UN PETEE-T CLUSTERFUCK DANS LE CHAMPS DE AUBURN
Hopefully you don't remember this:
In other cases, though, message board communities can run 180 degrees in the wrong direction with a story with amazing consistency with existing fan beliefs. This tendency warps even further when the story has to do with a rival school.
For instance (clearing throat, assuming creepy movie guy voice here) :
Did you know that a NCAA official visited Auburn recently? Hmm whaddya think THAT means, huh? COULD BE A VERY INTERESTING SUMMER IN ALABAMA ha ha ha ha
Bama boards wentand are goingnuts with insinuation, innuendo, scuttlebutt and calumny about Auburn.
It ain't calumny if it's true, which it is. Which makes us dead, dead, dead wrong about there being little to the whispering campaign bubbling for three plus months on the Plains. Someone's alleging that 18 Auburn football players took 97 hours in classes from a sociology professor, Thomas A. Petee, and that those classes involved very little reading--often as little as a single book--and the award final grades that differed from the students' overall GPAs by the deviation of more than a full point. If you would like a big name benefitting directly from this arrangement, you have one: Cadillac Williams, former Auburn running back and current Tampa Bay Buccaneer.

The prof in question, Thomas A. Petee. Note the sports-themed bobbleheads in back.
Someone in this case does not mean a disgruntled Alabama fan off his medication chewing on his shoes in his mom's basement while feverishly dialing Paul Finebaum for the 872nd time that day. Someone in this case is an Auburn sociology professor, James Gundlach, who blew the whistle on Petee and the "directed readings" and went to the Times with the story. Gundlach alleges that a pivotal faculty meeting ended the willy-nilly awarding of the directed readings to athletes. (Only in academia can you find the phrase "pivotal faculty meeting.")
Yet rather than chasten Petee for the haphazard awarding of directed readings, Petee received a promotion to chair of the Department of Sociology, Anthropology, Criminology, and Social Work, a position he will probably hold for the next ten minutes following this story.
Cracking out our admittedly rusty Occam's Razor, let's look around the factors and likely outcomes of the situation.
Reaction One: Is this something? Answer: definitely. The sourcing doesn't come from a hayseed Deep Throat or begrudged employee. It's a professor just shy of retirement who's sitting atop years of credibility and a guaranteed pension thanks to tenure. In the article his basic testimony is correlated by multiple former Auburn players, administrators, and other professors on campus. All point to Petee's classes and directed readings set up by Virgil Starks, the director of Student Athlete Support Services at Auburn and a victim of a name given to him by Fate's Typecasting Department. The sourcing is solid, so shooting the messenger will not be an option for Aubies looking for an easy out, particularly since Starks played an important role in funneling students to the sociology program. That's collusion on the part of the athletic department, which prevents this from being a lone wolf case of a single, sports-mad prof dishing out free credit to anyone who could make or break a tackle.

Cadillac cruised through college. Now you know how.
Reaction Two: WOOOOOt!!! AUBURNZ GOING DWN 111111. The initial reaction after reading this for collected Georgia and Alabama fans will be pure schaudenfreude, a natural sentiment since the period of concern coincides directly with the apex of Auburn's recent football success under Tommy Tuberville (who very wisely adopted the ancient PR tactic of "ain't saying shit" in regards to the story.)
The regulatory entities overseeing any potential sanction, punishment, or response to the potential academic fraud come in a three-pack.
First, there's Auburn University, who through the office of the Provost has launched "its own investigation" into the situation. The story, wending its way through message boards in many surprisingly accurate permutations, was pre-empted by a statement yesterday only mentioning the Auburn board's commitment to maintaining its accreditation and that an investigation was ongoing.
We could take this initial reaction one of two ways: either Auburn wagers that this comes to nothing and can be pinned on a single professor, or they're grabbing their collective ankles and waiting for the reaming of their already shaky accreditation that might follow this story. It's an strategy betting on two extreme outcomes, which considering that this is an academic scandal involving SEC football players seems like sound gamesmanship on their part.

Auburn: either ducking completely, or simply grabbing ankles.
Second, there's the accreditation entity, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. Auburn's already earned probation from them one in 2003 following a bloody insurgency in the Auburn community regarding the freewheeling ways of its Board of Trustees. This intifada of lawsuits, editorials, and likely unseen fistfights between grown men ultimately culminated in SACS placing Auburn on academic probation from 2003 to 2004. This incident could provoke SACS to revoke accreditation completely, a nasty scenario leaving Auburn on footing shakier than your local chapter of DeVry College.
Third, there's the NCAA. If you would like to know what they will do...you won't. There's no rationale behind the way they behave as an organization. If Auburn had an offensive nickname or played D-II ball, we would be talking serious sanctioning here. Yet there size, status, and success in the business of collegiate football presents a hard sanction for what remains a toothless, confused regulator. Ask Hypnotoad what the NCAA's going to do--you'll get as good an answer from him as you'll get from Myles Brand.
Reaction Three: That's The SEC For You. It would be great to refute this. It really would. You know, we wish we had those secondary abs, too. Like D'Angelo has in the "How Does It Feel" video: the eight-pack with the cuts shooting down off the stomach into the groin? We'd wager that fifty percent of women would actually take their pants off for you on the street if you had those, and since we're married, that's all we'd do: flash secondary ab, take the pants, and walk down the street with our shirt off and a stack of women's pants over the shoulder like the prize kill of a hunter. We don't have them, though, and this is well-documented proof that Still, Everyone's Cheating.

Just one ab. We don't need to borrow the whole set, D'Angelo.
Mike Slive, the head of the mucho-monied SEC, has stated that cleaning up the conference's reputation stands as a priority. An opportunity to demonstrably act on this has just crashed flaming and smoking into your living room. Just saying...
As for Tuberville, we recommend the words of Admiral Painter from Hunt for Red October.
This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it.
150 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nerdy Sociology teacher is probably nothing more than a football groupie.
by Cool Hand Mike on Jul 14, 2006 10:48 AM EDT reply actions
P.S.: Love the Hunt For Red October reference.
“The russians don’t take a shit without a plan, son”
Classic
by Cool Hand Mike on Jul 14, 2006 10:50 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t understand how it’s against the rules to take a directed reading class. Every school has them, e.g. The University of Alabama offers one in their Womens Studies program entitled “Contemporary Transgender Theory.” Every school has them. This professor probably did too many. He will get fired. The NCAA won’t get involved as long as these guys did their work.
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 10:57 AM EDT reply actions
Occam’s Razor you say? I have a much simpler explanation. "Ahem. OK, here’s what we’ve got: the Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the saucer people under the supervision of the reverse vampires are forcing our parents to go to bed early in a fiendish plot to eliminate the meal of dinner. [Or, in this case Auburn football] We’re through the looking glass, here, people…
by Nick on Jul 14, 2006 10:58 AM EDT reply actions
Orson, you forgot to mention under reaction 2 that this means probably Middle Tennessee State is going to face the wrath of Miles Brand.
by NDTom on Jul 14, 2006 11:05 AM EDT reply actions
I would actually say that all internet rumors were absolutely false until the point when WSJ leaked that the NYT would be releasing an article. There just happens to be so many rumors floating around at this time of year that it seemed as though they slowly developed into the truth.
by nixforsix on Jul 14, 2006 11:09 AM EDT reply actions
Where did Warren leak this, Nix? Got a URL?
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 11:11 AM EDT reply actions
Orson
Check this link:
http://mb19.scout.com/fauburnfrm2.showMessage?topicID=125463.topic
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 11:16 AM EDT reply actions
In the WTFHTT department. D’Angelo’s mugshot here: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/dangelomug1.html
by rjm on Jul 14, 2006 11:21 AM EDT reply actions
Get me a transcript, then. For a few reasons:
Warren’s a friend, and what you’re accusing him of is way, way unethical. Gimme a link that isn’t a secondhand bit of quotage, or give me nothing. We’ve gotten transcripts off of TI before.
Also, there’s the question of plausibility here. Which is more likely to be true: your desire as a fan to deny a problem, or the published and vetted work of a newspaper which could be sued for millions if it isn’t true? We’d bet on the latter.
If something like this came out about Florida, we’d be enraged, not in denial. It’s what a sensible college fan should do.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 11:28 AM EDT reply actions
What am I accusing him of? I was saying that the first bit of rumors in regards to a female NCAA investigator being on campus were absolutely false. When in actuality is what Auburns new directors of compliance (former NCAA employees) reporting for the job.
The moment that rumors on the internet starting to become true is after WSJ mentioned that a NYT article would be coming out. That’s when information about that article started creeping out which happened to be factual.
by nixforsix on Jul 14, 2006 11:33 AM EDT reply actions
Petee needs the black circle around his eye to complete the photo.
by GamecockTony on Jul 14, 2006 11:34 AM EDT reply actions
“sensible” & “college fan” I have never heard of such a thing.
by Nile Kinnick on Jul 14, 2006 11:34 AM EDT reply actions
You’re accusing him of talking about a story in the works, which is a big deal.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 11:35 AM EDT reply actions
Wow, so it looks like some bama fans like Warren could have indeed helped in the report which may significantly damage Auburn’s accreditation. Man I love this state. Without Alabama, how could we ever get through the offseason not killing ourselves?
by Up with the White and Gold on Jul 14, 2006 11:35 AM EDT reply actions
Orson –
It disappoints me that you cannot see through this.
by Bax23 on Jul 14, 2006 11:36 AM EDT reply actions
Please, elaborate, Bax. Would love to hear the conspiracy theory.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 11:37 AM EDT reply actions
As to your point about NCAA Investigators, those message board rumors have so far been proven to be false. There were NYT writers on campus, but no NCAA PIs. Just wanted to clear that up.
Also, here’s a link to an article by Will Collier quoting WSJ on Tider Insider. I don’t have a subscription so I can’t help you out but Will might.
http://vodkapundit.com/
by AUAlum on Jul 14, 2006 11:38 AM EDT reply actions
Bama was also behind the Bay of Pigs and the so-called “Moon Landing”. Don’t you folks know anything?
It’s all ball bearings these days.
Perhaps you need a refresher course.
by GamecockTony on Jul 14, 2006 11:40 AM EDT reply actions
Sorry, didn’t know that was against the code of ethics. I’ll try to find the original posting of the thread I saw on the ITAT members board.
by nixforsix on Jul 14, 2006 11:41 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t know why I’m shocked they want to blame this on everyone but their university. “It’s a great liberal NYT conspiracy I tells ya! And bama too – you just know they’re behind it somehow”
And it’s “their” not “there” size, status, etc
by tim on Jul 14, 2006 11:41 AM EDT reply actions
Orson, I don’t think that WSJ simply saying “the Times is going to publish an article that will make you happy” is especially unethical. That’s incredibly vague and has little chance of affecting the story that the NYT is trying to cover.
by Michael on Jul 14, 2006 11:42 AM EDT reply actions
Two things
1. If allegations are to be believed, its local writers who did more to leak the story than Warren.
Listen to Finebaum’s broadcast two days ago interviewing David Wesson, the Sports Editor of the Tuscaloosa News.
2. The professor in charge of this received his PhD from Notre Dame. So I’m blaming the whole damn thing on Brady Quinn, Lou Holtz, and grass grown especially long to so down Reggie Bush.
by AUAlum on Jul 14, 2006 11:46 AM EDT reply actions
Newspaper staffers generally don’t comment on upcoming stories, Mike, but they’re particularly tight about it at the Grey Lady. We think that post is about an existing banking story. What NixForSix and Vodkapundit are suggesting is that Warren was commenting on the Thamel piece, which would be bad.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 11:46 AM EDT reply actions
I agree with you there Michael… if he was leaking information about the story that would be a problem… just saying that a story is cooking about Auburn… I’m not offended… but as the site demonstrates regularly, I’m not a journalist.
by Stranko Montana on Jul 14, 2006 11:49 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t think legit Auburn fans would blame the academic issues on Bama. If this was going on it’s an internal problem that needs to be corrected. There isn’t anything wrong with these types of classes. You can take them at any school. AU fans are mad that it’s Auburn that gets featured for this. Seriously, how do half of football players at virtually any school actually pass? Vince Young even made it through school for three years.
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 11:50 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t think wsj did anything unethical. everyone that posts/reads that board know who he is and who he works for, and he didn’t say anything about the content or subject (outside of it being about AU) of the article, just that the posters who were up in arms about the NYT’s reporting of classified information should start looking favorably at the NYT again in a few days nudge nudge wink wink.
by Todd on Jul 14, 2006 11:51 AM EDT reply actions
How can Bama be behind it?
The whitleblower comes from Auburn’s own Sociology Dean!…and just because Warren St. John works for NYT doesn’t mean there’s a Bama Consipiracy. Weak accusation. Auburn want to point the finger at everyone but themselves…pitiful!
by Mike on Jul 14, 2006 11:53 AM EDT reply actions
Here’s the thing about Warren’s supposed “leak.”
Supposedly he said something about a female NCAA investigator at Auburn (it’s not quoted which makes me suspicious, but anyway) A) it turned out not to be true and b) the NYT story doesnt say anything about NCAA investigators. So — what did he leak? Sounds more like he was wrong. Doesnt a leak have to be like, a leak of something that’s going to be in the paper?
And secondly, that other comment seems to be in the context of a politcal discussion about the NYT banking story and dems and repubs, not football, and who knows if he’s referring to a specific story anyway. Further, a story that will make the homers happy as he put it could be about just about anything — Tennessee, how great Bear Bryant is, blah blah blah. I’m not buying the conspiracy.
by bob on Jul 14, 2006 11:53 AM EDT reply actions
“2. The professor in charge of this received his PhD from Notre Dame. So Im blaming the whole damn thing on Brady Quinn, Lou Holtz, and grass grown especially long to so down Reggie Bush. "
I think that’s something we can all get behind.
by peacedog on Jul 14, 2006 11:56 AM EDT reply actions
But there’s a distinction between commenting, which necessarily implies discussing the facts of the story, and vague statements that there is a story coming down the pike, without even mentioning the subject matter of the story.
I loved Will Collier’s beef that the New York Times prints intelligence details that they get from government leakers, but they won’t answer his questions. It’s not as if it’s part of the NYT’s function to report on intelligence doings, as opposed to answering questions from an angry Auburn fan.
What’s going to be most ironic is when Auburn’s internal investigation finds nothing major to be amiss (and if Gundlach’s statement to the AJC about athletics taking precedence over academics at Auburn are to be believed, that’s a virtual certainty), Collier will likely respond to claims of “whitewash!” with “that’s BS conspiracy thinking; maybe you should go to Roswell or Area 51!” And yet his original response to the article is to blame Bama, WSJ, the NYT, the Tuscaloosa News, and apparently the rest of the organized media for conspiring against Auburn.
by Michael on Jul 14, 2006 11:56 AM EDT reply actions
Let’s all remember that Auburn only has so many books that haven’t been colored in, as has been well-documented by a certain Evil Genius. On that fact, I say they should be given a pass, but I’m giddy on the inside :) Also, belatedly, FORZA ITALIA for the World Cup, nothing like celebrating in Rome with your 1,000,000 closest friends (although it does still tie for Gainesville after a nat’l championship)
by italiangator on Jul 14, 2006 11:58 AM EDT reply actions
Now THAT is a response the University of Michigan School of Law would be proud of.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 11:59 AM EDT reply actions
All I have to say is James Brooks.
The guy graduated from Auburn and later told the world that he couldn’t read.
Is this really a surprise to anyone? But if I was an Auburn fan I would be pissed!
by Odell 51 on Jul 14, 2006 12:03 PM EDT reply actions
Full disclosure, again: Cuddles Swindle is a grad of Auburn.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 12:06 PM EDT reply actions
funny pic about the story:
http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k278/jlwhit1/feardumb-1.jpg
by Mike on Jul 14, 2006 12:09 PM EDT reply actions
“The sourcing doesnt come from a hayseed Deep Throat or begrudged employee.”
Who do you think got passed over for the position that Petee currently holds?
From the Huntsville Times – http://www.al.com/sports/huntsvilletimes/index.ssf?/base/sports/1152868684135850.xml&coll=1
“Gundlach, officials said, confirmed to Auburn that, at least in part, his dissatisfaction with being passed over when Petee was promoted in 2002 led him to ultimately take his allegations to The New York Times earlier this year.”
by Jason on Jul 14, 2006 12:10 PM EDT reply actions
Worst case scenario…this Peete guy gets axed, Auburn places heightened regulations on professor discretion of independent studies (something that may go into effect for the entire NCAA), and then at this years Iron Bowl 20,000 fans from each school murder each other.
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 12:12 PM EDT reply actions
Allegations which no one is denying, Jason.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 12:13 PM EDT reply actions
Re: the pictures, quotes, etc. of Carnell…since when does academics really come into play in regards to football? Should we just start to factor this in? So now Vanderbilt starts every SEC game with a 28 point lead?
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 12:17 PM EDT reply actions
It’s rather interesting that the NY Times has done 2 offseason articles on Auburn the last 2 years. The first revolved around the FCA and was discredited by the NCAA. Now this comes out from a disgruntled AU prof who was passed over for promotion over a year ago and the classes were not only open to all students, the athletes took less than 25% of the classes offered, and when AU found out about it, the classes were nixed in 2005, a full year ago.
The whistleblower, however, may have violated federal law in releasing the names of the students involved to the press.
Every school has relatively easy courses, take UF for example. UF core curriculum, required by all undergrads, includes Jorts Construction 101. From what I can tell, everyone gets an A in that class.
As for the leak, this article was supposed to be in Sunday’s NYT, but apparently, they were scooped by the OA-News and had to publish it early. A Blair Switch project, as it were.
BTW, the whistleblowing professor is most noted for his Ig Nobel Prize where he proved that country music increases the suicide rate.
I was drunk the day my diploma got out of sociology…
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 12:20 PM EDT reply actions
Virginia Law, bitches. Michigan Law is nice and all, but what do you make of a school that produced Catherine McKinnon and Ann Coulter?
by Michael on Jul 14, 2006 12:20 PM EDT reply actions
NewAZTiger: there is no class in Jorts Construction, since we’re all born with a pair securely fastened to our umbilical cord.
There was a class at UF (1 credit only, if we recall correctly) that was called “Growing Fruit for Fun and Profit.” The “fun” part is what cracks me up.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 12:22 PM EDT reply actions
The NYT does a good job of conveniently leaving out a lot of facts in this article. Read this and you’ll have a different opinion on the matter… http://www.al.com/sports/huntsvilletimes/index.ssf?/base/sports/1152868684135850.xml&coll=1&thispage=1
by Adam on Jul 14, 2006 12:23 PM EDT reply actions
The fact that you’re all born with Jorts is exactly why Jorts Construction 101 is a complete and total academic farce.
Why, it’s almost like taking Wine Tasting at the Capstone.
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 12:24 PM EDT reply actions
Adam, why is that—because the allegations were made public by a guy who was passed over for Petee’s spot? In what way does that diminish from the veracity or significance of the allegations? Hell, the claims Gundlach is making are documented and not in dispute whatsoever. As for their significance, just see the quotes from academics at other institutions—they are absolutely astounded at what Petee was engaging in.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 12:29 PM EDT reply actions
Seems the NY Times reporter has a bit of a history.
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 12:29 PM EDT reply actions
Deep Throat had a bureaucratic grudge, too.
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 12:31 PM EDT reply actions
AUAlum and peacedog,
James Gundlach hasn’t a degree from Notre Dame.
GUNDLACH, JAMES H., 1942-
Professor. Born: December 15, 1942, in Watonga, Okla. Parents: Leo Carl and Clara (Van Dorn) Gunlach. Education: Oklahoma State University, B.A., 1969; University of Texas, M.A., 1975; Ph.D., 1978. Married: Carol on April 31, 1969. Children: One. Associate professor at Auburn University.
There is a Marketing prof at ND named Greg Gundlach. I took a class of his, complete tool who had never heard of Taco Bell.
by Tommy Gee on Jul 14, 2006 12:32 PM EDT reply actions
And Adam, you want to talk about leaving out some details? How about the fact that Langenfield was allowed to enroll in one of Petee’s directed reading courses 9 or 10 weeks into a 15 week semester? That’s ridiculous.
Oh, nevermind, you’re right—it’s much more likely the NYT reporter is biased against AU than the Huntsville Times writer is biased for them.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 12:36 PM EDT reply actions
Rainmaker – I understand that for Petee the implications are very serious. What I’m saying is that this is more an internal academics issue than anything else. This being a football blog, I figured the only ramifications anyone would care about would be harm done to athletics. In this case, there will most likely be none, much to the chagrin of a lot of Auburn’s rival fans, I’m sure.
by Adam on Jul 14, 2006 12:38 PM EDT reply actions
Actually, I fail to see how your post in any way makes the point which you now claim it was designed to. The only conceivable interpretation of your post was that the Huntsville Times piece you linked painted a picture far more favorable to AU in terms of whether or not significant improprieties took place by calling into question the credibility of the whistle-blower and including quotes from players far different in tone and substance from those in the NYT article.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 12:42 PM EDT reply actions
It appears that Carnell Williams took the class after his 2004 season was over and while he was preparing for a multi-million dollar career.
Biggest non-story of the year?
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 12:43 PM EDT reply actions
Tommy,
Petee has the PhD from the Dome, not Gundlach.
I think Michael brings up a good point about the NCAA taking a strong look into IS cases.
Petee is to Independent Study classes as Willie Williams is to Lobster Dinners on Recruiting Visits.
by AUAlum on Jul 14, 2006 12:43 PM EDT reply actions
Boy, some of you guys are slow, delusional, or both. Carnell was simply used as an example (a high profile one)—his taking two independent study courses during the spring of his senior year is hardly what this is all about. But keep beating the hell out of that straw man.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 12:59 PM EDT reply actions
Adam,
I think this is more than just an acedemic issue. If athletes were directed to this class by the athletic department the program is in danger of sanctions.
by tzubear on Jul 14, 2006 1:02 PM EDT reply actions
Bottomline is until the Worldwide Leader reports it, nothing is happening. Do you understand, NOTHING IS HAPPENING! Nothing to see here, move along.
Where are my pictures of Brandon Cox without his shirt on?
by Jason on Jul 14, 2006 1:06 PM EDT reply actions
So would every athletic department that directed kids towards a kinesiology major also be in danger of sanctions?
The main issue is that one professor was supervising too many classes. No player has said they were anything but legit classes that required hard work.
by nixforsix on Jul 14, 2006 1:09 PM EDT reply actions
Why don’t you show the picture of the stinky hippie that dropped the dime on AU? Or mentioned that he has a hardon for Dr. Petee eversince he was passed over for promotion?
Yep, I am a proud AU grad. And if this is the best the they can come up with after two + years of digging then not too worried.
by NameOfTheRose on Jul 14, 2006 1:09 PM EDT reply actions
This whole thing is a straw man.
It was reported upon and fixed over a year ago. It does not involve any improper benefits for athletes. At worst, it is a grade-inflation issue because the professor gave EVERYONE A’s and B’s. Not just student athletes, but every other person that took the class.
Carnell’s name is a big deal, because he is the superstar that the article infers got extra benefits to remain eligible, but that is clearly not the case. Carnell took a light load after the Sugar Bowl to get ready for the NFL Draft. That a star athlete would do this when his eligibility is up is only news to people that have been under a rock for the past 50 years.
What I want to know is why the NY Times is reporting this as a Sports story when there is little, if any, evidence that this is a sport story. It’s much more of an internal academic story, and it was fixed over a year ago.
Cue Officer Barr Brady.
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 1:12 PM EDT reply actions
Hey Ritty,
I’ll give you Vandy and 28 as a running wager for 12 weeks.
Deal?
by GamecockTony on Jul 14, 2006 1:16 PM EDT reply actions
NewAZTiger,
I think the link to auburn.scout makes a good point, and it echoes Mr. Swindle’s analysis. There is no telling what will come of this, but it certainly is an issue. As the Scout article implicitly recognizes, the Langenfeld situation may be the most problematic for Auburn’s athletic program, assuming Langenfeld received special treatment because he is an athlete. I agree that it is highly unlikely that this will result in major NCAA sanctions (the NCAA’s well-established position is to concede academic indpendence—just look at what UT got away with). Regardless, to call this a non-story is ridiculous-unless you believe that a professor singlehandedly making his university an academic laughingstock isn’t a major story.
by BenUGA on Jul 14, 2006 1:23 PM EDT reply actions
Clearly because the New York Times hates Auburn. What you need is an unbiased journalist like, say Phillip Marshall, to write a piece on it. Oh wait.
And, no, NewAZTiger—Carnell was used to demonstrate how these “courses” worked. Of course he was picked because he was a superstar, but his experience is by no means what is driving this thing.
Nix, keep spinning pal. You and I both know you’re comparing apples to oranges (then again, maybe you don’t).
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 1:28 PM EDT reply actions
I can’t see Warren St. John ever using the word “homers.” The writing style of the text of his alleged “leak” is 180 degrees from his normal writing style, both in his professional work and on TiderInsider.
by rtr on Jul 14, 2006 1:28 PM EDT reply actions
I’ll tell you this much…there’s a good chance D’Angelo wishes he had YOUR abs right now. You seen a picture of that guy recently?
by Ian on Jul 14, 2006 1:31 PM EDT reply actions
’s been hitting the chicken grease a little hard, eh?
by Orson Swindle on Jul 14, 2006 1:33 PM EDT reply actions
The OSU fan is in court today:
http://www.deadspin.com/sports/whimsy/its-judgment-day-for-mike-cooper-187334.php
by AU03 on Jul 14, 2006 1:36 PM EDT reply actions
If a student’s name was given to the press without obtaining consent for his information to be released, federal law was violated. I’d say the ethics of the whistleblower are in question.
Once again, this is a non-story because it was reported to the proper authorities at the university back in either late 2004 or early 2005 and the university took action and corrected it by this time last year. That is precisely how it should’ve happened.
This was not a course for football players only. It was a course for ALL STUDENTs of which the overwhelming majority were NOT FOOTBALL PLAYERS. It is no more of a sports story than to say that football players will be taking U101.
What this story really is about is petty infighting in a sociology department amongst tenured professors. Big whup.
Now, perhaps someone else could clue me in as to why the New York Times thinks this is a sports story over a year after the problem was noted, addressed, and fixed?
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 1:43 PM EDT reply actions
I’m just curious when the DeVry Institute of Technology becaome DeVry College. I didn’t discover this until I moved to Decatur off College Ave and saw the sign (silly me thinking the street was named because of Agnes Scott and not DeVry).
by Crazy Joe on Jul 14, 2006 1:44 PM EDT reply actions
NewAZ, I suggest you get in touch with the NYT immediately and let them know how much of a non-story this is.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 1:53 PM EDT reply actions
Hey Rainmaker…relatively speaking this is a nonstory for the NYT. We are about to have another installment of the Crusades after all when….NEWSFLASH…. students (including athletes) get to take easy classes with nice professors who give them B’s for book reports.
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 2:14 PM EDT reply actions
Ritty, I’m pretty sure that’s not what NewAZ meant in calling it a “non-story.” Then again, reading comprehension has never seemed a strong suit of the AU faithful.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 2:21 PM EDT reply actions
I’ll agree that the NCAA is likely not going to make anything of it, because it’s probably not strictly football related. Where it becomes an issue though is with Auburn’s accreditation. They’ve had problems in the past including probations, and even losing their accreditation before. If this shows up as enough of a problem for the university, it could conceivably cause Auburn to face losing their accreditation again. That may not directly effect the football team, but if you don’t think something like that would hurt recruiting and the university, you’re out of your mind.
by rebel84 on Jul 14, 2006 2:24 PM EDT reply actions
Hey Rainmaker relatively speaking this is a nonstory for the NYT. We are about to have another installment of the Crusades after all when .NEWSFLASH . students (including athletes) get to take easy classes with nice professors who give them Bs for book reports.
You’ll be pleased to know that my home delivery edition of the Times has the “Crusades” adequately covered on A-1 and relegates the Auburn story, despite its obvious importance to you, to the sports section — unless, of course, you were implying that Sports should have covered Hezbollah’s need to trade for a relief grenade pitcher if they’re going to hang with the Israelis in the playoff race.
by DevilGrad on Jul 14, 2006 2:24 PM EDT reply actions
au has now sunk to the lowest of the lows. It has been reported that au and tosu have merged, manufacturing a mega-quagmire of education that will simply be know as t.u.r.d.d.(The Uneducated Race of Degreed Derelicts). The mascot of this epicenter of academia will be a compilation of fecal matter donated by Pat Dye and Maurice Clarett the day after “taco night” and will forever embody the great institution. Along with the athletically friendly Independent Studies, other classes based on Pay-for-Play, Professional Athletics (andy “because I don’t need no education” katzenmoyer),Health (this is basically just rubbing one out in some public forum) and Animal Husbandry with an emphasis in beastiality will be offered for further education. With two campuses residing in columbus and operlika, a third is being expedited in knoxville, tn. School officials commented on the third campus in saying, “there is a real growing need for the third campus in knoxville, it is supply and demand, economics, and the dollar dollar bill yo!” The rep then added “this thing is about to bust loose, we have plans to begin construction of new facilities in every city with a population over 200 in mississippi and arkansas.”
by King Harvest on Jul 14, 2006 2:28 PM EDT reply actions
When has Auburn lost its accreditation?
SACS had AU on probation and did not yank the accreditation. And SACS was ON CAMPUS during the time these classes were taken and AU was cleared about this time last year.
Rainmaker, you’re trying to make rain here. There is none. Questioning my comprehension skills while demonstrating your lack thereof is mildly amusing. Ritty understood what I was saying.
If this is a major story for the New York Times, then they are in serious trouble.
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 2:29 PM EDT reply actions
I tell you what, this whole thing is embarassing. Absolutely embarassing. Here you have a guy that got a freaking phd from Notre Dame and he’s reduced to handing out reading assignments to Auburn football players? I am thoroughly humiliated and accept all due ridicule.
by Notre Dan on Jul 14, 2006 2:34 PM EDT reply actions
Notre Dan, by osmosis, I now feel dumb.
Thanks for reminding us what a PhD. in Sociology from anywhere will get you.
At least I have my BBA to fall back on.
by chrisnd on Jul 14, 2006 2:36 PM EDT reply actions
NewAZ, per usual, you’re making very little sense. It was the reading comprehension ability of Ritty that I was calling into question (but given), but given your misconstruction of my post, perhaps I was remiss for failing to do so.
And, no, Ritty did not understand what you were saying. That is, unless your post was intended to express the belief that this is a non-story in relativity to world events, as opposed to simply a non-story solely within the realm of sports. If you want to be disingenuous after the fact, go ahead and tell me that’s not what you meant.
At what point, exactly, did I demonstrate a lack of reading comprehension skills? Shit, after you call the New York Times, you better get the LSAC on the phone and tell them my near-perfect LSAT was a sham.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 2:40 PM EDT reply actions
Now that’s the kind of razor-sharp wit I expect from a trailer-dweller such as yourself. Well done.
If you must know, his last name was Petee and he had a glorious dick-target and a penchant for sniffing jocks.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 2:46 PM EDT reply actions
This is not only a non-story with regards to world-events, it’s a non-story with regards to sports.
At best it’s a minor story with regards to one particular type of class offered by one particular professor to all students on AU’s campus. That would be a regional or national type story, not a sports story. In fact, the only sports angle I can see is that a minority of students in the classes were student-athletes, and the only way it gets printed is that a top 5 NFL draft pick took 2 of the classes.
No Carnell, no Sports Story. Since Carnell took the classes AFTER his eligibility had expired, it is not a sports story.
And for clarification, SACS was on campus during this time period and cleared AU in December of 2005.
Perhaps we should investigate Alabama’s Criminal Justice program. Seems I recall one of their students was recently arrested. He happened to play football, so I have to wonder if he learned anything in those classes…
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 2:48 PM EDT reply actions
I’m sure he learned how to exercise his right to remain silent.
Which is more than we can say for you.
by DevilGrad on Jul 14, 2006 2:51 PM EDT reply actions
The only thing that makes this an “issue” for AU over and above the typical crip-course shenanigans (sp?) that occur in EVERY athletic program, is the University’s recent troubles with SACS. That’s what the Tigers should be worrying about, and that’s what could cause NCAA involvement.
As a MSM press bashing, NCAA hating, conservative republican UA alum, I believe there are two contributing factors to the story:
1. The NYT (or, the “smart-ass yankee” contingent) loves to do stories on dumb jocks, corruption in athletics, and anything that might conform to their worldview of sports as something which desevres derision. If something like this takes place in a southern state, where they’re all a bunch of misguided yokels anyway, then it’s a bonus. I have no trouble at all believing the the NYT reporters used deception and lies to gain their access, and that they are painting the situation (whatever it ends up actually being) in the worst possible light. Anybody who is reveling in this story about Auburn doesn’t understand that the effort here by the NYT is to discredit the South in general and the state of Alabama in particular: at a MINUMUM at least as it pertains to football.
(As an aside, if WSJ or Wesson DID leak the story, then Auburn owes them a debt of grattitude: otherwise, the AU provost’s office wouldn’t have been able to get in front of it).
2. Tommy Tubberville put his own dumb ass in this sling by going around and trumpeting his football team’s academic prowess every chance he got. Think about it for a minute: you’re the head coach of a PUBLIC university football team, and you get the results showing that you’re ranked ahead of some of the more prestigious academic institutions in America. Do you then: a)run through the streets shouting with glee and bragging to anyone who’ll listen, or b) say “oh shit, we need an audit”?
by sandman227 on Jul 14, 2006 2:54 PM EDT reply actions
I must have missed something and given the number of posts I am not going back to see what it was that I didn’t comprehend correctly. Maybe I should have taken a reading comprehension “directed readings” at Auburn instead of Political Science classes (actually that would have been more beneficial)…but that wouldn’t be news would it? Headline: Some punk kid from Auburn takes blow off class gets B+
Nope, instead it’s…Headline: 4 punk kids at Auburn take blow off class, one is athlete. Now that’s news!
And sorry, I saw what must have been a photoshopped image of the NYT that had a headline about Auburn on the front.
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 2:56 PM EDT reply actions
Nice dodge, NewAZ. You and I both know your original point had nothing to do with the relevance of this story in relativity to world events.
And you are absolutely kidding yourself about what could conceivably make this a “sports story.” How about the fact that 18 players on the 2004 team were taking these directed reading courses (which are clearly illegitimate courses in practice) and that Auburn’s APR was presumably inflated by this?
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 2:56 PM EDT reply actions
And to see the Cadillac spin on this already…check out USAToday:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/2006-07-13-auburn-grades_x.htm?POE=SPOISVA
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 2:58 PM EDT reply actions
Hey Rainmaker…what exactly are illegitimate courses in practice?
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 2:59 PM EDT reply actions
Rainmaker, 97 credit hours over 85 student athletes is about less than 1.25 credit hours per student. That’s not going to dent the APR either way.
Yes, my original point was that this is a non-story in every sense of the word. You’re sitting around making accusations without pointing out the inconsistancies. I suppose that makes a good lawyer.
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 3:02 PM EDT reply actions
Let’s see, Ritty—how about ones in which no real work is required? Ones for which a student receives several hours of credit for (allegedly) reading one book and writing a short paper on it? Or ones that are NEVER (outside of AU) offered as independent studies (i.e. typically robust courses such as statistics)?
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 3:02 PM EDT reply actions
All I know is that until Carl Monday gives me the scoop, I don’t know what to believe
by Nick on Jul 14, 2006 3:04 PM EDT reply actions
Actually, as the article points out, it’s unclear as to how much this practice affected APR (coming from an AU representative), but I guess you know.
As for your statement about my “making accusations without pointing out the inconsistancies [sic],” what in the hell does that even mean?
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 3:04 PM EDT reply actions
I agree with you on the Statistics class. I dont remember what the article said but somehow I think it wasn’t a survey of statistics but rather something more specific. I don’t know.
I thought you were going somewhere else with that and my point was going to be virtually every class I have ever taken anywhere was illegitimate in practice.
by Ritty on Jul 14, 2006 3:07 PM EDT reply actions
Apparently, it means that this conversation is over.
by NewAZTiger on Jul 14, 2006 3:07 PM EDT reply actions
“you better get the LSAC on the phone and tell them my near-perfect LSAT was a sham.”
nobody needs to listen to anything you say after this statement, Rainmaker.
completely pointless, and there is always somebody smarter, and somebody who made higher on the LSAT.
p.s. don’t be another guy with a JD who screams “I have a JD damnit, respect my authoritah!”
by Benjamin H. Cardozo on Jul 14, 2006 3:13 PM EDT reply actions
Maybe I read a different Article AZ, but 97 hours divided by 18 student athletes is 5.38 per, which is almost two classes worth.
It certainly had SOME positive effect on their APR.
by RedTide on Jul 14, 2006 3:57 PM EDT reply actions
you better get the LSAC on the phone and tell them my near-perfect LSAT was a sham.
nobody needs to listen to anything you say after this statement, Rainmaker.
completely pointless, and there is always somebody smarter, and somebody who made higher on the LSAT.
p.s. dont be another guy with a JD who screams I have a JD damnit, respect my authoritah!
Comment by Benjamin H. Cardozo July 14, 2006 @ 3:13 pm
Good points — and excellent choice of pseudonym.
by DevilGrad on Jul 14, 2006 4:08 PM EDT reply actions
wow. 100+posts over this? come on now… why can’t we all just get along? sniff
by psuedosilentobserver on Jul 14, 2006 4:29 PM EDT reply actions
I doubt that the New York Times has it out for the South, or for the state of Alabama, or for Auburn University in particular. Alabamans aren’t helping their cause with their stupid conspiracy theories and their willingness to look the other way while their institutions of higher learning abandon their core mission: education.
The fact that Auburn EVER GOT CLOSE to having its accreditation yanked over outlaw boosters ought to be humiliating to the Barners, but they don’t care. Defend, defend, deny, blame Bama, blame the yankees, you name it.
Pathetic. This is right up there with Tennessee’s “Madommon double videos” literary masterpiece and the Jim Harrick higher learning initiative at Georgia.
by Doreblogger on Jul 14, 2006 4:56 PM EDT reply actions
Hey, Judge Cardozo, I have a box full of fireworks and am looking to take the train out of town for the weekend. What’s the worst that can happen to me?
by parker91 on Jul 14, 2006 5:02 PM EDT reply actions
I have said it before and I’ll say it again.
All schools cater to athletes and all of them are bending the rules some.
At least the big powerhouse schools do.
What still makes me laugh a little is the ones who cheat or try to and never win doing it(TMNC THAT IS).
Everyone has thrown a stone or two at other schools while sleeping in their glass houses.
by CHARLIE Murphy on Jul 14, 2006 5:10 PM EDT reply actions
don’t trip, and if you work for the train company, for god’s sake, don’t help anybody.
and change your name, because Palsgraf is a stupid name.
by Benjamin H. Cardozo on Jul 14, 2006 5:11 PM EDT reply actions
Personally, the IS course doesn’t bother me as much as the fact that this kid DIDN’T EVEN REALIZE HE WAS IN THE WRONG COURSE FOR 9-10 WEEKS!!!!
Shouldn’t that automatically put AU on NCAA sanctions?
by JohnWA on Jul 14, 2006 5:27 PM EDT reply actions
Cardozo, I think you severely missed the point of my comment. It was not intended in any way to suggest that I was above reproach (or that there was no one out there smarter, etc., as you alluded to)—rather, it was a tongue-in-cheek response to NewAZ’s baseless suggestion that my reading comprehension skills were lacking.
My apologies if it struck a nerve.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 5:56 PM EDT reply actions
Rainmaker, while I agree totally with your assessment of the AU situation, as a recent law school grad, I feel compelled to call you out for your error in judgment re: the LSAT stuff. Nothing screams “I have a small penis” like posting information about your LSAT score on a CFB blog.
I’ll refrain now from detailing my law school resume to bolster my credibility in this forum. But I still have a small penis.
by vandybama on Jul 14, 2006 6:15 PM EDT reply actions
there are enough attorneys on this damn blog to fill an Auburn independent study class. shouldn’t somebody here be billing hours if I’m not going to do it?
by Benjamin H. Cardozo on Jul 14, 2006 6:31 PM EDT reply actions
Vandy, as I wrote before it was intended tongue-in-cheek and in response to the suggestion that I had difficulty in the reading comprehension department. Regardless, I realized immediately after posting it that I should’ve resisted the temptation.
That said, I find it ironic that in the very post in which you admonished me you alluded to your own “law school resume” in nearly an equally suggestive way as the comment for which you were calling me out.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 6:43 PM EDT reply actions
Rainmaker,
The irony was intentional, as was my admission of having a small penis. (I mentioned my law school resume “in passing” because I have a small penis).
Let’s just shake hands and make up. I applaud your use of “dick target”—that’s a classic. I also enjoy the way you’re sticking it to that crazy barner.
Cardozo,
I’m not billing yet as I have to take the f%#$#ng bar in less than two weeks. I come here for study breaks only to read more about Palsgraf. Gee, thanks. Ha.
by vandybama on Jul 14, 2006 7:03 PM EDT reply actions
Maybe my reading comprehension skills are lacking after all. My apologies.
by Rainmaker on Jul 14, 2006 7:12 PM EDT reply actions
and it’s all come full circle.
this thread will be in recess.
by Benjamin H. Cardozo on Jul 14, 2006 7:28 PM EDT reply actions
The Auburn folks are going through the first stage – denial. I am familiar with the concept having had the same reaction when I started to hear what the market was for a marginal defensive tackle. An Auburn caller to a local sports talk show said it was the work of Howell Rains – who has not been at the Times in over two years. When advised of this fact, the Auburn caller said, " um yeah, but I bet he still has connections." There was also some mention of sour grapes though it is uncertain if this was a remarkably unoriginal observation aimed at Bama fans or the condition of the gentleman’s wine celler.
by Bamaleg on Jul 14, 2006 8:52 PM EDT reply actions
Really, Auburn self-reported with that ridiculously HIGH Academic Progress Rate report.
Who could have foreseen THIS effect of an absurd program aimed at punishing the LOW end of the spectrum?
Auburn floated right to the top of that little piece of academia self-indulgence.
I love college football, but it has more wrong with it than Major League Baseball. Ever.
by Boclive on Jul 14, 2006 10:39 PM EDT reply actions
I have so far had two reactions to this news.
1. As a Kansas fan, should I really care that much? It’s not going to affect the Fighting Manginos and their inevitable march to the buffe..National Championship anyway.
2. I was born in Athens, and I like UGA, so this is…heh…pretty funny.
However, one question must be resolved. Does AU score any Fulmer Cup points for this? Somehow? Please?
by Will on Jul 15, 2006 12:45 AM EDT reply actions
Somebody please tell me AU has to retroactively forfeit the ’04 games.
by Newspaper Hack on Jul 15, 2006 12:16 PM EDT reply actions
Why do lawyers always feel the need to tell everyone that they have a JD? Douchebags. No one cares. JDs are not MDs so don’t get all high on yourselves.
by eddie on Jul 15, 2006 2:37 PM EDT reply actions
Eddie apparently is going blog-to-blog being an idiot this weekend.
by Mike on Jul 15, 2006 4:34 PM EDT reply actions
Barners should have spent a lot of time on this “non-story”. Seems this worries them almost as much as the possibility that Shula gets his 2nd 10 win season before Tubby does.
by BamaCPA on Jul 15, 2006 5:44 PM EDT reply actions
Orson,
You mentioning the course “Growing Fruit for Fun and Profit” on this blog (post 51) only reinforces my habit of daily (ok, hourly) visits. http://www.hos.ufl.edu/rldweb/FRC1010.htm
Surely, Stranko remembers the first 9-10 weeks of this class before he realized he was in the wrong one.
Short story: While my couse load was too full to ever take this spectacular class, I only discovered it existed because my roommate took it to fill out a semester. He got a B (!) for an “unkempt notebook.” I still ridicule him between plays at the Swamp when academics come up.
by Verdigo on Jul 15, 2006 6:13 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t understand the whole fuss. Almost every school has classes in it that are easy, whether they are freshmen “discover yourself” classes, or PEs. When I was a freshmen at the University of Kentucky I took a class where the instructor let us on the final (there was no midterm) sit wherever we wanted and talk if we wanted. Plenty of people cheated, asked each other questions, looked on each other’s test, but because there wasn’t any athletes in this class it doesn’t matter? This test was easier than Harrick’s at UGA’s, but was there a fuss made about it? As a UGA student I have every reason to relish in UA’s misfortunes, but come on guys… why be ignorant about the situation? There are easy classes everywhere, a few UA student athletes took an easy class, as well as other students of the university. Are you going to say your university doesn’t have any BS classes? Its not like their entire curriculum for 4 years was a bunch of IS classes, reading a book, then reporting on it. For UA guys, it sucks, UGA had to deal with it with Harrick (as if PE classes are EVER hard), and for everyone else hating on UA, are you seriously saying your university didn’t have any gimme classes? If you are, you’re lying to yourself, or your school isn’t in D1 athletic.
by Whats the fuss? on Jul 16, 2006 2:47 AM EDT reply actions
At Auburn, a 10 page paper is 3 credit hours.
At Alabama, a 5 page paper is 5 credit hours.
by NewAZTiger on Jul 16, 2006 1:40 PM EDT reply actions
Do you Aubies think that offering the class to real students hid the fact that is purely set up as a tool to keep your football tards eligible? Only 25% of Petee’s students were athletes, but Petee was working at 350% of a normal work load. For shits and giggles, lets say that the athletes would get into the classes that their academic advisor wants them in before those classes are filled by normal students. If the same number of athletes are allowed to take those “directed reading” classes but Petee’s workload is reduced to say 100% of a normal course load, percentage of athletes rises to 87.5%. I guess you guys took directed reading math classes with Barnell.
by Don'tFeedPhil on Jul 16, 2006 2:12 PM EDT reply actions
Of course, JB Closner had already graduated…and didn’t play in the bowl game.
by RIP Logan Young on Jul 16, 2006 2:42 PM EDT reply actions
Imagine that, Bama giving 6 credit hours for one 5 page paper. Pot meet Kettle.
by Aujerm on Jul 16, 2006 2:50 PM EDT reply actions
You barners can hide behind the high number of hours that Petee was teaching if you want to. Had Petee been teaching a normal load, 80% of his students would have been athletes.
by Don'tFeedPhil on Jul 16, 2006 3:33 PM EDT reply actions
Sorry to hear about this but the Florida Gators have a similar problem. There is an instructor (Dr. Fagerberg) who teaches a course, Medical Terminology, that has been reported for awarding all A’s to athletes. This practice has been reported to his Dean and nothing was done. As it turns out, his Dean is the Athletic Department Representative (Dr. Varnes). Amazing!!!!!!
by Stan Beland on Jul 16, 2006 4:52 PM EDT reply actions
Wwwwhhhhhiiiiirrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!
Spin control by sheephumpers in full gear!
“So how do we get paid now?”
- Brandon Johnson to Terry Bowden on his first day as AUburn HC.
by John in Hsv on Jul 17, 2006 12:22 AM EDT reply actions
speaking of tards, shout out to the dummy that came up with the most ridiculous conspiracy theory i’ve ever seen (post 137). This is embarrassing for AU, but nothing more. For all you self righteous pricks who think AU is the only SEC school that is dumping athletes in sociology, give me a break. I guarantee if you look at your own team’s roster you willl see a majority of them are majoring in Sociology or some other completely useless major that anyone with an 8th grade level of intelligence could earn a degree in.
by 4 in a row on Jul 17, 2006 1:31 AM EDT reply actions
Is that all you can come up with Mike? Apparently you are going blog-to-blog looking for what I write. Thanks buddy!
by eddie on Jul 17, 2006 8:50 AM EDT reply actions
John in HV, your Brandon Johnson quote is completely fabricated. Brandon Johnson was in 7th grade when Terry Bowden became Auburn’s head coach. He didn’t even play for him. Don’t make things up. You look like an idiot.
by JamesBostic on Jul 17, 2006 10:29 AM EDT reply actions
NYT – scooped by the OA-News and Pwn3D by the Pickens County Herald.
by NewAZTiger on Jul 17, 2006 3:17 PM EDT reply actions
Pickens County=Home of David Housel (and also yours truly). Looks like K. Strickland has incorporated the message-board brand of conspiracy theory into his article. The irony is gut-wrenching given his inquisition of the NYT.
by vandybama on Jul 17, 2006 5:52 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t think AgBArn is the only school with a “jock major” but theyare currently the only ones stupid enough to get caught doing it in what appears to be record numbers.
by Don'tFeedPhil on Jul 17, 2006 8:20 PM EDT reply actions
i love this. this is great. get me more of this for christmas.
by S on Jul 28, 2006 4:48 PM EDT reply actions
Garf bfooir heeelsi klak belunka.
I be James Brooks
by James Brooks on Jul 29, 2006 5:37 PM EDT reply actions

by 















