BLOGTOBERFEST! TAMPA WILL ALWAYS GET YOU IN TROUBLE EDITION.
The finest collection of arbitrarily selected links and stories on the interweb, brought to you this morning by Geico, whose ads almost make commercial breaks tolerable:
–UConn coach Randy Edsall dismissed five players from the Huskies’ football team this weekend after the players brought beer back to their hotel room in Tampa the night before a 38-17 loss to South Florida.
This stands as further proof that Tampa is the real-life version of the city in Pinocchio where children become donkeys, enticed by shiny things and candy into getting into big, big trouble.
Go ahead and play pool and smoke–it always ends badly in Tampa.
–Lloyd Carr’s double-secret bubble of mumspeak notwithstanding, Mario Manningham is on crutches and will be off the field for a while for the Michigan Wolverines, per Brian and any Wolverines message board you’d care to cruise. This will affect the Wolverines offense, which has been using Manningham as their field-stretching play-action threat to great effect to this point.
–In more hearty, niacin-rich Big Ten news, P.J. Hill may be the heir to the “big-boned back” throne at Wisconsin, according to Bruce Ciskie, who follows football in parts of the country where drunks cannot pass out in ditches for fear of dying from exposure. He also thinks the Heisman is a meaningless beauty contest, just in case you wanted to know exactly how he feels about it.
–The Index wants everyone to just put down the syringe and hold off on euthanizing dynastic USC for a second, posting very compelling numbers about USC’s past hiccups during the regular season. He would also like you to know that Tim Tebow will probably run off tackle if he’s in the game.
–Georgia allows fifty for the first time since Spurrier? Paul blames the Cherrishinski.
–Firing coaches in the middle of a season is tacky, bogus, low-class…and just might be a move of suprising effectiveness, according to Pete Thamel of the New York Times, who recaps Florida’s midseason spiking of [NAME REDACTED] and the effect it had on the pursuit of Urban Meyer. According to Meyer, the firing and complete admission that the university was engaged in a job hunt seemed far more tastefully done than sniffing around behind a lame duck coach’s back.
“New synergies are created” alert: it may be catching on as a sports business practice:
“I think what Foley did was astute and showed clearly there was a strategy,†said Neil Cornrich, a lawyer and agent who represents numerous college coaches, including Iowa’s Kirk Ferentz and Oklahoma’s Bob Stoops. “I think that’s the trend. The smart athletic directors will follow Foley.â€

Is thinking it would be “proactive” to just fire you now.
–In totally unrelated news: Dirk Koetter says “you don’t know the real Dirk.” The one who likes Jean Miro, and long hikes in the sierras, or the one who cried the first time he heard “X-Factor” by Lauren Hill, because you know, it could all be so simple, babe, but you’d rather make it hard. Did you know he likes peppermint tea when he’s sad? Did you? Or that he’ll get paid exactly $950,000 for each year remaining on his contract in the event of his firing?
–SMQ’s right: after Ohio State, spots 2-5 are “up for grabs.”
–SMU’s quarterback has a stalker–a male stalker. Justin Willis was suspended from the team indefinitely for punching the stalker, says Willis’ father, whose son is living a scene from The Talented Mr. Ripley sans the beautiful Mediterranean scenery right now. Stalking is an art, though; remember that it’s always important to give your victim their space, since stalking’s less of a sprint, and more of a marathon. They will love you eventually! Especially after you save them from the tiger attack you spent three years carefully orchestrating!
–Nestor calls Arizona a “cheap, white trash” program. We call racism! What about the black trash on their roster, huh? Or latinos? They’ll never get the coveted “ethnic trash” athlete with this kind of recruiting.












29
I don’t see the same sort of things at Blue-Gray Sky at all. BGS is well written and thought out and they seem to tolerate resonable differing opinions.
Of course there are some total douchebag ND sites, I can think of one (Kelly Green) that was about the same level as Bruins Nation. The sad thing for UCLA is they don’t seem to have any high quality fan sites.
Just the self-inflicted wound that is Bruins Nation.
Comment by oc phil — October 11, 2006 @ 2:18 pm
28
RE: Comment #27 - Bruins Nation and Notre Dame’s BlueGraySky.blogspot are both known for blocking anybody that disagrees with them. Interestingly, they are both USC’s main rivals.
I guess those cotton-pickers are not men enought to take an ocassional jab, or objective commentary, and just want to play amongst them girls.
Apologies to girls out there since they are tougher than those clowns that run Bruinsnation and Blue Gray Sky!
Comment by Harvey Wireman — October 11, 2006 @ 4:27 am
27
The wheels came off of UCLA last season? That’s what you call a record of 10-2? There is only one game you can have any complaints about and that was Arizona. USC is on another level and it is delusional to think otherwise.
“Objective evidence?” What a joke. I’d still like to see a white coach coming off a 10 win season get that kind of crap. Dorrell gets attacked about how he wins even when he wins.
Did coaching cost the UW game? UW took USC down to the wire this week so maybe they are just a better team than UCLA.
And while I find Bruins Nation hilarious to read at times, I do note how the moderators will delete and block anybody who disagrees with them. In fact I noticed a stink about that over there on Monday.
Comment by oc phil — October 10, 2006 @ 11:55 pm
26
Then again, “fans†like you –who can so readily explain away nationally televised humiliations such as Arizona and the Southern Cal games of last season[...]
At the risk of causing further irritation, Ajax, OC Phil is a USC fan. So I’m guessing he probably won’t be posting to Bruins Nation anytime soon.
In the meantime, where the hell are the Alabama and Auburn fans? Isn’t there some kind of Barn / incest threadjack to draw attention away from us?
Comment by DC Trojan — October 10, 2006 @ 11:46 pm
25
UCLA fans tend to forget the accomplishments of Dorrell as a player. They casually forget what he did for UCLA.
Comment by David — October 10, 2006 @ 7:12 pm
24
OC Phil:
To say that we do not give Dorrell credit is a clear indication that you just do not read our blog. There was plenty of credit given to Dorrell at times last season, until, of course, the wheels completely fell off. Then again, “fans” like you –who can so readily explain away nationally televised humiliations such as Arizona and the Southern Cal games of last season– are the reason we are saddled with a head coach who is still learning on the job. Did coaching not cost UCLA the game against UW?
Why does one man deserve to be put ahead of an entire program and its dedicated fanbase?
Getting to your allegations of racism–Rather than run over here like a little girl talking your shit, feel free to visit BN and lay out your case as to why you think any of our criticisms of Karl Dorrell are based on anything other than what has taken place on the field during his tenure. Contrary to what you have done, we’ve mad our criticisms very clear and back them up with objective evidence. I expect to see specific quotes from any of us to back up your assertion, which is obviously a desperate attempt at race baiting.
Apologies to the EDBS crew for turning this into a UCLA thread — you guys do an outstanding job.
Comment by ajax — October 10, 2006 @ 6:18 pm
23
The guys at Bruins Nation give no credit to Dorrell whenever something goes well and slam him whenever anything goes wrong. They seem to hate him whatever he does, and the question becomes WHY do they harbor such irrational hate for a successful coach?
Normally I hate it when people play the race card, but the level of crap KD gets makes no sense otherwise. This is the internet so unfair attacks are par for the course, but after a while it seems like certain coaches (like Ty W. and Dorrell) get a really out of whack ratio of success to attacks.
In the case of Bruins Nation it is also clear that living in the shadow of USC’s team is one of the things making them so crazy. They have never been one of the elite programs in football and the odds are they never will become one of the elite, no matter who the coach is. It is too hard of a thing to do.
Comment by oc phil — October 10, 2006 @ 5:26 pm
22
Best I could do on short notice:
http://www.spirit.ucla.edu/DanceHome.htm
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/0609/gallery.cfb.cheerleaders.week1.pg/content.9.html
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/0609/gallery.cfb.cheerleaders.week1.pg/content.10.html
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://i.a.cnn.net/si/multimedia/photo_gallery/2005/10/25/gallery.collcheerleaders/gallery2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.cnnsi.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/2005/10/25/gallery.collcheerleaders/content.2.html&h=680&w=458&sz=62&hl=en&start=3&tbnid=-mrIWG2c6Iu0JM:&tbnh=139&tbnw=94&prev=/images%3Fq%3DUCLA%2Bcheerleaders%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DG
Comment by DC Trojan — October 10, 2006 @ 5:07 pm
21
I agree Mark. Bad form.
Comment by Broom — October 10, 2006 @ 4:32 pm