THE WEEKEND IN REVIEW: ZOMBIE HEAD--CHECK.
Zombie head, check: we weren't going to believe that USC wasn't that good until we saw them lose, a.k.a. the "zombie rule" (Believe the zombie is dead when you see the head bashed in and rolling.) Oregon State brought the shaolin spade, ending their 27 game Pac-10 streak and allowing pollsters to cut the vestiges of 2003-2005 that had kept USC in the 2 spot.

Zombie hunters: If you're going to fight with a beaver, stay hard to win. USC didn't.
Immediate, short-term, bum-on-the-streeet-looking-for-food question: How far will the drop? Oh, they'll drop--oh, lordy will they. The question is how far (Nine spots? Behind Cal? Behind Notre Dame? And behind the Big East twins Louisville and West Virginia?)
Long-term, stodgy investment banker-pondering-investing-in-lunar-colonies question: is this a hiccup or a real change in periodicity for the otherwise boundless potential winning curve of the USC Trojans football program?
Think long and hard here, because programs all ebb and flow differently, but on a hedging historical note did you not think of other dynasties exiting the chrysalis of back to back championships and emerging as...merely good? Or worse still, declining? We wondered at the time if we were watching that instant where coach-poaching, new starters, and the ravages of change had finally caught up with the Trojans. And we think, sitting on the caffeine rocket of a Monday morning, that we finally did see that on Saturday. It's less similar to Miami/Ohio State '02, where OSU beat a team that never dominated like that again; the best comparison would likely be to Nebraska/Arizona State '96, where ASU bit the ass of a team clearly in transition between various forms of badassedness. Nebraska would share the national title the next year, which USC very well could do next year. But those waiting for a clear statement of intereggnum in CFB finally got it after a season of close calls, and as we shape our mountain of mashed potatoes at the dinner table, we tell you that...this means something.

Jake the Snake, pre-mustache days, saw a dynasty cruising on past credit take a dip, too.
Call HR, revise incentives package immediately. Another thing that has added up in grand fashion for the Trojans: coaching brain drain. Ed Orgeron may not have been the valedictorian of his class at Huey Long's School for Bayou Badasses, but he did create lineman who played as if their families' lives depended on it. (Probably because Ed had them followed by backwoods assassins ready to strike at any time. Black cat, white cat, still catches mice, right?) More pressing still, the duo of Steve Sarkisian and Lane Kiffin, wunderkind coaches that they are, clearly coach at a level just a few notches below the standard established by Norm Chow. Key coaching turnover has likely robbed the Trojans of a few of the margins that used to sustain them through close shaves and blow open potential cruise games over crap opposition.
Talent is king, whether it pulls the strings on the sidelines or throws those beguilingly simple pass routes the Trojans specialize in, and attracting it and keeping it is as much a function of the organization as the actual execution of plays on the field. The Trojans have, at least by the Economist's standards, done the right things: hired and trained internally, mentored talent from within (see Kiffin and Sarkisian,) and tried to hire the best people they can to coach the team. (If you don't think coaching is all that important, exit discussion four sentences ago. Sorry for the late notice.) They've done the same for recruiting, a sale made easier by the twin aphrodesiacs of glamour and plush SoCal living.
And yet in all systems, there's a trough, and SC's hit one. The rest of the season's plotlines will rush through the hole put in USC's season on Saturday, making the Oregon State Beavers the most important player in the semi-mythical national college football scene this year. If you'd care to argue that, ruminate on the fact that with a victory in the APOCALYPTICALLY IMPORTANT MONDOMATCH OF THE MILLENIUM on Thursday, West Virginia could put a Big East team in line for a shot at the national title without a surfeit of backflipping by the BCS. Thanks to Oregon State, you're sipping blue coffee in bizarro world this morning. For that breath of fresh and strange air, our hats off to the Beavers.
![]()
This season brought to you by Bizarro Superman and the Oregon State Beavers. You're welcome.
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Beavers wear out Trojans; Remainder of season pregnant with possibilities!
by OhioDawg on Oct 30, 2006 10:35 AM EST reply actions
If you look at the makeup of the current Ohio State coaching staff, it would seem that the coordinators are likely to stay as career assistants. Other assistant coaches may leave, but not Heacock or Bollman. That leads me to believe that they may have some staying power at the top of the heap. However, replacing Troy Smith will not be as easy as replacing Carson Palmer with Matt Lienart.
by Crabapple Buck on Oct 30, 2006 10:40 AM EST reply actions
First we had ‘beaver jokes’, now we have ‘bizarro superman says you’re welcome’. The tags alone make it gold, jerry, gold.
by History_Ant on Oct 30, 2006 10:41 AM EST reply actions
But will replacing Troy Smith be as hard as replacing Vince Young?
by OhioDawg on Oct 30, 2006 11:03 AM EST reply actions
This is the only place on the internet where you can get bizarro Superman and links to the Economist in the same post. Well done, gents!
by DevilGrad on Oct 30, 2006 11:12 AM EST reply actions
Speaking of the The Orgeron, did you hear Brent Saunders bashing Ole Miss for getting rid of Cutcliffe? Said it was the worst and most inexplicable coach firing in years.
by Jackwraith on Oct 30, 2006 11:19 AM EST reply actions
Colt has held his own quite well since stepping into Vince’s shoes. Check out his numbers compared to leading Heisman candidate Troy Smith:
http://burntorangenation.com/story/2006/10/30/4192/6558
Turns out it was harder replacing Michael Huff. The secondary is Texas’ achilles heel.
by Orangeblood on Oct 30, 2006 11:23 AM EST reply actions
Three losses in four years, by a total of eight points, is virtually violating the laws of nature. It’s impossible to sustain. But there are structural issues that go beyond youth and injuries. You already mentioned the coaching.
Their D-Line doesn’t have the same level of talent. People compare this year to ‘03 (Matt, Lendale, and Reggie’s first). That team had six D-lineman that are on NFL rosters now. There are no Troy Polamalu’s or Lofa Tatupu’s on this team; leaders who aren’t prototypical 5-star recruits. Last thursday, David Newberry, former punter / now commentator mentioned that the team hasn’t been the same at practice for two years now. Leinart’s class was the last one to experience the 6-6 season. An unhealthy arrogance develops with that success.
I don’t know where this year’s team will finish. I suspect next year it’ll be top three. Experience, talent (and of course, health) should guarantee it. But all the ingredients that make you THE team in CFB, I don’t know if they’ll all converge for us again in the near future. Nevertheless, it’s been a great ride. Every true fan deserves a ride like this. After surviving the 80’s and 90’s, I’m greatly appreciative.
by SeaTrojan on Oct 30, 2006 11:34 AM EST reply actions
Screw Brent Saunders. And John Saunders,too, for that matter.
by RaginCajunRebel on Oct 30, 2006 11:35 AM EST reply actions
Nevertheless, it’s been a great ride. Every true fan deserves a ride like this. After surviving the 80’s and 90’s, I’m greatly appreciative.
Amen to that. When I think back to sitting watching SC lose to Fresno State in 92 at the Freedom Bowl, not knowing how mediocre the next few years were going to be, I’m sure as hell not going to complain now.
by DC Trojan on Oct 30, 2006 11:41 AM EST reply actions
D’oh! Brain lapse. JOHN Saunders. Thanks, RCR.
by Jackwraith on Oct 30, 2006 11:47 AM EST reply actions
During the Viet Nam war, actual headlines said:
“Nixon Firm On Pullout”
I suppose the same might be said of Mr Bush only with humorously ironic undertones.
by Grant on Oct 30, 2006 11:58 AM EST reply actions
Given the zombie theme, wouldn’t Solomon Grundy have been a much more appropriate supervillian drop-in?
by Albino Tornado on Oct 30, 2006 12:01 PM EST reply actions
No problem, Jack. But I will say this about John Saunders: he’s an idiot. Several things make his opinion on football related topics worthless for me:
1. He works for ABV/ESPN
2. He’s Canadian
3. He played college hockey.
for a good look at things, here’s an article from the memphis commercial appeal that’s actually fairly written.
http://www.commercialappeal.com/mca/football/article/0,1426,MCA_478_5102145,00.html
by RaginCajunRebel on Oct 30, 2006 12:03 PM EST reply actions
SeaTrojan, I think you hit the nail on the head by pointing to a lack of true leadership on the team. There are really no strong senior leaders on the team who know what it’s like to lose. I know this sounds like a weak excuse, but I think this is a key reason to our troubles this year (along with some poor play calling and of course poor play).
We have a team of top talent who likely didn’t lose much in high school, now on a team that hasn’t lost much in the past 3 years. I think some have an unrealistic attitude that they can just show up and win. We found out that isn’t the case this weekend.
I still believe we’ll finish strong this year and be back in contention next though.
I’ll still take this SC team over any from the Smith/Hackett/Tolner era.
by Rex Cramer on Oct 30, 2006 12:04 PM EST reply actions
oops…typo. Saunders works for ABC/ESPN. And his opinion is still without value. And he’s still Canadian.
by RaginCajunRebel on Oct 30, 2006 12:04 PM EST reply actions
I think the coaching brain drain also explains the demise of FSU and Miami as well, though theirs is more dramatic. Losing Mark Richt just killed FSU and Coker got rid of a lot of excellent assistants.
Spurrier used to not-so-subtly point out the importance of coaching when we wondered out loud how Ray Goff was such a good recruiter but Florida whipped them every year. The talent levels were just the same, but the coaching at Florida was so much better.
And we are seeing the same thing with Cutcliffe back at Tennessee now — he really makes a difference.
And this is why I’m pleased with Urban Meyer — he’s still learning how to succeed in the SEC, but I’m sure he has made a difference and will continue to do so.
by baconboy on Oct 30, 2006 12:07 PM EST reply actions
You could bring up Michigan’s old and new defensive coordinators to back up that point about assistant coaches, too.
by Flop on Oct 30, 2006 12:28 PM EST reply actions
“I’m not a zombie, but hey, when in Rome…” —Barney Gumbel
by Will Collier on Oct 30, 2006 12:29 PM EST reply actions
When you typed “Brent Saunders” I figured you were combining the two-headed monster of Brent Musberger and John Saunders.
Sort of a rhetorical question here, but which one is worse (Ohio State & Michigan fans need not answer)?
by Geaux Irish on Oct 30, 2006 12:31 PM EST reply actions
clarification needed:
Brent Musberger::Big 10 as Keith Jackson::Pac 10
by Geaux Irish on Oct 30, 2006 12:33 PM EST reply actions
It wouldn’t be the same without Musburger saying “Big House” and “pardner” 47 times during a Michigan game he’s announcing.
by Dave on Oct 30, 2006 1:04 PM EST reply actions
Geax Irish,
You hit the nail on the head. But Keith Jackson didn’t suck total ass in the booth and get knee pads out for individual players like Musburger.
I hate that guy.
by Odell 51 on Oct 30, 2006 1:09 PM EST reply actions
this win is really a sign of how great this year’s Ohio State team is. They are so good, their goodness is spilling over to all the other OSUs.
by john ludwig on Oct 30, 2006 2:05 PM EST reply actions
The northern couch burners are tOSU. Always dot your i’s and cross your t’s.
by canuck on Oct 30, 2006 2:20 PM EST reply actions
Well said SeaTrojan. And one of the reasons we don’t have senior leadership on the team is that most of the players who would have been seniors (besides the obvious Bush and White) are now playing on Sundays. Every team that wins the MNC needs luck to do it. SC’s ran out on Saturday, but nobody ever gets all the breaks.
This game could be the spark that sets off another run like the Cal loss in 2003. Or we go down the tubes and lose another 2 or 3 games down the last stretch. At this point though the Rose Bowl and a top 5 finish are very realistic goals to shoot for. And that isn’t bad in such a rebuilding/reloading year.
by oc phil on Oct 30, 2006 2:32 PM EST reply actions
Rex Cramer #15 and OC Phil,
Clarification: I said they don’t have ’leaders", not “senior leaders”. Grootegoed, Polamalu, Cody, were leaders before their senior year. Tatupu was a leader by the end of his first game at Auburn. Leinart and Mike Williams were leaders by the middle of their sophmore year. I see a bunch of athletes running around without an intrinsic sense of what their exact role or assignment is…and this is BEFORE they get faked out by a wily receiver or checked off by an upperclassman QB.
Carroll is a great coach with the right mindset to shorten the ebb after this four year flow. I believe he has the adaptability to challenge an “inevitable decline”. There are issues that will take more than just “tightening things up” if they’re going to get back to the previous four years. I look forward to seeing PC’s response to the challenge.
by SeaTrojan on Oct 30, 2006 3:14 PM EST reply actions
Valid points on the leadership issue, but it can be hard to gauge that from afar sometimes. The internal dynamics of a team are not always obvious. The whole team being so young is a big part of the leadership void I think.
And I’d certainly trust Pete Carroll in this situation to get the team back into MNC contention next year (and while it is a longshot it is not impossible for the team to still make the game this year with one loss, but a ton of things would have to happen). The team looks a whole lot better than they did when he took over. There is no need for any freaks with OCD to be starting up a “TrojansNation” site calling for PC’s firing.
by oc phil on Oct 30, 2006 4:35 PM EST reply actions
19-0!
To hell with the Huskers, and thanks for the mention. I can’t believe ASU hasn’t had a great win in 10 years. Oh well, back to .500 football and my precious scotch. I love scotch, scotchy scotchy scotchy.
by Big Jon on Oct 30, 2006 5:21 PM EST reply actions
As Fukuyama rightly observes, forecasting the end of history is a problematic exercise. Nonetheless, there is undoubtedly a clear directional trend of current events.
USC lost, it may lose again this year, but their presence will be felt for the coming years given their inherent advantages of coaching and talent. . . . If PC leaves, however, all bets are off.
by Allaha on Oct 30, 2006 7:13 PM EST reply actions
I disagree with those that say the Trojans have no leaders. I think Ryan Kalil is a solid leader on this team. We just do not have enough leaders. All things being equal I would settle for a fullback right now. I wonder why Bradford didn;t get any time?
by Marc Ruffalo on Oct 31, 2006 2:44 AM EST reply actions
carrol needs to bench washington. He wasn’t touched at all on one fumble and barely was touched on the other. Moody has a much better burst.
by oski on Oct 31, 2006 11:14 AM EST reply actions

by 















