Comments on: YET ANOTHER FULMER CUP UPDATE: HERDISTANIFICATION.

By: Sean

Sean — Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:52:24 +0000

To which I say: On Wisconsin!!

Come on Orson, give the Big Ten its due! Iowa, OSU and Wisconsin all have given some single pointers at the very least.

By: C. Coleman

C. Coleman — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:41:27 +0000

Wisconsin wants F-Cup points!

Only in Wisky would a drunk football player on a scooter run into another car whose driver is also drunk.

By: Sean

Sean — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:14:45 +0000

NewAZTiger

Why can’t The Conference That Can’t Count win the Fulmer Cup?

+ We have legions of beer guzzling students!
+ We have campuses out in corn fields with nothing else to do!
+ We have couches to burn!

Perhaps the Southern schools have an advantage: By drinking the hard stuff instead of beer, they aren’t as distracted by having to go to the bathroom. Also, you aren’t distracted by trying to find your coats in January before pummeling students outside bars.

By: NewAZTiger

NewAZTiger — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:59:18 +0000

You Big-10 boys are gonna lose this one, conference wise. We’ve still got UT and UGA holding out the big guns.

Face it, even in the Fulmer Cup you guys play thick-ankled.

By: Sean

Sean — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:34:56 +0000

What of the Conference That Can’t Count? Wisconsin and Purdue stake us 19 points, and then in one fell swoop MSU gives the SEC a commanding lead with 29 points? And Tennessee and Alabama haven’t even contributed yet!

Where is Ohio State? Where is Minnesota? Where is Iowa?

By: Volunteer Tom

Volunteer Tom — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:59:28 +0000

Tennessee has 0 points!

If we end the year that way, and we will, are you gonna change the damn name from Fulmer Cup?

By: twinshawk

twinshawk — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:18:18 +0000

In reviewing the current FulmerCup Race there appears to be a small omission from my Hawkeyes.

Corey Robertson

By: NDTom

NDTom — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:43:36 +0000

i read that as “flipping around boobies” the first time through, and was both confused and curious.

By: Orson Swindle

Orson Swindle — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:42:08 +0000

“No-cost extra–” Remind us to use that phrase more often in reference to things like plumber’s crack, Lou Holtz getting your program on probation, and Mark May’s goatee.

By: Stacey Keibler Luvs Me

Stacey Keibler Luvs Me — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:40:56 +0000

Wooderson and Phil K.:

Sticks and stones may break me bones, but words will never hurt me…

I out-pueriled you both!

By: DC Trojan

DC Trojan — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:38:40 +0000

DevilGrad, I think it’s the difference between displaying the anal cleft for pay as opposed to a no-cost extra. There’s got to be a business opportunity here for Florida strippers who are good with their hands / pipes / [insert your own bad pun or double entendre].

By: DevilGrad

DevilGrad — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:35:14 +0000

florida has a statute for affray as well. also, in the entertainment laws, a stripper may not show his/her �anal cleft,� which is awesome.

Does that also apply to plumbers? If not, it seems like an Equal Protection issue — gender discrimination.

By: Orson Swindle

Orson Swindle — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:28:50 +0000

HO-ooohhhh!!! [/lion-o]

By: Wooderson

Wooderson — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:22:22 +0000

Does anyone else think that KSU’s logo on the scoreboard page looks a little bit like the Thundercats’ logo?

By: adam

adam — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:04:20 +0000

florida has a statute for affray as well. also, in the entertainment laws, a stripper may not show his/her “anal cleft,” which is awesome.