I predict the big one hits California this year. Although there will be many losses, some good will come out of it. The PAC-10 has lost 3 schools and ND is more! God bless mother nature.

(Too subtle?)

We do buy into springboards, which may be the only thing we have in common with Craig James (besides genus species, dependence on O2, and a tendency to blab incoherently.)

What? No carnal knowledge of Susie Kolber?

“Auburn lost Stanley McClover on the defensive line, a catalyst for so much of the mayhem they made defensively last year” – Please. McClover never lived up the hype that he had during recruiting. He was a liability against the run and was known to take plays off. He will be remembered as another Robert Johnson – remember him, didn’t think so.

Brandon Cox have a slump? Definitely possible, but you discount Al Borges as the OC. With a solid O-Line, the best running back (and stable of running backs) in the SEC, an experienced and tough (albeit undersized QB), and the best OC in the conference; they are a second WR away from being better on offense than last year. Combine that with a defense led by Will Muschamp and I think they deserve a lot of the hype they are getting. Although, it’s not as much as they would be getting had they beaten Wisconsin; which in long run I think may be the best thing that could have happened to this team.

When did Florida get good enough to not lose twice to Auburn in one season? Who says they are better than Georgia? I would be concerned about the fact that everyone is down on Georgia (an established national power) and high on Florida (hot coach du jour in his second year with an as yet unproven offense and the nations only female quarterback).

Bottom line, as long as the Great Pumpkin loses another 5 games and devours David Cutcliffe during a hallucinogenic binge; I think we can call this a successful season.

War Eagle!

full-throated howls will return when unbeaten West Virginia, scourge of the defoliated Big East, finishes unbeaten but is passed over for the Fiesta Bowl in lieu of once-beaten…

… you can enter your own one-loss team (or two-loss ND)here. But if the ACC sucks ass this year, it may be worth it.

I only applied to two schools, GT and ND.

I had a full ride to Tech, and I still went to ND for the better looking women.

also, whoever believes that ND girls don’t get naked a) has no game, b) isn’t trying hard enough, or c) doesn’t know where to look.

JohnWA: I don’t get too excited about either results from a different level or a team’s results being attributed to an assistant coach. Weis could turn out to be what he is being touted as, but he could be a big flat flop as well. So far he just hasn’t done anything other than beat some mediocre teams (or strong teams having bad years) and play a close game against SC. I suspect most of the neutral fans out there didn’t watch the ND-Stanford game last year to see how bad they looked in that contest. If the ND defense does not play better than that this year, UCLA could light them up.

Another difference:

GT women are going to have excellent careers.
U[sic]GA women are majoring in MRS. They are walking ovaries.

But agreed, its a lot easier for a 23 year old Tech alum to get laid in Athens than at Tech and the women are more numerous generally better looking.

Choo choo.

UGA girls don’t smell of curry and sulfuric acid.

UGA girls don’t have adams’ apples

UGA girls shave their arm pits. Not their foreheads.

If Notre Dame doesn’t have better looking women than GT, I’d be shocked silly. That said, GT women will let you see them naked. ND women won’t.

Typical Tech Woman

pwd