PETA: HATES COCKS
PETA has come out and asked South Carolina to change their name, since cockfighting is a brutal, bloody sport that doesn't exactly benefit the animals involved. (But have they thought about what the roosters would be doing out in the street if they didn't have fighting?)
Being the idiot that we are, we went all the way to Laos to watch our first cockfight when we could have gone a few hundred miles east to South Carolina, our own little neighboring slice of the developing world. It looked like a pretty bad affair for all concerned, though it probably looked worse than it was by certain things that are very cheap in Vang Vien. (Beer Lao was like a buck fifty for a gallon or so of low-grade, cold brew. And marijuana may have been involved, too. Or both. We have a hard time remembering.) All we remember was blood, feathers, and shirtless brown men screaming like banshees while tossing around oddly colored money excitedly. And that sentence will likely be our epitaph.

We're the guy in plaid along the fence. And no, we weren't close to sober.
But as someone who polishes off more chicken than some large Chinese cities, we can't feel anything close to sympathy here. We know very little about PETA with the exception of all of those hot naked women they get to prance around naked at fur shows. However, if they're against cocks, we've got a problem with them, since like most men we're pretty happy with ours.
(Admittedly, some sites are bigger fans of cocks than others.)
In response, we kill two birds with one stone by declaring our support for South Carolina and by posting a picture of a man who knew a thing or two about taking cocks seriously.

Johnny Wadd: surely PETA wouldn't have a problem with him?Or his 'stache?
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You faked me out. That’s a four year old letter.
Whatever, I blogged it anyway.
by Kevin @ Fanblogs.com on Aug 10, 2005 8:10 PM EDT reply actions
We’re in limbo before the Nancy Clark thang. Pardon us.
by Orson Swindle on Aug 10, 2005 8:26 PM EDT reply actions
Damn. Blog foul. Perhaps we have just proven Nancy Clark’s point.
by Stranko Montana on Aug 10, 2005 9:37 PM EDT reply actions
If they want to do something about saving animals, they should start with the ones in their care:
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
by R.D. Baker on Aug 11, 2005 2:23 PM EDT reply actions
Well, you just highlighted another advantage blogging has over professional journalism. You can’t put this much attention on cock in a real newspaper article.
by Peacedog on Aug 11, 2005 3:45 PM EDT reply actions
TO eggs supporters; Nancy Clark eggs bloggers.
“Some of you may have read my rant the other day on offensive mascots, saw the little phrase “animal mascots are offensive to PETA” and thought I was running jokey-jokes. Well, I was trying to be funny. Unfortunately, it also turns out to be true, w…
by Cheap Seats on Aug 11, 2005 7:56 PM EDT reply actions

by 















