HORSE-TRADING: THE REVISED EDSBS.COM PRESEASON TOP TEN
Dear Stranko,
We showed you ours, and you’ve shown us yours. Stranko, we’re now in the horse-trading stage of constructing our poll. We drop two teams, Ohio State and Utah, while adding Oklahoma and, at the risk of being labeled homers, Florida. Averaging most of the common threads led to the order, unless otherwise stated. Here’s my revised proposal:
1. USC. No disagreement here.
2. Virginia Tech. The team on both our top 10s with the highest ranking in each. Why not? They’re as good as anyone on the list with few obvious weaknesses. When people ask us why, we’ll just type the name “Vick” over and over again until they start slobbering and stop questioning our wisdom.
3. Texas Again, we concur on their overall strength. On defense, they’re going to dismantle people under Chizik’s new schemes. we can concur they’re a better overall team than Tennessee-look at the last four games of the regular season for Tennessee, btw, their pass defense got porous quick-so they can sit nicely here.
4. Tennessee. Sliding in right behind Texas due to bad pass D. We had them at 2, you’ve got them at 7…it’s a nice compromise. Other than that, an typically hulking crew with a load of potential, like all of Fulmer’s teams.
5. Michigan. You’ve got them at nine, which seems too weak for a crew as consistent as this current Wolverines team. The big question mark is defense, but with Iowa’s struggles in the run game, we can’t seriously put them in the top ten, no matter how good a coach Ferentz may be.
6. Oklahoma. Too much rebuilding to put them ahead of any of the previous teams, but too good to put any further down. We missed on them completely in our top ten but somehow included Utah sans Alex smith and Urban Meyer. Drop them and put Oklahoma here, somewhat under the radar where they seem to be more comfortable.
7. Louisville. Too good on offense and moving into the Big East. Improved on defense. Let’s get bullish on their chances of giving the BCS a great big UFIA in the fall.
8. Florida. That’s as high as we can rationally allow Florida to be ranked coming in, given the adjustments to the offense and the ongoing process of shaking the Zookery out of this crew. Look at the seven teams ranked higher. Who would they replace in terms of preseason potential? If this weren’t the first season, we’d buy heavy. As it stands, we can’t jump head-first into the Meyer pool just yet.
9. Boise State. Win at Athens. Win at Athens. Win at Athens. That’s everything to this team right now, and should be. People are visual learners. They need to see this team dismantle a team on their home field in front of a national audience to believe.
10. Miami. If Kyle Wright plays within his own limits, the Canes will be surprisingly good, even in the new Kumite-style ACC.
Sincerely,
Orson












1
We’re getting warmer I think. Let me rhuminate.
Comment by Anonymous — June 20, 2005 @ 1:52 pm
2
I can mostly live with this composite order except I have a hard time believing a one dimensional Texas will beat a one dimensional Oklahoma…. although it’s got to happen some day.
Comment by Anonymous — June 20, 2005 @ 3:29 pm
3
We can sympathize with that, but part of the preseason polling is how you finished the year before. That breaks firmly in Texas’ direction.
Comment by Anonymous — June 20, 2005 @ 4:45 pm
4
Won’t OU-UT come down to Peterson vs. Young? Maybe those two should just play each other, alternating possessions starting at the 25 and seeing who can get in the endzone more often over the course of ten possessions.
I think that the rankings look pretty good, although I think Michigan is overrated, something I wrote about last week for the BlogPoll roundtable. And I guess VaTech can be #2, but as always, they need to prove that they can muster the requisite offense when needed. Obviously, Vick should help.
Comment by Joey — June 21, 2005 @ 10:58 am
5
Thanks for the comment-we loved your review of the John Legend show the other day.
That’s what it comes down to with rankings, right? They just look OK, not great. It’s an asinine exercise, at its heart, but it’s what we’ve got. And Michigan might be overrated, but you know voters will put a team from each major conference in the top ten immediately, and we feel a great deal better putting UM in than run-less Iowa and mercurial OSU. ( We’re not drinking the Purdue Kool-Aid yet-that’s a run and shoot offense in a pipe-swinging conference. )
We like the idea for OU-UT. It may come down to that this year, anyway, if Texas is as good as they’re supposed to be.
Comment by Anonymous — June 21, 2005 @ 11:04 am
6
[...] That Rose Bowl thing? Never happened–we’re sure Herrmann will straighten that inability to defend mobile qbs before the OSU game. Note we didn’t even think of the sophomore slump, which infected Henne’s season seemingly from the beginning. We went on to put Texas at #4, not bad, but then finished out a shamefully nearsighted top ten loaded with specious, haute-couture offenses (HCOs) picked from the weedy ranks of the WAC, Mountain West, and Big East, including Louisville, Boise State, and Utah in the top ten. Stranko’s suggestions obviously came from somewhere a little closer to reality, but he homered up by putting Florida fifth and also falling for the HCO by including Boise State and Louisville in his top ten. Stranko also wildly overestimated Oklahoma’s potential, which went up in flames in a week one stunner to TCU. (But at least he didn’t become infatuated with Adrian Peterson like we did, insisting he would win a Heisman as a sophomore. We take another sip of Windex and shake our heads sorrowfully as the librarian looks nervous, calls security…) We’re sure Michigan will fix that “mobile qb” problem they’ve had…right? [...]
Pingback by EDSBS » WRONG, UNINFORMED, US: EDSBS 2005 — January 13, 2006 @ 3:03 pm