52 REASONS ESPN/ABC/DISNEY SUCKS
While not strictly a college football issue, we all as sports fans consort with the many-armed devil that is Disney/ESPN/ABC in our attempt to digest as much football in the precious time we’re allowed each season. And in doing so–either in watching the games, searching for highlights, or zoning out after downing five beers in front of the television–you will come across much, much, much to dislike. Actually, we thought of fifty-two things we don’t like.
1. Synergy. Promo the games you have the rights to while barely mentioning the big games on in other places, no matter how important they might be. Push your product over THE GAME. Vile corporate entertainment thinking that yields little but viewer disgust.
2. Regional broadcast fiascoes. No shit here–the Tampa Bay area enjoyed the Rutgers/WVU game on the weekend of the Texas/Oklahoma game because…well, because the evil spider god in charge of everything decreed it, we suppose. Here in Atlanta we frequently got the Tar Heels getting knocked around the yard instead of a better matchup across the country.
3. Stuart Scott. His poetry slam two days ago didn’t happen, because if we did admit it, then we’d wake up crying in a ball in the corner struck by the sadness of what has become Sportscenter.

Boo. Yeah, boo.
4. The absence of Keith Olbermann.
5. The continued, painful obsolescence of Keith Jackson. Yeah, that’s more of a complaint with God, but pending a response from the Deity himself, we’ll blame his corporate masters who act as accomplices.
6. Sportstainment! The next few are attached to this umbrella concept of the idea that sports isn’t entertainment all by itself. Consider them pieces of evidence in one long indictment of Disney’s attempt to force ESPN into becoming the story, not the medium.
7. Nick Lachey, interviewer.
8. ESPN Hollywood. Lower ratings than “Christopher Lowell, After Hours.”
9. “The Hot Seat” segment. Nothing more excruciating than watching former partial qualifiers attempting to think against the clock.
10. Dream Job.
11. Stephen A. Smith. Mark Shapiro, the prime mover behind Sportstainment! and former head of ESPN, said he just HAD to hire Smith after every focus group detested his ass. Well, there you go. Would love to kick the ass of the editor of Highlights magazine for bewitching him with those devilish puzzles all these years. Makes a sport we already don’t care about all the more ignoreable–and isn’t that what a great spokesman for the sport is supposed to do?
12. Tom Berenger’s horrible old man prosthetics in The Junction Boys. Bear Bryant as burn victim, evidently.
13. WHOOSH. Fox shares some blame here, but we’ll still fault ESPN for jumping on the bandwagon by putting sound effects to every gesture.
14. Chris Berman’s “WHOOP!” noise. Berman will make several appearances here, since he’s one of the worst things about the network, so we’ll just list the offense and the death strike we think is appropriate. In this case, we think the two hand spiral neck snap, an old Seagal move, would be perfect.
15. TomBob Ley’s banishment. Outside the Lines, one of the best shows on ESPN, is relegated to the status of “Sunday Morning Boring Old Man News Thing.” How Ley stays at the network when he could be at HBO’s Real Sports is a testament to his loyalty–or his laziness, perhaps.
16. Dan Patrick’s hair dye. Has now moved squarely into Wink Martindale territory.
17. I…love…highlights without shtick…songs that don’t suck dick…and twins!!!
18. Speaking of songs that suck…Big and Rich have made their way onto our Orbital Death Ray list, along with Mark Shapiro. For a long time college football existed as a fiefdom apart from the Sportstainmenttastic! world of ESPN–pleasantly stodgy, frills-free coverage of a sport that allowed you to soak in the atmosphere of each game through the screen. Now we have Nick Lachey interviewing people and Big and Rich suggesting that we need more Ying with our Ying Yang. Two old pieces of redneck jerky–including one who one of our readers pointed out, bears a striking resemblance to Phyllis Diller–who were pulled out of a hat at random by marketing schmucks in New York who were like, “Okay, people. Red state sport—we need us some edgy country!” Total, horrid, absolute fecality soiling the last show we watch on the network.
We’re coming…and we’re shit-tayyy!!!
19. Making the story, not reporting it. Two words: Terrell Owens.
20. High school kids committing live on the network. Recruiting’s creepy enough with Tom Lemming involved. Upping the ante to national coverage only adds to the ick factor.
21. Ron Jaworski’s backseat role. His explanation of schemes and coverages is pure, elegant analysis. So he’s forced to do it at 11:30 with a concussed madman and a very cute lesbian. That’s a push, we suppose.
22. Berman’s lack of preparation. He’s ad-libbing half the time and doing so badly, stuttering and stammering while barely concealing his head-tracking reading of the teleprompter. Appropriate death strike: spinning heel kick, Walker, Texas Ranger- style.
23. Desmond Howard. We just hear happy music while he blabs on about whatever he’s talking about. Mostly bossa nova, actually.
24. The Outdoor Games. In a typical move, ESPN takes our insomniac treats–including the World’s Strongest Man competitions–and packages them into Sportstainment!. What they fail to understand is that we liked them because they were on when we got home from the bar drunk enough to find them entertaining.
25. Lee Corso. Not so fast, my friend! His analyses come down to “Ooh! They’re tougher than the other guy!” or “Kirk said this, so I’ll disagree with him and put on this mascot head!” Makes the already superb Herbstreit look like a bona fide savant in comparison, which may be his role.
26. Mike Gottfried. America’s most dyspeptic college football announcer. Frowns at babies and accuses them of lack of discipline for shitting their diapers. Misses calls frequently. The opposite of fun.
27. Berman’s clip of him throwing a football to catching the ball from Doug Williams. Yes, you were skinny once. Now you’re fat and an easy target. Appropriate death strike: run over with Brinks Truck, chase him down with a lawnmower.
28. The forced animosity between John Clayton and Sean Salisbury. Team Under Armor vs. Goliath has more verisimilitude.
29. Wide angle shots, fades, and pensive shots of young athletes recounting the trauma of growing up poor/fatherless/in Bosnia/stricken with acne/slightly nervous/average/motherless/with rickets/etc in puff pieces. Adversity, dear ESPN, is boring. Show us how long it takes for Matt Leinart to pick up a girl in a bar–now that would be Sportstainmenttastic! Hey-yo!
30. Woody Paige. In our hometown, this guy cleaned your septic tank. On ESPN, he’s an “expert.”
31. The rape of Buster Olney, a fine sportswriter.
32. Fake news conferences.
33. Flavor in our broadcasts. Yes, Dan and Keith did it very well. But show us a goal, td, basket, point, or homer without a “SAY HELLO TO MY LITTLE FRIEND” once, and we will send you a shiny dollar in the mail.
34. Mark May. The youngest disciple of the Gottfried school of broadcasting, a nasty, choleric presence on the screen whose vagina-pelt-looking goatee only added to his dislikeable on-air demeanor. Makes pure evil presence of Lou Holtz seem agreeable in comparison. Oh, speaking of…
35. Lou Holtz. You have a speech defect, and should not make a living talking on television. Oh, and you’re a cheater. Would be entertaining only if they made him speak from behind his own salad bar shield; we’re guessing it would look like those shots of cobras striking at people behind plexiglass in zoos, with spit flying in gobs all over the surface.
36. Chris Berman’s nicknames. Appropriate death strike: in honor of their upcoming Big 12 championship game, how about a dim mak Brown shot to the throat?
37. Beano Cook. Beano’s visage just plain scares the hell out of us. Plus, he’s been trying to kill us for years, with the last incident being a failed stabbing on the streets of Singapore in 2003.
38. World Series of Poker. Not bad in an hour’s dose. Unbearable in four hour stretches.
39. 3: The Dale Earnhardt Story. Find us someone who thinks anyone actually calls their father “diddy” in the South NOT named Bowden, and we will show you an actor two years out of drama school.
40. ESPNU. Not even sure what this is, but it’s unknown and strange–therefore by instinct we must hate it.
41. Chris Berman referring to himself as “The Schwam.” Fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck you. Appropriate death strike: cruise missile while singing onstage with Huey Lewis.
42. ESPN, the Magazine. Huge pages, fellatio-style coverage of the shittiest citizens of the athletic world, and very, very little content.
43. Mark Shapiro, the man behind the Sportstaimentization! of the network. Gone, but not forgotten.
44. Mike Lupica. Only makes two statements a year about college football, both atrociously wrong and dumb. Abrasive without insight. We’d say he represents the worst of Northeastern sportswriting, but Dan Shaughnessy still breathes in Boston.
45. Mel Kiper, Jr. We shouldn’t really hate on Mel–to be this wrong and still get paid for it bespeaks of a certain grandiose swindletude we have to admire. But that said–no one gets their assigned pundit beat wrong with greater consistency. Built entire reputation on saying Trev Alberts sucks, which, well, duh?
46. Not enough Sumo. The Bashos rule, and we have no idea when they’re on.
47. The ESPYs.
48. Rush Limbaugh, football analyst. Yes, it’s ancient history–but the shame remains.
49. The disappearance of Chris Mortensen. He’s your NFL insider, and you put him–literally–behind the set. Because he’s working back there during the show! It Sportstainmenttastic!
50. PTI. Not for the show itself, but for its shambolic impact on ESPN programming, which now features argumentative elements in even the least confrontational formats.
51. Jim Donnan. Looks like he rolled out from beneath an overturned fishing boat in someone’s front yard, put on a tie and and a coat, and rolled into the studio for a segment or two.
52. Chris Berman’s BACK BACK BACK BACK BACK BACK call. Appropriate death strike: kicking knee break, joint-lock arm hold, thrown into path of oncoming commuter train.
1,370 Responses to “52 REASONS ESPN/ABC/DISNEY SUCKS”
Pages: « 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 … 28 » Show All
Pages: « 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 … 28 » Show All









851
Jeff says:
Yeah. I’m sure that the success of the MVC, CAA, and even the SEC (whom I keep reminding people that ESPN’s bubble analyst said it was “incredible” that the SEC would get as many berths as the Big 10) will equate to more ESPN and CBS television appearances. Maybe we’ll stop getting over a dozen Big East, ACC, and Big 10 games a week. Maybe we’ll get an SEC team outside of Kentucky every now and then, or maybe a single weekly MVC game.
Well, maybe not.
March 20th, 2006 at 9:12 am
852
Jeff says:
SPORTSNATION POLL: Who would make the best NFL commissioner?
Bud Selig
Condoleezza Rice
Donald Trump
Skip Bayless
Terrell Owens
Well, I should count my blessings. At least the poll didn’t include Danica Patrick, Barry Bonds, Maria Sharapova, Tiger Woods and the African-American NASCAR driver.
March 21st, 2006 at 11:56 am
853
Adam says:
Alright so I read the full list and about 250 comment and only one addressed the Chris Berman’s “Top (way more than) 10 plays of the week”. I fucking hate the fact that 10 turns into 20 and in the few weeks of the year in which we have multiple sports, sometimes 30. The problem is that every play is sooo sportstainment qualified that I could care less if I ever see another diving catch unless the player losses a limb or kills a fan in the process. I dont care about another dunk unless the back board comes down. And the absolute last fucking thing I want to hear is Berman doing his old rendition on Jerome Bettis “bumbling stumbling” or “Boof boof boof”, when anyone actually runs north south. War! I’m out!
March 21st, 2006 at 12:20 pm
854
Jeff says:
JESUS H. CHRIST. Eat shit, ESPN. Stop trying to make “instant history.”
“It’s safe to say no team will duplicate UCLA’s decade of dominance. But Andy Katz (and others) admit: Duke’s run of nine straight Sweet 16s under Coach K is a worthy comparison to Wooden’s wizardry.”
Gee, ESPN. Duke has beaten a 16 and an 8 or 9 for nine straight years. UCLA won TEN NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS. A worthy comparison indeed.
March 22nd, 2006 at 10:50 am
855
Jeff says:
I’m hoping that one day soon ESPN will do an IndyCar story about me. I don’t see why not. The network’s doing daily stories about Danica Patrick, and she hasn’t won a race either. You know, it wouldn’t be so damn annoying if they’d do ONE FUCKING STORY about Dan Wheldon.
March 22nd, 2006 at 8:21 pm
856
Mike says:
From ESPN’s first page – “The winners — LSU, Memphis, Texas, UCLA — moved on. But Thursday’s round of epic games will be defined by two players who got their hearts broken, Adam Morrison and J.J. Redick.”
Because it’s far better (and easier) to write more stories about Morrison and Redick, who are not surprisingly gone, than to waste everyone’s time by profiling Kenton Paulino, L.R. Mbah a Moute, Tyrus Thomas, anyone from Memphis, or any other player who made big plays to help his team win. After all, ESPN’s reporters might have to do some actual reporting were they to write a story about anyone other than Redick and Morrison, and that would be a waste of resources that could be used to make the new Barry Bonds reality show.
Speaking of the Bonds show, ESPN has already started using it as a source for quotes as to Bonds’ “innocence” regarding steroid use. The show itself is such a conflict of interest it’s not even funny.
March 24th, 2006 at 2:05 pm
857
Jeff says:
Even though ESPN’s favorite basketball team lost, I’m almost afraid to bring this up, because I’ll be taken to task for it by somebody who doesn’t get it.
But ESPN loves to stir the pot with “Race Card” stories. Yet I never see one story that is so painfully obvious to me and other people who have lived in the South at any point in his life: Duke’s popularity is built on the “closet racism” of its white East Coast fan base. They’ll use code words to explain why they like Duke, like “They play good fundamental basketball,” and yet they’ll thumb their noses at Kentucky basketball, NASCAR and anything else with a Southern white fan base as “backward” and “racist.” Yeah. Duke’s popularity has nothing to do with the fact that they’ve been able to recruit the best white players in the country for the last 20 years. Or that the African-American players they get usually don’t have tattoos, rap albums, or come from the Ghetto (because, they’ll say, “they don’t fit into our type of game”). Or that Duke’s popularity shot through the roof ONLY when it beat the all-black, undefeated UNLV team. It’s just so funny to hear them complaining about how a team with five African-American players (from the “racist” Deep South, no less) beat them by playing “dirty street ball” and not getting called for the fouls.
Yeah, and the Deep South is the only part of the country that is racist, too.
Why aren’t Scoop and Stephen A. giving us that story?
March 24th, 2006 at 3:33 pm
858
Jeff says:
“LSU’s roster features three talented QBs who could start for many teams — including last year’s starter JaMarcus Russell . Did somebody in the SEC say “controversy?”"
No. You did, asshole. And you and the network probably won’t shut the fuck up about it, and probably won’t stop asking the questions to them and their coaches, until we’re all saying it and their season is ruined.
Why don’t you spend more of your time doing what you do best? Spread rumors that Keyshawn will sign with the Giants and Jon Runyan will sign with the Jets (neither did, by the way). Or create more mythology about Jim Calhoun and his UConn progam. UConn won because they “persevered.” Not because the refs lost control of the game (as Verne Lundquist suggested), started calling ticky-tack travels and 3-second calls on Washington, fouled the ENTIRE Washington team out, and allowed UConn to shoot FORTY-SEVEN free throws.
March 25th, 2006 at 12:22 pm
859
Mike says:
I’m not a women’s basketball fan, but when did the Oklahoma Sooners become the biggest story in women’s college basketball? For once ESPN didn’t cram UNC down viewers’ throats, and yet this seems to be the season in which it would have been justified. I’ve seen more on Oklahoma on ESPN’s front page since the tourney started than the Tarheels. And today, the reigning champs from Baylor got knocked out while LSU (who has made the last two F4’s, I believe) advanced, and yet Oklahoma gets the headline. Stacey Dales must have more pull there than I thought.
March 26th, 2006 at 12:22 am
860
Jeff says:
It’ll be fun to see if ESPN gives the publicity to LSU if it gets both teams in the Final Four. They praise UConn every time it happens.
You know what the sad thing is? ESPN ignored LSU’s men’s team all year. As I mentioned in earlier posts, LSU did not get a national television appearance until the last day of February. And here they are, an ignored SEC team, in the Final Four. Now ESPN discovers that “Big Baby” is a reporter’s wet dream, and NEW YORK coach Larry Brown says Tyrus Thomas should be the first pick in the draft–and now the network will try to act like it’s been their best friend all along.
I hope John Brady and his Tigers tell ESPN to take their cameras and reporters and shove them up their asses.
March 26th, 2006 at 12:49 am
861
Jeff says:
Mike, to answer your question as to why the network is shoving Oklahoma women’s basketball down our throats, the best player on Oklahoma’s women’s team is the daughter of Bubba Paris. Bubba Paris is a former football player from Michigan (ESPN’s second- or third- favorite football team), former offensive lineman for the San Francisco 49ers (Chris Berman’s favorite football team), and ESPN employee (he is a pro football contributor for “Cold Pizza”)
Does that answer your question? ESPN just figures that people lime me aren’t going to do the research and expose the network for the fraud it is, I guess.
March 26th, 2006 at 1:00 am
862
Jeff says:
May this be the weekend that ESPN’s college basketball programming paradigm goes down in flames. You know what I’m talking about:
1. The Big East, the Big Ten, the ACC and (occasionally) the Big 12 are the only conferences worth televising.
2. The SEC is a conference in serious, serious decline.
3. Kentucky is the only team in the SEC worth televising.
4. Duke and UConn are the only teams that people want to see.
5. Small conferences like the Missouri Valley Conference and the Colonial Athletic Association do not deserve to be on television because their teams have no chance to be in the Final Four.
6. Teams from those conferences can’t compete with the “big boys” because they can’t recruit McDonald’s All Americans and play a touch conference schedule. Once again, they don’t belong on television because of this.
7. “The first weekend of the NCAA Tourament is about the little guys. The second weekend is about the big guys.”
I dare you to explain this one to me and justify what you are doing. Too bad nothing is going to change. ESPN already has contracts with the big conferences that it will never try to get out of. But hell, maybe showing a Missouri Conference game on ESPN-U once in a while instead of showing Duke games from the “Cameron Crazies Cam” would be an improvement. I thought ESPN justified their 126 networks to the public because it meant more teams will get more games on television–not seeing a Duke game from three different camera angles.
March 26th, 2006 at 8:07 pm
863
Mike says:
One of ESPN’s analysts said tonight that GMU’s run to the F4 will now make the Mid-Majors worth scheduling for the BCS conference schools. I forgot, BCS schools weren’t scheduling mid-majors because those teams weren’t worthy, not because they didn’t want to run the increasing risk of losing to one or more of them. My mistake.
Here’s another fun note: The F4 of the NIT contains 0 ACC teams as well, despite the fact that Maryland and Florida State were each given homecourt through at the least the Elite 8 of the tourney (and in Maryland’s case, an undeserved 1 seed). The amount of CAA teams? 1. Old Dominion, who only received one home game which came after Maryland choked at home. There was also a MVC team (Missouri State) and another CAA team (Hofstra) in the NIT’s Elite 8. But please, I welcome all the analysts to continue to cite past NCAA tournament results to let us know why mid-major teams aren’t worthy to make this year’s NCAA tournament and the Florida State’s of the world are.
March 27th, 2006 at 2:22 am
864
Jeff says:
Seth Davis on Mike & Mike this morning: “If George Mason wins it all, they should have to play Hofstra for the REAL national championship on Tuesday.”
I know it’s sort of tongue-in-cheek, but they couldn’t avoid trying to make it about New York again. Maybe Hofstra’s tourney resume looks better now, but the team’s exclusion is still no greater injustice than, say, Missouri State’s.
I can’t wait for the ESPN movie about George Mason’s run to the Final Four. In the movie, Tony Skinn will be punched in the balls in the conference tournament, be out until the UConn game, and hit a half-court shot at the buzzer to win it. The network can call it “Glory Road 2.” Maybe Packer and Nantz can be the bad guys too, while Dick Vitale and Jay Bilas fervently defend the team’s selection on Sportscenter right after it happens. And maybe they can beat Duke instead of UConn, because people hate Duke more. I just can’t figure out how to put Bobby Knight in it yet.
March 27th, 2006 at 1:41 pm
865
Mike says:
Knight can offer words of wisdom to Jim Larranaga, who is having trouble controlling his all-black team (because as we know, an all-black basketball team is full of showoffs who don’t play “team” basketball). George Mason begins the season 2-15 despite playing in the NCAA’s version of the boondocks that is the CAA (which, for the movie’s sake, will contain joke schools like The Waterboy’s South Central LA State U. and Adams College, along with Notre Dame so that they have someone to beat in a miraculous conference tourney final which must be won since they were so bad to begin with). The team doesn’t start to figure things out until Coach Knight helps out to save the day. The joke about Tony Skinn is too funny. And yet, you know that it’s the type of fact that would be changed in such a film.
If Florida wins it all, does South Carolina get to play them for REAL national title, too?
March 27th, 2006 at 1:55 pm
866
Jeff says:
No. Even better. If LSU beats GMU in the finals, then LSU still has to play Florida in the REAL championship (UF beat them twice). And if Florida beats LSU, then it has to play South Carolina. But then again, Tennessee beat S. Carolina twice (and Florida, for that matter). But then again, does that mean that if Tennessee wins that game, then Wichita State is the “real” national champion? I think you see where I am going here.
That’s just what we need: somebody to give us a USC football-type of explanation that team X should be the national champion even though it didn’t play in the championship game.
March 27th, 2006 at 4:17 pm
867
Jeff says:
I dare any ESPN-related network to once, JUST ONCE, show us a tennis highlight that doesn’t feature Maria Sharapova.
March 27th, 2006 at 7:30 pm
868
Vic says:
Great sight guys. I have a solution for the Boo-Yahs to make their network great again;
1. Stop debating questions that can’t be answered.
ex. Who’s better, Kobe or Jordan? Is Lance Armstrong the greatest athlete ever? What is the greatest moment in Sports history? Who’s better the Yankees of the 90’s or the Yankees of the 20’s?
These kind of questions are just useless time wasters. You could use this time to maybe show a few more highlights.
2. Stop asking questions that will eventually be answered.
ex. Will Barry Bonds pass Hank Aaron? Will the Colts go undefeated? Will T.O. fit in Dallas? Will college football have a playoff system?
I know you like to think of yourself as the worldwide leader but you cannot predict the future. Please stop trying.
3. Make a decision, do you want to cover a story or do you want to be E!?
You have had Pedro Gomez following Barry Bonds for over two years as Bonds comes closer to the HR record. In that time Gomez has broken NO new story on Barry. You would think Gomez would have been the one who had the inside information on the BALCO scandal instead of just standing outside of Pac-Bell park. For Pete’s sake Bonds doesn’t even talk to the media for the most part, He releases information through his web-site. If you want to be a real newsman you have to dig a little for the story, even if it means hurting some feelings. If you are so in bed with the major sports that you can’t objectively cover them than you need to just admit you are just a sports version of “Entertainment Tonight”
Do you remember why people first turned to your network? No, it wasn’t for wacky catch-phrases and hypothetical questions. It was for getting information. If you lived in Detroit but followed Philadelphia you knew how your team won. You got more than just the score which is what your local newscast gave you. Yes it was nice that your anchors were not mearly “stuffed suits” reading off a teleprompter but you have now gone too far. I do not watch for Chris Berman, or Stuart Scott, or Dan Patrick, I watch for the sport! FOCUS ON THE SPORT YOU DUMBASSES!!!
March 28th, 2006 at 8:57 am
869
Jeff says:
In relation to the network’s love affair with everything George Mason, ESPN is already trying to revise history. Now, it just says they lost to Hofstra in the tournament. It used to say it lost to Hofstra, and Tony Skinn punched a guy in the balls. I guess they figure people don’t want to know that their Cinderella is a thug.
The network is also sure to remind us every time they say they beat Wichita State in the Sweet Sixteen, that this game was a rematch of a game played on ESPN BRACKET BUSTERS WEEKEND.
ESPN is acting like it’s been the friend of the mid-majors all along. Now I’ve seen everything.
Speaking of George Mason, I heard an interview with GMU play-by-play man on a Kansas City radio station the day before the Wichita State game. He said that its supposed fan base still didn’t care about the team, adding that they were more concerned about Duke. 3 days later, 20,000 George Mason fans were pulling for them in the arena. That’s almost as pathetic as ESPN. I guess all the frat boys in the D.C. area traded in their faded Duke gear for GMU stuff.
March 28th, 2006 at 10:26 am
870
Mike says:
The fact that ESPN is continuously promoting Monday Night Football, which obviously doesn’t begin until September, is absurd. Anything to push their own products and eat up time during the show formally known as SportsCenter is fine with them, I suppose.
March 29th, 2006 at 1:58 pm
871
BDogg says:
…coming up on cold pizza, comedian ray ramano gives his opinion on who the jets should take with their draft pick and also if he thinks this is finally the year for his mets. joakim noah has a pretty wild hair-do, ahead on 1st and 10 woody and skip will debate which college player left in the tournament has the best hair.
i wish i made that up. i wish i had my brain cells back as well.
March 29th, 2006 at 2:03 pm
872
Jeff says:
“JUMPIN’ JUMBALAYA! I hope you like crawfish, because the Final Fours will have a distinct LSU bayou flavor!”
Yep, and all those 3-toothed, overall-wearing Cajuns will be coming up the Mississippi in their paddleboats with their pet alligators–just like your parent company portrayed them in “The Waterboy.”
I don’t personally hold or endorse the beliefs I’m placing next, but I wonder what would happen if a Southern-based media outlet ran a headline that read: “OY VEY! I hope you like matzah balls, because Syracuse is going to the Final Four!” Or “SH&T YEAH, MOTHERF&%KERS! I hope you like fried chicken, because Georgetown is going to the Final Four!”
March 29th, 2006 at 3:17 pm
873
Jeff says:
I swear to freakin’ God, ESPN executives must have said in their meetings this week: “I think that most of America, and by ‘America’ I mean ‘East Coast,’ is in love with George Mason. Therefore, let’s ignore the other teams in the tournament except for the occasional story that shows how goofy “Big Baby” is, and shove George Mason so far down their throats that the rest of the country will be sick of hearing of them by Thursday.”
Only ESPN could ruin a Final Four as wide open and unpredictable as this one. I heard host after host on ESPN Radio talk this week about how this Final Four will be the lowest rated in history, because none of ESPN’s trademark teams are in it and nobody wants to watch because their brackets are shot. C’mon America, prove them wrong. This is your chance to prove once and for all that ESPN’s Duke/Big East/Big Ten philosophy is misguided. If you don’t watch, you show ESPN that it was right.
March 30th, 2006 at 10:18 am
874
Jeff says:
Beano Cook: “If George Mason wins the national championship, it will be a bigger upset that the 1980 US hockey team winning the gold medal.”
Hey Beano, if George Mason had to beat an all-star team consisting of Kobe Bryant, Tim Duncan, Kevin Garnett, Allen Iverson and Shaquille O’Neal–maybe I’d agree with you. Because, if you look it up, that’s basically what the US hockey team was facing in the Soviet team in the Olympic semifinals. If they’re not facing that team, then SHUT THE FUCK UP and stop trying to create “instant history.”
And, in a completely unrelated story: any day now, ESPN will start telling that the New Jersey Nets are now the favorite to win the NBA championship–if it hasn’t done it already. Remember who told you first.
March 30th, 2006 at 6:30 pm
875
Jeff says:
Skip Bayless has a new column today:
“As much as I’ll root for LSU, I’m afraid its kids will be reduced to frustrated tears by the Bruins.
I’m afraid Noah West will outplay Joakim Noah on Monday night.
Get ready, America. Your party is about to be pooped.”
Yes, America. ESPN has allowed the guy who said the Bengals would be in the Super Bowl, the guy who said from day one of the playoffs that the Seahawks were a fraud and would never make the Super Bowl (and later said they were “robbed” when they actually made it), the guy who said USC was a Team for the Ages and that Texas didn’t belong on the same field, to make another prediction. You’d think a guy who is so wrong EVERY SINGLE TIME HE OPENS HIS MOUTH would lose his job or be forced to write about men’s volleyball on Page 3.
If I were you, I’d put all my money on LSU and George Mason immediately.
March 31st, 2006 at 2:06 pm
876
Mike says:
Ever so often, Scoop Jackson writes something that seems so absurd in premise that I have to check it out. Today was one of those occasions and as with my previous attempts to read Scoop’s “writing,” I was only able to get through about half of it before wishing that I could put a bullet through my screen. Who at ESPN and/or whatever basketball magazine Scoop works at thinks that Scoop has any sort of writing ability? There’s garbage, and then there are the columns by Scoop, Skip Bayless, Shanoff, Jim Caple, etc.
March 31st, 2006 at 10:16 pm
877
Jeff says:
Hey…it’s the first Major League Baseball holiday of the season, and ESPN, once again, insists on giving us an Atlanta Braves game. Congratulations, ESPN. It’s one of the few days that I will watch baseball all day. And what do you do? You give us a team we can watch EVERY SINGLE DAY on a competing network. Why do you give us the Braves on all these holidays and Wednesday nights (when you have exclusive national telecasts)? Are you doing this because the Braves are popular, or because you know you can intentionally sabotage TBS’s programming? You know what I think.
April 3rd, 2006 at 9:42 am
878
Jeff says:
Here we go again. Another tired ESPN litany today of “The game is too late for the East Coast” complaints. I know from personal experience that it sucks, but don’t forget that THE WORLD DOESN’T REVOLVE AROUND THE EAST COAST AND NEW YORK CITY, even though ESPN thinks it does. If losing an hour or two of sleep tonight so that the UCLA fan base isn’t still at work when the game begins, so be it. Besides, if ESPN’s research and philosophy are correct, New Yorkers and other Notrheasterners aren’t watching the game anyway tonight because none of “their teams” or George Mason are playing.
And, FOR GOD’S SAKE, stop bringing “the kids” into it. That argument is so full of shit. My dad always let me stay up if I wanted when an important game was on television. Nothing bad ever came of it. And how often these days do the kids want to stay up late for it anyway? They’re probably in the other room playing the Xbox or PS2 while you’re watching the game to begin with. At least admit that it’s about you.
April 3rd, 2006 at 6:14 pm
879
Jeff says:
“Billy Donovan is the hottest commodity in college basketball. He’s won it all. He’s young. He’s in the South. He’s a basketball coach at a football school….Does that mean it’s time for Billy Donovan to move on?”
I heard this today on ESPN radio–only one hour after I heard Mike & Mike chastize Jay Wright for being a candidate for other coaching positions.
Of course, ESPN would probably consider Temple or Seton Hall a better coaching job than Florida.
April 4th, 2006 at 5:31 pm
880
Dino says:
On Sportscenter the other night, the segment before the commercial break was advertising the homeruns of opening day. Last player in the clip just happened to be Barry Bonds, WHO NEVER EVEN HIT A DAMN HOME RUN THAT DAY!!!!! He went 1 for 4 with a ground rule double that lazily bounced over the fence. ESPN destroys this guy day after day yet manages to sneak him in every chance they get, even when its false advertisement.
Thank God I live in Canada and we dont have this crap shoved down our throat day after day.
April 5th, 2006 at 6:16 am
881
Jeff says:
Sounds similar to what ESPN did with the Indycar results this weekend. Usually, it lists the top 3 or top 5 finishers. This weekend it gave us the top 6.
Danica Patrick finished 6th.
April 5th, 2006 at 2:19 pm
882
BDogg says:
I love when they show giants highlights. one big barry “highlights” session, detailing every at bat, even ones where he does not get a hit. you are lucky if you see more than one clip of something else that went on in the game.
April 5th, 2006 at 4:38 pm
883
daFrankster says:
sick of: Barry- and his 2-for-18, grounded out highlights’.
espn “predicting futures” for everybody &everything.
cold pizza and all the other low-life loser columnists.
danica P. who aint never gonna win any race.
yanks/sox.
m. sharapova( who is overratted).
the “hot seat” esp. with no-namers.
the watered down, commercialism of what once was pure sports entertainment.
more Danyelle sargent
more Dana jacobson
April 6th, 2006 at 8:17 am
884
Jeff says:
I’m sure glad ESPN got the NFL’s dick out of its mouth long enough to give us an episode of SportsCenter tonight, complete with a scrolling list of this year’s new NFL schedule–and (as Mike pointed out) non-stop reminders of which games were on ESPN Monday Night Football.
What, is the network having a lovers’ quarrel with Barry Bonds right now?
April 6th, 2006 at 7:42 pm
885
Mike says:
I can’t believe that they had a show for the release of the NFL schedule. Unless you have pressing plans to buy tickets, who gives a rat’s ass?
It was nice for ESPN to air a real episode of Baseball Tonight rather than the frequently bastardized versions that come on sporadically (be they ruined by time restrictions and/or the Harold Reynolds/John Kruk eating up half of the show opining about useless crap). It’s not just in my head that Baseball Tonight used to feature full highlights of every game instead of some highlights, tons of filler, and loads of useless opinions, right?
Finally, 67% of ESPN.com users think that Tiger Woods will win the Masters. Well, that is not necessarily true. When asking “Who will win the Masters,” ESPN only listed the players who are currently in the Top 5 in the World Ranking. Someone should really get on the phone and let the other 85 players in the tournament (well, maybe 70 or so once you toss out the amateurs and old former champs) that they do not have a chance to emerge victorious. This is just like the previously cited polls regarding auto racing, among other sports. World #3 Retief Goosen should feel honored that ESPN actually deemed him worthy of being listed for once. I’m surprised that they didn’t get stuck for names of players after the Woods/Els/Singh/Mickelson quartet and opt to slot Michelle Wie in the 5th spot.
April 7th, 2006 at 12:15 am
886
Jeff says:
In a related topic, Mike: Who is the most feared hitter in baseball? Barry Bonds, Vladimir Guerrero, David Ortiz, Albert Pujols, Alex Rodriguez. Do I have to time to explain how this SportsNation poll is ridiculous on so many levels?
1. What does “feared” mean? Apparently by the choices, “feared” means “best power hitter.”
2. Does that mean that nobody “fears” Ichiro?
3. Is A-Rod “feared”? I know it’s a cliche now, but if the game was on the line, I’d “fear” facing Jeter more, because he knows how to hit in the clutch.
4. Why is Vlad on the list? His stats don’t merit it, even though he is a popular big-market player.
5. At the same time, does nobody “fear” Mark Texiera, Andruw Jones, Miguel Cabrera, Derrek Lee, and a healthy Ken Griffey Jr.? (and that’s just off the top of my head)
6. I know that this is opinion, but Pujols should get at least half the votes and win in a landslide. Big Papi is the only other player on the list I’d “fear” on Pujols’ level if the game was on the line. As mentioned earlier, if I was down 9-1 in the 8th inning and runners were on base, I’d “fear” A-Rod the most.
And that’s just a start.
April 7th, 2006 at 8:23 am
887
Jeff says:
ESPN’s top story this morning on TV:
“Brett Favre still hasn’t decided if he will retire.”
This is gotten BEYOND fucking ridiculous. “Weekend Update” on “Saturday Night Live” used to make fun of this shit: “Our top story tonight, Generalisimo Francisco Franco is still dead.”
April 8th, 2006 at 10:57 am
888
Mike says:
Ha, I was just about to post the same thing. I’m surprised that they haven’t bumped The Masters from being the lead on their website. However, if it rains in Augusta today, there’s ESPN’s window to do so. Maybe ESPN can create a reality show in which Favre and Roger Clemens travel around to the stadiums of their potential suitors and give press conferences to say that they have nothing new to say. They could establish “Garbage Night” on the network in which the block together this show, Barry Bonds in “The Spin Zone,” Bobby Knight’s awful show, Arliss, and anything that stars Stephen A. Smith, preferably a show in which screaming at viewers plays a prominent role.
April 8th, 2006 at 11:43 am
889
Mike says:
Julius Hodge shot in Denver. Favre’s press conference is still the top non-Masters story at ESPN.com, though. It is now accompanied by a poll. How pathetic.
April 8th, 2006 at 12:19 pm
890
blaine says:
On First and 10 today,Jay Crawford asked Bayless and Paige who would win if Mickelson played righthanded, and Woods played lefthanded.Unbelievable. These clowns have reached a new high in lows
April 10th, 2006 at 9:23 pm
891
Dino says:
Im sick and tired of ESPN being cheap hookers for the Sox/Yankees and give them blowjob after blowjob on Sportscenter everynight. Opening day in Detroit gets a “blink of an eye” mention while they provide us with yet another Yankees/Sox segment that lasts a good 2-3. Nobody outside of New York/Boston gives two shits about those two teams.
Good for Jim Thome being back but last time I checked, Chris Shelton led the league in homers so far and not Thome so lets tone down the Sox/Yankees oral sexing of him a tad.
April 11th, 2006 at 6:12 am
892
BDogg says:
Leinart has fired his agent! (what?!) The Duke lacrosse team is off the hook! (yes!) Damon’s return to Boston! (oh my god!) Ortiz got a new deal! (someone named derek lee got one too!) was the yankee’s win yesterday a “must win?” (only a week into the season? of course it was!)
April 11th, 2006 at 12:01 pm
893
Jeff says:
While ESPN has been sucking the NFL’s dick over the new schedule and the move of Monday Night Football, have any of the following questions ever been addressed by ESPN:
1. Recent tradition dictates that the Super Bowl loser gets to play in the first Monday night game (now Sunday night). However, the NFL opted to give the first Sunday Night game to NEW YORK for the “Manning Bowl” instead of giving it to the non-East-coast Seahawks. Why?
2. The “flex” schedule will probably be just a way to get the NFC and AFC East teams on national television more often at the end of the season.
3. This “NFL Network” schedule is going to set up an UGLY confrontaton between cable operators, the NFL, and the public–probably resulting in another cable rate hike just so we can get another channel we probably didn’t need in the first place. Those “NFL Network” games could have been played on another network that has part of the NFL contract.
4. Why does NEW YORK always get a Saturday game when the NFL begins showing nationally-televised Saturday games at the end of the season?
5. Why do the pathetic NEW YORK Jets get to play a primetime game on Christmas night?
6. Why does my team, which usually has a 12:00 CT starting time, have to move its game to 3:15 CT when NEW YORK comes to town–just so that the NEW YORK market can have a Jets/Giants doubleheader?
7. Is ESPN’s non-stop self-promotion of being the “home of Monday Night Football” a form of deceptive advertising? The showcase game of the week is no longer on Sunday nights. The showcase is the Sunday night game on NBC. You wouldn’t even know it if all you watched was ESPN.
I doubt that any of these questions will ever be answered on ESPN.
April 11th, 2006 at 2:46 pm
894
Jeff says:
Since I brought up the “NFL Network,” and the league putting NFL games on the network to force a confrontation between cable operators, the league and the public (and ESPN being a willing participant on behalf of the NFL):
I went to the “NFL Network” site to find out about how the network is being offered. The first thing that happens is that you are required to enter your personal information, your cable provider, and zip code–so they can “inform” you of your options in your area. When I entered the info, I was informed that my evil cable operator did not carry the “NFL Network.” But never fear! It immediately gave me the option to send the following form letter to my cable provider:
______________________________________________________
Mediacom
(my local address, city, and zip went here)
4/11/2006
SUBJECT: Please add NFL NETWORK!
Dear General Manager,
I am writing to request that you add NFL NETWORK to your channel lineup.
As you are aware by now, NFL NETWORK has greatly enhanced its programming lineup to include over 90 NFL games, including regular season, preseason and NFL Europe and also will be replaying NFL games from the previous weekend. This is the first time NFL games will be available outside their live airing! This, and all the live press conferences, a daily news and information show, plus all the exclusive inside access, makes this a channel I must have to follow the most popular sport in this country.
Please let me know that I will be seeing NFL NETWORK as part of your channel lineup, or you will leave me no choice but to seek a provider who does offer it.
_____________________________________________________
I don’t think that these strong-arm bully tactics are going to be exposed on SportsCenter any time soon.
April 11th, 2006 at 5:56 pm
895
Jeff says:
Coming up next on ESPN News: Jeffrey Maier, 10 years later.
ESPN is still glorifying the kid who caught the ball in play in Yankee Stadium during the ALCS only to have the incompetent umpire call it a home run.
I’m not kidding. It’s on right now. He’s in the studio being interviewed live.
Fuck you, ESPN. Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you.
Are you going to interview the father-and-son duo who attacked the Royals’ first base coach during a White Sox game on their ten-year anniversary?
And would you be interviewing this guy if he was an Oriole fan, and the Yankees were the victim?
Fuck you. Fuck off and die.
April 13th, 2006 at 5:41 pm
896
Mike says:
Not sure which is funnier: The Bills’ “pick” in ESPN’s mock draft being the current top story at the website or the fact that Chris Shelton is included in a poll asking “which non-Pujols 1B would you most want you team built around?”. I know that Shelton’s off to a great start and it’s good that an article was written about him, but please remember that Steve Decker was being called the next Gary Carter after his hot first couple of weeks in 1991.
April 15th, 2006 at 7:40 pm
897
Jeff says:
“Captain Obvious” moment of the week: Barry Bonds is on the cover of ESPN the Magazine. And ESPN executives still swear up and down that running a reality show about one of the athletes it’s reporting on doesn’t constitute a conflict of interest.
I found out he’s on the cover just moments after I saw the Sunday feature story on “Jeffrey Maier: 10 years later.” I guess the live feature on ESPN News earlier this week wasn’t enough.
April 16th, 2006 at 9:09 pm
898
bdogg says:
ok, so barry’s not doing so hot in the beginning of the season…but espn is doing a reality show on him. so, to keep him in the news, we have to continually hear about how bad he’s doing? that real low, annoying, and irrelevent; but one thing it isnt is objective sports reporting. its just like that knicks shit thats alwasys on. if you’re going to report on bad teams, how bout the bobcats/trailblazers?
April 17th, 2006 at 5:30 pm
899
Jeff says:
Did you know that there are some USC players in the draft? Of course you do, because they won’t shut up about it. They treated “USC Day” or whatever they called the day USC players had their NFL workouts like it was a presidential primary or something like that. They’ve made it painfully clear that whichever team picks first is OUT OF ITS FUCKING MIND if it doesn’t pick Reggie Bush. Matt Leinart’s agent change gets as much coverage as George Bush picking a Supreme Court justice. LenDale White’s draft value is more volatile than Google stock. (I know it’s not ESPN, but) All three guys have been “The Best Damn Sports Show” to plug themselves and praise the Trojans. Winston Justice and Dominique Byrd get as much coverage as D’Brickashaw Ferguson, Vernon Davis and Marcedes Lewis, even though there’s no way in hell they’re in those other guys’ leagues.
But there’s no USC bias at ESPN (or the other media in general).
April 19th, 2006 at 10:06 pm
900
Chris says:
Skip Bayless!
Holy christ that man is dumb.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=bayless/060410
Here he says that Mickleson’s major win should come with an *, because ‘tiger didn’t play well enough’.
Honestly, wtf.
April 20th, 2006 at 8:28 am