Comments on: YIKES.

By: tzubear

tzubear — Thu, 18 May 2006 14:26:36 +0000

was refering to the ’small chance anyone would read it (at this blog)’. Reporting on the event is not in bad taste.

By: Orson Swindle

Orson Swindle — Thu, 18 May 2006 14:04:05 +0000

Oh, yeah. Thus the brevity of the post and the insistence that this is so the opposite of good for anyone.

By: tzubear

tzubear — Thu, 18 May 2006 13:59:55 +0000

I like tasteless jokes as much, if not more , than the next guy. However, when it comes to refering to a SPECIFIC victom, I would caution against posting anything of the sort on the web. There is a very small chance (no offense orson and stranko)someone who knows this girl can read this.

By: Wooderson

Wooderson — Thu, 18 May 2006 12:24:20 +0000

Old enough to count, old enough to mount.

Old enough to pee, old enough for me.

Got any mroe good ones FreeShoes?

By: FreeShoesU

FreeShoesU — Thu, 18 May 2006 02:03:14 +0000

If there is grass on the field play ball! If there is no grass roll her over and play in the mud.

By: Caz

Caz — Wed, 17 May 2006 15:35:07 +0000

This all went down in Kentucky, actually, not New Mexico. Insert Kentucky quip here.

By: RowdyRoddyPiper

RowdyRoddyPiper — Wed, 17 May 2006 11:47:57 +0000

tzubear: I just looked up the statutes in New Mexico (well a summary of them) linked in my name. It’s the great bodily harm that is the distinction, or if the victim is under 13. I guess this all presumes that this took place in New Mexico, which is not clear from the article.

By: tzubear

tzubear — Wed, 17 May 2006 04:52:12 +0000

RRP-

Exactly, it is statutory rape even if he didnt force himself on her. I cant imagine she was down with sodomy?! So, if he did force himself on her, I am confused what he would have had to do for 1st degree rape. I suppose the bodily harm angle is the reason, but it seems this would just add an assault/battery charge on top of rape.

By: RowdyRoddyPiper

RowdyRoddyPiper — Wed, 17 May 2006 02:06:20 +0000

@tzubear: I didn’t see anything that indicated it was consensual. I don’t think a 13 year old could consent in any event. It varies from state to state and I don’t know New Mexico, but I’m guessing it’s not second degree because he didn’t use a weapon or there was no great bodily harm (well aside from the rape).

By: RowdyRoddyPiper

RowdyRoddyPiper — Wed, 17 May 2006 01:54:30 +0000

My suggestion is to quit lawyering the Fulmer cup points. Navy can have that one blemish…uhhh and the whole tailhook thing…and I guess that law and order episode where the chick pilot kills her boyfriend…and I think there was a Costner movie…no way out or something.

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 16 May 2006 23:11:22 +0000

I second what NavyGrad has said and have brought it up before. If New Mexico isn’t getting points for anything lamar Owens should be taken off the list because his eligibility had already ended.

By: NavyGrad

NavyGrad — Tue, 16 May 2006 20:35:59 +0000

How are recruits with scholarships not included in Fulmer Cup points but former players who have expended their eligibility elligible?

By: Ian

Ian — Tue, 16 May 2006 20:35:40 +0000

I guess Hal Mumme’s finally made his mark on NMSU.

By: tzubear

tzubear — Tue, 16 May 2006 20:25:22 +0000

I am not an attorney so somebody, please, enlighten me. Did this guy only get 2nd degree rape because it was consensual?

By: Orson Swindle

Orson Swindle — Tue, 16 May 2006 20:21:06 +0000

You win!