HERE’S THE STORY! IGNORE THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
An email from an angry fan (Matt from LSU) got us thinking (always a dangerous thing) :
Can you please explain to me how LSU can hand a conference opponent their worst loss at home in 40 years (beat Ole Miss 40-7), and Penn State can struggle to beat a poor Michigan State team, YET the pollsters still decrease the LSU lead over Penn State?
Can you please explain how LSU can win a game while Penn State doesn’t play, yet LSU loses ground yet again in the polls?
Can you please explain why Texas doesn’t earn more first place votes when USC struggles to beat a WAC team who lost to Nevada?
Only one of these questions has an easy answer: USC held the votes because they still haven’t lost and Reggie Bush is having one of those seasons that forces sportswriters into increasingly ludicrous territory attempting to describe just how…deflaculent his gameplay has been this year. (See? Deflaculent isn’t even a word, we just had to pull it out of our ass in a vain attempt to approximate what Reggie Bush does on the field. Hyperbole doesn’t cover it, so tubby journalists the nation round are banging away on laptops tossing in nonsense words like “scrotufulactic” and “obstraspectaculiferous” while their editors slam coffee cups to the floor in frustration. Fortunately for us, we have no such journalistic integrity, and can label Bush’s alien level of agility as “deflaculent” without flinching.)

Reggie Bush: straight nasty deflaculence.
The other questions center on another important trend in national coverage of what is basically a regional sport: narrative. The primer on this was written by Gunslingers–a piece on par with Martin Luther’s 95 theses, Newton’s Principia Mathematica, and Hobbes’ Leviathan for its sheer cromulence in its field–who lays out with well-chosen examples the formation and dynamics of a national narrative as dictated by Papa E in Bristol. LSU, like other teams in other ways, is a victim of this narrative, a story shaped by profit motive, population dynamics, and most importantly, a human weakness for easy storylines and pat finishes.
First of all, let’s clear this up, though: LSU is NOT getting screwed. The bowl tie-in with the Sugar Bowl is the SEC prize provided you AREN’T undefeated and racing toward the 1 versus 2 title game. So the BCS rankings, irksome as they are to Tiger fans, really don’t mean shit as long as time traveling mischief makers from the future don’t muck around and force a fumble in the fourth quarter of the Tennessee game stopping a Vol comeback and preserving LSU’s undefeated season. That loss, which in retrospect was one of immense impact on the national scene, won’t vanish from the rolls anytime soon.
Scratch all of this if faultlines rupture, the rivers run red with blood, and a rain of locusts pelts the fields where USC and Texas lose next week and send the BCS to hell in a flash of chattering pundits and scuttling bowl officials in funny-colored coats. Barring that, though, the one-two matchup maximizing ratings and national hubbub goes down: a West-Coast dynamo with a photogenic, starlet-humping qb and a meth-fast dervish of a running back matchup plays the Southern/Sunbelt demo-covering Texas Longhorns. A pretty nifty pitch for the networks, who need only a prominent star from the New York area and a half-naked woman on the screen every other shot to have their ideal college football package up and running.
Musberger:…And safety Gino DiBruglia, Brooklyn’s finest, drops back in coverage for the Longhorns, makes the pick, and returns the ball 76 yards for a td before leaping into the arms of…EVA LONGORIA!!! And every redblooded American male just wished they had a scholarship to that school in Austin, Gary! Not a bad gig if you can get it, now down to Jackarooooo on the sidelines for the whole story, Jack–

If only ABC could work Eva in, it would be perfect.
The narrative consists of two principal parts right now:
1. USC–this year’s Greatest College Team Ever™–is on an unstoppable roll to a matchup with Texas. Substories to be exploited are:
a. Mack Brown’s quest for the unattainable national championship.
b. Matt Leinart’s life-better than yours ever thought about being.
c. Reggie Bush, Heisman winner, showing off the goods for the scouts in said national championship game.
The last point is especially precious to ESPN right now, especially with the latest Gameday commercials. The announcer guy intones:”…and we’ll bring you the latest on the Heisman race from our experts.” This is followed by the disembodied head of Kirk Herbstreit looking smack in the camera and announcing “It’s unfair right now to compare anyone to Reggie Bush.” Never mind that Texas has one more game for Vince Young to shine in and that Leinart and Bush may still split the West Coast votes leaving Young with a plurality and the Heisman. Narrative has its demands.
2. Joe Pa has a happy comeback at Penn State and will get national pub. Why? Because it’s a great story and it never hurts to have one loss on the season in December. Not to mention Penn State’s foothold in the nearly college football-proof Northeastern demographic, which makes all those lengthy broadcast blocks easier to pitch to advertisers wary of blowing money on a what is a slippery demographic. Wanna argue the point? Name another sport where you’ll see mutual fund ads bumping up against spots for Yamaha ATVs and the Marines. Evidently, we’re somewhere between cow-turd burning Appalachian trash and Dockers-wearing middle-aged investor class. Wait, that is pretty damn accurate, actually…
3. Notre Dame, after a long Time of Troubles, is back. (Storyline only available on NBC.)
Is that the whole narrative? Of course not. The lost storylines, or at least those lost to the hyper-focuses lens of the ABC/ESPN/Disney Brahmins:
1. LSU. Our perceptive reader, Matt, is perhaps a bit sensitive to this being an LSU fan in a season that’s been as good as any in recent memory for the Tigers–but he’s right. LSU, since the Katrina debacle, has gotten little if any pub for ripping through a triumphant season despite the obstacles presented by the largest natural disaster in the nation’s history, a head coaching change, and a first year starter at qb. Respek needed, but the ADD of the media will prevent it from happening barring a slaughter of Georgia in the SEC game followed up by a pounding of equivalent magnitude for their opponent in the Sugar Bowl.
2. The comeback coaches. Coaches previously thought to be on the ropes or making high-pressure debuts made nice comebacks to finish their seasons in several locales. Bill Callahan, who had Nebraska fans pining for Frank Solich a year ago, came back to finish 8-4 in a 30-3 pounding of Colorado. Urban Meyer, whose weeping had the jackals drooling a few weeks ago, gave the entire Gator Nation a happy ending on Saturday with a 34-7 gotterdamerung defeat for the disintegrating Seminole Empire, bringing his first season tally to 8-3 with the wind at his back going into recruiting and the bowl season. The cuddly Mark Mangino, college football’s only perfectly spherical head coach, went 6-0 at home, had one of the most underrated defenses in the whole nation, and beat more ranked teams than–Mother Mary forgive us–Notre Dame did in their renaissance season. Mike Shula proved to be more than just a genetic lottery winner by rolling a punchless Crimson Tide team to a 9-2 record despite giving up on the whole “scoring points” thing for the better part of five games. O’Leary at UCF, Price at UTEP, Spurrier at SC–those stories are on the national radar, but they’re just the beginning of the long list of coaches who pulled themselves and their teams through nightmarish adversity this season.
3. Oregon. The Ducks need to reserve a spot on the perpetually underpubbed list, but not for lack of trying, what with Phil Knight throwing them out their in uniforms straight from the U of O’s freshman “Russian Constructivist Design 101″ class. The Ducks only lose to USC, blow doors on the rest of their slate, and completely revamp their moribund offense in a single year…to the sound of crickets from the national media. They won’t get the bowl they deserve–the Fiesta–and could fall into the same trap Cal fell in last year against Texas Tech in the Holiday Bowl, mailing in a half-assed performance in a consolation game. Hopefully they won’t spoil the redemption of both Mike Bellotti, who’s dispelled some of the common wisdom that the spark of the program packed its bags a few years ago and went to Berkeley, and for Gary Crowton, who just a year ago was busy running BYU into the ground (pun intended). He’s single-handedly turned Kellen Clemens into the best full-time student qb on the West Coast.

Long live the Glorious People’s Ugly Jersey Collective!
4. The effects of conference realignment. Watching Florida State wobble into the third quarter of the Florida game Saturday brought this point home in dramatic fashion: realignment has forever altered the program dynamics of the ACC and the Big East. Florida State will never be as dominant as they once were now that they play in a conference with Virginia Tech and Miami lurking in the ledgers. The Big East, the conference closest to flatline in terms of national prominence, made a fantastic leap towards respectability by nabbing the USF Bulls, Louisville, and UConn. As far as growth potential, no conference has more room to grow or more incentive to do so and do it quickly–their automatic BCS bid expires in 2006, and with major conference at-large bids already crowding the upper reaches of desired bowl slots, the memory of Pitt’s embarrassing caning by Utah last year coupled with a potentially lopsided WVU matchup with LSU in the Sugar Bowl means one thing: play hard now or be relegated to Conference USA status fast.









1
Rick says:
OK, I’ll suck it up and say that ND probably deserved to lose a spot in the polls for their mistake filled showing at Palo Alto though that calm little drive at the end kinda sorta looked like the mark of a champion. And the almost-700 hundred offensive yards wasn’t bad either. The fact that Stanford was 1-10 on third down might mean that the D isn’t quite as bad as advertised also but I digress. Why doesn’t a 19-17 win at home against Arkansas drop LSU a spot or three as well? I mean, it’s not like Arkansas was playing for a bowl berth in the last game in the history of their 84 year old stadium. Also, didn’t SC beat AK by, like, 87-0?
Why I’m at it, I don’t think Oregon’s 7 point win over Arizona or 3 point win over WSU exactly qualifies as ‘blow doors on the rest of their slate.’ Let’s not get into the 32 point loss to SC…
Nice shot of Eva.
November 28th, 2005 at 1:15 pm
2
Orson Swindle says:
All good questions. But there’s still the matter of clearing your Pac-10 slate with one loss and getting bumped for a two loss Notre Dame team that lost to Michigan State.
November 28th, 2005 at 1:17 pm
3
boifromtroy says:
I don’t think Oregon is getting “bumped” by Notre Dame. The Irish are a given at-large team for a number of reasons which can only be described as Charlie Weis being a frangastiligic coach.
The injustice is if Oregon (or UCLA should they win Saturday) gets passed over a two-loss Ohio State, or even worse, Auburn, for a game played on the West Coast.
November 28th, 2005 at 1:26 pm
4
Bill says:
You qualify for an at-large BCS bid by merit (their proprietary ranking).
Once you qualify, there is no argument over merit. It’s about who the bowls want. Who deserves the at-large bid the most? ND. Why? Because that’s who the bowls want.
November 28th, 2005 at 1:36 pm
5
Boi From Troy » Remember Longhorns, History Repeats Itself says:
[...] I am not calling for a Buff’s victory…that would not fit the pre-determined 2005 Season narrative…but I wouldn’t be surprised to see one when I stumble home after my post-UCLA celebrations. [...]
November 28th, 2005 at 1:38 pm
6
Rick says:
I hear you, Orson. Reasonable folks can disagree on who is more deserving. I was only taking issue wit your characterization of OU ‘blowing doors’ on the rest of it’s schedule. UA and WSU were two of the worst teams in the Pac-10 and the Ducks barely got by them. Fortunately for ND, after the NC game, the BCS bowls aren’t about who is more deserving but who qualifies. The organizing commitees have every right to pick among the qualifiers for who they believe will make them the most money. Actually, from their standpoint, it’s more than a right it’s an obligation.
The bottom line really is this: the way the BCS bowls are currently set up with conference champions getting automatic bids no matter how mediocre they are, ND won’t take Oregon’s ’spot,’ West Virginia will. And FSU and Colorado may take OSU’s or Penn State’s or ND’s. The conferences have no one to blame but themselves for agreeing to it. The Pac-10 comissioner shouldn’t be calling the Fiesta Bowl committee to complain, he should call the commisioner of the Big East. The Fiesta Bowl was stuck with Pitt last year, they should be able to make the money back this year with a clear conscience.
November 28th, 2005 at 2:05 pm
7
Orson Swindle says:
Unfortunate and lazy verbiage–but if by “blowing doors” we mean “beating all but one,” it’s still close to right.
The automatic bids are disastrous, Rick. And not one of them is weaker than the Big East’s.
November 28th, 2005 at 2:09 pm
8
Rick says:
Gotcha, Orson. And BTW, it’s not nearly as lazy as my spelling or grammar.
November 28th, 2005 at 2:24 pm
9
Todd says:
why you gotta talk shit about C-USA?
November 28th, 2005 at 2:44 pm
10
Buckley says:
i can understand arguments for lsu, ohio state, et al, but oregon? let’s take a look at the non-conference schedule…
montana? houston? fresno state?
MONTANA?!?
fresno state looked good until this week. but there’s no excuse for scheduling I-AA teams. especially when you play in a BCS conference. doing so is a despicable practice, and reflects a conscious, intentional decision by Oregon’s administration to “schedule” a win. their exclusion from a BCS game is justice for all the teams who schedule quality non-conference opponents.
November 28th, 2005 at 3:23 pm
11
Heismanpundit says:
After seeing LSU’s performance against Arkansas, I’d say the BCS the Tigers ranked way better than they should be.
I’m tired of people saying Michigan State is a ‘poor’ team. Their record is bad, but they are not a ‘bad’ team in the sense that they can’t beat anyone good. They lost two or three of those games to good teams in very close contests. And they played in the toughest conference in the country this year.
A bad team would be: Ole Miss.
November 28th, 2005 at 3:43 pm
12
Orson Swindle says:
Fresno gave USC their best game this year at home–no cupcake there, even if they did lose to Nevada the following week.
The other two are bad, but most teams schedule one or two oinkers–unless you’re Texas Tech, in which case you nab a minimum of three.
November 28th, 2005 at 3:43 pm
13
Orson Swindle says:
Arkansas is much, much improved, HP. Ole Miss, though, is not, so you’re more than correct there.
John L. Smith isn’t buying green bananas at this point–especially following the firing of Mooch.
November 28th, 2005 at 3:44 pm
14
Bill says:
I think Smith is safe for one more year. MSU just got done paying off Bobby Williams. I don’t think they want to start paying a second coach again. His contract is up next year, from what I remember.
November 28th, 2005 at 3:52 pm
15
Norm says:
I don’t think that Oregon should be invited to a BCS game ahead of Ohio State, ND or Auburn… sorry, I’m roundly unimpressed by the Ducks (and they deserve karmic payback for those abominable uniforms, anyways).
But they shouldn’t be knocked for the Montana game, for two reasons. First, Indiana backed out of a scheduled game when Terry Hoeppner took over the Hoosiers program last spring (Indiana replaced Oregon with Nicholls State). Finding a replacement game several months before the season starts isn’t always the easiest task. Certainly no BCS-conference school has an opening at that late stage. Secondly, as one of the top teams in 1-AA, Montana’s probably a better team than 10-12 of the bottom feeders in 1-A that may have been available on such short notice. Playing a Kent State or Rice would have drawn the same derision in this conversation despite their 1-A status, and would have doubled the payout required due to the increased travel costs associated with playing teams with bigger rosters and further travel distances.
I’m not shilling for the Ducks here, because I think there are far more deserving teams in the BCS mix, but the whole “But they played MONTANA!” argument shouldn’t be the reason why.
November 28th, 2005 at 7:25 pm
16
Nick says:
Holy F$%^ing s$%&!!! A board with intelligent discourse on the BCS instead of flame wars. I did not think I’d ever see it!
November 29th, 2005 at 2:34 am