IF MACK BROWN LOSES…HE’LL STILL WIN TEN GAMES!
If Mack Brown loses to Oklahoma…so…fucking…what. Every year Oklahoma beats them in a new and painful way. 2000 and 2003: agonizing shotgun executions. 2002: a standard woulda-coulda-shoulda game. 2004 and 2001: defensive humiliations, including the infamous Jackie Chan safety blitz by Roy Williams on Chris Simms that may have ruined Simms as a player forever.
(We mean it–we think that single play broke him. We’ll say that at the risk of his daddy calling us out on national television to defend him, which seems to happen more often than dignity would allow. Chris Simms will forever be stuck in the moment where Williams swipes his arm and sends him crashing to the turf of his own endzone in humiliation. The only way Simms can ever redeem himself is a.) Get sent to prison, b.) Get Roy Williams out of the league and into a corrections department gig, and c.) Burn Williams for a game winning TD pass in the last seconds of a guards/inmates game orchestrated by a sadistic prison warden. Until then he’s as good as pencil shavings to any team or coach.)

Reduced a man to pencil shavings in one play.
Yet Texas gets everything it wants from Mack Brown, save a victory over a rival program that’s been as good as any over the past five years. Texas since 2001 under Mack Brown? Boggle the eyes:
2001: 11-2
2002: 11-2
2003: 10-3
2004: 11-1
Most fans would sell their grandmother’s dentures for records like that. Is that the mark of a mediocre coach? Their facilities are palatial. They recruit like madmen. They routinely beat everyone else in conference and win their bowls and out-of-conference games, making a particularly prominent punching bag out of the Big Ten lately with the shootout win over Michigan last year and following it up by edging out the Evil Sweatervest at home this year.
They’ve established poll buoyancy–a loss never seems to drop them too far away from the top ten, and they bob to the top of every preseason poll–and their recruits routinely morph into highly touted NFL draft picks. Oh, and Mack Brown has made every major Texas high school coach think he’s their boyfriend by bringing them flowers and making goo-goo eyes at them while his coaches plunder the powerhouses for prime recruits.

Mack: persuasive and charming in ways we can’t possibly understand.
Tom Osborne lost five in a row to Oklahoma at one point. Spurrier’s record against Bowden was dismal–he never even won a game in Tallahassee. He did tie one, though, which was somehow so much worse than simply losing. (Feel the flames of rage lick your eyeballs, Stranko, as you recall every agonizing instant of the ‘94 Choke at Doak. We remember it all, too, since we were the ones laughing as you goaded to the FSU fans by doing the chop with your band shoe in hand, cleverly referencing the “Free Shoes University” incident. Got the whole Gator band doing it, too, if we recall correctly.) No one suggested these two step down because of the long single-opponent losing streaks, just as no one suggests that Zook should have stayed because “well, he was 2-1 against Georgia.”
It’s a hack trick to suggest he resign for not beating Bob Stoops. Normally, we’re all in favor of this kind of hackery–hell, we love Stewart Mandel, and there’s not a cheap shot he won’t usually take. But Texas being good is good for college football, if only because it keeps Bevo on the field and off the slaughterhouse floor. The coach responsible for their success is Grandma Brown. It would be engaging in Jim Romery to suggest he resign, and that internet job is already taken.









1
Joey says:
I think that Simms was ruined before the Williams play, and that feat of athletic supremacy was simply the perfect symbol for a Powlus-like career.
October 7th, 2005 at 11:53 am
2
Orson Swindle says:
But Powlus won two Heismans, Joey.
October 7th, 2005 at 11:54 am
3
Todd says:
Who cares if he wins 10+ games if he can’t beat their arch-rival? That’s the game everyone remembers. Bill Curry put up good numbers at Bama (7-5, 9-3, and 10-2 w/ a co SEC championship) but never beat Auburn and that’s why we remember him as a loser. He wasn’t a bad coach, he won some big games and recruited well, but it took Stallings to turn those players and gains into champions. I don’t know if the same applies for Texas or not, but I would imagine in any huge rivalry the rules are the same. The one (or two) game(s) makes the whole season.
October 7th, 2005 at 12:01 pm
4
Orson Swindle says:
Curry’s tenure doesn’t come close to comparing with Brown’s–10 wins for four years running? Not in the neighborhood. Stallings doesn’t come close either, for that matter, especially once you throw the sanctioned forfeit year in the mix.
October 7th, 2005 at 12:04 pm
5
Todd says:
Brown’s record is certainly much better than Curry’s, but any reasonable person (i.e. a non-cfb fan) would look at that record and see “improved each year” and think we were insane for running him off for never beating auburn, just like any reasonable person would look at Mack’s and say “4 ten win season in a row is impressive” and think longhorns are insane for thinking he’s failing because of losses to OU. My point on Stallings was that, while Curry brought in good recruits and won some good games, Curry never got over that last hurdle (AU) to put Bama on top. Stallings came in, won a National Championship and ruled the SEC western division (stinking Florida, always winning the championship game…). Brown’s put up good numbers, recruited well, but his team wears a skirt generously payed for from Bob Stoops’s own pocket and is always runner up in the Big 12 south. Were I a Longhorn, I’d be a little pissed too.
October 7th, 2005 at 12:52 pm
6
Brian says:
Were I a Longhorn, I’d be a little pissed too.
Yes, but then you’d probably think about one John Mackovic and cease even your quiet muttering, methinks.
October 7th, 2005 at 12:56 pm
7
Ryno says:
Man
You know you really shat the bed if you have to stage a real life “Longest Yard” game in order to turn your life around.
October 7th, 2005 at 1:06 pm
8
Todd says:
Oh, Mackovic. Ray Perkins to Mack’s Bill Curry. Thank God I’m not a Longhorn…
October 7th, 2005 at 2:28 pm
9
T. Kyle King says:
I agree with Joey: Chris Simms was ruined long before Roy Williams took him downtown.
Chris Simms was qualified to become a starting quarterback at the major college level in the same way that Ted Kennedy was qualified to become a senator the first time he ran for that office. In each case, the guy had the same last name as his father and that was about it.
I love how the revisionist historians in Austin (with an assist from the fine folks in Bristol) refer to Major Applewhite as a “fan favorite.” Applewhite was a fan favorite when he was sitting on the bench. When Applewhite was starting ahead of Simms, the Longhorn fans did nothing but gripe and complain about how Chris Simms ought to be starting in Applewhite’s place.
Of course, all Major Applewhite ever did was break every passing record in Texas history, bail out Chris Simms, and demonstrate the Jay Barker/Buck Belue-like ability to win despite possessing only limited physical skills. I can understand why U.T. fans would have preferred an overrated pretty boy with a famous name instead.
October 7th, 2005 at 11:09 pm
10
Newspaper Hack says:
So true. About Barker. He only lost something like three or four games as a starter (plus a national championship as a mediocre sophomore) but I would never, ever trust him doing anything but hand off the ball. Too bad he couldn’t stave off injury to lead the Birmingham Bolts in the XFL. Yeah, I watched it. WHAT?
October 7th, 2005 at 11:53 pm