Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: AEG To Purchase Spurs?

APR'S OUT...AND EVERYONE PASSES!

Okay, real world demands calling here, but a quick note about today's NCAA APR ratings: they look fucked up to us. To say with a little more class: it appears a statistical rule leaving several prominent programs, including BCS schools, was constructed so that a generous jiggering of the numbers would take schools not making the grade and--poof!--vault them over the line.

Here, let's adjust this squad-size thingy...and up and over you go!

Reader DevilGrad's been all over this one in his other life as a commenter on Miami Hawk Talk--check out this thread for a good quick read-through at just a few of the numerical curiosities of the report.

One question, though: where's the SEC here? Cheating like crazed gremlins to escape the APR? Following the Fulmer "Urban Studies" route by railroading its players through laughably easy classes? Inundating the NCAA's offices with bags of unmarked bills and pics of shameless, toned coeds? (And if so, why is Arizona State in trouble here? They're the experts in this department.)

These numbers remind us of something...can't put our finger on it...hmm...

Take a look at the user-unfriendly APR display on the NCAA's website, which allows you to look up individual schools but denies you the opportunity to actually see them compared on a single sheet. Not by design, right? No, of course not...

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks for taking up this issue and for the link!

One clarification: The Dodd article is about last year’s APR. I linked to it to show the source material for my attempt to update the top ten list.

It’s funny you should mention OSU, though. Cheatypants’s boys managed to jump from 870 to exactly 925 in just one year. In a just world, the NCAA squad cars would be heading east on I-70 right now to open the academic fraud investigation, just as a precautionary measure.

For those of you who don’t want to read through the whole thread, the other travishamockery is that fifty-three I-A and I-AA schools missed the alleged “cut line” of 925 but were given a limited-purpose mulligan based on something called a “squad size adjustment.” Without the mulligans, over 40% of Division I football schools would have flunked. As it stands, the NCAA is patting itself on the back for sanctioning nine Division I-A schools — all of which, conveniently, are non-BCS.

by DevilGrad on Mar 1, 2006 6:01 PM EST reply actions  

From what I heard on the radio, Bama’s football program passed with flying colors. Now, I love the Tide, but I’m not stupid. Has the NCAA realized that to slay the sacred cow that is SEC football would be a horrible business decision? Somthing smells foul in Denmark, but if it means the Pac-10 gets slapped around and the SEC gets out clean, I can be down with that.

by Newspaper Hack on Mar 1, 2006 6:02 PM EST reply actions  

Just corrected the whole thing, DevilGrad.

by Orson Swindle on Mar 1, 2006 6:05 PM EST reply actions  

’Bama is one of the fifty-three schools that missed the 925 cut line but got to skate on current sanctions because of the “squad size adjustment.”

As Bobby Knight said back in Eighties, “It looks like the NCAA is so mad at Kentucky that they’re going to put Cleveland State on probation.”

BTW, you SECers should take note of Auburn’s score. It surprised the hell out of me.

by DevilGrad on Mar 1, 2006 6:12 PM EST reply actions  

Orson and Stranko -

You know the guys over at BGS are going to have a field day with this…..

by socalirish on Mar 1, 2006 6:59 PM EST reply actions  

Auburn had the highest score in the SEC and was up there with Harvard, Notre Dame, Navy etc.

by Auburn Fan on Mar 1, 2006 10:02 PM EST reply actions  

The football programs to receive public recognition by the NCAA were: Auburn, Boston College, Brown, Bucknell, Colgate, William & Mary, Cornell, Dartmouth, Davidson, Duke, Eastern Kentucky, Furman, Harvard, Lafayette, Princeton, Navy, Dayton, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Villanova, Wofford, Yale.

by Auburn Fan on Mar 1, 2006 10:16 PM EST reply actions  

But the real question is: is Auburn accredited this year?

by Free Logan Young on Mar 1, 2006 10:35 PM EST reply actions  

I just have to point out that Auburn players doing well in class is like saying that Uncle Rico is dominating the 10 and under football league. Come on, I know non-athletes that got in with sub-900 SAT scores. Of course their athletes are doing well; they’re probably in the top 15% on campus.

by Cody on Mar 1, 2006 10:40 PM EST reply actions  

“…but the real tragedy was that 15 hadn’t been colored yet.” – Steven Orr

by John on Mar 1, 2006 11:09 PM EST reply actions  

Jealousy is so beneath you all. Put down the Haterade and bask in the academic bastion that is Auburn U.

by Auburn Fan on Mar 2, 2006 8:20 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t know much about the APR, but from what I can remember some of the rules are pretty borderline retarded. Specifically schools being punished when players transfer and graduate from a different school is one.

by rjm on Mar 2, 2006 9:23 AM EST reply actions  

Academic bastard, maybe…bastion, not so much.

by Brian on Mar 2, 2006 11:55 AM EST reply actions  

Frankly you probably have to be a statistics undergrad major and a Harvard law graduate to even begin to understand what you read on that NCAA link. I mean, understanding the federal budget is simpler than the fine print on those pages.

Here’d be a good gallup poll question for fans of Div 1A schools:

If your team competes for your conference championships, occassionally wins one, and plays in major bowl games, do you give a shit whether the kids graduate or not?

by Mike on Mar 2, 2006 12:10 PM EST reply actions  

Myles Brand and his boys are pathetic and spineless. I don’t wanna pick on OSU (ok, maybe i do), but c’mon. Like Devilgrad said, they improve over 50 points in one year and get EXACTLY the bottom line. Everyone in america knows what’s really happening over there, i mean Sweatervest has investigator’s cellies on speed-dial. why even have a stupid requirement like this if it’s going to be twisted and unenforced anyway.

by Andy on Mar 2, 2006 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Because College Football is too important to be left to the professionals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_0172_small
DICK TALK WITH JASON WHITLOCK
Sg_head_small
The Time A Kentucky Fan Saved Me From Being Raped and Murdered

Recent FanPosts

Small
Yes Emma, there is a Jayhawk
227210_10150231884830560_734255559_9012780_1389568_n_small
Deep Thoughts with BamaTaxMan
Rotate-3_small
Climate Change and its First Effect on College Football
Turd_small
Dear Commentariat: HELP ME OUT
Small
A Year in the Life of a College Football Fan
Hangover_small
Six Nations Rugby - mud blood guts & beer
Fbimgp0931_small
Thanks commertariat (and Spencer)
Small
To my Dawg friends

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Img_0172_small Spencer Hall

Small Orson

Screen_shot_2011-08-18_at_2 Holly Anderson

Editors

Lzprofilepictwopointoh_small Luke Zimmermann

Me_tuscaloosa_small Doug Gillett

Trex_small Run Home Jack