early to mow the lawn, or faking your own death for ten hours in order to disappear to the bar for a tripleheader.
All of this leads us to nominate Bret Bielema for EDSBS Man of the Year. Rather than stump against the inane, craven rule–Bielema did what we’d do: mocked it. Watch the offsides kickoff to see the kind of giant, dinosaur sized smartassdom that must have roamed the earth in the Jurassic age of sarcasm. The coach who does not do this as an act of civil disobedience at the end of the half may begin the second half wearing a pink dress and a sun bonnet. (Mangino. You’re welcome.)
(The crew here may be our new favorite: Nessler, Danielson, and McGuire. Nessler booms the play by play, Danielson gives the analysis, and McGuire is free to be a crank, which is what he excels at.)
Bret Bielema, we salute you.
88 Replies »
Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All












88
[...] #12 Wisconsin: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 6. Average rank among all ballots: 15.33. The Badgers have to like the way things are looking in the Big 10. Michigan is set up for a down/rebuilding year during a season when Wisconsin must match up against the Skunkbears and Ohio State in consecutive weeks. What probably looked like a brutal 3 weeks of games against Michigan, OSU, and PSU now seems like a time of real possibility to take command in the Big Televen, particularly since the badgers have nearly their entire team back from a 9 win, 2007 season. And while we get this gut feeling that HC Bret Bielema is probably areal S.O.B., we know for a fact that he’s a clever S.O.B. [...]
Pingback by Her Loyal Sons » The HLS Totally Non-Homer Top 25 - Preseason Edition 2008 : #15 - #6 — July 25, 2008 @ 5:30 pm
87
[...] that was the pre-season fave to win the conference. Their head coach is all of 37 years old, is a master of the rulebook and is the only active Big Ten coach with a better winning percentage than the [...]
Pingback by Eleven Warriors » Blog Archive » Preview: #1 OSU v. #24 Wisconsin — November 1, 2007 @ 11:01 am
86
[...] Every Day Should Be Saturday has a great rundown of the events. [Link] [...]
Pingback by otis.otiskimzey - Otis’ Blog about his daily life » NCAA’s new rules are killing me slowly — November 20, 2006 @ 1:26 am
85
Correct me if I’m wrong, but couldn’t the return man have signaled fair catch and avoid taking the hit? How is it any more dangerous that playing for a blocked punt and not blocking the gunners? The punt return man has the option to either attempt to make a play or signal fair catch to avoid having his head taken off.
Great move by the Wisconsin coach. And agreed with the Penn State crying…after just about every game there has been tears about something. Weis was classless for running the fake punt, Michigan classless for hitting their quarterback hard, Wisconsin classless for taking advantage of a dumb rule and also hitting their coach out of bounds (Iike that was intention). Not to mention the near constant complaining about calls not going in their favor and how the Big 10 is out to get them.
Comment by huh? — November 9, 2006 @ 12:06 pm
84
Did I miss something? It looks pretty clear to me that Wisc. was penalized the standard 5-yards (when not offset by PSU’s holding).
Quoth I:
The yardage penalty is immaterial, because they’ll continue to be offsides
Hence the reason it falls under Rule 3-4 - they’re attempting to consume clock by committing a penalty. The way they’re committing the penalty actually allows them to commit it over, and over.
Officials are supposed to deal with it when a team attempts to consume clock like that. It’s the same thing as if a team would constantly commit penalties in order to stop the clock.
Comment by Pat — November 9, 2006 @ 11:47 am
83
“Holding to prevent a sack, pass interference to prevent a touchdown: those are perfectly fair actions because the team committing the penalty ends up in a worse situation than they were before the play started. This isn’t the case here. “
Did I miss something? It looks pretty clear to me that Wisc. was penalized the standard 5-yards (when not offset by PSU’s holding). Your point doesn’t hold water, Pat.
Comment by Aerobab — November 9, 2006 @ 8:08 am
82
Notice the only people really bitching about this are crying blue and white tears.
Yeah, it sucked. Yeah, it’s unfortunate for you. But the rest of the world loves it!
You would too, if you weren’t on the receiving end.
Comment by Erik — November 8, 2006 @ 5:53 pm
81
spiking the ball behind the center (and behind the LOS, without intent to reach an eligible receiver), in order to gain clock advantage, *should* be an intentional grounding penalty *and* an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty.
As I said above, spiking the ball is in the freaking rulebooks as not intentional grounding, and not illegal.
or because it’s a coach knowingly doing something illegal to gain advantage? In that case, all knowingly illegal penalties committed frequently are included.
It’s because it’s a coach knowingly doing something illegal because there is no punishment, whatsoever. The yardage penalty is immaterial because they’ll continue to be offsides until there’s no time left, at which point they’ll squib it.
The only thing that even comes remotely close is taking a delay of game to move into better punting position. And that’s such a ridiculously minor thing compared to running a completely illegal play to eliminate almost half a minute from the clock.
What makes it “unfair” is that Wisconsin’s committing an illegal action for which there is no compensation to Penn State. It’s a perfect example of something that should fall under Rule 3-4. It should’ve been called.
Holding to prevent a sack, pass interference to prevent a touchdown: those are perfectly fair actions because the team committing the penalty ends up in a worse situation than they were before the play started. This isn’t the case here.
Comment by Pat — November 8, 2006 @ 5:30 pm