IF IT'S JUNE, IT MUST BE DUMB TIME
The following is a complete and total waste of time. Which means you'll be reading the whole thing, right?
If it's June, it must be time for a hearty dose of dumb. And by dumb we can only mean Heismanpundit, who earns our ire for this piece where our hero--bravely fighting the encroaching forces of reason and the demands of hiding his biases under a canopy of Colbert-esque objectivity and bluster--coolly submits his ranking of the conferences. Stand back. Prepare yourself to be shocked. Standing at the top of his rankings he has....(drumroll please)....
The Pac-10. (You may remove yourself from the floor now. Smelling salts are in the drawer.)

Orson, clad in powdered wig, collapses with shock.
Bold, 180-proof opinion there. Truthiness, you might say. Or the festering grudge of someone bent on constructing the college football world around their own bizarre axis of unsupported assertion. Either way you read it's still dumb as hell as analysis, since it ignores record and fact in an effort to assert what the aforementioned writer will always assert anyway: the Pac-10 rules, offense is the only part of the game of football that matters, and you are both silly and dumb for doubting either.
We'll extend a courtesy by actually refuting the point with evidence: there! All done. A much better blogger's already done this for us, since SMQ is busy becoming the Borg of blogosphere, taking what you do well and doing it three times better while blogging at the insane pace of approximately 23,000 words a day. (Benzedrine: the breakfast of champions!) SMQ's piece dismantles HP's conference rankings as the worst of what "punditry" has to offer: opinion validated by cherry-picked facts delivered with blather and ostensible objectivity.
We'd prefer to let facts, stats, and record dictate what we might be able to glean from reality and move from there, a tricky thing since it involves reading and a rudimentary understanding of statistics. (Which is why HP doesn't know his x-axis from his y-axis, a geeky and definitive insult we can't really top, Brian.)
At the risk of using "concepts" and "numbers", two things which are to HP what torches are to the resurrected dead, let's engage in a little PPP analysis: purchasing power parity, using the "basket of goods" measure to engage in a comparison of conference currency. Our sample will come from the last bowl season. As we will note, this is just one sample from a sort of randomly assigned tournament. It is just one indicator, and not indicative of any absolute universal truth in college football. You may look at it and decide for yourself how powerful it is, but we would suggest that it at least says something more persuasive about the state of programs matched up nationally on a grand stage than us simply placing our hands up our ass and pulling out opinions based on wiggly terms like "sophistication." Not that we don't love sophistication...

Pac-10 offenses are complex. Billy Dee Williams is sophisticated, and a fine motherfucker by any account.
(Yes, we know econ geeks; there's problems with this. We love it when economists define something as "controversial," since it conjures up conference rooms full of dismal scientists engaging in escrima fights with rolled-up copies of The Economist.) For the record, we'd like to say we were terrible at economics, and spent most of the time reading the sports page in class, which may become all too evident below.
--The Pac-10, fine mega-conference that it is, sent five teams to bowl games last season: USC, UCLA, Arizona State, Oregon, and Cal. The record: 3-2, which is respectable but not eye-popping.
Losses: Texas, Oklahoma
Victories: Northwestern, Rutgers, BYU.
--The Big 12 sent Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa State, Texas Tech, Texas to bowls. (Full disclosure: 8 teams? God's wounds! We didn't even notice that during the bowl season.
Losses: Clemson, TCU, Alabama.
Victories: USC, Oregon, South Carolina, Michigan, Houston.
--The Big 10 sent Michigan, Minnesota, Iowa, Penn State, Ohio State, Northwestern, and Wisconsin to bowls.
Losses: Nebraska, Virginia, Florida, UCLA.
Victories: Florida State, Notre Dame and Auburn.
--The Big East sent South Florida, Louisville, West Virginia, and Rutgers.
Losses: NC State, Virginia Tech, and Arizona State.
Victories(y): Georgia.
--The ACC sent Florida State, NC State, Georgia Tech, Virginia Tech, Miami, Clemson, Boston College, and Virginia to bowls.
Losses: Utah, LSU, Penn State.
Victories: South Florida, Louisville, Colorado, Boise State, Minnesota.
--The SEC (the best like conference in the world for realz OMG!!!) sent Florida, Georgia, Auburn, LSU, Alabama, and South Carolina to bowls.
Losses: West Virginia, Wisconsin, Missouri
Victories: Iowa (god bless picky linesmen), Texas Tech, Miami.
So there's just a random, crazy sample of performance. Just one indicator to look at, peruse, and make a conclusion from when thinking a little bit about college football. If we were to daringly make our own assumption from this, it's that the most undervalued conference in college football isn't the Pac-10 (which has its own media node, L.A., to defend it) but the barren plains of the Big 12, the big part of the country performing solid work in the bowl season and giving us the national champion Texas Longhorns. This crazy, random sample would suggest that the PPP of the Big 12 was at a peak in December, and that the addition of Dan Hawkins at Colorado will probably add to that power (since we're dumb enough to assume that coaching matters in every conference, not just the Pac-10.)
We were dumb enough to write in the early days of this blog that the Big 12 was, in the wake of USC sacking of Oklahoma in the Orange Bowl, approaching status as "a finesse conference." This was clearly the worst idea since telling Chuck Norris that a roundhouse kick was NOT the best way to win a fight, and was dumb, dumb, dumb.
But we're sitting in Atlanta, Georgia, which affects things. Our time in the blogosphere has only made us a smarter fan by teaching us how fucking dumb we were to start, and reminding us how retarded we still are. This is the heart of antipunditry, a practice you can see on display at SMQ, on Feldman's blog at ESPN, or most anywhere you look in the college football blogosphere. We're biased, we know it, and we let events dictate the drift of our thoughts in between sodomy jokes, high-tech Microsoft Paint slander, and calling people dumb.
Speaking of that, we give you the college world according to dumb man Heismanpundit. Voila:

57 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The greatest piece of non-punditry in quite some time
Awesome stuff; especially the MS Paint map. First rate, guys.
The Highfalutin ’Pologist deserves no less. Kudos.
by Peter Bean on Jun 5, 2006 9:32 AM EDT reply actions
What in the fudge do “diversity of scheme” and “strength of schedule” have to do with anything? How tough a team’s schedule is may determine how easy it is to accurately gauge a team’s worth, but has sod-all to do with a team’s worth itself. And “diversity of scheme” . . . good gravy, is there anyone outside of Heismanpundit himself who actually gives a rat’s ass about this? A conference with 12 teams can run 12 different schemes, but if they run ‘em all shitty, that doesn’t make them a good conference.
I also love his snide blowing-off of teams like South Carolina and Arkansas as “a permanent underclass” just a few paragraphs after an implication that teams like Arizona and Washington State will be knocking some heads this season — ’cuz there are no weeks off in the mighty Pac-10!
Then, finally, there’s the whole “Big East with the what now?” thing, as if West Virginia and Louisville didn’t even exist. Your map is probably even more accurate than you realize.
by Doug on Jun 5, 2006 9:36 AM EDT reply actions
With “analysis” like this … you guys will never get mentioned in the New York Times.
by Nestor16 on Jun 5, 2006 9:39 AM EDT reply actions
While I generally agree with you about this piece, I find it amusing how pissed of SEC fans get if the primacy of thier conference is even challenged. From top to bottom the SEC is still the best conference, but not by much. It is no longer the CF superpower you all still assume it to be. Yes, Auburn disserved more respect two years ago, but LSU has had touble beating middle of the road PAC ten teams (OSU and ASU). Georgia’s loss to a (gasp) Big East team could easily happen to another major SEC power in the coming years. It is interesting you give props to the Big 12. It seems there is a great lack of games played between the SEC and Big 12. I have wanted to see more of these matchups over the last two years. There are only so many non conference games that can be scheduled, and bowls have been reluctant to pair SEC/Big 12 matchup when more lucrative Big ten and ACC matchups can be made.
by tzubear on Jun 5, 2006 9:45 AM EDT reply actions
I hate to bring it up since it is at the expense of my Irish, but you put ND down as a loss for the Big 10. I’m actually surprised no tOSU folks have “corrected” you yet.
by AllWhoYonder on Jun 5, 2006 9:51 AM EDT reply actions
Sure, tzubear. The rage is just regionalism writ large. We don’t assume the SEC’s the conference superpower, just one of four—thus the sarcastic “OMG!”.
The Big 12 deserves props for last season; they played a great slate of bowl games and performed admirably in all of them. Even the corpse of a Colorado team put up a fight against Clemson, and Texas Tech got into a grappling match with Alabama they couldn’t hope to win.
As for the loss to TCU, blame it on the unstoppable juggernaut that is the Horned Frogs. They got Oklahoma last year, too.
by Orson Swindle on Jun 5, 2006 9:52 AM EDT reply actions
Jesus, AWY. It’s a wonder we get the top off the scotch every morning. Corrected.
by Orson Swindle on Jun 5, 2006 9:57 AM EDT reply actions
AllWhoYonder, it took every bit of self control to not correct the tOSU/ND flip. Go Bucks.
by Tommy on Jun 5, 2006 10:12 AM EDT reply actions
You can look at the quality of PAC-10 beats: Northwestern, Rutgers, BYU…not exactly a murderers row there. In fact Northwestern is kind of like a PAC-10 Team stuck in Big 10 land; track meet pace, hope to have the ball last. Diversity of offense is an unbeleivably shitty measure. I can’t think of a more contrived way to rate teams. Maybe cuteness/ferocity of mascot? Which conference has the most fearsome mascot? The Big-10 is out; that goddamned big headed buckeye does not strike fear into the hearts of men.
by RowdyRoddyPiper on Jun 5, 2006 10:24 AM EDT reply actions
that goddamned big headed buckeye does not strike fear into the hearts of men
Until you consider the legions of Bucknuts bearing styrofoam coolers/portable outhouses who follow in its wake. Then, it’s hard to sleep well at night.
by DevilGrad on Jun 5, 2006 10:37 AM EDT reply actions
My biggest problem was with HP’s coaching ranking. Walt Harris is a genuis program builder yet Fulmer, Carr and Bowden are all national championship nit wits? There are many ways to measure a coach, but Ws and Ls is probably the best gauge.
by Bill on Jun 5, 2006 10:44 AM EDT reply actions
Don’t let that troublesome scotch cap keep you down! While in your more “clear” times of the day, fill up a squeeze bottle so that you can be at the ready from the moment you hit snooze for the eighth time. Bike bottles work well, or so I’m told…
by AllWhoYonder on Jun 5, 2006 10:45 AM EDT reply actions
Um, Orson…
Hate to be a stickler…but Kansas beat Houston in the Fort Worth Bowl. Yes, I realize nobody but me cares.
by PeteJayhawk on Jun 5, 2006 10:55 AM EDT reply actions
personally, it seems that the best way to rank conferences is to measure the number of teams that reside in the south eastern portion of the US. I’m not going to do any hard-core math before my liquid lunch, but i’ll guestimate that it’s SEC, ACC, and then the rest of the conferences.
SEC RULZ 4EVS!
by adam on Jun 5, 2006 10:56 AM EDT reply actions
but the stanford tree does, pac 10 still rules by ferocity rowdyroddypiper
by Nick on Jun 5, 2006 10:59 AM EDT reply actions
Nice one DevilGrad. The new OSU mascot should be a white trash ohioan with a mustache. This strikes fear into Librarians and children alike.
by Odell 51 on Jun 5, 2006 11:32 AM EDT reply actions
Any analysis that mentions the Spanish Menance is a good analysis.
REMEMBER THE MAINE
by Mac on Jun 5, 2006 11:46 AM EDT reply actions
Fair point, what are the other weak links in conference mascotery??
ACC:
Demon Deacons: I could give a shit if you’re a Demon. To my mind the Deacon was the guy who monitored orange drink or handed out name tags at fellowship after services.
Terrapin: High Falutin’ Turtle. If no genetic mutations/ninja skills present, fear is non-existant.
Hokie: This is just a turkey right?
Big 10:
Buckeye: You’re a fucking nut…or a delicious peanutbutter and chocolate creation.
Gopher: Scary only to those with a Hank Hill level passion for lawncare.
Big 12:
Cornhusker: strong workman who devotes his life to grain production. Not scary at all.
Sooner: Pilots covered wagon, fear factor = 0
Aggie: This is just an agricultural college student right? Scary only to attractive sheep.
Big East:
Cardinal: Not scary.
Orangemen: I’d imagine this had something to do with Protestant Irish. Now I think it’s a big orange fuzzball.
PAC 10:
Ducks: Darkwing Duck, Duckman and Howard the Duck, three examples of a duck’s highest evolutionary potential…needless to say, not at all scary.
Beavers: Scary to those who enjoy undisturbed stands of conifers and unobstructed flow of waterways. Loved by those that enjoy easy vagina jokes.
Stanford Cardinal / Tree: Terrified of Beaver, cannot be scary.
South Eastern Conference:
Commodore: Feared by those that hate swinging floor burners and tender soulful ballads. Not feared by Rusty Griswald.
Volunteer: Scare factor 0. Coonskin cap does not help.
Crimson Tide: Images of Russian nuclear aresenal instability and doin it on the rag. Scary to those that are afraid of the unconventional.
The facts are out there gentlemen, decide for yourselves which conference truly r00lz them all!
by RowdyRoddyPiper on Jun 5, 2006 11:52 AM EDT reply actions
Never mind the fact that Arkansas is being used as an example of SEC “underclass” when it was USC playing Arkansas that was used as an example of the PAC10 willing to play hard out of conference games. When that discussion was brought up, nary a soul was questioning the talent on Arkansas and their ability to challenge for the SEC title. Now, when comparing conferences, Arkansas is a bottom-feeder. Does this “analysis” now discount the result of the USC-Arkansas season opener?
by ND Alum on Jun 5, 2006 11:54 AM EDT reply actions
I think the bowl results are important in comparing conferences but you have to look at the inteconference games as well. UCLA beating Oklahoma and USC blowing out Arkansas are just as relevant to the relative strengths of the conferences as the bowl games.
Plus the SEC takes crap about the weak OOC scheduling but the Big 12 is even worse. That’s how they get so many teams bowl eligible. Didn’t Texas Tech actually play 3 1AA teams last year (or did it just seem like they did)?
by phil on Jun 5, 2006 11:57 AM EDT reply actions
I wouldn’t conisder Arkansas as part of the underclass of the SEC, though I wouldn’t say they were one of the elite either.
And Arkansas wasn’t the hook to hold up OOC scheduling arguments for USC or the Pac 10. Auburn (USC), Oklahoma(UCLA-OU), Nebraska (USC) Va Tech (USC) etc. do a better job there.
by phil on Jun 5, 2006 12:02 PM EDT reply actions
Anyone that considers John L. Smith or Glen Mason a paragon of football intellect, really needs to:
A) Watch more football, with head not up ass.
B) Avoid football analysis, in public.
by RowdyRoddyPiper on Jun 5, 2006 12:03 PM EDT reply actions
Hey Orson…In the Big 12 section for bowl teams you have texas listed twice and don’t have Oklahoma listed.
by Matt on Jun 5, 2006 12:05 PM EDT reply actions
“diversity of offensive scheme”?!?!?!
Is there some sort of college football affirmative action plan I haven’t heard about? Are there quotas? Shouldn’t each conference be required to have one team running the option out of the wishbone?
Considering how the Heisman Trophy—and good fucking luck ever winning one of these John W. Heisman—is now pretty much for “the quarterback, tailback, wideout who is part of an extremely productive offense of a team in the running for the mythical national championship who puts up great statistics and the occasional jaw-dropping game highlight” it should be expected that “best” equals lots of flashy offense.
I guess the sixth category should be for amount of time appearing in SportsCenter highlights. Although, bonecrunching hits by linebackers probably won’t count.
And, your college football map is pure genius! Just more proof that something simple and lacking in diversity—or lots of bright colors—can be great.
by BaggyPantsDevil on Jun 5, 2006 12:15 PM EDT reply actions
It’s good to see that USC-Pundit is able to diversify his portfolio of inane analysis.
Now that I reread the above sentence, i can’t use the word analysis. I prefer the phrase: “steaming pile of self-fulfilling and self-pleasing circular logic and bias”.
PS. We Texas fans sure do wish we could somehow trade Mack Brown for superstar coach Walt Harris.
by Chris on Jun 5, 2006 12:19 PM EDT reply actions
Roddy, You are very mistaken.
I was scared shitless by howard the duck.
of course I was like 5, but still.
by Wooderson on Jun 5, 2006 12:35 PM EDT reply actions
Roddy,
Who is NOT petrified of a beaver? Buck teeth man, huge petruding(sp) buck teeth!
by tzubear on Jun 5, 2006 12:47 PM EDT reply actions
The duck is one of the most versatile (derivative of “diverse”) members of the animal kingdom, showing proficiency in flying, swimming, and walking (or waddling). Fearsome, indeed.
by YMB on Jun 5, 2006 1:00 PM EDT reply actions
RRP,
Syracuse is know simply as “the orange” now.
by Odell 51 on Jun 5, 2006 1:12 PM EDT reply actions
i love the smell of college football in early june. smells like victory.
as an fsu fan who regulary reads thanks to a rival gator friend, i appreciate your site as much as a seminole can (excellent writing, amusing points of view, generally rational points). i must take exception with you pretending florida state didn’t go to a bowl game, even though we lost a game we should have lost much earlier than 1 a.m. at any rate, that would take the acc even with the highly praised big 12 in your analysis in bowl games and bowl win-loss record.
by matt on Jun 5, 2006 1:19 PM EDT reply actions
I’m sorry but PAC-10 is a 4-5 in competitiveness! I think I threw up alittle bit in my mouth!
his rational: No weeks off
SEC: 2.5 out of 5 in competitiveness
Just because these teams some teams haven’t won championships in a long while doesn’t mean they’re not competitive! Just ask UT if Vandy is a week off. Ask a UF fan how scary Ole Miss or Mississippi State can be. Ask a UGA fan if South Carolina will be competitive this year.
I’m sorry the SEC is not as competitive as a league that’s had the same champion for the last FOUR F’N YEARS!
I’m sorry, did he say you he’s objective?
I don’t know where his loyalty lies, but he can’t honestly believe that stuff.
Heisman Pundit wins the award for the biggest Flaming Turd of the Off-season.
by Erik on Jun 5, 2006 1:19 PM EDT reply actions
Reading that article – and trying to formulate an intelligent rebuttal – just made my head hurt. I’m pretty sure I started bleeding from the ears, too.
by beta_gator on Jun 5, 2006 1:25 PM EDT reply actions
I am annoyed by the lack of respect for the Big East.
Eh… all in a day.
by CouchBurnin'Girl on Jun 5, 2006 1:53 PM EDT reply actions
What A Dick Bandit that guy is. I thought folks on the West Coast were smarter and more evolved than we Southerners.
I vote to Redact him.
by Erik on Jun 5, 2006 1:58 PM EDT reply actions
Thanks for the link.
Want to get some drinks tonight? Maybe catch a movie?
by Heismanpundit on Jun 5, 2006 2:01 PM EDT reply actions
As a Pac-10 fan I was insulted by the lunacy that Heismanpundit posted
(“Do they expect us to swallow this tripe?” “And here is this tripe, courtesy of Heismanpundit!”).
In my ignorant opinion, comparing coaching ability only works if teams are equally matched. Overall there are just too many variables to consider when goes down this slippery slope. Sometimes the most simplistic system works the best, head to head match-ups on the field. We saw that complexity meant almost nothing in the game between Boise at Georgia because one is a more high profile program in a talent rich state and thus is able to attract a greater number of better athletes. We have also seen that in the Red River Rivalry where through sheer coincidence Grandma Mack Browns coaching ability was not a liability thanks to Vince Young and Oklahoma “suffering” last year. I do not think that Walt Harris leading Stanford would do well against the insult to severely retarded trolls that is fat Fulmer because of the differences of roster depth. In addition the gravitational pull exhibited by fat Fulmer makes him one of the few coaches that has his own satellites orbiting around his midsection, the other being Mangino. Good God, I hope never to see a game between both of those Unicron sized planet eaters because the gravitational attraction between them would rip the Earth apart.
by anon.4 on Jun 5, 2006 2:40 PM EDT reply actions
Someone said Unicron. This thread is now officially immortal.
by jonathantu on Jun 5, 2006 2:58 PM EDT reply actions
A tree cannot be scary?
You obviously never saw the movie Poltergeist.
by Red Root on Jun 5, 2006 3:30 PM EDT reply actions
Or Harry Potter. The Whomping Willow beats up a goddamned car.
by Orson Swindle on Jun 5, 2006 3:46 PM EDT reply actions
Matt-
Orson can speak Nole. Even my grandfather the FSU fan, who passed away a few years ago from a heart condition discovered when he literally had a heart attack watching the first “wide right” game against Miami, got along with him.
-The Conscience of a Nation, product of a mixed (UF/FSU) marriage
by The Conscience of a Nation on Jun 5, 2006 4:04 PM EDT reply actions
HP-
no drink, no movie. Just sit in the corner and think about what you’ve done.
by Erik on Jun 5, 2006 4:37 PM EDT reply actions
Victories: Iowa (god bless picky linesmen)
That’s what I call SEC karma, after the LSU hail mary in ’05.
by J.J. on Jun 5, 2006 5:48 PM EDT reply actions
Ok, I’m sure at this point in the thread no one except maybe Orson is going to read this, but…
OMG ORSON, YOU’RE IN A MIXED MARRIAGE?!?!?!?!?!
I’m the President of The Organization Of Americans Opposed To The Gay Marriage Ban Ammendment Because It Ignores The Much More Insidious Issue Of Mixed Collegiate-Allegance Marriages, and I find this very disturbing. And unfortunately our Atlanta Chapter isn’t very strong, because, well, who really gives a damn about the UGA-GT rivalry.
by RedTide on Jun 5, 2006 5:50 PM EDT reply actions
No—we’re married to the product of a mixed marriage. TCOAN is all Gator.
And for the record, we do have a grad degree from Tech, which makes us doubly loathsome to Georgia fans.
by Orson Swindle on Jun 5, 2006 5:58 PM EDT reply actions
If you want to throw magic or posessed trees into the mix, so be it, but it would make my “objective opinion” much less truthy.
by RowdyRoddyPiper on Jun 5, 2006 6:39 PM EDT reply actions
damn orson, i don’t think you can’t buy enough R.E.M. records to get that stain out.
by kleph on Jun 5, 2006 7:08 PM EDT reply actions
Kleph —
as translated into English (or “En-grish,” as the language is sometimes known at the Trade School), your statement means that Orson can buy enough R.E.M. records to remove his double Gator/Jacket educational pedigree. Of course, such linguistic construction can only be the result of a) the Tito Puente school of Talk Fast Wrong; or b) an affinity for the University of Georgia and Southern Comfort. Just a guess.
by the cuban comet on Jun 5, 2006 8:06 PM EDT reply actions
My favorite part is the “talent” rating, where he concedes the SEC is clearly ahead of the PAC-10.
‘Just because you’re better than us, don’t think you’re better than us!’
by Chg on Jun 5, 2006 11:30 PM EDT reply actions
I just had this idea elsewhere, as one does: it’s time to stop fighting and start some conference synergy. In principle this should mean our weather (just can’t do the humidity), your tailgates, some joint co-ed teach-ins on self-presentation, and football that combines razzle dazzle and tectonic hits. I mean, I cannot but love an unofficial conference motto of “if you ain’t cheatin, you ain’t tryin.” (that is the unofficial motto, isn’t it?)
However, if it’s anything like corporate merger synergy, we’d end up with organic juice and quinoa and organic jicama salad being pitched to an angry crowd comprised of Wazoo and Vols fans comparing camo while both teams are trying to find creative ways to lose. Although the Wazoo fans might be a bit too cosmopolitan to put up with the Vols…
by DC Trojan on Jun 6, 2006 12:08 AM EDT reply actions
Did anyone else notice that in his “diversity of offensive scheme”, he crowed about the fact that the PAC-10 has all of the “spread”, “dynamic passing offense”, and “west coast offense”? Like there’s much diversity there?
by Brad Warbiany on Jun 6, 2006 9:18 AM EDT reply actions
Whew!… I feel better about where I get my football blog fix from now…
by RedTide on Jun 6, 2006 10:07 AM EDT reply actions
“I just had this idea elsewhere, as one does: its time to stop fighting and start some conference synergy”
No, remember this is the way we are controlled by “The Man”. The more we fight amongst ourselves the less aware we are of the global take over by Oregon and the dreaded Nike swoosh.
by anon.4 on Jun 6, 2006 10:36 AM EDT reply actions
No, remember this is the way we are controlled by The Man. The more we fight amongst ourselves the less aware we are of the global take over by Oregon and the dreaded Nike swoosh.
Ah, it’s all becoming clear now… hence the Mythical National Championship and the distractions of bizarre uniforms… There’s a tri-lateral commission joke in here somewhere.
by DC Trojan on Jun 6, 2006 10:47 AM EDT reply actions
Who told you about the tri-lateral commission? You will still be dealing with the pickle matrix when that baby hits the market.
by anon.4 on Jun 6, 2006 10:55 AM EDT reply actions
Didnt Texas Tech actually play 3 1AA teams last year (or did it just seem like they did)?
Five if you count that game in Lincoln and the one with the team from College Station.
by michael on Jun 6, 2006 3:39 PM EDT reply actions

by 
















