BLOGPOLL! WHEN I FEEL HEAVY METAL…BLOGPOLL!
Our admittedly jacked up Blogpoll appears below, with notes on said jackedupedness below it:
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Auburn | — |
| 2 | Southern Cal | 1 |
| 3 | Ohio State | 1 |
| 4 | Texas | — |
| 5 | Tennessee | 3 |
| 6 | Florida State | 10 |
| 7 | Notre Dame | 4 |
| 8 | Louisiana State | 3 |
| 9 | Iowa | 2 |
| 10 | Louisville | 1 |
| 11 | West Virginia | 1 |
| 12 | Florida | 1 |
| 13 | Nebraska | 1 |
| 14 | Michigan | 3 |
| 15 | Oregon | 11 |
| 16 | Penn State | 3 |
| 17 | Texas Tech | 3 |
| 18 | Clemson | 3 |
| 19 | Miami (Florida) | 13 |
| 20 | Georgia | 2 |
| 21 | Michigan State | 2 |
| 22 | Arizona State | 2 |
| 23 | Minnesota | 3 |
| 24 | Rutgers | 2 |
| 25 | Fresno State | 1 |
Notes:
–Okay, you can’t move much around in the top five or so since we’re pretty sure any of those four teams could, at any point, demollish any team in the country at this point. Only one team looked to be performing at Max Q efficiency in week one, and they’re sitting at five–Tennessee, who we had loaded up at eight last week anyway. (Ooh, feel the warmth of “right rays” warming the cheeks of our ass…it’s almost like being a pundit!) Southern Cal gets a bump for actually playing someone on the road, even if they did have it at laugher status by halftime.
–Tennessee, as mentioned, gets a five spot for being most impressive in skunking Jeff Tedford’s genius stock for the week. Message board warriors, perhaps you’d like to discuss the implications this game might have on the overall value of the Pac-10 as a conference. No, really, go ahead. We’re not stopping you.
–The rest of the poll is a complete muddle with one glaring error. Speaking of the Pac-10…Oregon needs to be somewhere in the 10-14 range, but we had some problems with Brian’s poll widget. They did beat Stanford, but a conference game in which you ballbust your opponent, hang forty on them, and play well against an offense capable of scoring points, you deserve bump. Blame the musician for their lowly ranking, not the instrument–we need to fix that. (Now bumped up to 15…hmm, still doesn’t quite look right.)
–Virginia Tech doesn’t appear because…well, we plead incompetence. We usually do. They need to be somewhere around 15, since they looked fine in their opener and were, as we predicted, the same team they always are minus some speed and impressive felony potential under center. Oklahoma, on the other hand, has no quarterback and almost lost to UAB. On notice!
–And Miami and Cal richly deserve their respective demotion. We depolled Cal altogether because such a public and unsightly pants-soiling deserves a commensurate response, but note also that Cal claimes a serious quarterback problem with few solutions in sight. Their long term prospects hinge entirely on the alchemy of Marshawn Lynch’s running and a defense that couldn’t rattle Eric Ainge. Not promising.
Miami’s offense under Larry Coker has gotten progressively worse each year he’s been the head coach of Miami. There’s little reason for a pattern-minded brain to expect any change in that pattern, even with a new coordinator on board. Buster Davis did singlehandedly dismantle their offensive gameplan Monday night, but even if you’ve got Lucifer McBadass at MLB one player shouldn’t have that kind of impact on a first-rank program’s offense. On notice!
–And who doesn’t like Fresno State? The answer to this question is always: no one.

1
1 










49
Sorry ND,
I don’t see you staying in the same stadium with Texas, Ohio State, Arburn, FSU, USC, or LSU.
Comment by JohnInHuntsville — September 7, 2006 @ 5:47 pm
48
What, no Montana State?
Comment by DAve — September 7, 2006 @ 8:04 am
47
“I take it 75 years wasn’t long enough? ”
Excuse me but that 136 years a-hole
Comment by RUinsane — September 6, 2006 @ 9:48 pm
46
Doesn’t matter where you rank BAMA, Orson. Don’t you bump us even one spot after the 30th, though. And we don’t play anybody before ya’ll either. Do not give us props the week before the 30th so that you can apply that salve afterwards. You don’t have to rank us, but I’m pretty sure you still have to play us.
But we ain’t nothing to worry about. You know that. 26th maybe. 29th more likely. That ain’t nothing to a # 12 team like Florida.
12? That number is familiar to me somehow…
Comment by Boclive — September 6, 2006 @ 7:46 pm
45
#4, while that quote is from my favorite Led Zeppelin song, it was quote was actually taken from Robert Johnson’s song of the same title.
The dude died broke, he at least deserves his props.
It takes me awhile to respond now- my workplace knows where I go, and they don’t want me to come here anymore- or any website with the word “blog” in it.
OK, Orson, you’re not “buying” us- but you have us #1?
(Insert relevant Marvin Gay song title)
Comment by MiseanAUFan — September 6, 2006 @ 7:17 pm
44
“Their long term prospects hinge entirely on the alchemy of Marshawn Lynch’s running and a defense that couldn’t rattle Eric Ainge. Not promising.”
Is it too late to take back those Norris-esque facts about Marshawn? I didn’t see one roundhouse kick the whole game.
Comment by J.J. — September 6, 2006 @ 5:24 pm
43
Calvin got the ball 7 times for 111 yards. I wouldn’t be surprised if no receiver does better against ND’s D except for Jarret.
Still, Nix didn’t know how to deal with a defense with six defensive backs and it showed. According to the Gwinnet Daily Post, “They were smarter than me and knew I wouldn’t be patient enough to keep running it,†Nix said. “They knew I would be bull-headed and throw a few passes here and there when there was no sense in doing it. You live and learn.†Not sure what to think about that, but I’ll be happy if he just scores 20+ points against Virginia, something we haven’t done in a real game since Auburn and UNC last year.
Comment by Up with the White and Gold — September 6, 2006 @ 4:23 pm
42
Was in Patrick Nix who didn’t throw to Johnson enough? I thought he was calling plays now but surely he would know to get the back to him all the time.
Comment by AUAlum — September 6, 2006 @ 3:00 pm
41
Damn, I’m an FSU fan and even I think #6 is too high. You must be doing the same thing I’m doing with Clemson - ranking them astonishingly high as part of a complex reverse jinx designed to ensure victory when you go head-to-head. Damn you guys!
Quick question: Notre Dame is #7, and outside of an atrocious helmet-to-helmet call by the ref Tech played them toe-to-toe. Shouldn’t the Jackets by somewhere in that poll? Hell, I’d put Calvin Johnson by himself at #21…
Comment by mobius — September 6, 2006 @ 2:58 pm